cover
Contact Name
Indah Asikin Nurani
Contact Email
berkala.arkeologi@brin.go.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
berkala.arkeologi@brin.go.id
Editorial Address
BRIN Publishing, Directorate of Repositories, Multimedia, and Scientific Publishing Gedung B. J. Habibie, Lantai 8 Jln. M. H. Thamrin No. 8, Kebon Sirih, Menteng, Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10340
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Berkala Arkeologi
ISSN : 02161419     EISSN : 25487132     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55981/jba.
Core Subject : Social,
We are a journal on archaeology published by the National Research and Innovation Agency every May and November each year. This journal seek to promote and shares research results and ideas on archaeology to the public. We covers original research results, ideas, theories, or other scientific works from the discipline of Archaeology mainly in the Indonesian Archipelago and Southeast Asia. Interest from other disciplines (such as history, anthropology, architecture, geology, etc.) must be related to archaeological subject to be covered in this journal. Our first edition was published on March 1980.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Arkeologi
Articles 1,574 Documents
POLA HIDUP KOMUNITAS GUA HUNIAN PRASEJARAH KAWASAN KARST BLORA Indah Asikin Nurani
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i1.385

Abstract

Blora limestone region is an important area where several prehistoric sites, occupied continuously during the Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene, are discovered. The Pleistocene sites are found in the southeast part of the Blora regency and the ear1y Holocene sites are located in the District of Todanan, in the western part of the regency. One of the most interesting sites situated in this area is the Kidang cave. It is the only limestone cave which shows traces of human occupation in this area. This paper will discuss about the possible adaptation as well as occupation patterns in Kidang Cave.
RAJYA RAJYA ING JAWA MADHYA, RAJA-RAJA MATARAM KUNA ABAD 9-10 MASEHI: PERBANDINGAN ANTARA NASKAH PUSTAKA RAJYA-RAJYA I BHUMI NUSANTARA DENGAN PRASASTI WANUA TENGAH III Kayato Hardani
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i1.388

Abstract

Pustaka Rajya Rajya has become a controversial text in Indonesian historiography. Some experts including philologists, archaeologists, and historians are still having strong arguments on the authenticity of the text. Pustaka Rajya are indeed an interesting text to be examined. Among others, Pustaka Rajya told 'a fantastic' story, on the History of Ancient Mataram Kings. In other hand, we also found another authentic historical source, Wanua Tengah Ill inscription. This copper inscription also contains a 'short story' about ancient Mataram kings. Therefore, in this article informations from the two sources will be compared. The result shows how the 'writer in the past' has written 'his own past'.
YAJNA SRADDHA DAN YAJNA MEMUKUR Rita Istari
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i1.390

Abstract

The most popular text from Majapahit Era, Nagarakertagama, mentioned a ceremony called Yajna Sraddha. This ceremony is related to the dead. The description on the ceremony recalls to the present day Yajfia Memukur ceremony which is still conducted by Hindu Balinese. The purpose of Yajfia Sraddha and Yajfia Memukur ceremonies are basically similar. It is devoted to the people who have passed away so that they can re-unite with the Gods or with the ancestors. This article compares these two ceremonies to reveal the similar aspects.
MOJOPURA WETAN, DESA PENYEBERANGAN DI DAERAH ALIRAN SUNGAI (DAS) BENGAWAN SOLO PADA MASA MAJAPAHIT? Hari Lelono
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i1.392

Abstract

Majapahit is a powerful kingdom which ruled Java from 12th to 15th century A.D. The kingdom was well known as the center of Javanese civilization with a tremendous influential power throughout the archipelago. Its capital was found in an area which had long been assumed as located in Trowulan District of Mojokerto Region in East Java. Archaeologists had long been assumed that the potential main access for entering the area were roads as well as rivers with Bengawan Solo as the most important one. Some old Javanese inscriptions mentioned the crossing-through villages lying over the river's edge which among them were Madanten, Wringin Wok and Bajrapura. Those village names could still easily be found until today, located over the edge of Bengawan Solo River in Gresik District. Mojopura Wetan is believed as an ancient village as mentioned in the inscription, identical to Bajrapura. Beside located close to Bengawan Solo, in the village was also found Hindu and Buddha statues. At present in the village could still be found the activity of local people using small boat to cross the river.
PENELITIAN ARKEOLOGI BAWAH AIR DI INDONESIA TANTANGAN, PELUANG, DAN ARAH KEBIJAKAN PENELITIAN ARKEOLOGI MARITIM Siswanto
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i1.393

