cover
Contact Name
Lukman Santoso
Contact Email
justicia@uinponorogo.ac.id
Phone
+6285643210185
Journal Mail Official
justicia@uinponorogo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Sharia, UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo Puspita Jaya Street, Jenangan District, Ponorogo Regency, East Java, Indonesia.
Location
Kab. ponorogo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial
ISSN : 16935926     EISSN : 25027646     DOI : 10.21154/justicia
The journal aims to advance knowledge in Islamic legal studies within Muslim societies from various perspectives, enriching both theoretical and empirical research. It covers a range of subjects, including in-depth studies of living law in Muslim communities, legal negotiations on human rights, and issues related to comparative legal systems and constitutional law in Muslim-majority countries.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 359 Documents
Pembubaran Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia Perspektif Maqashid: Otoritas atau Otoritarianisme Siti Muazaroh
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1622

Abstract

One thing that cannot be denied is because HTI has been officially dissolved, their ideological doctrine cannot just stop. Departing from Khaled Abu Fadl's theory, this paper tries to examine more in line with why HTI was dissolved. The main focus is on the dissolution decision's emergence, is government authority or unilateral decision needed? To answer, the author uses maqashid's analysis to understand what the government wants to agree on regarding the dissolution. Based on observations and studies of data in literary studies, it was concluded that the dissolution was carried out not with the help of the NKRI but also regarding the security of the mission. Based on this argument, the dissolution of HTI is the government as the authority holder, not authoritarianism caused by the DPR (legislative body), the MA (judiciary), and several religious leadersSatu hal yang tidak dapat dipungkiri bahwa meskipun HTI telah resmi dibubarkan, doktrin ideologi mereka tidak mungkin berhenti begitu saja. Berangkat dari teori Khaled Abu Fadl, tulisan ini berusaha menelaah lebih dalam mengapa HTI dibubarkan. Fokus utama diarahkan pada kemunculan keputusan pembubaran tersebut, apakah sebagai bentuk otoritas pemerintah atau keputusan sepihak (otoritarianisme)? Untuk menjawab hal ini, penulis menggunakan analisis maqashid sebagai cara untuk memahami apa yang ingin dicapai oleh pemerintah terkait pembubaran itu. Berdasarkan pengamatan dan kajian data dalam literarur research, Disimpulkan bahwa pembubaran dilakukan tidak semata dalam upaya menjaga NKRI tetapi juga menjaga stabilitas visi misi dan kinerja pemerintahan. Berdasarkan argumen ini, maka pembubaran HTI adalah sikap pemerintah selaku pemangku otoritas, bukan otoritarianisme sebab diikuti oleh DPR (lembaga legislatif), MA (lembaga yudikatif), dan  beberapa tokoh agama.
Pengaturan Usaha Mikro Kecil Yang Berkeadilan di Provinsi Lampung Didiek R. Mawardi; M. Ruhly Kesuma Dinata; Suwardi Suwardi
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1627

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to gain an in-depth understanding and analysis of the role of the Lampung Provincial Government regarding the growth of the micro-business climate in order to be able to reconstruct legal policies that foster a fair and micro-business climate. The study uses a qualitative constructivism paradigm with a socio-legal approach to inductive logic. The research location was in Lampung Province, especially in the Regency; North Lampung, Central Lampung, City of Metro. Primary data is collected through interviews and equipped with secondary data and observations. The data is then processed and analyzed by qualitative description with content analysis techniques. The study results in this study itself are; First, the role of bureaucrats in the Lampung Provincial Government in establishing micro-business legal policies has not been maximized, especially in the implementation of initiation processes, public consultations, and participatory participation of stakeholders. Second, a legal policy can be reconstructed if there is strong political will from bureaucrats, forming a small team to conduct aspirations and mobilize participation.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memperoleh pemahaman dan analisis yang mendalam mengenai peran Pemerintah Provinsi Lampung terkait penumbuhan iklim usaha mikro, agar mampu merekonstruksi kebijakan hukum yang menumbuhkan  iklim usaha dan mikro yang berkeadilan. Penelitian menggunakan paradigma kontruktivisme kualitatif dengan pendekatan socio-legal logika induktif. Sementara lokasi penelitian berada di Provinsi Lampung, khususnya di Kabupaten; Lampung Utara, Lampung Tengah, Kota Metro.  Data primer dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, dan dilengkapi dengan data sekunder dan observasi. Data selanjutnya diolah serta dianalisis secara deskripsi kualitatif dengan teknik analisis isi. Hasil kajian dalam penelitian ini sendiri adalah; Pertama, peran birokrat di Pemerintah Provinsi Lampung dalam menetapkan kebijakan hukum usaha mikro belum maksimal terutama dalam pelaksanaan proses inisiasi, konsultasi publik, sinergitas partisipasipatif stakeholders. Kedua, Kebijakan hukum dapat direkonstruksi apabila ada political will yang kuat dari birokrat, membentuk tim kecil untuk melakukan penjaringan aspirasi dan menggalang partisipasi.  
The Element of "Injustice" in The Process of Executing The Auction of Collateral Items From The Murabaha Financing Contract at Shariah Commercial Bank Cucu Solihah; Dhody Ananta Rivandi Widjajaatmadja; Uus Ahmad Husaeni
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i2.1638

