cover
Contact Name
Joni Laksito
Contact Email
info@lpkd.or.id
Phone
+6285726173515
Journal Mail Official
info@lpkd.or.id
Editorial Address
Perum. Bumi Pucanggading, Jln. Watunganten 1 No 1-6, Kelurahan Batursari, Mranggen , Kab. Demak, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 59567
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
ISSN : 30466180     EISSN : 30465648     DOI : 10.62383
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen. Jurnal ini adalah Jurnal ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara yang bersifat peer-review dan terbuka. Bidang kajian dalam jurnal ini termasuk sub rumpun Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara menerima artikel dalam bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia dan diterbitkan 4 kali setahun: Maret, Juni, September dan Desember.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 166 Documents
Pembuktian Ilmiah VS Alibi: Bagaimana Ilmu Forensik Mengatasi Tantangan Pembelaan pada Kasus Raden Adante Adiatma Nugroho; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.955

Abstract

Scientific evidence has become an important element in modern criminal justice, especially in complex cases such as Raden Adante, where alibis are used as the main defense strategy to undermine forensic evidence. In this case, scientific methods such as DNA analysis, digital traces, and toxicology examination succeeded in breaking the defendant's alibi. This research examines how scientific evidence can overcome the challenges of alibi strategies which are often used to confuse the investigative process. This study shows that accurate and standardized forensic evidence is able to objectively confirm the presence of the defendant at the scene of the crime, thereby strengthening fair and effective law enforcement efforts. The research uses a juridical-normative approach with qualitative analysis, examining regulations, legal doctrine, and expert views to assess the role of scientific evidence in dealing with alibi defenses.
Refleksi Kritis atas Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum Internasional di Indonesia dari Sudut Pandang Filsafat Ilmu Yokhebed Arumdika Probosambodo
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.959

Abstract

Refleksi kritis atas perkembangan ilmu hukum internasional di Indonesia menurut sudut pandang filsafat ilmu menjadi hal yang penting untuk dikaji karena memberikan pemahaman mendalam tentang konsep, ruang lingkup, dan hubungan antara filsafat ilmu dan ilmu hukum internasional. Selain itu, tinjauan kritis terhadap perkembangan ilmu hukum internasional di Indonesia juga akan memunculkan pemahaman yang mendalam tentang keterbatasan, tantangan, serta implikasi filsafat ilmu terhadap praktik ilmu hukum internasional di Indonesia. Kajian ini muncul sebagai respons terhadap kebutuhan akan peninjauan kritis yang mendalam terhadap keterbatasan, tantangan, serta solusi yang dapat diusulkan dalam konteks perkembangan ilmu hukum internasional di Indonesia. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini akan memberikan landasan yang kuat untuk menjalankan refleksi kritis atas perkembangan ilmu hukum internasional di Indonesia dari sudut pandang filsafat ilmu.
Reformulasi Perkap No. 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengamanan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Syairulan A. Radjak; Ahmad, Ibrahim; Moonti, Roy Marthen
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1086

Abstract

Guarantee fiduciary guarantees play an important role in economic financing in Indonesia. However, implementation of fiduciary guarantee execution often leads to legal conflicts, especially the abuse of executorial power by creditors. Court Decision Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 changes the execution mechanism to better protect the rights of debtors and emphasize the principle of justice. protect the rights of debtors and emphasize the principle of justice. This raises the need to reformulate Perkap No. 8/2011 to be relevant to the changes.changes. Research This research uses a normative method that analyzes the relevant laws and regulations related laws and regulations, the principles of justice, and their compatibility with social dynamics. The focus is to review the relevance and weaknesses of Perkap No. 8/2011 after the Constitutional Court Decision. The Constitutional Court's ruling limits unilateral execution and requires an acknowledgment of default or a court decision before execution. default or court decision before execution is carried out. This increases the protection of debtors' rights, but also adds procedural burdens for creditors. for creditors. The reformulation of Perkap No. 8/2011 is necessary to ensure that execution is more fair and lawful. The reformulation should include mechanisms that prioritize legality, protection of debtor rights, and oversight of abuse. monitoring against abuse. Synergy between the court, the police, and related parties need to be strengthened to create a balanced and transparent legal ecosystem and transparent.
Analisis Pelanggaran Hukum Disiplin Finansial Standar Profesional Account Officer oleh Pegawai dalam Penyaluran Kredit di Bank BRI: Studi Putusan: No. 10/G/2013/PHI/PN.KPG Shinta Adella; Agnes Fitryantica
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1095

