cover
Contact Name
Reski Nofrialdi
Contact Email
nofrialdireski@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
ejrev.info@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Padang City, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia, 25112
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Ekasakti Journal of law and Justice
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 29877954     EISSN : 2987436X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.60034/ejlj
Core Subject : Social,
Ekasakti Journal of law and Justice is an peer-reviewed journal. This journal is managed by the Master of Law Program, Universitas Ekasakti. The purpose of EJLJ is as a medium of communication, information and legal science development. This journal contains studies in the field of law which are the results of research in the field of law directed to promote the values of Pancasila and democracy to build a sense of nationalism. Therefore, the Master of Law Program Universitas Ekasakti initiated to establish a journal that specifically develops the current issue of law. Starting from 2023 onward, Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice requires English as its main language and therefore only accepts journal articles written in English.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 92 Documents
The Ethical Responsibility of Forensic Doctors for the Confidentiality of Autopsy Results for the Crime of Murder Andre P; Susi Delmiati; Laurensius Arliman
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/ctx67497

Abstract

The ethical responsibility of forensic doctors for the confidentiality of the results of the autopsy of the crime of murder at Bhayangkara Padang Hospital is a form of multidimensional responsibility that includes legal, ethical, social, and humanitarian aspects. In carrying out their duties, forensic doctors must maintain a balance between the obligation to assist law enforcement objectively and the protection of the dignity and privacy of victims and their families. Violations of the confidentiality of autopsy results are not only a violation of professional ethics, but also have the potential to be a violation of criminal and administrative law, which can ultimately damage the integrity of forensic institutions and public trust in the judicial system. Therefore, this responsibility must be carried out with full professional awareness, high integrity, and compliance with legal norms and noble human values. Obstacles in the implementation of the ethical responsibility of forensic doctors at Bhayangkara Padang Hospital for the confidentiality of the results of the autopsy of the crime of murder include two main dimensions, namely legal constraints and non-legal constraints. Legal obstacles include the indecisiveness of norms in Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, weak structural protection for medical data, overlap between health law and criminal procedure law, and the absence of sectoral regulations that specifically regulate forensic medicine. Meanwhile, non-legal constraints include weak information security systems, low ethical literacy, social pressure on forensic doctors, lack of cross-sector training, limited support facilities, and cultural influences that sometimes do not support efforts to maintain medical confidentiality.
Application of Elements of Participation in Crime of Trafficking in Goods That are Not in Accordance with Indonesian National Standards Anggara Wijaya Herman; Iyah Faniyah; Bisma Putra Pratama
Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Master of Law Program, Ekasakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60034/qpm4xs32

Abstract

The application of the element of participation by the Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation of the West Sumatra Regional Police against the crime of trafficking in goods that are not in accordance with the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) is to position the qualification as the perpetrator who ordered the act (doen pleger), because the will of the main perpetrator is realized through the actions of other parties under his control. On the other hand, distribution managers, marketing agents, or retailers can be classified as participating in the conduct (medepleger) if they are proven to have knowledge of the non-conformity of goods with applicable standards, but continue with sales activities. Any perpetrator involved in the chain of circulation of goods can be held criminally liable as long as it can be proven that they have knowledge or at least strong suspicion about the non-conformity of the goods with applicable standards. The obstacles encountered by the Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation of the West Sumatra Regional Police in the application of the element of participation to the crime of trafficking in goods that are not in accordance with Indonesian national standards are the most prominent legal obstacles in the investigation of this case are in the aspect of proving the element of guilt and the involvement of the perpetrators which are doctrinally the core of participation. The regulatory structure regarding the crime of trafficking in goods that does not meet standards is still scattered and fragmentative, causing difficulties for investigators in identifying which norms are relevant to ensnare the perpetrators of participation. Non-legal aspects, limited human resource (HR) capacity of investigators are crucial factors that affect the effectiveness of the implementation of inclusion elements, especially in cases involving the distribution of goods digitally. It is related to the low level of legal awareness among business actors and the public, especially in the trade sector of daily necessities.

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 92