cover
Contact Name
R. Panca Pertiwi Hidayati
Contact Email
wistara.unpas@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
wistara.unpas@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pasundan Bandung, Jl. Sumatera No. 41 Bandung
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Wistara: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra
Published by Universitas Pasundan
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27223159     DOI : https://doi.org/10.23969/wistara
Core Subject : Education,
Wistara: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, berisi artikel dan/atau laporan hasil penelitian, kajian (teori maupun aplikasi), dan bahasan kepustakaan berkaitan dengan bidang bahasa, sastra, serta pengajarannya
Articles 116 Documents
Representasi Nilai Perjuangan Film Mungkin Esok atau Nanti Semiotika Charles Sanders Peirce: nilai perjuangan, film, semiotika Mia, Salmia; Kasmawati, Kasmawati; Aryanti, Aryanti
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Vol. 6. No. 2, 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the representation of struggle values in the film Mungkin Esok Lusa atau Nanti using Charles Sanders Peirce’s semiotic theory. The research employed a qualitative descriptive method by analyzing 13 selected scenes through the elements of sign, object, and interpretant, as well as identifying types of signs including icons, indexes, and symbols. The results reveal that the film portrays struggle values such as hard work, loyalty, responsibility, morality, spirituality, sacrifice, courage, and national spirit. The meaning of the signs is closely linked to Indonesian cultural values, including politeness, respect for teachers, devotion to parents, simplicity, commitment, honesty, consensus, and maintaining social harmony. The findings show that the film not only presents a romantic drama but also serves as an effective medium to convey moral messages, raise awareness of struggle values, and inspire audiences to apply them in daily life.
Prinsip Kesantunan dalam Kolom Komentar Instagram @nikitamirzanimawardi_172 Kajian Pragmatik Herawati, herawati; Fadli, Irwan
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Vol. 6. No. 2, 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine the form of compliance with the principle of politeness in the speech of social media users in the Instagram comment column @nikitamirzanimawardi_172 based on Geoffrey Neil Leech's pragmatic study. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were obtained through direct observation of social media user comments that appeared in several selected posts. The study was conducted based on Leech's theory of politeness principles, with an emphasis on the extent to which social media users adhere to these principles. Based on the analysis that has been done, the data found based on the principle of politeness of language are: The maxim of modesty/humility (0 data), the maxim of agreement (7 data), the maxim of sympathy (9 data), the maxim of wisdom (2 data), the maxim of generosity (4 data), and the maxim of appreciation/praise (13 data). The total data in this study is 35 data. The most dominant data in this study is the principle of praise (approbation maxim). The results of the study show that amidst the dominance of negative comments, there is still an awareness of polite language among some social media users. This reflects an effort to maintain communication ethics in online interactions, even in controversial contexts. Keywords: principles of politeness, Nikita Mirzani, social media, and pragmatics.
The Role of AI Writing Assistance Tools in Supporting EFL Students’ Research Proposal Writing Vivi Aulia
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Vol. 7. No.1. 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to investigate how AI writing assistance tools can support students in the research proposal writing process. It was conducted on 15 EFL undergraduate students at Universitas PGRI Kalimantan who composed their research proposals using these tools. The data were gathered through structured interviews and documentation focusing on students’ experience of using AI writing assistance tools for research proposal writing, its benefits, its drawbacks, and how the writing area improved after using the tools. This research revealed that during the research proposal writing, the majority of the students utilized these tools to help them generate ideas, create an outline, provide sample sentences, translate complex texts, and summarize the research paper articles. In addition, the findings also demonstrate that these tools help them improve their vocabulary, compose the background and literature review sections of their proposal, and correct the sentences properly. Furthermore, this research has also revealed some drawbacks of these tools. This research’s drawbacks from students’ experiences include oversimplified explanations obtained from the tools and their over-reliance on these tools. It can be concluded that AI writing assistance tools should be wisely utilized as a supplementary tool rather than a replacement tool for critical thinking and academic writing skills.
MBTI Dichotomies and Speaking Achievement Analysis of English Tadris Students Nabilah Fairuz R; Mukrim Mukrim
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Vol. 7. No.1. 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/wistara.v7i1.47096

