cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dayan Fithoroini
Contact Email
dayanfithoroini@unival-cilegon.ac.id
Phone
+6281318596974
Journal Mail Official
justiciareligia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. H. Enggus Arja No. 1 Citangkil-Cilegon Prov. Banten, Indonesia
Location
Kota cilegon,
Banten
INDONESIA
Justicia Religia
Published by Universitas Al-Khairiyah
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30475880     DOI : https://doi.org/10.3898
Core Subject :
Justicia Religia is an Islamic Law Journal published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Al-Khairiyah. The journal features scholarly publications in the field of Islamic Law, encompassing classical and contemporary Islamic legal studies; comparative studies between Islamic Law and other legal systems; Islamic Family Law (Ahwal al-Syakhsiyyah); Islamic Criminal Law (Jinayah); Islamic Economic Law; Islamic Constitutional Law (Siyasah Syar‘iyyah); Human Rights in the Perspective of Islamic Law; methodologies of Islamic legal research; the implementation of Islamic Law in the modern world; Minority Fiqh (Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat); and other areas related to Islamic Law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 20 Documents
 1   2 
ADOPSI ANAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA M. Raudho; Siti Layin Musfiko
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Justicia Religia : Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i1.421

Abstract

Adopsi anak merupakan praktik sosial yang berkembang luas di masyarakat Indonesia sebagai bentuk kepedulian dan perlindungan terhadap anak yatim maupun anak terlantar. Dalam perspektif hukum keluarga Islam, praktik ini dikenal dengan istilah tabanni. Islam memandang bahwa pengangkatan anak merupakan perbuatan terpuji apabila dilandasi niat memberikan kasih sayang, pemeliharaan, serta pendidikan yang layak bagi anak. Namun, Islam memberikan batasan tegas bahwa anak angkat tidak boleh disamakan statusnya dengan anak kandung, khususnya dalam hal nasab, kewarisan, dan kemahraman. Hal ini sebagaimana ditegaskan dalam Al-Qur’an surat Al-Ahzab ayat 4–5 yang melarang penyandaran anak angkat kepada selain ayah kandungnya. Sementara itu, hukum positif di Indonesia memberikan dasar hukum yang jelas bagi praktik adopsi melalui Undang-Undang  No. 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak yang kemudian diperbaharui dengan UU No. 35 Tahun 2014, serta Peraturan Pemerintah No. 54 Tahun 2007 tentang Pelaksanaan Pengangkatan Anak. Hukum positif memandang adopsi sebagai salah satu instrumen perlindungan anak dengan prinsip utama the best interest of the child (kepentingan terbaik anak). Regulasi tersebut mengatur prosedur pengangkatan anak baik melalui jalur pengadilan maupun lembaga sosial, dengan tujuan utama menjamin hak-hak anak agar tetap terpenuhi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji konsep adopsi anak dari perspektif hukum Islam dan hukum positif Indonesia, serta menganalisis titik temu maupun perbedaan antara keduanya. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat perbedaan prinsipil dalam hal nasab, waris, dan status hukum anak angkat, namun kedua sistem hukum memiliki kesamaan dalam hal menekankan kewajiban pemeliharaan, pemberian kasih sayang, serta perlindungan hak-hak anak. Dengan demikian, adopsi dapat dijalankan secara harmonis sepanjang tidak melanggar prinsip syariat Islam dan tetap sejalan dengan regulasi negara, sehingga hak anak tetap terlindungi baik secara hukum maupun moral.
PRAKTIK RADD DALAM HUKUM WARIS ISLAM Muhammad Riyan; M. Islahuddin; Mimin Rohimin
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Justicia Religia : Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i1.422

Abstract

This study discusses the practice of Radd in Islamic inheritance law, which is a method of settling residual inheritance when there are no ashabah. This study uses a qualitative approach with the library research method to analyze the radd concept from a historical perspective, its conditions and calculation methods. The results of this study show that radd occurs when there is residual property after distribution to ashabul furudh and there is no heir to the ashabah. There are differences of opinion among scholars regarding radd, such as the opinion of Zaid bin Tsabit who handed over the remaining wealth to Baitul mal, Uthman bin Affan who distributed to all ashabul furudh including husbands/wives, and Umar bin Khattab and Ali bin Abi Talib who only gave the heirs of nasabiyah, Ibn Abbas almost the same as the settlement of the third group, That is, not giving radd to the heirs of the sababiyah. However, he did not give radd to the grandmother. This article also presents an example of a radd calculation based on this opinion. A comprehensive understanding of radd is needed to ensure fairness in the distribution of inheritance according to Islamic law.
Perbedaan Pandangan dalam Pernikahan Dini antara Ulama Klasik dengan Ulama Kontemporer Dedi Setiawan
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Justicia Religia : Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i1.423

