cover
Contact Name
Irwansyah Suwahyu
Contact Email
irwansyahsuwahyu99@gmail.com
Phone
+6282191045293
Journal Mail Official
ri@abcollab.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Cempaka Mekar Raya No. 10 Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam
ISSN : 29884888     EISSN : 29886430     DOI : https://doi.org/10.66053/ri
Qur’anic and Hadith Studies Studies on Qur’anic exegesis (tafsir), ulum al-Qur’an, ulum al-hadith, thematic studies, and contemporary approaches to understanding the primary sources of Islamic teachings. Islamic Thought and Philosophy Research on classical and contemporary Islamic thought, Islamic philosophy, kalam (Islamic theology), and the development of intellectual traditions within Islamic civilization. Islamic Law and Contemporary Fiqh Studies on fiqh, usul al-fiqh, maqasid al-shariah, Islamic legal reform, and the application of Islamic law in various contemporary social and legal contexts. Islamic Education Research on Islamic education, curriculum development, pedagogical innovation, character education, and the transformation of Islamic educational institutions in modern contexts. Islam and Social Transformation Studies examining the relationship between Islam and social change, cultural dynamics, politics, governance, and community development. Islamic Ethics and Spirituality Research on Islamic ethics, akhlaq, Sufism, moral philosophy in Islam, and spiritual development in individual and social life. Islam and Contemporary Global Issues Studies addressing the interaction between Islamic teachings and contemporary global issues, including Islamic economics and finance, environmental sustainability, technological developments, digital society, public policy, and emerging socio-economic transformations.
Articles 226 Documents
Halal certification among UMKM in a Muslim-minority market: A maslahah mursalah perspective Muhammad Sukri; Dzulkifli Al’Amin; Naziah Abas; Andi Muh. Taqiyuddin BN; Muhammad Hassanal
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): October
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i5.1156

Abstract

Purpose – This study analyses the implementation of halal certification among Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in an urban district with a Muslim-minority population and evaluates that implementation through maslahah mursalah. Design – Qualitative field research with a normative-empirical approach was conducted in Paal Dua District, Manado City, from December 2025 to February 2026. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with twelve food and beverage MSME operators, two Halal Product Process (PPH) Assistants, and two members of the Fatwa Commission of the Indonesian Ulema Council of North Sulawesi Province, supported by structured observation and document analysis, and were then analysed through hybrid thematic coding. Findings – Certification uptake among the informants is uneven. Three interrelated barriers account for this pattern: limited procedural understanding, assistance that is discontinued before completion, and the belief that Muslim ownership together with ingredients presumed to be lawful already guarantees halalness. Read through maslahah mursalah, different functions of certification operate at the dharuriyah, hajiyah, and tahsiniyah levels, rather than certification as a single whole occupying all three at once. Research Implications – The findings rest on a small purposive sample within a single district and describe the cases studied rather than the MSME population of that district. Consumers were not interviewed, and actual halal compliance was not measured through product testing or audit. Originality – This study separates the obligation of halal consumption, which is grounded in explicit textual authority, from the modern administrative certification mechanism that is properly the object of maslahah mursalah reasoning, and applies the three levels of benefit to primary evidence gathered in a Muslim-minority setting.
Harmonization of sharia and Bugis culture in the Maccera’ Wettang ceremony Nurul Khalizah Rohadatul Aisy; Andi Satria Ningsih; Risnawati Hannang
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): October
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i5.1181

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines the social meanings and Islamic legal status of the Maccera’ Wettang seventh-month pregnancy ceremony in Panincong Village and assesses selective harmonization of Sharia and Bugis custom. Design – A qualitative socio-legal case study used observation, documentation, and interviews with eight purposively selected informants. Ritual components were analyzed through ‘urf, attributed causality, purity, benefit or harm, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah; SRQR guided reporting only. Findings – Prayer, lawful food sharing, family support, and safe cleansing align with ‘urf sahīh. Mappitto’ and birthing simulations require non-divinatory interpretations; ritual chicken-blood application is ‘urf fāsid. Massage safety and efficacy were not clinically evaluated. Research Implications – The findings support considering participatory reform with maternal-health safeguards, not blanket acceptance or rejection. Generalization is limited by one village, eight informants, and the absence of intervention testing. Originality – A component-based ‘urf assessment links Islamic jurisprudence with living Bugis custom and proposes, rather than validates, a culturally sensitive reform pathway.
Cash waqf linked sukuk and the integration of Islamic social finance into Indonesia's fiscal policy framework: A PESTEL analysis Samsul Arifai; Lince Bulutoding; Rahmawati Muin; Rahman Ambo Masse; Raub Noor Adila Binti Abd
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): October
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i5.1204

