cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad Nabilul Maram
Contact Email
nabilulmaram@gmail.com
Phone
+6285378122169
Journal Mail Official
journalaijqh@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Gg. Modin No.10 A, Jemur Wonosari, Kec. Wonocolo, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60237
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
AIJQH
Published by Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30309352     DOI : 10.62032/aijqh
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Art,
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
An-Nur International Journal of the Quran & Hadith (E-ISSN: 3030-9352) is primarily dedicated to disseminating original research papers on studying the Quran and Hadith. Twice a year by Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur since 2023, it focuses on publishing original research articles (literature or field). AIJQH publishes articles in both English and Arabic, aiming to bridge the gap between two distinct Islamic and Western scholarship traditions.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 35 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
The Thoughts of Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī and Ahmad Hassan in a Comparative Study of Usury Hadiths Mochamad Varendy
مجلة النور الدولية للقرآن والحديث مجلد 2 عدد 2 (2024): AIJQH - November
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v2i2.30

Abstract

Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī and Ahmad Hassan are prominent scholars who have an essential role in the development of Islam. These two figures have extraordinary thoughts in the fields of hadith, tafsir, and fiqh. Yūsuf al-Qardhawi's thoughts on the issue of usury are different from Ahmad Hassan's thoughts. This research aims to determine the differences and similarities in the thoughts of the two figures. The research method used is library study; the data sources come from articles, books, and other readings. The analysis results in this study show that in their thinking, both figures agree that the law of usury is haram. However, according to Yūsuf al-Qardhawi, it can be considered usury if everything contains an additional amount that exceeds the original amount without exception. At the same time, Ahmad Hassan's usury only occurs in matters of borrowing and lending. Apart from that, something where there is an excess in an amount is not included in usury.
Yusuf Al-Qardhawi's Hermeneutics: An Alternative Moderate Reading of Qur'an Anas, Ahmad
مجلة النور الدولية للقرآن والحديث مجلد 2 عدد 2 (2024): AIJQH - November
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v2i2.49

Abstract

Contemporary approaches to Qur'anic interpretation have often been criticized for their perceived excesses and controversial methodologies. This research explores al-Qardhawi’s concept of Qur'anic hermeneutics as an alternative method for a balanced and moderate approach to contemporary Qur'anic reading. Al-Qardhawi’s methodology integrates textual, socio-historical, and contextual approaches with modern scientific disciplines, providing interpretive flexibility that remains rooted in maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah while preserving the authority of the Qur'anic text. This study employs a descriptive qualitative methodology, analyzing al-Qardhawi’s hermeneutical concepts through his primary works, supported by secondary sources such as books and journal articles. The findings reveal that the Qur'anic text must be interpreted in alignment with the linguistic norms of its revelation, employing a linguistic approach alongside careful consideration of siyāq (context). Maqāṣid serves as a crucial instrument to validate the meanings of verses and contextualize them for contemporary realities. While the socio-historical approach is significant, al-Qardhawi maintains that the universality of Qur'anic lafāẓ (expressions) transcends the context of revelation and remains applicable to subsequent circumstances. Integration with various scientific disciplines is deemed essential for meaningful interpretation. Additionally, the insights of the Ṣaḥābah (Companions) and early scholars are valuable for comparing and reinforcing interpretative understanding.
Intertextuality in Tafsīr al-Jāmi‘ li Ahkām al-Qur’ān by al-Qurṭubī Wara, Jullul; Ahmadi, Ahmadi; Marsaton, Lukman
مجلة النور الدولية للقرآن والحديث مجلد 2 عدد 2 (2024): AIJQH - November
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v2i2.52

