cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Rizky Mahaputra
Contact Email
greenation.info@gmail.com
Phone
+6281210467572
Journal Mail Official
greenation.info@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Kapten. A. Hasan, Telanaipura, Kota Jambi, Jambi 36361, Indonesia
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Published by Greenation Research
ISSN : 29863856     EISSN : 29863155     DOI : https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (GIJLSS) is a journal that uses a blind peer-review model that can be accessed online. GIJLSS aims to publish a journal containing quality articles that will be able to contribute thoughts from theoretical and empirical perspectives for the advancement of technology and education. The writings on GIJLSS will make a significant contribution to critical thinking in the scientific field in general, particularly in the fields of Law and Social Sciences.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 85 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
The Authority of the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS) to File Bankruptcy Petitions Against Controlling Shareholders of Non-Systemic Failed Banks Napitupulu, Diana R.W.
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v3i4.698

Abstract

This article examines the legal authority of the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan/LPS) to file bankruptcy petitions against controlling shareholders of non-systemic failed banks. The issue arises from the need to recover state funds used in bank resolution while simultaneously upholding fundamental principles of corporate and insolvency law, particularly limited liability and legal certainty. Using normative juridical research, this study analyzes statutory provisions governing deposit insurance, banking supervision, and bankruptcy, complemented by doctrinal analysis and relevant legal principles in financial regulation. The article argues that the authority of LPS to initiate bankruptcy proceedings against controlling shareholders constitutes a special legal mechanism that departs from the general concept of shareholder immunity. Such authority is designed to prevent moral hazard, ensure accountability of bank owners, and protect public interests embedded in the stability of the financial system. In the context of non-systemic failed banks, this mechanism reflects a policy choice to prioritize efficient recovery of resolution costs without triggering broader systemic risk. However, the exercise of this authority raises several legal challenges. First, ambiguities remain regarding the scope and limits of LPS’s standing before the Commercial Court, particularly in establishing a direct causal link between the actions of controlling shareholders and the bank’s failure. Second, the interaction between the LPS Law and the general Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Law creates potential tensions concerning procedural safeguards and the principle of due process. Third, inconsistent interpretation of shareholder liability may undermine predictability in judicial practice. This article concludes that while the authority of LPS to file bankruptcy petitions against controlling shareholders of non-systemic failed banks is legally justifiable as a lex specialis regime, its implementation requires clearer statutory standards and more consistent judicial interpretation. Strengthening these aspects is essential to balance public financial protection with the rule of law and shareholder rights.
Legal Protection for Land Rights Holders in The Context of Land Registration in Indonesia Ardiansyah, M. Filusi; Darwati
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v3i4.703

Abstract

Land registration is commonly regarded as a central instrument for achieving legal certainty in land administration. Through registration, land rights are formally recorded and recognized by the state, providing an administrative framework intended to prevent disputes and to clarify ownership and control over land. In practice, however, an excessive emphasis on administrative registration may narrow the scope of legal protection by equating protection solely with registration status. This approach risks marginalizing land rights that arise from substantive legal relations existing prior to, or outside of, formal registration procedures. In the Indonesian context, land rights may originate from various sources, including long-standing possession, contractual arrangements, inheritance, and recognition under customary law. These rights often develop through social and legal processes that are not immediately reflected in administrative records. When legal protection is defined primarily through registration, the protective function of land law may shift from safeguarding legitimate rights to enforcing procedural compliance. This situation creates tension between legal certainty as an administrative objective and substantive justice as a normative principle. This article examines legal protection for land rights holders within the context of Indonesia’s land registration system by analyzing the relationship between administrative procedures and substantive land rights. Using a normative juridical research method, the study evaluates statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and judicial approaches to assess whether land registration adequately fulfills its protective function. The analysis demonstrates that legal protection should not be confined to registered land alone, but must extend to substantively valid rights that exist beyond formal records. The article argues for a balanced approach in which land registration operates as an administrative instrument that strengthens, rather than restricts, the protection of land rights holders, thereby ensuring that legal certainty and substantive justice are harmonized within Indonesia’s agrarian legal framework.
Legal Protection for Land Rights Holders Beyond Administrative Registration: Re-Examining The Declarative Function of Land Registration in Indonesia Ardiansyah, M. Filusi; Darwati
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v3i4.704

