cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mohammad Fikri
Contact Email
jaladalah@gmail.com
Phone
+6285190060450
Journal Mail Official
lp2m@stisnq.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Imam Sukarto no 60, Baletbaru, Sukowono, Jember, Jawa Timur, 68194, Indonesia
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Published by LP3M Institut KH Yazid Karimullah
ISSN : 2962889X     EISSN : 29628903     DOI : 10.59246
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora is published by Islamic Sharia College Nurul Qarnain, Jember, East Java, Indonesia. The journal publishes articles of interest to education practitioners, teachers, education policy makers, and researchers. This journal encompasses research articles, original research report, reviews social studies. The journal is highly receptive to new research patterns and methods. The following articles will be issued for publication: political sciences, social, law, and humanities, etc.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 402 Documents
 37   38   39   40   41 
Persepsi dan Motivasi Ketua Rukun Tetangga (RT) dan Rukun Warga (RW) terhadap Program Insentif Pemerintah Daerah di Desa Pepe Kabupaten Sidoarjo Nisrina Nadaa Tsabitah; Dwi Setianingsih
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/hfptag69

Abstract

Local government incentive programs provide financial support to neighborhood administrators, yet recipients may interpret these incentives differently according to their experiences, needs, and social responsibilities. This article examines how Neighborhood Association (RT) and Community Association (RW) heads in Pepe Village, Sedati District, Sidoarjo Regency, perceive the local government incentive program and how these perceptions relate to their work motivation and social action orientations. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach involving five informants, consisting of three RT heads and two RW heads, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured in-depth interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model and interpreted through Max Weber’s social action theory. The findings reveal three principal perceptions of incentives: personal income, neighborhood operational funds, and recognition of community service. These interpretations shape different motivational responses. While some informants demonstrate stronger motivation through financial support and increased capacity to address community needs, others maintain their commitment primarily through religious values, social responsibility, and intrinsic motivation. The program supports neighborhood administration and community activities, but its implementation faces challenges related to insufficient financial amounts and uneven policy dissemination. The findings highlight the importance of clarifying the purpose of incentives and aligning policy support with the operational needs and responsibilities of RT/RW administrators.
Eksekusi Jaminan dalam Penawaran Efek Melalui Layanan Urun Dana Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Fani Yurnalis; Wetria Fauzi; Yasniwati Yasniwati
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/kgwzg989

Abstract

alternative financing for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and start-ups seeking to develop their businesses through the issuance of debt securities or sukuk. In securities crowdfunding services, collateral may be provided to protect investors against the risk of issuer default. However, the extent of the organizer’s authority to act as investors’ representative in relation to collateral remains unclear, particularly regarding its legal position and authority to enforce collateral in the event of default. This issue requires a distinction between the organizer’s contractual authority to represent investors and the legal position required to exercise enforcement rights under collateral law. This study aims to analyze the legal position and authority of the organizer in collateral enforcement within securities crowdfunding services. This research uses a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings show that Article 65 of Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No. 17 of 2025 requires the organizer to act as investors’ proxy in offerings of debt securities or sukuk, including supervising, inspecting, and administering collateral. However, this representative authority does not automatically grant the organizer the authority to enforce collateral. In fiduciary security, Article 8 of Law No. 42 of 1999 allows fiduciary security to be granted to more than one fiduciary recipient or to their authorized proxies or representatives. Nevertheless, the legal position of the fiduciary recipient and the authority of its representative must be established in accordance with applicable fiduciary security law and registration requirements. The enforcement process must also comply with Articles 15 and 29, including the Constitutional Court’s interpretation regarding the determination of default and the voluntary surrender of collateral. Meanwhile, under mortgage rights, Article 9 of Law No. 4 of 1996 provides that a mortgage holder must be an individual or legal entity acting as a creditor, while Article 6 grants the right to sell the mortgaged property through public auction to the first mortgage holder. The organizer may act as a representative in the enforcement process based on a valid power of attorney from the party legally entitled to enforce the collateral. However, the organizer does not acquire the legal status of a mortgage holder merely by acting as investors’ representative. Therefore, legal uncertainty remains regarding the limits of the organizer’s authority to represent multiple investors in collateral enforcement. Clearer regulations are needed to ensure legal certainty in collateral enforcement within information technology-based securities crowdfunding services.

Page 41 of 41 | Total Record : 402

 37   38   39   40   41 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Article in Press Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Januari : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora More Issue