Abstract

This study critically examines the intertextual patterns in Tafsīr al-Jāmi‘ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān by al-Qurṭubī, focusing on its relationship with earlier works, particularly Aḥkām al-Qur’ān by Ibn al-‘Arabī. Intertextuality in this context refers to external influences and connections between texts, exploring how al-Qurṭubī engaged with, borrowed from, and elaborated on previous tafsīr literature. The research employs a descriptive-analytical method grounded in Julia Kristeva’s intertextual theory and is conducted through library research. The findings reveal distinct intertextual patterns, with the most prominent expansion pattern. This pattern involves quoting source texts and enriching them through elaboration and additional reasoning, demonstrating al-Qurṭubī’s intellectual engagement and methodological rigor. These results highlight the dynamic interplay between tradition and originality in al-Qurṭubī’s work, offering new insights into the intertextual practices in classical Islamic scholarship.
The Meaning of al-Maysir from the Perspective of Middle Eastern Mufasirs and Its Contex: English Maliha, Dewi; Alhusna, Mahdalina Nanda
مجلة النور الدولية للقرآن والحديث مجلد 2 عدد 2 (2024): AIJQH - November
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v2i2.53

Abstract

This paper examines the perspectives of Sayyid Quṭb, Aḥmad Muṣṭafā al-Marāghī, Muḥammad ‘Abduh, and Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī regarding the meaning of al-maysir and its contextualization in contemporary settings. The study stems from the issue of modern prize-based draws, which share characteristics with the concept of al-maysir. The research aims to present a balanced interpretation to address these challenges. It explores the relationship between prize-based draws and al-maysir as outlined in Surah al-Baqarah [2]: 219 and Surah al-Mā’idah [5]: 90-91. A thematic tafsir approach is employed to capture the exegetical views, gathering related verses under a single theme for comprehensive analysis. The findings indicate that, according to Sayyid Quṭb, Aḥmad Muṣṭafā al-Marāghī, Muḥammad ‘Abduh, and Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī, not all forms of prize-based draws are deemed haram from a Quranic perspective. As technology has evolved, prize-based draws manifest in various forms, offline and online. The study concludes that draws associated with al-maysir—particularly those involving betting, fostering enmity, or causing negligence of religious duties—are impermissible. Among these exegetes, only Muḥammad ‘Abduh, in Tafsir al-Manār, specifically discusses maysir al-yanāṣīb, or lottery gambling, which closely resembles modern prize-based draws. Although contemporary draws may occur without direct interaction and may seem less prone to causing animosity compared to pre-Islamic gambling practices, they still involve elements of gambling as they represent the unjust acquisition of wealth without legitimate exchange or benefit.
Al-Uslūbiyyah fī Āyāti al-Ta‘ajjub fī al-Qur’ān al-Karīm Nur Kholis; Said, Imam Ghazali; Muayyad, Shobikul
مجلة النور الدولية للقرآن والحديث مجلد 2 عدد 2 (2024): AIJQH - November
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v2i2.64

Abstract

تناقش هذه الدراسة الآيات المتعلقة بالتعجب الواردة في القرآن الكريم. بما أن القرآن هو كتاب مقدس يتمتع بأدب رفيع، فإن دراسة القرآن تتطلب منهجًا لغويًا، وفي هذه الحالة، الأسلوبية. يمتلك القرآن الكريم مجموعة متنوعة من الأساليب اللغوية في التعبير عن معنى التعجب. في الواقع، إذا كان التعبير عن جملة التعجب يعتمد فقط على صيغة التعجب مثل "ما أفعل" و "فعل به"، فإن الأدب اللغوي للقرآن لا يتم الوصول إليه بشكل كامل. تتمثل مزايا دراسة أسلوب التعجب في الكتاب المقدس للقرآن الكريم في عدة نقاط. أولًا، يعكس القرآن الله بكل مخلوقاته التي لها مكانة تستحق الإعجاب. ثانيًا، يعد دليلاً على أن القرآن يمتلك أدبًا لغويًا ديناميكيًا، وليس ثابتًا. ثالثًا، هو دليل على أن القرآن يحتوي على أوصاف متعددة في طرق التعبير - في هذه الحالة - التي تظهر معنى التعجب، وفي نفس الوقت يجب أن يتم فهم معنى التعجب بشكل غير موحد، بل من المهم أيضًا الانتباه إلى سياق الجملة.
The Orthographic Identity of Rasm ʿUthmānī in the Qur’an: Tracing Substitution, Hamzah, and Word Structure Nada, Tsania Qothrun; Faizah, Siti Nur; Azzahra, Sinta Nuriyah
An-Nur International Journal of The Quran & Hadith Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJQH - May
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v3i1.79