Abstract

Misconduct is an act that violates applicable legal provisions and contravenes professional norms. In the context of banking, violations of financial discipline and professional standards can have a serious impact on the financial stability and reputation of the institution. This research analyzes violations of financial discipline law committed by employees in lending at Bank BRI, based on a case study of Decision No. 10/G/2013/PHI/PN.KPG. These violations included non-compliance with lending procedures, abuse of authority, and violation of professional ethical standards set by the bank. This research uses a normative juridical approach, which focuses on the study of applicable legal norms through the analysis of legal documents and related literature. In its decision, the panel of judges considered evidence and witness testimony that showed negligence and non-compliance by the Account Officer. The implementation of sanctions for these violations is expected to provide a deterrent effect and improve compliance with financial discipline and professional standards. The study also identifies the steps taken by Bank BRI to improve its supervisory system and training for employees to prevent the recurrence of similar violations in the future. This study makes an important contribution to understanding the dynamics of financial discipline law violations in the banking sector and the remedial measures that need to be taken.
Pentingnya Rencana dalam Sebuah Pemerintahan Habibatul Qalbi; Tarisha Lingke Lubis; Ghassani Marisah Hasibuan
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1101

Abstract

Plans are a vital component in a government to achieve directed and sustainable development. This research aims to identify the importance of plans in managing resources, setting priorities, and creating transparency and accountability in government. The method used in this research is qualitative analysis based on literature reviews and case studies related to plan implementation in various governments, both national and local. The focus of this research includes the role of plans in resource efficiency, risk mitigation, and coordination between institutions. The research results show that governments that have thorough planning are better able to optimize the use of budget, labor and time compared to governments without clear plans. In addition, a good plan helps the government anticipate potential risks and challenges, as well as provide strategic solutions to face them. In terms of transparency, planning documents enable the public to monitor government performance, increase public trust, and support public participation in the development process. This research also found that plans that are inclusive and involve various stakeholders are able to create stronger synergy between institutions and maintain program sustainability even if there is a change in leadership. In conclusion, plans in government are not only a tool to direct development, but also an important instrument to ensure stability, effectiveness and efficiency. With a structured plan, the government can achieve development goals optimally and have a significant impact on community welfare. This research recommends strengthening planning capacity at all levels of government to improve the quality of governance and public services.
Hambatan dan Peluang Efektivitas Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Frensiska Ardhiyaningrum; Diana Setiawati
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1132

Abstract

Business disputes are increasing in Indonesia along with the growth of economic relationships. Litigation is often perceived as time-consuming and costly, making Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a more efficient and relationship-friendly alternative. This study aims to analyze the obstacles and opportunities in implementing ADR for business dispute resolution in Indonesia, based on the legal framework provided by Law Number 30 of 1999. The research employs a normative legal approach with descriptive analysis. Data were collected through literature reviews of legal regulations, academic literature, and journal articles. The findings reveal that although ADR holds significant potential for resolving business disputes efficiently and cost-effectively, its implementation faces several challenges. The primary obstacles include the lack of awareness among business actors about ADR's benefits, the perception that ADR lacks the legal authority compared to litigation, and the limited quality of mediators and arbitrators. The study also highlights the importance of enhancing the capacity of ADR practitioners through continuous training and educating business actors to build trust in this method. By addressing these challenges, ADR is expected to become the primary choice for resolving business disputes, fostering a conducive business environment, and supporting long-term economic growth in Indonesia.
Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Pelayanan Publik melalui Penerapan Etika Administrasi di Dinas Sosial Provinsi Sumatera Barat Afrina Welni; Miken Wulandari; Yunita Yunita; Randy Wilyan Putra; Yulia Hanoselina; Rahmadhona Fitri Helmi
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1157

