cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mohsi
Contact Email
silamohsi@gmail.com
Phone
+6282332975294
Journal Mail Official
silamohsi@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Office: Jl. Raya Palengaan Km. 11, Pamekasan 69362
Location
Kab. pamekasan,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Qisth: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Published by Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30472768     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36420
Core Subject : Religion, Economy, Social,
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Qisth: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam is a peer-reviewed academic journal that focuses on the exploration of contemporary issues in Islamic legal studies. The journal adopts both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and covers a wide range of topics within social, religious, economic, cultural, political, and legal contexts. Qisth operates within the framework of Islamic law, encompassing Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh), Islamic Legal Methodology (Ushul Fiqh), the Objectives of Islamic Law (Maqashid Sharia), and Islamic Legal Philosophy. It engages with both classical and contemporary Islamic scholarship to critically address current developments and challenges. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to, the following areas: Social and Cultural Studies: Investigations into marriage practices, divorce, customary law, social policies, and related sociocultural phenomena from an Islamic legal perspective. Religious Studies: Research on Islamic astronomy, halal industries, government religious policies, zakat, waqf, and other religious legal issues. Economic Studies: Analyses of Islamic economics, Islamic banking law, and contemporary economic challenges related to Sharia. Political Studies: Studies on Islamic political systems, governance, and the intersection of politics and Islamic law. Legal Studies: Discussions on marriage law, inheritance law, Islamic economic law, family law, civil law, comparative law, and other fields relevant to Islamic legal discourse. Qisth invites scholars, researchers, and practitioners in the field of Islamic law to contribute high-quality, original research articles that offer fresh insights and critical analysis, aiming to advance the development of Islamic legal studies in both theory and practice.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 28 Documents
 1   2   3 
Analisis Perlindungan Hak Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Adat Suku Dalam (Terasing) dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Muhammad Nur Karim Al Ismariy; Lailasari Ekaningsih; Ridho Saadillah Ahmad
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/qtmp4g53

Abstract

The marginalization experienced by the Suku Dalam (indigenous and isolated community) reflects the persistent weakness of human rights protection for indigenous peoples, particularly in ensuring the right to a decent standard of living through control over customary land (tanah ulayat). Customary land is not merely an economic asset, but constitutes a living space, cultural identity, and the foundation of social and ecological sustainability for the Suku Dalam. This study aims to analyze the forms of human rights protection afforded to the Suku Dalam in relation to the right to a decent life, to examine the legal status and recognition of customary land within the national legal system, and to assess the role and responsibility of the state in guaranteeing the protection of indigenous peoples’ rights. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, based on library research of legislation, court decisions, and national as well as international human rights instruments. The findings indicate that although the legal recognition of indigenous peoples and customary land exists normatively, its implementation remains weak due to overlapping regulations, limited participatory mechanisms, and the dominance of economic development interests. Therefore, the state is required to strengthen substantive protection through affirmative policies, recognition of customary territories, and consistent application of human rights principles to ensure a dignified and decent life for the Suku Dalam. Keywords: Suku Dalam, Human Rights, Customary Land, Decent Living, Indigenous Peoples.
The Legitimacy of Hawalah Contract in Cash on Delivery Payment System (Qiyas Analysis in Online Sale Transactions) Airin Nur Abidah; Muhammad Zainuddin Sunarto
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/txtg5z08

Abstract

This study examines the legitimacy of the Cash on Delivery (COD) payment system in online sale transactions through the application of qiyas by analogizing COD to the hawalah contract. This normative legal research employs the al-sabr wa al-taqsim method within the framework of masalik al-‘illah to determine the effective legal cause (‘illat) underlying the permissibility of COD. The analysis demonstrates that the transfer of payment obligation (naql al-dayn) constitutes the sole ‘illat mu‘tabarah that unites COD with hawalah. Unlike bai‘ al-dayn bi al-dayn, which involves the exchange of debt for debt and is prohibited in Islamic law, COD operates as a mechanism for transferring the collection of payment through a third party. Accordingly, COD is deemed legally valid (mubah) under Islamic law as a payment system facilitated by a third party and does not fall within the prohibition of bai‘ al-dayn bi al-dayn. This finding affirms the methodological flexibility of Islamic commercial jurisprudence in addressing contemporary digital transactions while maintaining normative consistency with classical legal principles.
Dari Nasab ke Nilai Moral: Rekonstruksi Konsep Kafā’ah dalam Perkawinan Islam Perspektif Empat Mazhab Fatmawati; Mutia Tsamratus Sabrina
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/m7h52e63

