cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Junaidi
Contact Email
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalconsensus@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln. Kol. H. Animan Achad (d/h Jln. Sukabangun II) KM. 6.5 Lr. Suka Pandai No. 1610. Palembang, Indonesia.
Location
Kota palembang,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29622395     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46839/consensus
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda (STIHPADA) Palembang berisikan tulisan ilmiah, hasil pembahasan penelitian, pembahasan buku dan pendapat yang mendukung. Artikel Hukum yang dipublikasikan pada jurnal ini merupakan hasil karya ilmiah mahasiswa dan dosen yang telah memenuhi Pedoman Penulisan bagi Penulis (Author Guidelines) yang telah ditentukan oleh Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Semua artikel yang dikirimkan oleh penulis dan dipublikasikan dalam jurnal ini ditelaah melalui peer revie process. Jadwal penerbitan setahun 4 (empat) kali pada bulan Februari, Mei, Agustus, dan November. Tulisan yang dikirim harus berpedoman pada metode penulisan ilmiah dan petunjuk penulisan sebagai terlampir. Isi konten tulisan tanggung jawab sepenuhnya penulis. Redaksi tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap isi konten tulisan.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)" : 6 Documents clear
Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pertanahan dalam Perspektif Keadilan Agraria di Indonesia suhaimi; Erick Sani; Jamatul Firdaus; Gusuy Maharani; Bayu Aji Rekso dipurwo
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyses the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement in the field of land through the perspective of agrarian justice. The aim is to evaluate the level of effectiveness, identify inhibiting factors, and formulate policy recommendations to strengthen the protection of equitable land rights. The method used is normative law with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach. Primary and secondary data in the form of regulations, doctrines, and jurisprudence were collected through literature studies and analysed qualitatively and prescriptively. The findings show that law enforcement has not been effective. The main obstacles include regulatory disharmony, weaknesses in the land administration and data systems, difficulties in proving cases, and poor coordination between law enforcement agencies. In conclusion, strengthening law enforcement requires: regulatory harmonisation, integration of land databases, capacity building of officials, and the implementation of policies oriented towards the restoration of agrarian rights and justice as a priority in case resolution.
Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Tekanan Struktural terhadap Penggunaan Diskresi Penyidik dalam Proses Penyidikan Yasak D. SA; M Thaher; Ilham Sadikin; Rizki Ramadhan; Deshaini, Liza
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The factors that encourage investigators to exercise discretion during criminal investigations are closely linked to the practical dynamics of law enforcement, where investigators frequently encounter situations that are not explicitly regulated in detail by statutory provisions. This study aims to identify and analyze the determinants influencing investigators’ use of discretionary authority in the investigation process. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, treating legal rules as a coherent normative system to assess the legal basis, scope, and limits of investigative discretion. The findings indicate that the use of discretion is shaped by several key factors: regulatory limitations, considerations of substantive justice, the need for efficiency in law enforcement processes, public interest considerations, social and political pressures, and the level of investigators’ professionalism and ethical standards. These findings suggest that discretion functions as an essential instrument for bridging procedural requirements and practical investigative needs in pursuit of justice, yet it must remain subject to accountability and control mechanisms to prevent misuse of authority
Implikasi Hukum Pajak PPH Dan PPN Terhadap Investasi Aset Kripto Di Indonesia Amalia, Rizki Fitri; Kancana, Haqkida; Jabarti, Ahmad; Kesuma, Joni
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/consensus.v4i3.1726

Abstract

The increase in transactions and the number of crypto asset investors has legal implications, particularly in taxation, which requires adaptive, fair, and legally certain tax policies. This study aims to analyse the impact of Income Tax (PPh) and Value Added Tax (PPN) on crypto asset investment in Indonesia, in order to provide legal certainty and protection for investors, as well as to support state revenue. This study uses a normative legal method with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach. Legal materials were obtained through a literature study that was analysed qualitatively and prescriptively. The results of the study show that the imposition of PPh and PPN on crypto assets has provided a basis for legal certainty by establishing crypto assets as valid taxable objects, as well as encouraging administration and taxpayer compliance. However, the volatility and cross-border nature of crypto assets pose challenges for tax fairness and collection effectiveness, related to rapid regulatory changes, jurisdictional limitations, and low investor tax literacy. This study concludes that there is a need to strengthen a more stable legal framework for crypto taxation, harmonise regulations across sectors, and improve tax education to create fair, certain, and sustainable tax policies in Indonesia's digital investment ecosystem.
Komparatif Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati Antara Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Acara Pidana Thailand Riri Alip Wibowo; Frendi Rushadinata; Robbi Kurnia Pratama; Jidan Ramadhan Jordan
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The death penalty represents the most severe form of punishment in criminal law and is still retained by several countries, including Indonesia and Thailand. Although both countries are retentionist, they demonstrate significant differences in regulating and implementing capital punishment through their criminal procedure laws. This study aims to comparatively analyze the regulation and implementation of the death penalty in Indonesian and Thai criminal procedure law, as well as to assess the extent to which procedural mechanisms ensure the protection of death row inmates’ rights. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that Indonesian criminal procedure law emphasizes legal certainty and the finality of court decisions, whereas Thailand prioritizes procedural flexibility through effective clemency mechanisms and a de facto moratorium. These differences indicate that the legitimacy of the death penalty is largely determined by the quality of due process of law rather than merely by the existence of substantive criminal norms. This study is expected to contribute to the development of comparative criminal law and to inform future reforms of criminal procedure law in Indonesia
Tantangan dan Efektivitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Koneksitas di Indonesia:C hallenges and Effectiveness in the Connectivity Justice System in Indonesia Fiqashri Eisza Prasetya; Triantiny, Weni; Natasya, Natasya; Sitompul, Krisna
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tantangan dan Efektivitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Koneksitas di Indonesia:C hallenges and Effectiveness in the Connectivity Justice System in Indonesia
Telaah Normatif Pelaksanaan Prinsip Transparan, Partisipatif, Objektif, Akuntabel, Dan Terbuka Dalam Pemilihan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Untuk Mewujudkan Pasal 15 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Djufri, Darmadi; Kesuma, Derry Angling
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/consensus.v4i2.1760

Abstract

The trifurcation of the selection mechanism for constitutional judges cannot be separated from the construction of norms in the Constitutional Court Law, which regulates the selection of constitutional judges with a high degree of flexibility so that it can be interpreted freely and according to the preferences of each regime by institutions that have the constitutional authority to nominate constitutional judges. If left unchecked, this will lead to chaotic conditions in the recruitment of constitutional judges, which will ultimately produce constitutional judges with low qualifications. Transparency in the recruitment of judge candidates from the early stages can increase the contribution of the public in providing input regarding the track record of constitutional judge candidates. Public participation in the recruitment system for constitutional judge candidates is necessary in order to produce ideal constitutional judges. There is controversy among experts in administrative law, but the dynamics of statehood require dissenting opinions in order to find someone who meets the expectations of many people. The selection of Adis Kadir as a judicial candidate by the House of Representatives (DPR) will always have the potential to trigger public debate.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022)