cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Desi Sommaliagustina
Contact Email
nawalaedu@gmail.com
Phone
+6281374694015
Journal Mail Official
nawalaedu@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Raya Yamin No.88 Desa/Kelurahan Telanaipura, kec.Telanaipura, Kota Jambi, Jambi Kode Pos : 36122
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Ipso Jure
Published by PT Anagata Sembagi Education
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30327644     DOI : https://doi.org/10.62872/55p1zf80
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Ipso Jure is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal dedicated to advancing scholarly research and discourse in the field of law, with a particular emphasis on the principles of the rule of law. The journal aims to provide a platform for academics, legal practitioners, policymakers, and researchers to address contemporary legal issues and trends that shape societies globally. All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), ensuring free access and reuse with proper attribution. Focus Ipso Jure focuses on exploring current and emerging legal challenges that influence the development and application of the rule of law. The journal seeks to publish original research that offers innovative perspectives, rigorous analysis, and practical insights into legal systems, theories, and practices. By fostering interdisciplinary and comparative approaches, Ipso Jure aims to contribute to global legal scholarship and promote dialogue among diverse legal traditions. Scope The journal welcomes original research articles, theoretical analyses, and policy reviews that address issues and trends in the following areas of law: Administrative Law Agrarian Law Banking Law Civil Law Commercial Law Comparative Law Constitutional Law Corporate Law Criminal Law Cyber Law Economic Law Environmental Law Human Rights Law International Law Legal Philosophy and Theory Legal Sociology Types of Contributions Ipso Jure primarily publishes original research articles (3,000–5,000 words) that present empirical findings, theoretical insights, or critical analyses. The journal also considers high-quality review articles or policy analyses that align with its scope and contribute significantly to legal scholarship. All submissions undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and integrity, as outlined in our Publication Process. Audience The journal targets a global audience, including: Legal scholars and researchers seeking to advance knowledge in law. Legal practitioners addressing practical challenges in their fields. Policymakers and government officials shaping legal frameworks. Students and educators exploring contemporary legal issues. Commitment to Open Access As an open access journal, Ipso Jure ensures that all published content is freely accessible to readers worldwide without financial or legal barriers. Authors retain full copyright of their work, and articles are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, promoting the widest possible dissemination and reuse of research. For submission details, please refer to our Author Guidelines. For questions about the journal’s focus and scope, contact the editorial team at nawalaedu@gmail.com.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 195 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
Exploitation of Legal Loopholes in the Regulatory System: A Justice and Legal Certainty Perspective Basri Basri
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Ipso - May
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/5dvexe41

Abstract

Legal loopholes are a phenomenon inherent in every regulatory system, arising from editorial imperfections, normative voids, interpretive ambiguities, and social developments that outpace the formation of laws and regulations. This study aims to analyze the exploitation of legal loopholes from the perspective of substantive justice and legal certainty, by evaluating their impact on the integrity of the Indonesian legal system. Using normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this study finds that opportunistic exploitation of legal loopholes creates tension between formal legality and substantive justice, and threatens public trust in the rule of law. The results indicate that legal loopholes stem from four main factors: (1) weaknesses in legislative drafting; (2) technological and economic developments that outpace regulations; (3) inconsistencies in judicial interpretation; and (4) conflicts of norms between regulatory levels. This study concludes that there is a need for a reconstruction of the legal formation paradigm that is oriented towards preventing regulatory loopholes from the planning stage, accompanied by strengthening judicial review mechanisms and developing the doctrine of teleological interpretation.
Adaptive Law in the Era of Disruption: Legal Flexibility in Facing Global Change Jemielka Roosje Satyana Pilongo; Yohanis Yabes Tjiaman
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Ipso - June
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/9wq2vd69

Abstract

The era of technological disruption marked by the revolution in artificial intelligence, blockchain, the platform economy, and digital transformation has placed conventional legal systems at a critical juncture that requires a fundamental response. This study examines the concept of Adaptive Law as a new legal paradigm that offers flexibility, responsiveness, and regenerative capacity in the face of unprecedented acceleration of global change. Using a normative legal research approach enriched with a comparative analysis of the implementation of adaptive law in various jurisdictions, this study finds that legal systems that are resilient and relevant in the era of disruption are those that integrate continuous renewal mechanisms, regulatory sandboxes, sunset clauses, and multi-stakeholder participation in the norm-formation process. The results of the study indicate that adaptive law is not merely procedural flexibility, but rather a comprehensive legal philosophy that requires a fundamental reconstruction of how the legal system is conceptualized, formed, and implemented. The study's conclusion confirms that the transformation towards adaptive law requires systemic institutional reform, a shift in legislative paradigms, and the development of institutional capacity capable of keeping pace with the increasingly rapid pace of technological and social change.
Legal Accountability for Artificial Intelligence-Based Decisions from a Modern Legal Perspective Siska Sanjahaya
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Ipso Jure - July
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/72achm15