Abstract

The provision of Islamic banks' facilities to their customers is practically still applied as collateral, as a form of trust that binds both parties until a contract ends. However, if the customer fails to pay, the opportunity to carry out the collateral may be carried out by the bank as a solution; the last is the customers' obligation that cannot be fulfilled. The bank, as an economic institution, basically does not want to suffer losses. This study aims to analyze the element of ignorance at the auction of Murabaha contract items. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with analytical descriptive data analysis. The findings of this study are that the practice of the execution of collateral still contains the element of death, this can be seen from collateral items that will be auctioned from the beginning of the contract, the value is higher than the facility received by the customer, and sometimes does not involve the customer to determine prices selling collateral, it is not uncommon for the owner of the collateral not to be informed of the execution of the guarantee so that the bank sells collateral at a price not following the wishes of the customer.Pemberian fasilitas yang diberikan bank syariah kepada nasabahnya secara praktik masih diterapkan barang jaminan, sebagai bentuk kepercayaan yang mengikat kedua belah pihak sampai suatu akad berakhir, namun dalam hal nasabah gagal bayar peluang untuk melaksanakan eksekusi atas barang jaminan mungkin saja dilakukan oleh pihak bank, sebagai solusi terakhir atas kewajiban nasabah yang tidak dapat ditunaikan dan pihak bank sebagai lembaga ekonomi pada dasarnya tidak mau mengalami kerugian. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk menganalisis unsur kezaliman pada lelang barang jaminan akad murabahah. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis data deskriptif analitis. Temuan penelitian ini yaitu praktik proses eksekusi atas barang jaminan masih mengandung unsur kedholiman, hal ini terlihat dari barang jaminan yang akan di lelang sejak awal akad, nilainya lebih tinggi dari fasilitas yang diterima nasabah, dan dalam proses lelang terkadang tidak melibatkan pihak nasabah untuk menentukan harga jual atas barang jaminan, bahkan tidak jarang pihak pemilik barang jaminan tidak diberi tahu pelaksanaan proses eksekusi jaminan itu, sehingga pihak bank menjual barang jaminan dengan harga yang tidak sesuai dengan keinginan pihak nasabah.
Indonesian Jurisprudence Ahmad Qodri Azizy’s Perspective Muhammad Shohibul Itmam
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1639

Abstract

This paper explains the thoughts of Indonesian jurisprudence from Ahmad Qadri Azizy's perspective. This study's focus includes, first, how is the epistemological thought of A. Qodri Azizy about Indonesian Jurisprudence, and second, how is the Indonesian Jurisprudence on A. Qodri Azizy's perspective. The method of this study is descriptive-analytical critical with normative legal approaches. The study's findings are, first, the epistemology used by A. Qodri Azizy is the integration between the common law and the Islamic law with a democratic and scientific approach known as a legal eclecticism in Indonesia. Simultaneously, the Indonesian legal science concept that the jurist designed is the effort to implement Islamic law in Indonesia. The effort to implement the Islamic law was carried out scientifically, academically, with democratization following the pluralist legal system in Indonesia.Tulisan ini menjelaskan pemikiran ilmu hukum Indonesia perspektif Ahmad Qodri Azizy. Fokus kajiannya meliputi, pertama bagaimana epistemologi pemikiran A. Qodri Azizy tentang ilmu hukum Indonesia Indonesian Jurisprudence, dan kedua, bagaimana konsep ilmu hukum Indonesia Indonesian Jurisprudence perspektif A. Qodri Azizy. Metodologi penulisan bersifat deskriptif analitis kritis dengan pendekatan hukum normatif. Temuan tulisan adalah, pertama, epistemologi yang digunakan A. Qodri Azizy adalah integrasi antara ilmu hukum umum dan ilmu hukum Islam dengan pendekatan demokrasi dan keilmuan yang dikenal dengan eklektisisme hukum di Indonesia. Sedangkan konsep ilmu hukum Indonesia yang dirancang adalah upaya posistivisasi hukum Islam di Indonesia. Upaya postivisasi dilakukan secara keilmuan, akademik dengan proses demokratisasi sesuai sistem hukum pluralis yang ada di Indonesia. 
Jihad Harta dan Kesejahteraan Ekonomi Pada Keluarga Jamaah Tabligh: Perspektif Teori Tindakan Sosial Max Weber Khusniati Rofi'ah; Moh Munir
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1640

