cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad Rayhan
Contact Email
ahmadrayhan30@gmail.com
Phone
+62 819-1763-7016
Journal Mail Official
ethosplr@sinesia.id
Editorial Address
Puri Cempaka Azalea A9 No. 22, Panancangan, Cipocok Jaya, Kota Serang, Provinsi Banten
Location
Kota serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Ethos and Pragmatic Law Review
Published by Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31105831     DOI : https://doi.org/10.69836/ethos
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Ethos and Pragmatic Law Review (EPLR) (E-ISSN : 3110-5831) is a scholarly journal that publishes research articles, conceptual studies, and critical analyses in the field of law, with a primary focus on Administrative Law, state financial law and Tax Law. This journal serves as an academic platform aimed at enriching the body of legal scholarship, fostering constructive discourse, and bridging the gap between legal theory and practice in both national and global contexts. EPLR is committed to upholding ethical values (ethos) in every published work, while adopting a pragmatic approach that emphasizes relevance and tangible benefits for society, government, academics, and legal practitioners. The journal’s scope includes, but is not limited to: The dynamics and reform of Administrative Law, including institutional aspects, public policy, authority, and governance. The development of state financial law and Tax Law, viewed from the perspectives of regulation, implementation, comparative law, and its connection to the national financial law system. Contemporary issues at the intersection of administrative law and tax law, such as legal certainty, fiscal justice, and the protection of citizens’ rights.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Penguatan Tata Kelola Industri Singkong di Provinsi Lampung DITA PURNAMA; Adila Puspa Hestiantini; Utami Nur
Ethos and Pragmatic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Ethical and Pragmatic Perspectives on Contemporary Legal Issues in Governance a
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/ethos.v1i2.142

Abstract

Provinsi Lampung dikenal sebagai wilayah penghasil singkong terbesar di Indonesia, namun pengelolaan industrinya masih menghadapi sejumlah tantangan, di antaranya ketidakstabilan harga, posisi tawar petani yang rendah, serta proses hilirisasi yang belum berkembang optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi efektivitas implementasi kebijakan pemerintah daerah dalam memperkuat tata kelola industri singkong di Lampung dengan memanfaatkan model implementasi George C. Edwards III, yang mencakup dimensi komunikasi, sumber daya, disposisi pelaksana, dan struktur birokrasi. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui studi literatur dan analisis dokumen kebijakan, dengan menelaah berbagai regulasi resmi seperti Surat Edaran Gubernur Lampung Nomor 7 Tahun 2025 dan Instruksi Gubernur Nomor 2 Tahun 2025, serta referensi akademik dan laporan yang berkaitan dengan tata niaga singkong dan kebijakan harga komoditas pertanian. Temuan penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa pelaksanaan kebijakan belum berjalan secara efektif, ditandai oleh lemahnya penyebaran informasi kebijakan, keterbatasan sumber daya manusia dan pembiayaan, rendahnya komitmen pelaksana di tingkat operasional, serta struktur birokrasi yang belum terkoordinasi dengan baik. Kebijakan yang ada cenderung bersifat administratif dan normatif sehingga belum mampu mendorong peningkatan kesejahteraan petani maupun penguatan sektor hilir. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan koordinasi lintas sektor, peningkatan kapasitas dan dukungan sumber daya, pembentukan lembaga khusus yang menangani tata niaga singkong, serta penerapan mekanisme evaluasi berkelanjutan guna memastikan tata kelola industri singkong yang lebih efektif dan berorientasi hasil.
Legal Analysis Of The Failed Investment Of The Jakarta-Bandung High-Speed Rail Project: Ambition Vs Reality Widi Nugrahaningsih; Seroja Kusuma Dewi; Rini Diah Puri Handayani
Ethos and Pragmatic Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Law and Justice
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/ethos.v2i1.179

Abstract

The Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway (KCJB) project, operated by PT Kereta Cepat Indonesia China (KCIC), represents Indonesia’s strong ambition to accelerate national strategic infrastructure development and strengthen bilateral cooperation with China. Nevertheless, behind its physical progress, the project has encountered serious challenges characterized by investment failure, including cost overruns, construction delays, and potential legal disputes. This article aims to analyze the failure of the KCJB investment from a legal perspective by examining the gap between infrastructure ambitions and Indonesia’s regulatory realities. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by an extensive review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis reveals that the KCJB investment failure is largely driven by weak regulatory harmonization, legal uncertainty, imbalanced contract structures, and the complexity of financing schemes that were insufficiently anticipated within the existing legal framework. Furthermore, the absence of competitive tendering processes, overlapping authorities between central and regional governments, and limited legal protection for public interests have significantly increased investment risks. These conditions have ultimately undermined legal certainty and the effectiveness of project governance. The article concludes that strengthening regulatory frameworks, enhancing contractual transparency, and restructuring public–private partnership mechanisms are essential to mitigate the risk of investment failure in future large-scale infrastructure projects and to ensure that development ambitions align with the principles of legal certainty and good governance.
Judicial Review of the Audi et Alteram Partem Principle in Denpasar Administrative Court Ruling No. 2/G/LH/2018/PTUN.DPS Hana Nailah Abiliah; Raine Graciea Firdaus; Shifaunissa
Ethos and Pragmatic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Ethical and Pragmatic Perspectives on Contemporary Legal Issues in Governance a
Publisher : Yayasan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Sisi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69836/ethos.v1i2.191

Abstract

The development of the Celukan Bawang Coal-Fired Power Plant Phase II has generated an environmental dispute that resulted in the Denpasar Administrative Court Decision Number 2/G/LH/2018/PTUN.DPS. This case is significant as it concerns the application of the audi et alteram partem principle, a fundamental principle guaranteeing the right of parties to be heard fairly, particularly in environmental disputes that are preventive in nature and involve broader public interests. This study aims to analyze the application of the audi et alteram partem principle in the decision and to examine its implications for access to justice for affected communities. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, with secondary legal materials analyzed through qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings show that the panel of judges only fulfilled the formal hearing requirement by allowing the parties to submit their claims, but failed to meet the substantial hearing requirement by not seriously considering empirical evidence and substantive arguments presented by the plaintiffs. The termination of the case at the preliminary stage without examining the merits undermined the precautionary principle and weakened the protection of community environmental rights. In conclusion, the application of the audi et alteram partem principle in this decision was not optimal and resulted in a denial of justice in environmental law enforcement.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Ethical and Pragmatic Perspectives on Contemporary Legal Issues in Governance a Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Ethical and Pragmatic Approaches to Public Law, Governance, and Digital Democra