Abstract

Early marriage is a social phenomenon that remains prevalent, particularly in developing countries such as Indonesia. This practice has sparked debates among scholars, especially between classical and contemporary Islamic scholars. Classical scholars generally allow early marriage based on Qur’anic verses, prophetic traditions, and the practices of the early Muslim generations, provided that the essential pillars and conditions of marriage are fulfilled. In contrast, contemporary scholars emphasize the approach of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, which focuses on welfare, health, and psychological readiness of the spouses, thereby tending to reject or restrict early marriage practices. This study aims to analyze the differences in perspectives between the two groups of scholars through a literature review. The analysis shows that classical scholars focus more on the legality of the marriage contract, while contemporary scholars take into account the social, educational, and health impacts. These differences are reflected in modern legal regulations, including Indonesian positive law, which sets the minimum age for marriage at 19 years. Thus, this divergence highlights the dynamic nature of Islamic jurisprudence and the necessity of contextualizing Islamic law to meet the needs of modern society.
HAK REPRODUKSI PEREMPUAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF MAQAṢID AL-SYARI‘AH DAN HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM Ikhwanul Karim
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Justicia Religia : Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i1.424

Abstract

Hak reproduksi perempuan merupakan salah satu isu penting dalam diskursus hukum keluarga Islam kontemporer. Hak ini mencakup kebebasan perempuan untuk menentukan jumlah, jarak, serta kesehatan dalam proses kehamilan dan persalinan, yang sering kali berbenturan dengan tafsir keagamaan maupun struktur sosial patriarkis. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hak reproduksi perempuan dalam bingkai Maqaṣid al-Syari‘ah, khususnya pada tujuan hifẓ al-nafs (perlindungan jiwa) dan hifẓ al-nasl (perlindungan keturunan), serta melihat implementasinya dalam hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis-teologis, melalui analisis literatur fiqh klasik, hukum positif (Kompilasi Hukum Islam), dan kajian kontemporer tentang gender. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip Maqaṣid al-Syari‘ah mendukung pengakuan hak reproduksi perempuan, karena berkaitan erat dengan upaya menjaga keselamatan jiwa, kesehatan ibu, serta keberlangsungan keturunan yang berkualitas. Dengan demikian, hukum keluarga Islam memiliki landasan normatif untuk mengakomodasi hak-hak reproduksi perempuan, sehingga dapat menjawab tantangan sosial dan medis di era modern.
Relevansi Maqasid al-Shari’ah dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Hukum Kontemporer Dayan Fithoroini
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i2.463

Abstract

The rapid social, technological, and economic changes of the past two decades have placed legal systems, including Islamic law, under significant methodological challenges. Phenomena such as the digitalization of transactions, the development of fintech, medical bioethics issues, and the complexity of public governance demand a legal approach that is not only textual but also able to capture the normative objectives and fundamental values intended to achieve sharia. In this context, the maqasid al-shari'ah is re-emerged to analyze its relevance as a normative approach in resolving various contemporary Islamic legal issues. Using library research methods, this study examines classical and modern literature to identify the position, function, and implementation of Maqasid al-shari'ah in responding to issues such as digital transactions, reproductive health, and social governance. The findings indicate that Maqasid al-shari'ah provides a flexible, adaptive, and welfare-oriented framework, thus serving as a guideline for realizing contextual, progressive, and solution-oriented Islamic law. In conclusion, the maqasid approach is highly relevant for the development of Islamic law in the modern era.
Studi Komparatif Tentang Sariqah dalam Perspektif Empat Mazhab Mimin Rohimin
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i2.467

Abstract

Sariqah (theft) is one of the ḥadd crimes in Islamic criminal law that carries specific requirements regarding its elements, conditions, and prescribed punishment. The four major Sunni schools of law Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi‘i, and Ḥanbali agree that sariqah refers to the unlawful and covert taking of another person’s property. However, they differ significantly in determining the nisab (minimum value of stolen property), the criteria for protected property (hirz), the types of goods that qualify for hadd, and the exceptions that may prevent the implementation of the punishment of amputation. This study aims to comparatively analyze the perspectives of the four schools concerning the essential conditions and elements required to impose criminal liability for sariqah, as well as to examine the textual and jurisprudential foundations underlying these differences. Using a library research method and a comparative approach, the findings reveal that the Ḥanafi school adopts a stricter stance on the nisab and the nature of stolen goods, the Maliki school emphasizes social stability and the relative value of the property, the Shafi‘i school focuses closely on the textual stipulations of hadith, while the Ḥanbali school tends to follow the apparent meaning of the scriptural evidence. These variations demonstrate that Islamic criminal law allows for interpretive flexibility and a wide scope of ijtihad in responding to diverse social contexts. This research contributes to the broader discourse on Islamic criminal jurisprudence and enriches comparative legal studies concerning contemporary issues in jinayah.
Perkawinan Metaverse: Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Perlindungan Hak Istri dan Anak dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Siti Layyin Musfiqoh
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i2.468