Abstract

This study aims to know whether there is a difference between the MBTI dichotomies on students' speaking achievement and how the variety of MBTI dichotomies influences students' speaking achievement. This study was conducted using mixed methods with an explanatory sequential design. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling; purposive sampling. The sample was Tadris English students' class of 2022 of UIN Datokarama Palu. The research sample consisted of 29 students, 8 of them were informants for the interview. The quantitative data as the core data were analyzed using SPSS, precisely the One Way ANOVA test, revealing that there is no difference in students' speaking achievement between extrovert-introvert, sensing-intuition, thinking-feeling, and judging-perception. Moreover, the absence of differences in results influences the MBTI varieties, indicating that MBTI dichotomies do not influence students' speaking achievement. In addition, based on the findings per trait, there is no influence on students' Extrovert, Introvert, Thinking, and Feeling beliefs in the speaking class; the assessment focused on students' activeness in speaking. Meanwhile, students Sensing, Intuiting, Judging, and Perceiving stated that the evaluation was based on the answers presented in speaking class and the demands of the answer in the form of the question to be answered. Therefore, the study assumed that students' personalities changed in speaking performance. Thus, there was no difference and no influence on speaking achievement based on the MBTI dichotomies because several factors influenced these changes. The factors are the demands of the goals, the precision of answers based on context, and the demands for activeness in speaking class. These findings have significant implications for English language education and psychology, challenging the traditional belief in the influence of MBTI dichotomies on students' speaking achievement.
Javanese Taboo Language as Social Interaction among Teenagers from Different Socioeconomic Backgrounds Fajar Susanto; Claudia Fira Inne Purwantoro; Tri Indrayanti
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Vol. 7. No.1. 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/wistara.v7i1.48610

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain why teenagers from different socioeconomic backgrounds use the Javanese taboo language and how taboo language influences the teenagers’ social interaction. This study was designed with the ethnographic qualitative approach. Because the subject has been decided in advance, the case study approach was also used in addition to the ethnographic method in this study. The participants in this study were four teenagers, two from the upper-middle class and two from the lower middle class. Data were taken with direct observations, recordings, and interviews. The findings indicated that a cursing ‘cok’, a sort of Javanese taboo language, is most commonly utilized by teenagers. That taboo language has become a common part of adolescents’ communication, particularly among lower middle-class teenagers. Family environment and peer groups strongly influence the normalization of taboo expressions in everyday speech. Lower middle-class participants tended to use taboo language as a symbol of intimacy, solidarity, and emotional expression, while upper middle-class participants showed greater awareness and control in avoiding taboo expressions due to stricter parental guidance and social norms. The study concludes that taboo language among teenagers is closely connected to socialization, identity, and interactional context rather than simply impolite behavior. Socioeconomic background significantly shapes teenagers’ perceptions, habits, and regulation of taboo language in daily communication.
On the Death of bin Laden: Construing Meanings behind Obama and Trump’s Speech: - Supiastutik Supiastutik; Yuwanda Auliya Akbar; Arona Kamelia Hani; Gifary Muhammad Gilang R.; Nadya Ummi Azizah; Riskia Setiarini; Nurhadianty Rahayu
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Vol. 7. No.1. 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian mengenai wacana yang disampaikan Obama dan Trump sudah banyak terdistribusi di ruang publik. Namun demikian, tiap penelitian memiliki fokus dan perspektif yang unik. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan pidato Trump dengan Obama terkait wafatnya bin Laden. Penelitian ini menganalisis tiga metafungsi bahasa yang ditawarkan Linguistik Fungsional Sistemik (LFS) pada pidato-pidato tersebut. Data yang dikumpulkan berisi ujaran yang dilontarkan pada pidato dua presiden Amerika Serikat yang berbeda dan sangat fenomenal: Barack Hussein Obama dan Donald John Trump. Data didapat melalui rekaman pidato yang dipublikasikan di situs siaran video populer, Youtube. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menguak makna dari pidato yang dibawakan oleh Barack Obama dan Donald Trump dan untuk mengidentifikasi berbagai strategi linguistik melalui kerangka teori yang digunakan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Trump cenderung mengafirmasi, alih-alih memberikan arahan, sementara Obama lebih banyak menyebarkan informasi dan instruksi. Temuan ini juga mengindikasikan bahwa tiap orator menampilkan kuasa dan makna dengan cara yang berbeda, dan pilihan mereka dapat memiliki peran dalam membentuk cara pemirsa melihat isu yang dibawakan dan siapa saja yang terlibat di dalamnya.

Page 12 of 12 | Total Record : 116