Abstract

This study explores the orthographic characteristics of Rasm Uthmānī, the codified Qur’anic script established during the caliphate of ʿUthmān ibn ʿAffān, focusing on three core features: al-Badl (letter substitution), Ahkām al-Hamzāt (rules governing the glottal stop), and al-Faṣl wa al-Waṣl (word separation and conjunction). Using a descriptive-linguistic and historical-contextual approach, the research analyzes how these features differ from modern Arabic orthography and how they accommodate phonetic diversity, syntactic fluidity, and theological nuance. The findings reveal that the Uthmānī script’s allowance for phonological variation and orthographic flexibility facilitates the preservation of multiple qirāʾāt without compromising semantic clarity. This integrative system enables the faithful transmission of the Qur’an’s oral and written dimensions across generations. The study concludes that Rasm Uthmānī serves not only as a static textual representation but also as a dynamic tool for interpreting the linguistic and theological foundations of the Qur’anic message. Its continued relevance in pedagogical and scholarly contexts underscores the enduring significance of early Islamic textual engineering.
The Prophetic Sunnah Between Revelation and Ijtihād: A Contextual Reassessment for Contemporary Islamic Legal Thought Qomariya, Nurul
An-Nur International Journal of The Quran & Hadith Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJQH - May
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v3i1.80

Abstract

The Prophetic Sunnah occupies a central position in Islamic jurisprudence as a source of divine guidance and ethical instruction. This study critically examines the dual nature of the Sunnah, exploring whether it is entirely divinely revealed or if it includes elements of the Prophet Muhammad’s independent reasoning (ijtihād). Employing a qualitative, library-based approach grounded in usul al-fiqh, the research analyzes key Hadiths through historical and functional lenses. It distinguishes between the Prophet’s legislative actions (Sunnah tashrīʿiyyah) and those shaped by his socio-political roles (Sunnah ghayr tashrīʿiyyah), demonstrating how contextual interpretation reveals the adaptive dimensions of prophetic practice. The methodology integrates textual analysis, juristic classification, and contextual reading of Hadith, enabling a clearer understanding of how the Prophet’s roles—as messenger, leader, judge, and individual—influence the legal authority of his sayings and actions. Findings highlight that while certain Prophetic acts were divinely mandated and universally binding, others were contingent on specific historical contexts and were open to divine correction or refinement. This study argues that contextual interpretation of Hadith, coupled with the differentiation between universal and particular Sunnah, strengthens the responsiveness of Islamic law in contemporary pluralistic societies. By aligning legal rulings with the overarching objectives of Sharia (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah), such as justice, welfare, and public interest, scholars can ensure the relevance and vitality of Islamic legal thought in addressing modern challenges. Ultimately, this approach preserves the integrity of the Sunnah while promoting a jurisprudence that is both rooted and reform-oriented
When Every Word Matters: Al-Samarra’i’s Rhetorical Exegesis and the Architecture of Meaning Ahmadi, Ahmadi
An-Nur International Journal of The Quran & Hadith Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJQH - May
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v3i1.81

