cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Akbar Narum
Contact Email
akbar.nasrum@gmail.com
Phone
+6282293685122
Journal Mail Official
pengelolajme@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Pemuda No. 339, Kab. Kolaka, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
Location
Kab. kolaka,
Sulawesi tenggara
INDONESIA
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)
Published by Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
ISSN : 25282468     EISSN : 25282026     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31327/jomedu
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
The Journal of Mathematics Education (JME) aims to serve as a scientific platform for researchers, practitioners, and educators in the field of mathematics education to publish their original research. JME welcomes contributions that advance theory, practice, and policy in mathematics education across all educational levels. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: Teaching and learning of mathematics Mathematics curriculum development Technology in mathematics education Mathematics teacher education Assessment and evaluation in mathematics education Systematic literature reviews Bibliometric analyses related to mathematics education The journal accepts quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods approaches relevant to these topics.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 150 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
EFECTIVITY OF CONTEXTUAL LEARNING TOWARDS MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF THE 7 TH GRADE OF SMPN 2 KOLAKA Ahmad Rustam; Andi Lilis Handayani
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i1.269

Abstract

This study was a quasi experimental research with the aim to know the effectiveness of contextual learning in kolaka city to the skills of mathematical communication. Population in this research was all student of class VII SMP Negeri 2 Kolaka Academic Year 2015/2016. To avoid a large bias in the determination of research samples, the researchers conducted several stages i.e. firstly to test homogeneity against the groups that had formed in the population. After that, took two classes of control and experiment group. Data collection techniques applied tests and observations. Data analysis techniques used descriptive statistics using data centering and data dissemination, then inferential statistics using Independent t-test. The results of descriptive research indicated that the mathematical communication skills of the students taught by using contextual learning of kolaka city consisting of 24 students showed the average value of 71.18 while students who were taught with conventional learning consisting of 27 students showed the mean value of 60.34. Furthermore, the results of inferential statistical analysis of hypothesis testing by using t-test obtained tcount as much as (2.03658)> ttabel (1.67655), indicating that H0 was rejected and H1 was accepted, meant that there was a significant difference between the mathematical communication skills of the students who are taught with contextual learning of kolaka city and conventional learning on the 7th grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Kolaka. From the result of this research, it can be concluded that the mathematical communication skills of the students who are taught by contextual learning of kolaka city is more effective than mathematical communication skills of the students taught by conventional learning in class VII SMP Negeri 2 Kolaka.
ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENTS’ GEOMETRIC REASONING ABILITY Andi Mariani Ramlan; Sri Muliana Ramlan
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i1.250

Abstract

This research was a descriptive research with quantitative approach that aimed to analyze or describe the geometric reasoning ability of SMA Negeri 1 Wundulako students in solving mathematical problems related to the building of the three dimensions. Indicators used to describe students' geometric reasoning abilities include visualization, analysis, abstraction, and formal deduction. Data collection techniques consisted of interviews to deepen information about students 'geometric reasoning abilities and written tests to get an idea of students' cognitive abilities. Subjects in this study, namely students class XI.IA SMA Negeri 1 Wundulako as many as 40 students who have studied three dimensional materials. Data analysis in this research used descriptive analysis. Based on the data analysis obtained average value of 49.86, median 53.33, mode 66.67. The standard deviation was obtained at 22.39, it showed that there was a considerable difference of value between the students who mean in high ability category with the average of 91,11, medium ability category equal to 66,27, and low ability equal to 31,82 , With minimum value is 3.33 and maximum 93,33. In general, based on descriptive analysis, the geometric reasoning ability of SMA Negeri 1 Wundulako students was still low.
INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF THE MATHEMATICS TEST INSTRUMENT AT JUNIOR SCHOOL Destiniar Destiniar
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i1.252