Abstract

Konsep kafā’ah (kesepadanan) merupakan salah satu prinsip penting dalam hukum perkawinan Islam yang bertujuan menjaga keharmonisan rumah tangga dan stabilitas sosial. Namun, pemahaman terhadap kafā’ah tidak bersifat tunggal, melainkan berkembang secara beragam dalam tradisi fikih, khususnya dalam empat mazhab Sunni. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis konstruksi konsep kafā’ah dalam perspektif mazhab Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Syāfi‘ī, dan Ḥanbalī, serta menelaah relevansi dan reinterpretasinya dalam konteks hukum keluarga Islam kontemporer melalui pendekatan maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kepustakaan, memadukan analisis normatif-yuridis, historis, dan komparatif terhadap sumber-sumber fikih klasik dan literatur akademik mutakhir. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh mazhab sepakat menempatkan agama dan akhlak sebagai inti utama kafā’ah, sementara perbedaan muncul dalam penilaian terhadap faktor-faktor sosial seperti nasab, profesi, kebebasan, dan kemampuan ekonomi. Perbedaan tersebut mencerminkan fleksibilitas ijtihad Islam dalam merespons realitas sosial yang beragam. Dalam konteks modern, pemahaman kafā’ah yang terlalu berbasis status sosial dinilai kurang relevan dan berpotensi bertentangan dengan nilai keadilan dan kesetaraan. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya reinterpretasi kafā’ah sebagai keserasian etis, spiritual, dan tanggung jawab bersama antara pasangan, sejalan dengan tujuan maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah dan dinamika hukum keluarga Islam kontemporer.
Kebebasan Berekspresi di Media Sosial: Dialektika Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Islam dalam Pembentukan Regulasi Digital Gufron Zainal Abidin Sdawi Manasiq; Mohsi Mohsi; Hammis Syafaq; Fahmi Assulthoni; Abd Ghani
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/qfmm9k86

Abstract

The normative regulation of freedom of expression on social media platforms remains unresolved, particularly in Muslim-majority countries that simultaneously operate under international Human Rights (HR) frameworks and Islamic Law principles. Available comparative scholarship tends to address this issue in general terms, without examining its specific implications within digital ecosystems. Drawing on a qualitative-comparative approach grounded in document analysis, this study examines international HR instruments specifically Article 19 of the UDHR and ICCPR alongside Islamic normative sources comprising the Qur'an, Sunnah, fatwa council rulings, and maqasid al-shari'ah literature. Both systems recognize freedom of expression as a fundamental right, yet differ substantially in philosophical foundation. HR frameworks condition restrictions on the principles of legality, legitimate aim, necessity, and proportionality; Islamic Law, by contrast, frames expression as a moral trust bounded by the protection of maqasid al-shari'ah and the principle of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar. This tension produces concrete regulatory gaps in digital content moderation, particularly regarding hate speech, blasphemy, and disinformation. In response to these gaps, the study proposes a three-component integrative regulatory model: balanced cyber-regulation design, multi-stakeholder co-regulation mechanisms, and digital literacy grounded in cross-perspectival communication ethics. The model offers an operational framework for policymakers and digital platforms seeking to develop fair and contextually sensitive content moderation policies.
Digitalisasi Identitas Masyarakat Hukum Adat: Tantangan Pengakuan Hukum dan Risiko Eksklusi Digital Muhammad Nur Karim Al Ismariy; Lailasari Ekaningsih
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/451hne27

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal recognition of indigenous peoples within Indonesia’s digital state administration system and to examine the risks of digital exclusion faced by indigenous communities in the development of modern state administration. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations, as well as secondary legal materials such as books, scientific journals, academic articles, and official government data analyzed through descriptive qualitative methods. The results of the study indicate that the legal recognition of indigenous peoples has normatively been regulated in the Constitution and various laws and regulations; however, in practice, such recognition has not been fully accommodated effectively within the digital state administration system. Administrative systems based on digital identity and data validation cause indigenous peoples who are not fully integrated into the formal administrative system to experience obstacles in accessing public services and obtaining administrative recognition. In addition, the digitalization of state administration creates risks of digital exclusion due to limited technological infrastructure, low digital literacy, weak administrative recognition, and the incompatibility between indigenous identity systems and modern state administrative mechanisms. Therefore, an inclusive and equitable digital administrative system is necessary to ensure legal protection for indigenous peoples in Indonesia.
Bonded Flexibility: How Socio-economic Relationships Shape Dynamic Margin Strategies in Indonesian Islamic Microfinance Mansur Mansur; Moh. Khoirul Umam; Fathiyatun Nikmah; Dwi Andayani
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/trqpzb20