Abstract

In Indonesia, underwater archaeology as a part of maritime study seems to be isolated, because the study has not yet made significant contribution to the understanding of maritime life ways in the archipelago. Various archaeological data needed to reveal the history of human settlement, insular trade, maritime history, migration, and other aspects of maritime culture in the archipelago are still concealed at the bottom of the sea or rivers. On the other hand, the development of underwater archeology in Indonesia is still left far behind compared to other Southeast Asian countries, so the abundant underwater archaeological data are still unreachable. So far, the existing underwater archaeology activities carried out within this largest archipelagic country are still aimed at exploring underwater 'treasure", with very limited concern on archaeological research. On another side, it is certainly aware that a"real" underwater archaeological research require the readiness of both human resources as well as the supporting equipments. Therefore, to develop more proper underwater archaeological activities, it is necessary to establish clear and executable policies and strategy, e.g by improving the quality and quantity of resources, establishing networking, and conducting other potential activities periodically, consistently, with high discipline.
BERBAGAI BENTUK PEMANFAATAN BANGUNAN INDIS DI KOTA MALANG: PEMIKIRAN AWAL TENTANG PENGELOLAAN BCB Muhammad Chawari
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i1.399

Abstract

The use of archaeological resources (BCB) in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 5 1992 on Cultural Property and Indonesian Government Regulation No. 10 1993 on the implementation of the Law no. 5 1992. According to these regulations, cultural property may be used for many purposes such as religious, social, tourism, education, science, and cultural purposes. This paper illustrates the use of some colonial buildings in the City of Malang which is not only in accord with the regulations but also added economical value. the building could also be associated with economical value. There are some examples in Malang showing the use of BCB based on its economical value, but the implementation tended to be individualistic and hasn't reached international level yet. The practical activities include: Festival Malang or Malang Old Festival; producing t-shirts and sticker with pictures of indis buildings; displaying pictures of indis buildings in restaurants, hotels, and stores, and also making various forms of old advertisement by one of the bakery in Malang.
COVER BERKALA ARKEOLOGI VOLUME 29 NO. 2 NOVEMBER 2009 Berkala Arkeologi
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 29 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

PREFACE BERKALA ARKEOLOGI VOLUME 29 NO. 2 NOVEMBER 2009 Berkala Arkeologi
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 29 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

MAJAPAHIT DALAM LINTAS PELAYARAN DAN PERDAGANGAN NUSANTARA Bambang Budi Utomo
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 29 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v29i2.375

Abstract

Majapahit has been known as agrarian and maritime kingdom as well, with a territory covered almost as wide as the nowadays Republic of Indonesia region, excluding part of Papua and West Java (the Sundanese Kingdom). This was the condition after Gajah Mada well-known vow, the Palapa. Long before MahÄpatih Gajah Mada spoke his vow, from the year 1292 CE inscription of Camundi one’s learned that the consecration of the statue of Bhattari Camundi during the time of ÅšrÄ« MahÄrÄja KÄ›rtanÄgara from SiÅ‹hasÄri was a token of his success in bringing all the areas and many islands around under his power. And that means that the idea of expanding the Java mandala had been managed by ÅšrÄ« MahÄrÄja KÄ›rtanÄgara since the 1270-s before the inscription of Camundi was established. Based on available written sources (scripts and inscriptions) and being compared to SiÅ‹hasÄri maṇá¸ala expansion, regions that were under Majapahit’s authority covered only parts of Central Java, East Java, Madura, Bali and Sumbawa. Majapahit’s power was very depended on the services of the coastal ports such as Kambangputih, Siddhayu, Gresik, Surabhaya, and Canggu. And as to it Majapahit established powerful navy arms to secure the Majapahit waters in the Java Sea. The Babad Lasam mentioned Lasam to be the port where RÄjasawarddhana (Bhre Matahun) warships anchored. RÄjasawarddhana was the ruler of Lasam who happened to be Hayam Wuruk's relatives. All these warships were assumed to protect Majapahit's waters in the Java Sea.
IDENTIFIKASI KAYU PERAHU KUNA SITUS PUNJULHARJO REMBANG JAWA TENGAH Widyanto Dwi Nugroho
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 29 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v29i2.376