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to know whether or not there was difference of interrater reliability coefficient about mathematics test which evaluated by 18 raters and 12 raters and analyzed using Fleiss Kappa method. Rater in this study as many as 60 people consisting of 20 mathematics teachers of the Junior School (SMP ), 20 lecturers of Mathematics Education, and 20 lecturers of FMIPA mathematics. Instruments assessed in the form of mathematical test instrument for class IX with a simple multiple choices. The reserach method used in the form of experimental methods and data obtained were analyzed by using t-test. The result obtained there was difference of interrater reliability coefficient about mathematics test which assessed by 18 raters and 12 raters. The interateral reliability coefficient of the class IX mathematics test analyzed using the Fleiss Kappa method and rated by 18 raters was higher than that assessed by 12 raters.
THE DIFFERENCE OF LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL APPLIED ON THE GRADE VIII STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 1 KOLAKA Supratman Supratman; St. Rahma
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v2i1.288

Abstract

The design of this research was experiment and aimed to know whether there was difference of learning result of mathematics between students taught by using cooperative learning model type TSTS, NHT, and STAD. The population in this study was all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Kolaka academic year 2015/2016 while the sample taken was by Cluster Random Sampling technique. Techniques of collecting data used test and observation technique. To get a representative test, the validity and reliability test were conducted. The data obtained were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity test, and One Way Anova test. From the analysis result, it was found that the initial analysis for normality test at 5% level (n = 26) obtained Dtabel = 0,264 while Dcount = 0.0975 (experiment class I) Dcount = 0.1668 (experiment class II) and Dcount = 0.1451 (control class), Because Dcount < Dtable then H0 was accepted so the data was normally distributed. For homogeneity test at 5% level (n = 78) obtained F (0.05, 2, 75)= 3.12 and L = 2.364 Since L < Ftable then H0 was accepted so the data was homogeneous. With One Way Anova test obtained Fcount = 13.427 and at 5% level obtained (2:75) Ftable = 3.12 for Fcount > Ftable then H1 was accepted so there were differences in learning outcomes between students taught using cooperative learning model type TSTS, NHTand STAD. Since H1 was accepted then a further test was conducted using scheffe t test. At level of 5% (dk = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 5.181. Because tcount > ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning taught by model of cooperative learning type TSTS was better than mean result of cooperativelearning type STAD. At 5% level (df = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 2.6429. Because tcount > ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning taught by model of cooperative learning type NHT was better than cooperative learning type STAD. At level 5% (df = 50) obtained ttable = 2.0085 and tcount = 2.5387. Because tcount > ttable then H1 was accepted so the mean result of students' mathematics learning which was taught by cooperative learning model of TSTS type was better than mean of mathematics learning result of student taught by NHT type.
DESCRIBE REASONING OF STUDENTS IN COMPLETING THREE DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM-SOLVING Nisraeni Nisraeni; Dwi Risky Arifanti
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.526

Abstract

This study aims to describe reasoning by highly capable subjects (ST), medium?impacted subjects (SS), and low-ability subjects (SR) in completing three-dimensional problem-solving tasks. This research is a qualitative descriptive research. Instruments in this study are researchers as the main instrument guided by the task of solving problems Mathematics and interview guidelines are valid. The subjects of this study were students of class XI IPA C consisting of 3 people (high-ability subject (ST), medium-skilled subjects (SS), and low-ability subjects (SR)). The research process follows the steps of: (a) formulating the reasoning indicator in solving Mathematics problem, (b) formulating the supporting instrument (valid problem solving task of Mathematics and interviewing), (c) did research subject taking, (d) perform data retrieval to uncover students' reasoning in Mathematical problem solving, (e) do triangulation techniques to obtain valid data (f) perform analysis of student reasoning data in problem solving, (g) conduct discussion of result of analysis, (h) make a conclusion of research result. The results of a highly capable subject study show: 1) in understanding the problem using inductive reasoning type analogies, 2) planning completion using inductive reasoning, 3) carrying out the settlement plan using inductive and deductive reasoning, 4) re-examining using common procedures. While for the subject of moderate ability and low-ability subjects in solving problems only meet one reasoning indicator that is filed allegations (inductive type of analogy) is at the stage of understanding the problem. By looking at the students' abilities teachers need to provide non-routine questions so that students are better trained in reasoning and able to develop students' communication skills both in the learning process and in the community environment.
COMPARISON OF LEARNING MATH LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS WITH SAVI MODEL AND NHT MODEL ON STUDENT SMKN 1 KOLAKA Supratman Supratman; Sri Wulandari Muhlis
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.495