Abstract

This article aims to assess the phenomenon of wealth jihad and family economic well-being among the Tablighi Jamaah group in Sidoharjo Ponorogo Village, associated with Max Weber's theory of social action, thus providing a holistic meaning of the meaning of wealth jihad and economic welfare. Using qualitative methods, and participatory approaches, this study produced several findings: First, wealth jihad according to members of the Tablighi Jamaat is an important and important thing. Second, the meaning of economic welfare according to members of the Tablighi Jamaah is when a person can live peacefully with his family even with simple needs. Third, the implication of the existence of wealth jihad against the economic welfare of the family of the Tabligh Jama'at is that they must issue assets to fight in the way of Allah, but they do not feel deficient. In the perspective of Max Weber's action theory, the actions of wealth jihad and economic well-being carried out by the Jamaah Tabligh group can be categorized as goal-oriented actions (Rational Instrumentally), Value-oriented actions, Affective / especially emotional actions and traditional action.Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji fenomena jihad harta dan kesejahteraan ekonomi keluarga dikalangan kelompok Jamaah Tabligh di Desa Sidoharjo Ponorogo dikaitkan dengan teori tindakan sosial Max Weber, sehingga memberikan pemaknaan yang holistik tentang makna jihad harta dan kesejahteraan ekonomi. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif, dan pendekatan partisipatif, kajian ini menghasilkan beberapa temuan: Pertama, jihad harta menurut anggota Jamaah Tabligh merupakan suatu hal yang penting dan utama. Kedua, makna kesejahteraan ekonomi menurut anggota Jamaah Tabligh adalah ketika seseorang dapat hidup dengan damai bersama keluarga meskipun dengan kebutuhan yang sederhana. Ketiga, implikasi dari adanya jihad harta terhadap kesejahteraan ekonomi keluarga Jamaah Tabligh adalah mereka harus mengeluarkan harta untuk berjuang di jalan Allah, akan tetapi mereka tidak merasa kekurangan. Dalam perspektif teori tindakan Max Weber, maka tindakan jihad harta dan kesejahteraan ekonomi yang dilakukan oleh kelompok Jamaah Tabligh ini dapat dikategorikan sebagai tindakan yang berorientasi tujuan (Instrumentally Rasional), tindakan berorientasi nilai (Value Rational), Tindakan afektif (affectual/especially emotional) dan tindakan tradisional. 
Mitos Dalam Teks Fikih Klasik: Analisis Pengkajian Fikih Terhadap Tema Akidah Iza Hanifuddin
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1641

Abstract

Generally, people see fiqh as a science of law that examines the concrete term, the real thing, and the visible issues. Therefore, it requires proof. Considerably, fiqh is irrelevant if it has to discuss issues that are not real, unseen, and difficult to prove. At this point, the theme of aqidah is usually referenced. The fiqh is not to address the more disguised axiomatic issues (sarair), and it is more suited to discuss the more fundamental issues (dhawahir). However, this thought becomes a problem when the social phenomenon that arises among us like “santet”, “gendam”, “susuk pengasihan” and others so forth in society that are close to the mystery. Fiqh has been used as a tool to punish such cases. Therefore, it is worthy and vital to present on this paper a variety of fiqh texts that are relevant to the study of mythical magic that can be used as a reference when faced with a problematic situation like it.Secara umum, umat melihat fikih sebagai ilmu yang membahas persoalan hukum yang mengkaji persoalan nyata, riil, bisa diamati secara kasat mata. Oleh karena itu, ia memerlukan pembuktian. Fikih dianggap tidak relevan jika harus membahas persoalan yang tidak nyata, ghaib, dan sulit dibuktikan. Pada poin ini, tema akidah biasanya bisa dijadikan referensinya. Artinya, fikih tidak untuk membahas isu-isu akidah yang lebih bersifat tersamar (sarâir) karena ia lebih cocok untuk membahas isu yang lebih nyata (dhawâhir). Bagaimanapun, hal ini menjadi problem ketika muncul fenomena santet, gendam, susuk pengasihan dan sebagainya di dalam masyarakat yang semuanya merupakan kasus yang dekat sekali dengan kegaiban. Namun, fikih ternyata dijadikan alat juga untuk menghukumi kasus sedemikian ini. Oleh karena itu, patut melalui tulisan ini dipaparkan berbagai teks fikih yang sesungguhnya relevan dengan kajian mitos kegaiban yang bisa dijadikan rujukan ketika menghadapi situasi problematik tersebut. 
Awliya’ in The Class of Islamic Political Symbolism: A Semiotic Approach Nurainun Mangunsong
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1652

