cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
lrrq@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lrrq@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Kec. Gn. Pati, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50229
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Law Research Review Quarterly
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27163415     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/snh
Core Subject : Education, Social,
The Law Research Review Quarterly has a history and rich vein of legal scholarship, especially for law student, combining distinct publication on the law of Indonesia, as well as Southeast Asia, and prominence within the Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang, with leading contributions to the discussion and shaping of law across the civil law world and further afield.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 255 Documents
The Development of the concept of unlawful act in a contemporary perspective Auliah Ambarwati; Berthon Jonathan; Aryoko Abdurrachman
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.63015

Abstract

The evolution of the doctrine of Unlawful Acts (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum/PMH) demonstrates increasingly complex dynamics within contemporary legal contexts. Rooted originally in the concept of onrechtmatige daad in Dutch civil law, this doctrine continues to evolve in response to demands for justice and the development of modern society. In Islamic economic law, the concept of PMH is connected to the principles of adl (justice) and maslahah (public interest), whereby an act is deemed unlawful not merely because it violates positive norms, but also because it contravenes moral and Sharia values. In contrast, within the common law system, PMH has its counterpart in the concept of tort, which emphasizes individual responsibility for the violation of others' rights through the principles of duty of care and negligence. Furthermore, the doctrine highlights third-party liability (third-party liability) in PMH, particularly when indirect involvement causes harm to others, such as through aiding and abetting or vicarious liability. Additionally, the doctrine of onrechtmatige overheidsdaad extends the scope of PMH to unlawful acts committed by those in power, affirming that the state too may be held accountable when its administrative actions or policies violate citizens' rights. Thus, contemporary PMH doctrine is no longer merely a civil law instrument, but rather has become a pillar of justice that balances legal accountability among individuals, corporate entities, and the state across various modern legal systems.
Bank Liability for Employees' Unlawful Acts in the Misuse of Land Rights Certificates as Credit Collateral LAELI NIKMATUL Hidayah; Ubaidillah Kamal
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.63023

Abstract

Banks as public trust institutions are not only responsible for the security of customer funds, but also for all documents and assets under their control, including land title certificates used as loan collateral. However, in practice, control of these documents has the potential to create loopholes for internal employees to act beyond their authority, as occurred at one of the PD. BPR BKK in Central Java. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of banks for unlawful acts of employees in the misuse of land title certificates as loan collateral, as well as the form of legal protection for certificate owners who are harmed. This study uses a normative legal research method through a literature study with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that banks can be held legally responsible based on the construction of Article 1365 in conjunction with Article 1365. Article 1367 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code through a functional interpretation of the phrase "in carrying out assigned work," which is reinforced by the institutional negligence of BPR in implementing the internal control system as required by POJK Number 9 of 2024. Legal protection for certificate owners is available preventively through POJK Number 22 of 2023 and POJK Number 9 of 2024, as well as repressively through civil lawsuits to the District Court and complaints to the OJK. This study concludes that it is necessary to strengthen regulations that specifically regulate protection mechanisms for customers in this dilemma in order to realize an accountable and fair banking system in accordance with the mandate of SDGs 16.
The Implementation of the Whistleblowing System in Supporting Good Corporate Governance at PT Angkasa Pura Indonesia Muhammad Faisal Ramadhan; Asmarani Ramli
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.63210

Abstract

The Whistleblowing System (WBS) is one of the instruments that supports the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). This research endeavors to examine the implementation of WBS in reinforcing GCG at the PT Angkasa Pura Indonesia Branch Office of Jenderal Ahmad Yani Airport Semarang, alongside the determinants influencing its efficacy. Utilizing an empirical juridical methodology (socio-legal research) within a qualitative framework, data acquisition was conducted through interviews with three employees, complemented by a comprehensive document analysis of pertinent statutory laws and regulations, internal company regulations, the Annual Report 2025, and relevant scientific literature. The results show that the implementation of WBS has been supported by internal regulations, clear division of authority, and reporting mechanisms that support GCG principles. However, its implementation still needs strengthening, especially in the socialization and understanding of employees about WBS and strengthening the reporting culture (speak-up culture). Based on Soerjono Soekanto's theory of legal effectiveness, the effectiveness of WBS is influenced by legal factors, law enforcement, facilities or facilities, society, and culture.
Exploring the Social and Cultural Realities of Dispute Resolution in Multicultural Societies: A Legal Anthropological Perspective Endriyani Lestari
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.63759

Abstract

From the perspective of legal anthropology, multicultural societies can be interpreted in two ways: positively and negatively. The phenomenon this paper seeks to study is how social conflicts or disputes can arise at any time, given their universal nature. Meanwhile, culture is a representation of human thought within society, encompassing diverse innovations. The author sees that conflicts or disputes are inevitable when individuals are firm in their own right and do not heed the truth (opinions) of others. This phenomenon may occur in multicultural societies, both between individuals and between individuals and a certain ethnic group. Legal anthropology plays a significant role in exploring the norms and values that shape people's lives. Legal anthropology views society as a whole and an interrelated unit. In the previous study, the author cited research by Nader and Todd (1978), which categorized disputes into three stages: the complaint by one of the parties, negative reactions, and the final stage of dispute resolution, brought to court. In addition, this study argues that several alternative dispute resolution methods in a multicultural society can be adopted from a legal anthropological perspective, including intercultural mediation, dialogue forums, and restorative justice
The Click That Binds: Dark Patterns and Consent Paradox in Indonesian Electronic Contracts Reza Kautsar Kusumahpraja; Muhammad Fauzi Rais Lutfi
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.63886

Abstract

The rise of digital transactions has shifted contract formation towards electronic clickwrap agreements. Nonetheless, the appearance of dark patterns manipulative interface designs that influence consumer choices poses a threat to the core principle of consensus ad idem (mutual agreement). This research examines the line between formal agreements and true consent in online contracts affected by dark patterns, exploring their impact on the principle of consensualism in Indonesian contract law. Employing legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal methods, the findings highlight a paradox: although a consumer's click may be legally binding, digital mechanisms can subtly distort free will, effectively creating a modern version of will. While many advanced nations have established supervisory tools, Indonesia's existing legal framework currently lacks specific regulations against dark patterns. Ultimately, Indonesia's digital contract law should evolve from emphasising formal agreements to ensuring substantive, informed consent. This study introduces the "Digital Will Legitimacy Test," focusing on three key indicators: proper information disclosure, autonomous will, and genuine consent.