Abstract

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of ttest analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t <t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of studentswho were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.
SELF ASSESSMENT TO KNOW UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATIC CONCEPT Deni Iriyadi
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.525

Abstract

This research is a qualitative study aimed to determine the students' understanding of the concept of matter limit. The subjects were students of class XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Watampone. The concept includes the definition of the limit. Data obtained using a research instrument in the form of self-assessment and then proceed with the interview subjects were selected based on the results of self-assessment has been done before. Analysis using qualitative analysis of students' understanding of the concept of the limit concept. The results of this study indicate that students' understanding of concepts some of which are not / do not understand especially regarding definitions limit. In addition students are also wrong about the resolution limit. Students who understand the concept of limit dinyakatakan them restate concepts, including examples and classify the sample to non-completion of function and limit the right results.
INCREASED MOTIVATION AND RESULTS OF STUDENT MATH LEARNING THROUGH REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION Wiwin Rita Sari; Siti Mutmainah
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i1.479

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the increase motivation and results of students' mathematics learning through Realistic mathematics Education approach. The study was conducted at VIII A grade students of SMP Ma'arif 01 Seputih Raman Central Lampung in geometry material. This type of research is classroom action research. The research was conducted during two cycles with each cycle consisting of the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Instruments used include questionnaires motivation to learn mathematics, observation sheets, and assessment test. Data analysis techniques using descriptive quantitative analysis obtained by converting scores into qualitative criteria. Results from this study are the increased motivation to learn mathematics students from pre-cycle to the second cycle. The result of Student Mathematics learning also increased successively from the pretest to the second cycle average of 62.88 students' mathematics learning outcomes; 76.82; and 81.36. Classical completeness obtained was 72.7%. In general implementation of learning by applying Realistic Mathematics Education approach can improve motivation and results of students' mathematics learning.
The Effect of I-CARE Learning Model on the Students' Metacognition Mamik Suendarti; Hawa Liberna
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.439

Abstract

The general objective of this study was to find and analyze empirically the effect of the I Care learning model on the students' metacognition. The method used in this research was the experimental method. The affordable population in this study was grade X students of SMK Assyafiah which is located at Jalan Bukit Duri No.29, South Jakarta 2016/2017 academic year. The sample of the study was 60 students obtained through random sampling method that the researcher mixed in the population so that all subjects were considered the same. Data collection was done by documentation techniques (learning model variables) and test techniques (student metacognition variables). The collected data was then analyzed using the t-test. Before the data was analyzed, first descriptive statistical analysis and data requirements test (normality test, homogeneity test) were carried out. The results of the study showed that there was an influence of the I Care learning model on the students' metacognition. In other words, students' metacognition who used the I Care learning model was higher than the students' metacognition who used constructivism learning model.
Effectiveness of STAD Cooperative Learning Model with LKS Help on Mathematical Learning Outcomes of Class VIII Students Istiqfar Istiqfar; Irma Magfirah
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v3i2.808

Abstract

The learning outcomes of mathematics are one of the benchmarks of the high and low quality of a mathematics learning process. This study aims to find out how the effectiveness of STAD type cooperative learning model with the help of worksheets on mathematics learning outcomes of class VIII students at MTs. Muhammadiyah Palleko in Takalar in 2014/2015 academic year. This research is quasi-experimental or quasi?experimental research. The instrument used in this study is the essay type learning test with a sample of 35 people, and the sampling technique used is saturated samples. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis. Based on the results of descriptive analysis obtained the average of the two groups, namely the experimental class before treatment (pre-test) of 59.16 and after the surgery of (posttest) 75.61, the average pre-test control class was 54.56, and the post test average is 58.25. Whereas based on the results of relative efficiency and inferential analysis it can be concluded that the STAD type of cooperative learning model with the help of LKS is effective in improving the mathematics learning outcomes of the eighth-grade students of MTs. Muhammadiyah Palleko District of Taylar.

Page 2 of 15 | Total Record : 150

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2016 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JME Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JME Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JME Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JME Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): JME Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): JME Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): JME Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): JME Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): JME Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): JME Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): JME Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): JME Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): JME Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): JME Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): JME Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): JME Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): JME More Issue