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with a rich maritime history. The finding of ancient wooden ark in Punjulharjo site, Rembang, Central Java that was ascribed to seventh century A.D., was a proof of the growth of the ancient maritime culture. This finding needs some support to find out the origin of the ark. This research was intended to identify the wood species used on board, stringer and dowel part. The identification result was expected to be useful to estimate the origin of the wooden ark. The wood identification process was done by observing the wood anatomy on the board, stringer and the dowel part using loupe and light microscopy. The identification result showed that according to its wood’s characteristic, the board part of the ark was predicted as wood from the family Sapotaceae, genus Palaquium, and species Palaquium spp. (Nyatoh Wood); wood used as stringer part was estimated as wood from the family of Olacaceae, family Scorodocarpus and species Scorodocarpus bornesis (Kulim Wood) and the wood used as dowel part was estimated as wood from the family Myrtaceae, genus Melaleuca and species Melaleuca leucadendron (Cajuput Wood). Based on the natural distribution of species used as component making of the ark, it was estimated that the ark was originated from Indonesian archipelago, specifically Sumatra island, Borneo island or Malay Peninsula.

Page 27 of 158 | Total Record : 1574


Filter by Year

1980 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 45 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 45 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 44 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 43 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 43 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 42 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 42 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 41 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 41 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 40 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 39 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 39 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 38 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 38 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 37 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 37 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 36 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 36 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 35 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 35 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 34 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 34 No. 1 (2014) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2013) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2013) Vol. 32 No. 2 (2012) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2012) Vol. 31 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 30 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 29 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 29 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 28 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 28 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 27 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 27 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 26 No. 2 (2006) Vol. 26 No. 1 (2006) Vol. 25 No. 1 (2005) Vol. 24 No. 1 (2004) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2003) Vol. 23 No. 1 (2003) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2002) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2001) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2001) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2000) Vol. 19 No. 2 (1999) Vol. 19 No. 1 (1999) Vol. 18 No. 2 (1998) Vol. 18 No. 1 (1998) Vol. 17 No. 2 (1997) Vol. 17 No. 1 (1997) Vol. 16 No. 2 (1996) Vol. 16 No. 1 (1996) Vol. 15 No. 3 (1995) Vol. 15 No. 2 (1995) Vol. 15 No. 1 (1995) Vol. 14 No. 2 (1994) Vol. 14 No. 1 (1994) Vol. 13 No. 3 (1993) Vol. 13 No. 2 (1993) Vol. 13 No. 1 (1993) Vol. 12 No. 1 (1991) Vol. 11 No. 1 (1990) Vol. 10 No. 2 (1989) Vol. 10 No. 1 (1989) Vol. 9 No. 2 (1988) Vol. 9 No. 1 (1988) Vol. 8 No. 2 (1987) Vol. 8 No. 1 (1987) Vol. 7 No. 2 (1986) Vol. 7 No. 1 (1986) Vol. 6 No. 2 (1985) Vol. 6 No. 1 (1985) Vol. 5 No. 2 (1984) Vol. 5 No. 1 (1984) Vol. 4 No. 2 (1983) Vol. 4 No. 1 (1983) Vol. 3 No. 1 (1982) Vol. 2 No. 1 (1981) Vol. 1 No. 1 (1980) More Issue