cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawan
Contact Email
journal@idpublishing.org
Phone
+6281990251989
Journal Mail Official
journal@idpublishing.org
Editorial Address
Perumahan Sidorejo, Jl. Sidorejo Gg. Sadewa No.D3, Sonopakis Kidul, Ngestiharjo, Kapanewon Kasihan, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55184
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Sustainable Civil Building Management and Engineering Journal
Published by Indonesian Journal Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30323711     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47134/scbmej
Core Subject : Engineering,
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Engineering
Sustainable Civil Building Management and Engineering Journal is an academic journal organized which a focus and scope: Sustainable Building Design and Construction, Civil Engineering for Sustainability, Building Management and Maintenance, Environmental and Social Considerations. The scope of SCBMEJ invites original research papers, review articles, and case studies that contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices in civil engineering, building management, and related disciplines. The journal encourages interdisciplinary approaches and welcomes submissions that address the challenges and opportunities at the intersection of environmental, social, and economic sustainability in the built environment.
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Bangunan dan Konstruksi
Articles 72 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
Determining the Shezi Coefficient Under Regulated Water Flow Conditions Mirzaev, Mirzabek; Ibragimov Ilhom; Inomov Dilmurod
Sustainable Civil Building Management and Engineering Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/scbmej.v3i1.5231

Abstract

In the lower reaches of the Amu Darya River, the hydraulic regime has been significantly transformed under regulated flow conditions. The determination of the Chezy coefficient plays a crucial role in analyzing the kinematics and hydraulic resistance of the river flow. Based on field data obtained from Tuyamuyin, Kipchak, Niyetbaytas, Samanbay, and Kiziljar hydroposts, empirical relationships between the Chezy coefficient, discharge, and morphological parameters were developed. The analysis revealed that conventional formulas proposed by Manning, Forchheimer, Pavlovskiy, Agroskin, and Jeleznyakov showed considerable deviations under regulated conditions due to nonuniform depth distribution and increased roughness coefficients. The derived relationship for the lower Amu Darya provides improved accuracy in estimating the Chezy coefficient compared to classical methods. This approach enhances hydraulic computations and offers a practical basis for riverbed regulation and hydraulic design in managed flow conditions.
Scheduling Analysis using CPM, PERT, and LoB Method Milinda Nur Indah Puspita; I Nyoman Dita Pahang Putra
Sustainable Civil Building Management and Engineering Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/scbmej.v3i1.5392

Abstract

Project delays frequently occur in construction projects and often result from the inability to accurately identify critical activities within the project network, leading to ineffective time control. Therefore, it is necessary to apply scheduling methods that are appropriate to the characteristics of the project in order to improve time control effectiveness and minimize the risk of delays. The aim of this research is to analyze scheduling results using the Critical Path Method, Program Evaluation and Review Technique, and Line Of Balance method. Also, to determine the difference in project completion duration using the PERT, CPM and LoB Methods. This research employs a quantitative method with a comparative approach, using secondary data that was obtained from a supervisory consultant. The data includes the durations and the work list. The analysis data is obtained to determine the critical path using PERT, CPM and LoB methods. The PERT method calculates three estimation times: optimistic duration, most likely duration, and pessimistic duration to determine the critical path. The results show the CPM and LoB method predicts the completion project in 159 days, and the PERT method predicts the completion project in 164 days. The difference in completing the project using the CMP and PERT methods is 5 days. The difference in project completion duration between LOB and PERT is 5 days. In contrast, no difference is observed between the CPM and LOB methods, as both yield an identical project completion time of 159 days.

Page 8 of 8 | Total Record : 72

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): October Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): July Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): October Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): April Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January