cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wahyu Abdul Jafar
Contact Email
milrev@metrouniv.ac.id
Phone
+6282182429320
Journal Mail Official
milrev@metrouniv.ac.id
Editorial Address
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 15A Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung Telpon: 0725-41507, Fax: 0725-47296 Fakultas Syariah IAIN Metro
Location
Kota metro,
Lampung
INDONESIA
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Lampung
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2986528X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i1.6881
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
MILRev Is a scientific law journal with a focus on studies in the field of Islamic law, starting from fiqh, fatwa, or qanun (laws, shariah regional regulations, compilations of Islamic laws). The aim is to develop knowledge in the field of Islamic law, in order to be able to respond to the needs of the wider community for scientific and contemporary Islamic law studies. This journal is intended for academics, researchers, and practitioners, who conduct research on Islamic law, both normative (library) and empirical (socio-legal) research. This journal is published twice a year and involves editorial teams, reviewers, and writers from within and outside the country
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 113 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
Digital Empowerment and E-Commerce Adoption among Handicraft SMEs: A Contemporary Islamic Economic Law Study Using the TOE Framework Nuril Aulia Munawaroh; Sudarmiatin; Erry Tri Djatmika; Agus Hermawan; Miftahul Munir
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11731

Abstract

This study critically examines the integration of the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework into digital empowerment practices among handicraft small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from the perspective of contemporary Islamic economic law. The research aims to explore how technological readiness, organisational capacity, and environmental support influence the adoption of e-commerce, while aligning these dynamics with Islamic ethical and legal principles such as fairness (‘adl), transparency (shafāfiyyah), and social welfare (maṣlaḥah). Using a qualitative descriptive approach, this study synthesises empirical findings from relevant literature and case studies of handicraft SMEs that have implemented digital transformation strategies. The analysis reveals that the successful adoption of e-commerce within Islamic legal frameworks depends not only on technological and managerial factors but also on compliance with sharia-based economic values that promote justice, trust, and ethical business practices. The study concludes that integrating the TOE framework into digital empowerment provides a holistic model for sustainable SME development, bridging modern economic innovation with the moral foundations of Islamic law. The academic contribution of this study lies in its interdisciplinary integration of the TOE framework with contemporary Islamic economic jurisprudence, offering a novel analytical model that bridges digital innovation and normative Islamic law. It enriches the discourse on digital transformation in Muslim-majority economies by offering a sharia-compliant perspective on sustainable SME development and policy formulation.
Contemporary Reassessment of Punishment in Islamic and Secular Law: A Comparative Study of Justice and Penal Philosophy Anis Mashdurohatun; Eid Abed Alhaleem Maslat Harahsheh; Muhammad Irwan Datuiding; Abun Hasbulloh Syambas; Prasetiyo Adhi Wibowo
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): MilRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v5i1.11887

Abstract

This study offers a contemporary reassessment of punishment in Islamic Sharia and secular legal systems by comparatively examining their classifications, objectives, and underlying penal philosophies. While both frameworks seek to deter crime, uphold justice, and preserve social order, they diverge significantly in epistemological foundations, moral orientation, and modes of legal authority. Employing a qualitative comparative legal approach, this research integrates classical Islamic jurisprudence with contemporary statutory regulations and judicial practices. The analysis moves beyond doctrinal exposition to address current challenges in crime prevention, legal objectivity, proportionality, and the role of state authority in administering punishment. Particular attention is given to the ethical coherence and legitimacy of each system in responding to modern social complexities. The findings reveal that Islamic Sharia—especially through its taʿzīr framework—offers a principled yet flexible penal paradigm that balances deterrence, moral reform, and restorative considerations. Its emphasis on proportionality, judicial discretion, and ethical responsibility reflects a holistic vision of justice consistent with the objectives of the Maqāṣid al-Sharia. Conversely, contemporary secular legal systems increasingly prioritize rehabilitation and utilitarian efficiency but often encounter structural challenges, including sentencing disparities, systemic bias, and susceptibility to political or socioeconomic interests. This study contributes academically by enriching comparative penal theory through an integrative ethical analysis of Sharia and secular models. It demonstrates that Sharia’s justice-oriented framework provides valuable normative insights for contemporary penal reform, particularly in enhancing fairness, accountability, and moral balance within modern criminal justice systems.
Contemporary Islamic Economic Law on Legal Protection for Bankrupt Guarantors: Comparative Insights from Common Law and Asian Jurisdictions Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono; Ermanto Fahamsyah; Hariyanto Sururi; Amaliyah
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11897

Abstract

The legal protection of guarantors declared bankrupt or suspended from debt payment obligations (PKPU), together with the principal debtor, remains a critical yet underexplored issue in Indonesian insolvency law. This study examines the scope and adequacy of such protections under contemporary Islamic economic law, providing comparative insights from selected common law and Asian jurisdictions. Employing a normative juridical approach combined with comparative legal analysis, the research analyses statutory provisions, judicial precedents, and doctrinal interpretations. The study highlights the imbalance of liability between guarantors and debtors, the absence of explicit safeguards under Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU, and the resulting implications for creditor rights and economic justice. Comparative analysis draws from the United Kingdom and United States (standard law systems) and Singapore, Japan, and Malaysia (Asian jurisdictions), revealing more structured protections for guarantors, including mechanisms such as independent liability, automatic stay, and negotiated debt restructuring. The findings indicate that Indonesia's current framework inadequately recognises the secondary and derivative nature of guarantor obligations, exposing them to disproportionate risk. This study contributes to the academic discourse by integrating contemporary Islamic economic principles into the analysis of insolvency law, providing a normative framework for reform and offering comparative insights that can inform both legislation and future research on guarantor protection. The study recommends legislative reform to explicitly regulate guarantor protection, integrating principles of proportionality, good faith, and balanced creditor–debtor relations, in line with contemporary Islamic economic law.

Page 12 of 12 | Total Record : 113

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): MilRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): MILREV: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): MILREV: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review