Abstract

This study examines how socio-economic bonding --operationalized through the relational dimensions of honesty (ṣidq), mutual respect (ikrām), trust (amānah), reciprocity (tabāduliyyah), and collective solidarity (tadāmun)-- shapes dynamic Murabaha margin strategies within a community-based Islamic microfinance institution. Drawing on a qualitative case study of BMT Al-Iktisab, Aeng Nyonok Branch, East Java, data were gathered through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and internal document analysis. Thematic analysis reveals that margin flexibility is not an ad hoc commercial concession but a systematically conditioned outcome of socio-economic bond depth between the institution and its member-clients. This relational conditioning is operationalized through a multi-factor scoring matrix, loyalty-based rebates, seasonal adjustments, and a five-stage ritualized negotiation process. The study advances the concept of "bonded flexibility" -- a relational pricing logic in which Sharia-compliant boundaries are sustained while margin parameters are legitimately calibrated in proportion to the strength and quality of socio-economic bonds. This framework extends socio-economic bonding theory into the domain of relational pricing within Islamic finance, demonstrating that margin determination is a socially constructed and ethically embedded process rather than a purely technical financial calculation.
Pandangan Asy'ariyah dan Maturidiyah tentang Akal sebagai Sumber Pengetahuan Hukum fatchun Naim; Rubab wildanum mukholladun; Muhammad Al Habsy
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/g3s2a885

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pandangan teologi Asy'ariyah dan Maturidiyah mengenai kedudukan akal sebagai sumber pengetahuan hukum dalam Islam. Perdebatan mengenai fungsi akal dan wahyu merupakan salah satu isu penting dalam ilmu kalam yang berpengaruh terhadap pengembangan pemikiran hukum Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka (library research) dengan pendekatan deskriptif-komparatif melalui analisis terhadap berbagai literatur klasik dan kontemporer yang membahas pemikiran kedua aliran tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Asy'ariyah menempatkan wahyu sebagai sumber utama pengetahuan hukum, sementara akal berfungsi untuk memahami dan menafsirkan ketentuan-ketentuan syariat. Menurut Asy'ariyah, akal memiliki keterbatasan dalam menentukan baik dan buruk secara independen tanpa petunjuk wahyu. Sebaliknya, Maturidiyah memberikan ruang yang lebih luas kepada akal untuk mengetahui keberadaan Tuhan serta memahami nilai-nilai moral secara rasional, meskipun wahyu tetap menjadi pedoman utama dalam penetapan hukum syariat. Perbedaan tersebut menunjukkan adanya variasi dalam memahami hubungan antara akal dan wahyu dalam tradisi pemikiran Islam. Meskipun demikian, kedua aliran sepakat bahwa akal dan wahyu merupakan unsur yang saling melengkapi dalam memperoleh pengetahuan hukum Islam. Kajian ini menegaskan pentingnya integrasi antara rasionalitas dan wahyu dalam pengembangan hukum Islam yang relevan dengan perkembangan zaman.
Status Hukum Kewajiban Informasi dan Larangan Produksi Produk Syubhat: Analisis Komparatif antara Fikih Muamalah dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Amilatuz Zahro
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/8bs8jh66

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal status of information obligations and the prohibition of producing syubhat (doubtful) products from the perspective of Islamic muamalah jurisprudence and Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The research employs a library research method with a normative juridical approach and descriptive-comparative analysis. The findings indicate that muamalah jurisprudence and the Consumer Protection Law share similarities in emphasizing the principles of honesty, information transparency, and the prohibition of tadlis (fraud) and gharar (uncertainty). The differences lie in their legal sources, scope of regulation, concept of syubhat products, forms of sanctions, and legal orientation. Muamalah jurisprudence positions the information obligation as a mandatory legal duty with moral-spiritual dimensions, whereas the Consumer Protection Law treats it as an imperative obligation accompanied by civil and criminal sanctions. Regarding the prohibition of producing syubhat products, muamalah jurisprudence prohibits it when the doubt arises from information concealment or the practice of tadlis and gharar, while the Consumer Protection Law does not explicitly recognize the term syubhat but provides protection instruments through the prohibition of trading goods that do not meet standards and misleading information. Both legal systems are complementary and can be harmonized to achieve comprehensive consumer protection.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 28

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)