Abstract

Why QS. al-Maidah 51 is often used as a reference in determining the legitimacy and justification of the leadership of government elections? How to understand the symbolic (semiotic) meaning of using the awliya word in al-Maidah 51 in the context of leadership politics in Indonesia? To answer that question, this study uses literature (library research) by asking for semiotics. The results of the study state that the meaning of awliya is QS. Special Al-Maidah 51, in a semiotic manner, is tentative, open, and plural because of the nature of language that is not always arbitrary and universal (multiplicity meaning). Signifiers are significantly influenced by the background of institutional structure, paradigm, and the basis of political stretcher or their support. At the paradigmatic level, both symbolic (textual and contextual) meanings of awliya have a basis for scientific epistemology. While the aspects of his semiotic pragmatism (Peirce) can be measured, determine to what extent awliya's symbolic meanings is effective and followed by Muslims as part of citizenship; and how far awliya’ is accommodated in the instruments of the state legal system (legislation).Mengapa QS. al-Maidah 51 kerap dijadikan referensi menentukan legitimasi dan justifikasi kepemimpinan jabatan Pemerintahan? Bagaimana memahami makna simbolik (semiotik) penggunaan kata awliya’ dalam al-Maidah 51 itu dalam konteks politik kepemimpinan di Indonesia? Untuk menjawab pertanyaan itu, kajian ini menggunakan kajian pustaka (library research) dengan pendekatan semiotik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemaknaan awliya’ QS. al-Maidah 51 secara semiotik bersifat tentatif, terbuka, dan plural karena sifat langue yang tidak slalu arbitrer dan universal (multiplicity meaning). Pemberi makna (signified) sangat dipengaruhi oleh latar struktur institusi, paradigma, dan basis politik usungan atau dukungannya. Pada level paradigmatik, kedua makna simbolik (tekstual dan kontekstual) awliya’ memiliki basis epistemologi keilmuan. Sementara aspek pragmatisme semiotiknya (Peirce) dapat diukur sejauhmana pemaknaan simbolik awliya’ itu berlaku efektif dan diikuti oleh umat Islam sebagai bagian dari kewarganegaraan; dan sejauhmana awliya’ itu diakomodir dalam instrumen sistem hukum negara.  
Hubungan Hukum Dokter dan Pasien: Perspektif Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Rifah Roihanah
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1664