Abstract

Land registration has long been positioned as a central mechanism for achieving legal certainty within land administration systems. In Indonesia, registration is formally designed to function as a declarative mechanism that records and publicizes existing land rights, thereby supporting administrative order and evidentiary clarity. Nevertheless, in legal practice, land registration is increasingly treated as a decisive factor that determines the existence and enforceability of land rights. This shift reflects a tendency to equate legal protection with administrative registration status, rather than with the substantive legitimacy of land relations. This article examines legal protection for land rights holders beyond administrative registration by re-examining the declarative function of land registration in Indonesia. Using a normative juridical research method, the study analyzes statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and judicial reasoning to assess how far registration has departed from its intended evidentiary role. The analysis demonstrates that substantive land rights may arise independently of registration through possession, contractual relations, inheritance, and recognition under customary law. When registration is elevated to a quasi-constitutive status, these rights risk marginalization despite their legal legitimacy. The article argues that effective legal protection requires a clear distinction between the existence of land rights and the administrative mechanisms used to evidence them. Land registration should operate as a supportive instrument that strengthens legal certainty without excluding substantively valid rights. By reaffirming the declarative function of registration, Indonesia’s land administration system can better harmonize administrative certainty with substantive justice and ensure more inclusive protection for land rights holders.
Judicial Interpretation of Land Registration and Legal Protection in Indonesia Between Administrative Evidence and Substantive Justice Ardiansyah, M. Filusi; Santiago, Faisal
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v3i4.705

Abstract

Land registration plays a central role in Indonesia’s land administration system and is widely regarded as a primary instrument for achieving legal certainty. In judicial practice, however, land registration does not function merely as an administrative record but also as a crucial element in evidentiary assessment during land dispute resolution. Courts are frequently required to interpret the legal status of registered land certificates in relation to substantive land rights that may arise from possession, inheritance, contractual relations, or customary law, placing judicial interpretation at the intersection between administrative certainty and substantive justice. This article examines how Indonesian courts interpret land registration within the broader framework of legal protection for land rights holders. Using a normative juridical research method, the study analyzes statutory regulations governing land registration, legal doctrines concerning declarative and constitutive registration systems, and selected judicial decisions in land dispute cases. The analysis focuses on the manner in which judges balance the evidentiary value of land certificates with proof of substantive land relations. The findings demonstrate that Indonesian courts do not consistently treat land registration as absolute or conclusive proof of rights. While land certificates are generally regarded as strong administrative evidence, judicial reasoning often allows for recognition of substantively valid rights that predate or exist independently of registration. This approach reflects an implicit acknowledgment of the declarative nature of land registration, even when administrative practice tends toward formalism. The article argues that judicial interpretation plays a decisive role in preserving the protective function of land law by preventing administrative formalism from overriding substantive justice. Strengthening this interpretative approach is essential to ensure that land registration supports legal certainty without marginalizing legitimate land rights within Indonesia’s pluralistic agrarian legal framework.
From The Podium To Social Media: The Evolution Of Islamic Da'wah In The Digital Era Yus, Yumaira; Maseleno, Andino
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v3i4.708

Abstract

The rapid advancement of communication technology has significantly transformed the practice of Islamic da’wah, shifting its delivery from traditional podium-based methods to digital and social media platforms. This paper examines the evolution of Islamic da’wah in the digital era, highlighting the opportunities, challenges, and strategic adaptations required to maintain its effectiveness and ethical foundations. Using a descriptive qualitative methodology with a library research approach, this study analyzes books, scholarly articles, and contemporary research related to digital da’wah. The findings indicate that social media platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok have expanded the reach of da’wah beyond spatial and temporal limitations, enabling interactive, multimedia, and audience-centered communication. Digital da’wah offers positive impacts, including broader accessibility, two-way interaction, and diverse content formats that appeal particularly to younger generations. However, it also presents challenges such as misinformation, commercialization, algorithm-driven content simplification, and declining digital ethics. Therefore, effective digital da’wah requires strong digital literacy, credible and verified content, ethical communication, sincere intentions, and collaboration among scholars, institutions, and policymakers. The study concludes that while social media is a powerful tool for contemporary da’wah, its success depends on balancing technological innovation with Islamic values and moral responsibility.

Page 9 of 9 | Total Record : 85

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March 202 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (June 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March 202 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (June 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (March 202 Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (December Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September More Issue