Abstract

The development of metaverse technology has given rise to the phenomenon of "metaverse marriage," which challenges the framework of Islamic family law, particularly in protecting the rights of wives and children. This study aims to examine the legal implications of metaverse marriage from an Islamic Family Law perspective, identify legal challenges, and formulate an adaptive framework. Using a normative-empirical method with content and conceptual analysis, this study examines legislation, Islamic doctrine, and academic literature. The findings indicate that the concept of virtual marriage creates new vulnerabilities related to marital validity, rights to maintenance, custody, and protection from violence, which are not yet addressed by conventional law. Consequently, adaptive guidelines or regulations are needed to ensure justice and well-being, in line with the dynamic principles of Islamic law.
Peran Hukum Islam dalam Mencegah Kekerasan Berbasis Rumah Tangga Eni Silviyani
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i2.469

Abstract

This study examines the role of Islamic Law in preventing domestic violence (DV) through a comprehensive library-based analysis of classical and contemporary fiqh texts, national regulations, and recent scholarly publications. The findings indicate that fundamental principles of Islamic Law—such as justice, compassion, and the protection of life and dignity—serve as strong normative foundations for preventing domestic violence within Muslim families. However, the effectiveness of these principles depends significantly on contextual interpretation, adequate religious education, and institutional support, including premarital counseling and gender-sensitive mediation in Religious Courts. The maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah framework proves highly relevant, emphasizing the protection of family welfare and safety as core objectives of Islamic Law. This study concludes that preventing domestic violence requires synergy between humanistic Islamic teachings, responsive public policies, and community empowerment. The research contributes to strengthening domestic violence prevention efforts through an Islamic legal perspective that promotes justice and family well-being.
Dekonstruksi Konsep Rajam dalam Hukum Pidana Islam Kontemporer Eni Silviyani
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Justicia Religia : Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i1.491

Abstract

This study aims to examine and deconstruct the concept of stoning punishment (rajm) in contemporary Islamic criminal law through a normative legal research approach. The analysis focuses on the normative foundations, fiqh legitimacy, and the relevance of stoning punishment within modern societies that uphold principles of justice and human rights. This research employs conceptual, historical, and philosophical approaches by examining primary Islamic legal sources, including the Qur’an, hadith, classical fiqh jinayah doctrines, and contemporary Islamic legal thought. The findings indicate that stoning punishment does not have an explicit normative basis in the Qur’an but is rather a product of juristic interpretation derived from hadith and early Islamic legal practices. The extremely strict evidentiary standards in classical fiqh suggest that stoning functioned more as a preventive symbol than as a repressive penal sanction. In the contemporary context, the implementation of stoning faces significant challenges due to the development of human rights norms and modern legal systems. Therefore, reinterpretation and deconstruction of the concept of stoning through the Maqaṣid al-Shari‘ah approach are necessary to ensure that Islamic criminal law remains aligned with substantive justice, human dignity, and public welfare.
Hak dan Kewajiban Suami–Istri dalam Fikih Klasik dan Kontemporer Sugiri; Dayan Fithoroini; Yogie Fahrisal
Justicia Religia Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Al-Khairiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3898/jure.v3i2.578

Abstract

This study examines the formulation and evolution of spousal rights and obligations in classical and contemporary Islamic jurisprudence through a library research approach. Classical texts such as al-Majmu‘, al-Mughni, and Bidayat al-Mujtahid outline a normative structure of marital relations based on reciprocal duties, with economic maintenance (nafkah), mahr, and protection identified as primary obligations of the husband, while domestic management and obedience within lawful limits are traditionally assigned to the wife. Contemporary scholarship, however, demonstrates increasing reinterpretations driven by socioeconomic change, gender dynamics, and legal developments in Muslim-majority contexts, including Indonesia. Modern studies emphasize the necessity of contextualizing classical provisions to ensure alignment with maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, particularly the principles of justice, dignity, and harm prevention (dar’ al-mafasid). The findings highlight that harmonizing classical jurisprudence with contemporary legal frameworks such as statutory reform and judicial practice offers a pathway toward a more equitable and responsive model of marital rights and responsibilities.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 20

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Justicia Religia : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Justicia Religia: Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Justicia Religia : Jurnal Hukum Islam