Abstract

This study examines the contribution of Fādil Al-Samarra’i to modern Qur’anic exegesis through his application of Manhaj Bayani, a rhetorical-linguistic method that highlights the Qur’an’s stylistic and semantic intricacies. Beginning with the theoretical framework developed by scholars such as Amin al-Khuli and Bint al-Shati’, Al-Samarra’i extends the approach by integrating philological analysis, rhetorical devices, and contextual sensitivity into his interpretive model. Methodologically, this research adopts a qualitative-textual analysis of Al-Samarra’i’s work Ala Tariq al-Tafsir al-Bayani, drawing on both primary and secondary sources. The analysis focuses on features such as contextual reading (siyāq), semantic differentiation (e.g., aʿṭā vs ātā), and structural cohesion through literary devices like repetition and parallelism. The findings reveal that Al-Samarra’i’s method effectively uncovers layered meanings and theological implications embedded in the Qur’anic language. While his approach excels in rhetorically rich texts, its applicability to more straightforward or legalistic verses may be limited. Nonetheless, his work significantly revitalizes classical tafsir by aligning it with the demands of contemporary discourse. The study affirms the continued importance of linguistic and rhetorical analysis as essential tools for understanding the Qur’an’s spiritual, moral, and communicative depth.
Reclaiming Justice: Abu Zayd’s Contextual Hermeneutics and the Political Ethics of the Qur’an Rozaq, Abdur; Mubarok, Hadziq; Marom, Moh Asnal; Ramadhan, Fauzy
An-Nur International Journal of The Quran & Hadith Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJQH - May
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v3i1.82

Abstract

This paper applies Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd’s contextual hermeneutics to four Qur’anic verses often invoked in Islamic political discourse: QS. al-Nisā’ [4]:59, QS. al-Baqarah [2]:30, QS. al-Shūrā [42]:38, and QS. al-Mā’idah [5]:44. Traditional interpretations have frequently endorsed literal and authoritarian readings, framing obedience, governance, and divine law as rigid imperatives. By engaging Abu Zayd’s concept of tārīkhiyyat al-dalālah (the historicity of meaning), this study reinterprets these verses through their socio-historical contexts and ethical substance. The analysis finds that each verse contains dynamic ethical imperatives: conditional obedience, ecological stewardship, participatory governance, and values-based jurisprudence. Abu Zayd’s methodology reframes Islamic political thought as a field grounded not in legal absolutism, but in moral dialogue. This approach supports a pluralistic, just, and context-sensitive reading of the Qur’an, offering new possibilities for integrating Islamic teachings with contemporary values of justice, human rights, and ethical leadership
Islam as a Universal Ethical Consciousness: An Analysis of Muhammad Asad’s Interpretation of al-Islām Wara, Jullul; Alhusna, Alya Nida; Maramy, Farah
An-Nur International Journal of The Quran & Hadith Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJQH - May
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijqh.v3i1.84

Abstract

This article explores Muhammad Asad’s interpretation of al-Islām through a critical analysis of his exegetical work The Message of the Qur’an. The study aims to examine how Asad departs from traditional interpretations by redefining al-Islām not as a rigid ideological construct but as a moral and spiritual disposition grounded in surrender to God. The research employs a descriptive-analytical method using linguistic-semantic analysis and historical-contextual approaches. Methodologically, the study focuses on Asad’s interpretation of key Qur’anic terms such as Islam, Muslim, and salām, analyzing their semantic fields and ethical implications. The results demonstrate that Asad views Islam as a universal path grounded in moral responsibility, extending beyond confessional boundaries. He contrasts with classical scholars like Ibn Kathir and Fakhruddin Razi by emphasizing ethical universality over exclusivist dogma. The findings suggest that Asad’s inclusive approach contributes to religious pluralism, interfaith dialogue, and the redefinition of Muslim identity in multicultural societies. His interpretation reclaims the Qur’an’s original moral intent, offering a framework that integrates Islamic teachings with contemporary values. Ultimately, the study concludes that Asad’s hermeneutics position Islam as a dynamic ethical system capable of addressing modern social realities while remaining faithful to its spiritual core.

Page 2 of 4 | Total Record : 35

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJQH - May Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): AIJQH - November مجلد 2 عدد 2 (2024): AIJQH - November Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): AIJQH - May مجلد 2 عدد 1 (2024): AIJQH - May مجلد 1 عدد 1 (2023): نوفمبر Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): AIJQH-November