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has penetrated various sectors of human life, from healthcare and finance to law enforcement to government administrative decision-making. The integration of AI into decision-making processes raises a fundamental question in legal science: who is legally responsible when an algorithm-based decision causes harm to a third party. This study examines the construction of legal liability for AI-based decisions from a modern legal perspective, focusing on two main dimensions: the existing normative framework and applicable liability models. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results show that Indonesia's positive legal framework does not explicitly regulate liability for AI decisions, necessitating comprehensive legislative reform. Furthermore, the product liability and shared liability models are considered the most relevant for application in the AI ​​context to ensure adequate legal protection for the public. This article concludes that a multi-actor approach with a specific regulatory framework for AI is the best solution that aligns with the principles of the rule of law.
Who Owns Ai-Generated Content? Examining Copyright Challenges in The Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence Rizky Wisudawan Katjong; Revie Kurnia Katjong
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Ipso Jure - July
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/m2vbag14

Abstract

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence technologies such as large language models and image diffusion models has fundamentally changed the landscape of creative work, as machines are now capable of producing text, images, music, and audiovisuals with a level of sophistication that resembles human work, thus giving rise to legal uncertainty regarding who is entitled to be called the creator and copyright holder of such content. This article aims to critically examine the conceptual and normative challenges faced by the copyright regime, particularly Indonesian copyright law, in responding to the phenomenon of works produced by generative artificial intelligence, by placing the principles of legal flexibility and adaptability as the main analytical framework amidst global technological disruption. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative legal approach, by examining relevant primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including developments in decisions and policies in the United States, China, and Indonesia. The study results show that the requirements of authenticity and human authorization that are the foundation of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright have not explicitly anticipated works born from autonomous generative processes, thus creating a normative vacuum regarding the legal status of artificial intelligence outputs, responsibility for copyright infringement in the data training process, and the division of ownership between users, platform developers, and training data providers.
Juridical Analysis Of State Boundary Determination From The Perspectives Of International Law And Indonesian National Law Kabella Azzahra; Rahmianti Ranti Pawari; Adystia Sunggara
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Ipso Jure - July
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/6kr1rd38

Abstract

The determination of state boundaries is crucial for safeguarding sovereignty and ensuring legal certainty. As an archipelagic nation, Indonesia faces unique challenges in aligning national legislation with international standards. This study analyzes the legal framework and implementation of state boundary determination from the perspectives of international law and Indonesian national law. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study examines the synergy between UNCLOS 1982 and Indonesian laws, including Law No. 43 of 2008. The findings reveal that while the normative legal framework is adequate, significant legal gaps persist due to differing delimitation methods (equidistance vs. equitable principles) and unresolved unilateral claims in strategic areas like the North Natuna Sea. This study concludes that resolving these deadlocks requires stronger harmonization between domestic enforcement and international maritime jurisprudence, alongside enhanced inter-agency technical coordination.

Page 20 of 20 | Total Record : 195

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2 No. 12 (2026): Ipso Jure - January Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Ipso Jure - July Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Ipso - June Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Ipso - May Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Ipso Jure - February Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): Journal of Ipso Jure-December Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 12 (2025): Ipso Jure - January Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025): Ipso Jure-October Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): Ipso Jure - September Vol. 2 No. 7 (2025): Ipso Jure - August Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Ipso Jure - July Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Ipso Jure - June Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Ipso Jure - May Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Ipso Jure - February Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): Ipso Jure - December Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): Ipso Jure - November Vol. 1 No. 9 (2024): Ipso Jure - October Vol. 1 No. 8 (2024): Ipso Jure - September Vol. 1 No. 7 (2024): Ipso Jure-August Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): Ipso Jure - July Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): Ipso Jure- June Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Ipso Jure - May Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Ipso Jure - April Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Ipso Jure - March Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Ipso Jure - February More Issue