Abstract

Therapeutic transactions are agreements between doctors and patients where with this agreement, the doctor has the authority to provide health services needed by patients. The rights and obligations of each party arise because of the legal relationship resulting from this therapeutic transaction. For doctors, patients have obligations as well as rights. Likewise, conversely, doctors also have rights and obligations to patients. An equal position between doctors and patients places both as legal subjects. Each subject matter in this position has rights and obligations that must be respected. Lawsuits from parties who feel that their rights are impaired, or their interests are in the aftermath of disharmony in the legal relationship between the two parties due to the denial of each party's obligations. The relationship between doctors and patients/sufferers in the agreement adopted is now carried out in an atmosphere of mutual trust (confidence), filled with emotions, hopes, and worries of human beings. This paper aims to examine the legal relationship between doctors and patients in therapeutic transactions and how the legal relationship between doctors and patients is in the Consumer Protection Act's perspective. In the event of problems in therapeutic transactions or malpractice, then the legal basis for using doctors is inappropriate when using Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK), but Law No. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice or Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health. The controversy that has arisen in applying the UUPK to the context of the relationship between doctors and patients has become one of the drivers of the emergence of the Law on Medical Practice. Doctors' professional services are different from other services referred to in the UUPK because their professional services are closely related to professional ethics. Therefore patients cannot be categorized as consumers based on UUPK.Transaksi terapeutik merupakan perjanjian antara dokter dengan pasien dimana dengan perjanjian ini dokter mempunyai kewenangan untuk memberikan pelayanan kesehatan yang dibutuhkan pasien. Hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak timbul karena adanya hubungan hukum akibat  transaksi terapeutik ini. Terhadap dokter, pasien mempunyai kewajiban sekaligus hak. Begitu pula sebaliknya dokter juga mempunyai hak dan kewajiban terhadap pasien. Kedudukan yang sejajar antara dokter dan pasien menempatkan keduanya sebagai subyek hukum. Masing-masing subyek hokum dalam kedudukan inimempunyai hak dan kewajiban yang harus dihormati.Tuntutan hukum dari pihak yang merasa dirugikan haknya atau kepentingannya menjadi buntut atas ketidakharmonisan hubungan hukum antara kedua  belah  pihak  akibat  pengingkaran pelaksanaan kewajiban dari masing-masing pihak. Hubungan antara dokter dengan pasien/penderita dalam perjanjian terapeuti kini dilakukan dalam suasana saling percaya (konfidencial), yang diliputi dengan emosi, harapan, dan kekhawatiran makhluk insani. Tulisanini bertujuan untuk mengupas hubungan hokum antara dokter dengan pasien dalam transaksi terapeutik, serta bagaimana kedudukan hubungan hokum antara dokter dan pasien tersebut dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Dalam hal terjadi permasalahan dalam transaksi terapeutik atau terjadi malpraktik, maka dasar hukum untuk menggungat dokter tidak tepat apabila menggunakan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK), melainkan Undang-Undang No 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran atau Undang-Undang No 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan. Kontroversi yang muncul dalam penerapan UUPK terhadap konteks hubungan dokter dengan pasien, menjadi salah satu pendorong munculnya Undang-Undang tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Jasa profesi dokter berbeda dengan jasa-jasa lainnya sebagaimana dimaksud dalam UUPK, karena jasa profesi dokter erat kaitannya dengan etika profesi. Oleh karena itu pasien tidak bisa dikategorikan sebagai konsumen berdasarkan UUPK.
Actualizations of Maqashid al-shariah in Modern Life: Maqashid al-Shariah Theory As a Method of the Development of Islamic Laws and Shariah Economics Abdurrohman Kasdi
Justicia Islamica Vol 16 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i2.1666

Abstract

This article aims to examine the thoughts of Imam al-Syatibi on maqashid al-shariah and its actualizations in modern life. The method used is qualitative, while the data analysis technique used is content analysis to analyze the substance of maqashid al-shariah. It is then correlated with the context of current human life. The results of the study show that the theory of maqashid al-shariah initiated by Imam al-Syatibi has presented shariah in its elastic face. Maqashid al-shariah has transformed Islamic theory into universal human values, such as benefit, justice, and equality in Muslims' lives in the world. This can be seen at least in two ways: first, maqashid al-shariah as a developing Islamic law method. The development of the theory of maqashid al-shariah has inspired the philosophy of Islamic laws. It becomes the basis of thinking and analysis, which is fundamental to Islamic legal thinking in this globalization era and dynamic social changes. Second, maqashid al-shariah in building shariah economics; maqashid al-shariah's theory occupies a very central and vital position in formulating a shariah economic development methodology. In the context of shariah economics, the purpose of maqashid al-shariah is to safeguard human benefits. A Muslim is encouraged to produce and consume goods/services, of course, within valuable considerations.
The Construction of Indonesian Political Fiqh: Maqasid Al-Shariah Perspective and Ahmad Ar-Raisuni’s Thoughts Syaiful Bahri
Justicia Islamica Vol 17 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia UIN Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/justicia.v16i1.1671

Abstract

Some issues in various classical political fiqh literature are irrelevant if applied in the current context. This paper discusses how important the reconstruction and renewal of several classical political fiqh issues are adapted to the plural Indonesian context. In this study, the author uses the Maqasid al-Shariah theory and Ahmad ar-Raisuni’s thinking, specifically addressing political issues as the mainframe of analysis. By conducting a library study, this study concludes that several classical political fiqh issues are indeed irrelevant to the times, and therefore need to be updated and reviewed. In addition, this study has also resulted in a new construction of Indonesian political fiqh formulated in four crucial issues: democracy, state format, criteria for leaders in Indonesia, and application of Islamic Law (Shariah).