Abstract

This study investigates the use of administrative ethics to increase the professionalism of public services in the West Sumatra Provincial Government Social Service. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with stakeholders and surveys of staff and service users using mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative). Research shows that the application of administrative ethics principles such as transparency, accountability and fairness significantly increases the professionalism of the apparatus and the quality of public services. Integrity, public trust, and operational efficiency of agencies can be strengthened by a strong ethical culture. In addition, this research found that continuous training, improving operational standards, and the use of information technology can help overcome problems such as employees' lack of understanding of administrative ethics and weaknesses in supervisory systems. Policy recommendations are made to encourage public services that are more responsive, professional and in line with community expectations.
Peran Hukum dalam Mendorong Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Menjamin Kesejahteraan Masyarakat : Perspektif Indonesia Bahrul Ulum
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1215

Abstract

This article examines the important role of law in promoting economic development and ensuring the well-being of people in Indonesia. It analyzes the legal framework that governs economic activities, focusing on principles and regulations that facilitate economic growth, protect rights, and promote social justice. This article explores the evolution of Indonesia's legal system in response to economic challenges and opportunities, highlighting key laws and policies that have shaped the nation's economic landscape. This includes an analysis of the constitutional foundations of Indonesia's economic system, with a special emphasis on Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, which mandates a "people's economy" based on the principles of kinship, cooperative ownership, and state control over vital resources. Furthermore, this article discusses the challenges and prospects of using the law as a tool to achieve sustainable and inclusive economic development. It emphasizes the importance of legal certainty, regulatory efficiency, and the protection of public interests in fostering a conducive investment climate and promoting equitable economic growth. The article also discusses the role of law in addressing important issues such as environmental protection, labor rights, and consumer protection, highlighting the linkages between economic development and social welfare. By examining Indonesia's experience, this article contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between law and economic development in the context of developing countries.
Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Jaminan Harta Pihak Ketiga dalam Kepailitan yang Dijadikan Harta Pailit Oleh Kurator Safirah Maharani Putri; Muhammad Rizal Rustam
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1220

Abstract

In bankruptcy proceedings, the presence of third parties whose assets are made part of the bankruptcy estate often leads to legal conflicts. The bankruptcy estate is a collection of assets managed by the curator to pay off the debtor's obligations to creditors. Problems arise when third-party assets, which should not be included in the bankruptcy estate, are included without a clear legal basis. This research aims to analyze the legal remedies that can be taken by third parties to protect their rights and interests. By reviewing the provisions in the Bankruptcy Law, as well as the prevailing practice, this study demonstrates the importance of verification of assets by the curator prior to inclusion in the bankruptcy estate. Legal procedures such as opposition (verzet) can be taken by third parties to challenge the curator's decision in the commercial court. The findings of this study highlight the need for a better understanding of third party rights and the legal mechanisms in place to prevent abuse of curator authority. It is hoped that this study will provide guidance to third parties in taking appropriate legal steps and strengthening legal protection in the bankruptcy process.
Efektifitas Penerapan Sistem Merid terhadap Prinsip Keadilan dan Kesetaraan dalam Menejeman PNS Lasambo, Nurlin; Uswatun Otoluwa, Siti Nur; Moonti, Roy Marthen
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1226

Abstract

Theimplementation of the merit system in civil servant management has shown its effectiveness in supporting the principles of justice and equality. However, to achieve more optimal results, efforts are needed to increase the capacity of human resources, strengthen supervision mechanisms, and enforce sanctions for violations. In addition, the government needs to encourage changes in organizational culture to better support the principle of meritocracy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term impact of implementing the merit system at different levels of government. The merit system is a reflection of professional personnel management where the placement of employees and officials uses performance competencies and track records as a measure of appointment. The main purpose of the implementation of the merit system is to improve professionalism, fairness, and equality in the management of Civil Servants (PNS). The purpose of this research is to find out the Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Merid System on the Principles of Justice and Equality in Translating Civil Servants. This paper was carried out with the aim of finding out how the Implementation of the Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Merid System on the Principles of Justice and Equality in Translating Civil Servants by using a qualitative analysis method. so that it is expected to contribute thoughts to the government in the assessment and implementation of Merid Sytem towards a better direction.

Page 8 of 17 | Total Record : 166