cover
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnaldisiplin@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaldisiplin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2746394X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/disiplin
Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda (STIHPADA) Berisikan tulisan ilmiah, hasil pembahasan penelitian, pembahasan buku dan pendapat yang mendukung. Redaksi mengundang para dosen, pakar, mahasiswa, membahas dan masyarakat yang tertarik untuk menuangkan hasil yang diharapkan ke dalam tulisan ilmiah. Jadwal penerbitan setahun 4 (empat) kali pada bulan Maret, Juni, September dan Desember. Tulisan yang dikirim harus berpedoman pada metode penulisan ilmiah dan petunjuk penulisan sebagaimana terlampir. Isi konten tulisan tanggung jawab sepenuhnya penulis. Redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap isi konten tulisan.
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021)" : 5 Documents clear
Implementasi Putusan Serta Merta (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad )Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Amin, Muhammad Nur
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v27i3.1376

Abstract

The position of the verdict immediately explicitly provided for Article 108 of Law No. 2 of 2004 on The Settlement of Indutsrial Disputes as a solution to restore the rights of workers/laborers in a rapid, accurate, and fair. However, in practice in the judiciary, especially in The Industrial Relation Court very rarely judge the verdict immediately (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) ruled that the reasons for decision will be in accordance with the Supreme Court Circular No. 3 of 2000. So, referenced in decisions is SEMA while law regulate the verdict. Therefore, it takes courage of a judge in the verdict immediately (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) based on the legislation that has been set so that the decision produced can provide justice for litigants.
Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan Serta Kelebihan Dan Kelemahannya Andi Candra; Warmiyana Zairi Absi
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v27i3.1377

Abstract

The court is not authorized to re-examine a case where the award of arbitration has been passed unless there is an unlawful act related to making an arbitration decision in good faith, and if the arbitral award violates public order. The advantage is that the confidentiality of disputes between the parties is guaranteed, delays can be avoided due to procedural and administrative matters and weaknesses, the arbitration award is very dependent on the technical ability of the arbitrator to provide satisfactory decisions to both parties. Because even though the arbitrator is an expert, it may not necessarily satisfy the parties.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Amuk Massa Liza Deshaini
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v27i3.1378

Abstract

Mass rage is a form of aspiration that is not conveyed properly. The great upheaval arose because of the aspirations that had been the pent up does not have a container to channel it properly so that a great upheaval occurs. Mass tantrums can also arise because of personal disputes that occur and then escalate into big problems. This is of course very unfortunate, Indonesian culture has declared democracy but the democracy that has been declared has not run smoothly. Legal protection for victims of mob violence is through compensation which is civil in nature, arises from the victim's request and is paid by the community/state or is a form of community and state accountability, restitution is criminal in nature, arises from a criminal court decision and is paid by the convict or the perpetrator of the crime. , or is a form of criminal responsibility and the factors that cause mass riots are socio-cultural factors, economic factors, "sara" nuanced factors (ethnicity, religion, race and between groups), policy factors (actions) law enforcement officers (police)
Tanggung Jawab Terhadap Barang Bukti Yang Disita Dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana Derry Angling Kesuma
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v27i3.1379

Abstract

Based on the explanation above, the material objects that have research power are goods that are the target of a crime, the proceeds of a crime, the tools used by the crime, as well as goods to aggravate or alleviate the defendant's guilt. Then it is further explained that the management of evidence is the procedure or process for receiving, securing, maintaining, releasing and destroying confiscated objects from a special room or place for storing evidence.The function of the place for storing confiscated objects is a place for objects confiscated by the State for the purposes of the judicial process. In the Rupbasan, objects must be kept for the purposes of evidence in the examination at the level of investigation, prosecution and examination in court, including items declared confiscated based on a judge's decision. The use of confiscated objects for the purposes of investigation, prosecution and examination in court, there must be a request letter from the official who is legally responsible for the confiscated objects. The release of the spoils to implement a court decision that has obtained permanent legal force, is carried out at the request of the prosecutor in writing. The destruction of the spoils is carried out by the Prosecutor, and witnessed by the Head of the Rupbasan.
Analisis Yuridis Aspek Hukum Benda Tidak Bergerak Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Hendri. S; Rusniati
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v27i3.1380

Abstract

The legal aspects of immovable objects as objects of fiduciary guarantees can be categorized into 3 (three) periods, namely: a. the period before Law no. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights; b. period after the enactment of Law no. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights, and: c. period after Law no. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. The provisions regarding immovable objects here are to accommodate credit needs for building owners without land rights where this building has a high economic value in accordance with the principle of horizontal separation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5