cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Safira Widya Attidhira
Contact Email
Safira.NGJ@gmail.com
Phone
+6281928686867
Journal Mail Official
Safira.NGJ@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Journal of Law, Society and Living Norms
Published by CV. Norma Global
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31232566     DOI : https://doi.org/10.66111
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Legal Studies and Interdisciplinary Research Constitutional Law and Constitutional Theory International Law and Global Governance Comparative Legal Systems Human Rights Law and Social Justice Corporate and Commercial Law Criminal Law and Justice Studies Civil Law and Private Law Legal Philosophy and Jurisprudence Law and Technology Environmental Law Legal Education and Methodology Interdisciplinary Legal Research Legal Culture and Customary Law Alternative and Medical Law Legal Pluralism Socio Legal Studies Sociological Jurisprudence Law and Artificial Intelligence Law and Cyber Crime
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Ethical Principles and Legal Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence: Ensuring Fairness and Accountability in AI Governance Muhidin; Lu Sudirman
Journal of Law, Society and Living Norms Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Norma Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents significant ethical and legal challenges, particularly regarding algorithmic bias, opaque decision-making, and the absence of clear liability mechanisms. This study examines how key ethical principles such as transparency, fairness, privacy protection, and accountability can be integrated into a legal responsibility framework to support fair and accountable AI governance. The research uses a normative juridical method with conceptual, statutory, and case approaches to assess the limitations of traditional liability models when applied to autonomous systems. The findings indicate that algorithmic bias can lead to both material and procedural injustice, while gaps in regulation create uncertainty about who should bear responsibility for AI-related harm. This study recommends the application of fairness by design, mandatory model documentation, algorithmic audits, and shared responsibility among developers, operators, and users. These findings highlight the need for adaptive regulation to ensure that the use of AI upholds justice, protects individual rights, and serves the public interest.
Legal Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Utilization in The Formation of Authentic Deeds Under Indonesian Notarial Law Widya Wahyu Utami; Ratih Agustin Wulandari
Journal of Law, Society and Living Norms Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Norma Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) had introduced new forms of automation into legal services, including notarial practice. This research examined the extent to which AI could be utilized in the formation of authentic deeds without violating the formal requirements stipulated under Indonesian law. Using a normative legal research methodology supported by a statute and conceptual approach, this study analyzed the Civil Code, the Notary Office Law, and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, alongside recent scholarly literature. The findings showed that AI had no legal standing as a public official, could not verify the legal capacity or free will of the parties, and could not fulfill mandatory procedural requirements such as physical presence, reading of the deed, and witnessing. AI was therefore limited to administrative and analytical support, including drafting templates, conducting legal research, and managing electronic documents. The study concluded that the use of AI in creating authentic deeds remained legally impermissible, as the validity of such deeds depended on human supervision and direct involvement of a notary as mandated by statutory provisions.
Reconstructing the Application of Denda Damai (Settlement-by-Fine Mechanism) in Corruption Cases: A Socio-Legal and Cultural Perspective in Indonesia Adi Setya Desta Landya; Aida Dewi
Journal of Law, Society and Living Norms Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Norma Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The growing discourse on the application of denda damai (settlement-by-fine mechanism) as an alternative approach to corruption cases reflected a shifting orientation in Indonesian law enforcement from retributive punishment toward administrative efficiency and restorative considerations. This study employed a normative legal method supported by a socio-legal perspective to evaluate whether this mechanism could be normatively justified and socially accepted when applied to corruption, which is legally classified as an extraordinary crime. The analysis showed that, although the settlement-by-fine mechanism offered potential administrative efficiency and faster recovery of state losses, it conflicted with the Anti-Corruption Law, which explicitly stated that restitution did not eliminate criminal liability. The findings also demonstrated strong public resistance rooted in cultural expectations of punitive justice toward corruption offenders. This study concluded that any policy reform in this area required normative consistency, procedural safeguards, and cultural legitimacy to align restorative aspirations with Indonesia’s prevailing legal and social values.
Legal Risks of Article 47 of Law No. 3/2025 on the Assignment of Active-Duty TNI Personnel to Civilian Office Febriyan Victorinus Lolobua; Lisma Lumetut
Journal of Law, Society and Living Norms Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Norma Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The amendment of Law No. 34/2004 through Law No. 3/2025 raises significant legal risks regarding the separation between military and civilian authority in Indonesia. The revised Article 47 expands the scope for assigning active-duty military personnel to fourteen ministries and agencies and permits broader transfers upon resignation or retirement. This study examines the legal risks and institutional implications of these provisions using a normative legal research method grounded in statutory analysis and official documents. The findings indicate a growing discrepancy between formal legal requirements and practical implementation, illustrated by the appointment of an active-duty officer as President Director of a state-owned enterprise outside the statutory list. This revolving-door pattern weakens legal certainty, expands potential conflicts of interest, and blurs civil–military boundaries established after the 1998 Reform. The study concludes that without strict enforcement of legal safeguards, the amendment risks undermining civilian supremacy, diluting accountability mechanisms, and enabling the resurgence of dual-function practices. Strengthening institutional oversight is essential to maintain democratic governance and uphold the principle of civilian control.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): August 2025