cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Novianita Rulandari
Contact Email
admin@sinergi.or.id
Phone
+6281289935858
Journal Mail Official
admin@sinergi.or.id
Editorial Address
Editorial Office Jl. Cikini Raya No.9, RT.16/RW.1, Cikini Kec. Menteng, Kota Jakarta Pusat Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10330
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Sinergi International Journal of Law
Published by YAYASAN SINERGI KAWULA MUDA
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30217989     DOI : https://doi.org/10.61194/law
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Sinergi International Journal of Law with ISSN Number 3021-7989 (Online) published by Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda, published original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of law. The journal attempts to assist in the understanding of the present and potential ability of law to aid in the recording and interpretation of international law practices.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 71 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
AI as Creator Debate: A Comparative Study of Regulations in Indonesia and the UK Alief Qurratul 'Ain Musafa'
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v4i1.955

Abstract

The concept of creator in copyright law, which has historically been associated with human creativity, is called into question by the growth of (Artificial Intelligence) in the creation of creative works. This essay discusses three primary subjects: (1) how AI regulation is governed by Indonesian law; (2) how AI regulation is governed by English law; and (3) what kind of legal protection is available for works created by AI. The purpose of this study is to examine how each legal system handles works created by artificial intelligence, particularly with regard to identifying creators and copyright protection procedures. By examining Law Number 28 of 2014 governing copyright in Indonesia and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA) 1988 in the UK, normative legal research with a comparative perspective is employed. The study's findings demonstrate that Indonesian law still bases creator recognition on human creative contributions. In contrast, the UK does not recognize AI as a legal subject and instead grants creator status to the entity who makes the required arrangements for the creation process. This comparison highlights the fact that attribution of rights to the human creators who oversee the creative process can accomplish acknowledgment of AI works without necessarily requiring recognition of the AI as creator. This essay suggests a more flexible normative approach to AI-generated works in order to improve Indonesian copyright law.The concept of creator in copyright law, which has historically been associated with human creativity, is called into question by the growth of (Artificial Intelligence) in the creation of creative works. This essay discusses three primary subjects: (1) how AI regulation is governed by Indonesian law; (2) how AI regulation is governed by English law; and (3) what kind of legal protection is available for works created by AI. The purpose of this study is to examine how each legal system handles works created by artificial intelligence, particularly with regard to identifying creators and copyright protection procedures. By examining Law Number 28 of 2014 governing copyright in Indonesia and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA) 1988 in the UK, normative legal research with a comparative perspective is employed. The study's findings demonstrate that Indonesian law still bases creator recognition on human creative contributions. In contrast, the UK does not recognize AI as a legal subject and instead grants creator status to the entity who makes the required arrangements for the creation process. This comparison highlights the fact that attribution of rights to the human creators who oversee the creative process can accomplish acknowledgment of AI works without necessarily requiring recognition of the AI as creator. This essay suggests a more flexible normative approach to AI-generated works in order to improve Indonesian copyright law.

Page 8 of 8 | Total Record : 71

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February 2026 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): November 2025 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): August 2025 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): May 2025 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): February 2025 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): November 2024 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): August 2024 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): May 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): February 2024 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): August 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): May 2023 More Issue