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines how Islamic social finance, particularly cash waqf mobilised through Cash Waqf Linked Sukuk (CWLS), relates to Indonesia's fiscal policy framework, identifies the political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal (PESTEL) conditions shaping it, and derives a classification of its institutional forms. Design – The study adopts a qualitative field research design within an interpretive paradigm. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with four key informants, non-participant observation, and analysis of regulations, official issuance documents, and institutional reports. Data were analysed abductively using deductive PESTEL categorisation and inductive sub-theme coding, and single-informant claims were flagged. Findings – The findings indicate that CWLS contributes to strengthening social financing capacity rather than functioning as a fiscal revenue instrument. The development of CWLS faces key constraints, including low public awareness of waqf, limited nazhir capacity, weak nazhir reporting systems, and regulatory gaps. Among the three modes of integrating Islamic social finance into fiscal policy; parallel complementarity, coordinative alignment, and fiscal incorporation; coordinative alignment represents the most feasible approach for further development. Research Implications – The study proposes three modes of interface between Islamic social finance and fiscal policy (parallel complementarity, coordinative alignment, and fiscal incorporation) and suggests coordinative alignment as the more feasible near-term direction. These are propositions derived from qualitative evidence and require validation through quantitative, mixed-methods, and cross-country research. Originality – The study contributes a three-mode institutional framework that distinguishes relationships by fund control, accounting treatment, and institutional linkage, and corrects the treatment of CWLS as an expansion of fiscal space.
Integrating Islamic financial and audit governance for strengthening Merah Putih cooperatives in Indonesia Tri Aji Pamungkas; Efri Syamsul Bahri; Darihan Mubarak; Muhammad Hakimi Mohd Shafiai; Reni Marlina
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): October
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i5.1229

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to develop an empirically informed conceptual model that integrates these dimensions into a coherent governance framework. Design – A descriptive qualitative approach was employed using in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving cooperative practitioners, a Sharia Supervisory Board, Sharia auditors, academics, and regulators. The data were analyzed through data reduction, categorization, thematic interpretation, and triangulation to identify recurring governance issues and relationships among the emerging themes. Findings – The findings identify five interconnected components: Sharia Governance, Internal Control System, Sharia Compliance Audit, Financial Transparency and Accountability, and Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation. These components were synthesized into the Integrated Sharia Audit and Sharia Financial Governance (ISAFG) Model, which positions Sharia compliance as a central governance principle linking decision-making, internal control, auditing, reporting, and continuous evaluation. Research Implications – This model provides a theoretical foundation for the development of a governance framework that can be tested in future research. Originality – The study contributes an empirically informed conceptual framework for strengthening Sharia-based cooperative governance.
INTEGRATING ECOTHEOLOGY AND SANTRIPRENEURSHIP FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT: A TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE PERSPECTIVE Fachrial Lailatul Maghfiroh; Arif Zunaidi
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i1.1257

Abstract

This study aims to explore how ecotheological values and santripreneurship are integrated into community economic empowerment at Pondok Modern Sumber Daya At-Taqwa (POMOSDA), Indonesia, and to develop a conceptual model for understanding their contribution to sustainable community development from a Triple Bottom Line (people, planet, and profit) perspective. This study employed a qualitative case study design following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 24 participants, including pesantren leaders, business unit managers, santri, alumni, community partners, and local entrepreneurs, complemented by participant observation and document analysis. Data were analysed thematically using source and method triangulation, member checking, and an audit trail to enhance trustworthiness. The findings indicate that ecotheological values rooted in khalifah, amanah, mizan, and maslahah provide an ethical foundation for institutional governance and resource management. These values are translated into practice through experiential santripreneurship, participatory community partnerships, and productive business activities. The integration is reflected in enhanced human capacity and social collaboration (people), environmentally responsible agricultural and resource management practices (planet), and the development of productive economic activities that support institutional and community economic empowerment (profit). Based on these findings, the study proposes the Integrated Ecotheological Santripreneurship Model as a conceptual framework for sustainable community economic empowerment. As a single-case qualitative study, the findings provide contextual insights rather than evidence of long-term or comparative impacts. Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the proposed model across different Islamic boarding schools using longitudinal, mixed-methods, or quantitative designs. This study extends the literature by integrating ecotheology, santripreneurship, and the Triple Bottom Line into a unified conceptual framework for sustainable community economic empowerment in Islamic boarding schools.
NAZHIR CAPACITY BEFORE REGULATION: A DELPHI–ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS PRIORITY MODEL OF SHARIA CAPITAL-MARKET INSTRUMENTS FOR PRODUCTIVE WAQF LAND IN INDONESIA Novi Imelda; Tatik Mariyanti; Agustina Suparyati
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i1.1386

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines whether two existing Sharia capital-market instruments, Sharia RDPT and Sharia DIRE, can finance development on unproductive waqf land, and which of them stakeholders judge more suitable.   Design – A two-stage sequential expert-based design. Ten experts (regulators, academics, practitioners, nazhir and investors) validated a five-cluster, twenty-four-element framework through a one-round, modified-Delphi content-validity assessment using Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio; seven of them then completed Saaty-scale pairwise comparisons, aggregated by geometric mean, tested at CR ≤ 0.10 and synthesised through the limit supermatrix.   Findings – Twenty-two elements were valid (CVI = 1.00); the two rejected elements both concerned specific regulation and were rejected mainly by regulator panelists, marking a regulatory perception gap. Stakeholders ranked first among clusters (25.23 per cent), and three separately judged clusters converged on the nazhir: low nazhir professionalism (33.02 per cent), nazhir capacity building (27.48 per cent) and the nazhir as stakeholder (22.37 per cent). The panel judged RDPT more suitable than DIRE (68.16 versus 31.84 per cent; 65.05 versus 34.95 per cent in the limit supermatrix), with RDPT favoured on 19 of 20 elements.   Research Implications – The evidence is ex ante and consists of aggregated expert priorities, not population estimates; the welfare specification and the implementation sequence are the authors’ translation of those priorities. The panel is small and Jakarta-based; replication is needed.   Originality – To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the two instruments within a single waqf-land financing framework and to validate the content of an ANP framework before weighting, so that elements not recognised as relevant are separated from elements that are merely weighted low.