cover
Contact Name
Wahid Fathoni
Contact Email
wafathoni@umy.ac.id
Phone
+628872339336
Journal Mail Official
wafathoni@umy.ac.id
Editorial Address
Office: E5 Building, 2nd Floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Adreess : Brawijaya Street, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, DIY, Indonesia
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Media of Law and Sharia
ISSN : 27211967     EISSN : 27162192     DOI : https://doi.org/10.18196/mls
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
The scope of the writings published in the journal Media of law and Sharia covers all aspects of positive law, including sharia law in Indonesia: Criminal Law This scope contains regulations that determine what actions are prohibited and are included in criminal acts, as well as determine what penalties can be imposed on those who commit them. Civil Law Studying humans as subjects in law, laws that arise from kinship, the law relating to the valuation of money/wealth and inheritance law. Constitutional Law Examine the ins and outs of the birth of the state, concepts and theories of sovereignty and state power, and the system and governance of the state and government, including examining the pattern of power-sharing and the formation of state equipment. State Administrative Law Picturing the system of governance, actions and behavior of officials or state administrative bodies in carrying out their duties and responsibilities, including the consequences and solutions for resolving administrative and state administrative disputes. Laws and Regulations Reviewing the system for the formation of laws and regulations from understanding basic principles or formal material principles. Definition and types of legal norms, the types and legal implications of the hierarchy of laws and regulations, the mechanism for the formation of laws and regulations, and how the system and mechanism for testing legislation.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 63 Documents
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Cacat Prosedur dalam Akta RUPS Luar Biasa: Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Yunita, Sahera; Ferdi; Misnar Syam
Media of Law and Sharia Vol. 6 No. 4: September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/mls.v6i4.440

Abstract

Indonesia’s national economy is developed on the foundation of economic democracy and the principle of the rule of law, which ensures certainty, order, and legal protection. Within the corporate sphere, the Limited Liability Company (Perseroan Terbatas/ PT) recognizes the General Meeting of Shareholders (Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham/ RUPS) as its highest organ with strategic authority, where every resolution must be formalized in an authentic deed prepared by a notary. Such deeds serve a crucial role in providing legal certainty and preventing potential disputes. However, practice reveals recurring problems in which RUPS deeds are drawn up without complying with legal procedures, thereby triggering conflicts and causing harm to shareholders. This issue is evident in the Padang District Court Decision No. 10/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Pdg and the Medan High Court Decision No. 315/Pdt/2021/PT MDN. This study aims to examine the notary’s liability in drafting procedurally defective RUPS deeds and to analyze the legal consequences arising from these judicial decisions. The research employs a normative juridical approach with a descriptive character, combining statutory analysis (statute approach) with conceptual analysis (conceptual approach). The data are derived from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, which are then qualitatively analyzed. The findings demonstrate that notaries in both cases failed to properly observe the principle of prudence, resulting in the deeds being declared invalid or null and void. In the Padang case, the court ordered restitutio in integrum by restoring the plaintiff’s legal position, while in the Medan case, the ruling was limited to annulment of the deed without explicit restitution. These outcomes affirm that notarial responsibility extends beyond formal or administrative duties, encompassing substantive obligations to uphold legal certainty and protect shareholders’ rights.
Tanggung Jawab Influencer dalam Iklan Endorsement: Perspektif Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Hasna, Nabila; Yunita, Ani
Media of Law and Sharia Vol. 6 No. 4: September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/mls.v6i4.441

Abstract

New Media is a term defined modern advertising emerge from technological development, one of them is endorsement. Endorsement brings negative effects beside its advantages such as massive spread of misinformation which led to consumer’s loss. There is no specific regulation organized endorsement practices in Indonesia. This empirical study aims to analyse available legal protection of consumers, and to identify the legal remedies to hold parties accountable. The results shows that both preventive and repressive legal protection is embedded in various legal instruments. These instruments regulate business actors’ obligations, prohibit misleading practices, and establish standards of advertising. Influencers may comply with these provisions by conduct double checking procedures and ensure that advertisement is aligned to legal standards. Repressive legal protection is also provided under the same legislative framework, which sets out the liability of business actors and prescribes administrative and criminal sanctions for violations. In seeking redress, consumers may pursue non-litigation mechanisms by lodging complaints to influencers, business actors, or relevant authorities such as Komdigi, BPOM, BPKN, BPSK, or LPKSM. If the non-litigation mechanism does not work out, consumers may pursue litigation mechanism by filing lawsuits in courts within their domicile
Discursive Contestations Beyond Parliament Shaping Indonesia’s Sexual Violence Criminal Bill: Dynamics, Actors, and Legitimacy Fajar, Habib Ferian; Semadaria, Kharisma Ratuprima; Wicaksono, Rifki Alfian; Meryadinata, Geofani Lingga; Latuconsina, Naimah; Akbar, M. Fabian
Media of Law and Sharia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/mls.v7i1.451

Abstract

Law Number 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (TPKS Law) emerged as a response to the increasing number of sexual violence cases and the inadequacy of previous legal frameworks in providing justice and protection for victims. The enactment of this law signifies the urgency of ensuring legal certainty grounded in justice, public benefit, and respect for human rights. This study examines the debate and the state’s response during the legislative process, reflecting the tension between human rights and religious morality paradigms. It highlights three main aspects: the role and interaction of various actors in shaping the debate, the construction of morality and human rights within the socio-political framework, and the juridical-political significance of the TPKS Law in forming responsive legal norms. Using a normative legal approach and theoretical analysis, the findings show that the law represents a convergence between human rights and religious morality, producing a compromise between legal and political interests. This dynamic marks a transition from repressive to responsive lawmaking, emphasizing civil society participation and legislative commitment. Ultimately, the TPKS Law stands as both a legal achievement and a product of political contestation that strengthens victim protection and upholds human dignity.