cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Badrun Taman
Contact Email
badrun.taman@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Phone
+6287889934136
Journal Mail Official
badrun.taman@mail.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Jalan raden Fatah Kelurahan Pagar Dewa Kecematan Selebar Kota Bengkulu
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
ISSN : 23555173     EISSN : 26569477     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v13i1
Core Subject :
Focus and Scope FOCUS This journal aims to disseminate scholarly works related to research and discussions in the field of Contextualized Islamic Law, contributing to an enhanced understanding of Islamic law. Through the publication of articles and research reports, it seeks to advance knowledge and enrich the discourse on Islamic law. SCOPE Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani welcomes research contributions from scholars, academics, and practitioners. Specifically, the journal invites papers addressing the following general topics: Contextualized Islamic Family Law Contextualized Islamic Criminal Law Contextualized Islamic Economic Law Contextualized Islamic Politics Contextualized Islamic Judicial System Contextualized Legal Aid in Islam Contextualized Islamic Jurisprudence
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 30 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue "vol 12, no 2 (2025): october" : 30 Documents clear
Beyond Reception: A Critical Reassessment of Snouck Hurgronje and the Formation of Islamic Legal Historiography in the Nusantara Archipelago (14th–16th Centuries) Sariat Arifia; Yusup Hidayat; Bambang Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.9644

Abstract

The Receptie Theory formulated by Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje has long occupied a central position in the study of Islamic law in the Nusantara, often treated as an objective explanatory framework for the relationship between Islamic law and customary law. However, this dominance has generated a historiographical problem by obscuring the pre-colonial legal realities of the region. This study critically reassesses the Receptie Theory by situating it within the broader context of colonial knowledge production and legal governance, arguing that it functioned not merely as an academic proposition but as an epistemic instrument of colonial power aimed at subordinating Islamic law. Methodologically, the research employs an interdisciplinary approach that integrates Critical Legal Studies, Postcolonial Theory, and Indo-Archaeo-Islamology. The analysis is grounded in extensive field research conducted over five years across more than fifty cities in four countries. Thousands of archaeological artifacts—particularly Islamic tombstones and epigraphic inscriptions dating from the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries—are examined and treated as primary legal-historical sources. The findings demonstrate that Islamic law had already operated as an autonomous, authoritative, and socially institutionalized legal system in the Nusantara well before the advent of European colonial rule. These empirical data directly challenge the foundational assumption of the Receptie Theory, which posits that Islamic law applied only to the extent that it was accepted by customary law. Instead, the evidence reveals a complex legal order in which Islamic norms functioned as positive law within political, social, and judicial structures. This study makes an academic contribution by deconstructing a long-standing colonial paradigm and reconstructing a more integrative historiography of Islamic law in the Nusantara. It advances postcolonial legal studies by offering an empirically grounded model for decolonizing Islamic legal historiography and re-centering indigenous Islamic legal agency in Southeast Asian history
The Role of Kyai and the State in Regulating Child Marriage: A Study in Cirebon Regency Muhammad Sibawaihi; Nandang Najmudin; Abdul Kholik; Muhammad Yogi Sandra
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8230

Abstract

Child marriage remains a pressing socio-legal issue in Indonesia, where religious norms often intersect and sometimes conflict with state regulations. This study explores the dynamic interaction between kyai (Islamic religious leaders) and state authorities in regulating child marriage within Cirebon Regency—a region known for its strong pesantren-based traditions. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with kyai, judges, and families, supported by observations and document analysis of court rulings, religious texts, and local socio-cultural practices. The findings reveal that most kyai continue to legitimize child marriage through classical fiqh doctrines such as darūrah syar‘iyyah (religious necessity) and maslahah (public interest), reflecting the enduring influence of traditional interpretations. However, younger kyai are beginning to adopt contextual ijtihād that aligns with contemporary child protection principles under maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Meanwhile, state institutions struggle to implement the 2019 Marriage Law effectively due to the strong moral authority held by kyai. This study contributes to the field of contextualized Islamic law by developing a model of legal harmonization that integrates maqāṣid-based reinterpretation of fiqh with Indonesia’s child protection framework. The research offers both theoretical insight—by advancing the discourse on critical legal pluralism in Muslim societies—and practical guidance for policymakers to foster collaboration between religious leaders and state institutions in preventing child marriage while respecting local religious values.
Legal Uncertainty in Dispute Resolution of Ijarah Muntahiya Bi al-Tamlik Contracts in Indonesia: A ḥifẓ al-māl Perspective Moh. Nurul Huda; Bambang Tri Bawono; Gunarto Gunarto; M. Dias Saktiawan
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8952

Abstract

Legal uncertainty in the construction of ijarah muntahiya bi al-tamlik (IMBT) contracts within the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) arises in two areas. First, ambiguity occurs in the transfer of ownership at the end of the lease term, which may use either a sale or a hibah (grant) scheme. Second, dispute resolution is often implemented disproportionately, causing financial harm to the musta’jir. This study employs normative juridical research with a statutory approach, as inconsistencies are found between legislation and fundamental legal principles. The findings indicate that ownership transfer in IMBT contracts should only be carried out through a sale mechanism. Using hibah is inconsistent with its classification as a tabarru’ contract and contradicts Article 362 of KHES. Moreover, dispute resolution should not treat the musta’jir as indebted and force the sale of the leased object before the contract term ends. Instead, proportional penalties, explicitly stipulated in the contract, provide a fairer mechanism. These results highlight the urgency of reformulating IMBT contract practice in Indonesia. For Sharia financial institutions, implementing clearer ownership transfer rules and fair dispute resolution mechanisms will enhance legal certainty, protect the parties involved, and strengthen public trust in Sharia-compliant financial products.
Legal Protection for Child Offenders in Bullying Cases: Challenges and Deviations in Restorative Justice Practice Ahmad Arifulloh; Andri Winjaya Laksana; Moh Aris Siswanto; Toni Triyanto
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.9425

Abstract

This study examines legal protection for children as perpetrators of bullying through the application of restorative justice. The purpose of the research is to analyze how restorative justice is implemented in resolving bullying crimes committed by minors, identify the obstacles encountered in practice, and formulate relevant solutions. This research is normative legal research using a statutory approach. Data were collected through literature studies, including legislation, academic literature, and previous research findings, and then analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that applying restorative justice to children who commit bullying can be carried out through the diversion mechanism, namely, the transfer of juvenile case settlement from the formal criminal justice process to non-litigation mechanisms outside the court system. This mechanism is in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which prioritizes the best interests of the child. From the perspective of criminal law theory, the implementation of restorative justice represents a positive deviation from the retributive justice concept, which is oriented toward punishment and retribution. Restorative justice shifts the focus of criminal justice from punishing offenders toward restoring losses experienced by victims, repairing social harm caused by the crime, and reintegrating relationships between victims, offenders, their families, and the community. The academic contribution of this study lies in strengthening the discourse on restorative justice in bullying cases involving minors by providing normative arguments that the restorative approach aligns more closely with humanitarian principles, children's rights, and the best interests of the child than conventional retributive approaches. These findings offer theoretical and practical insights for policymakers, law enforcement officers, educators, and child protection institutions to optimize diversion mechanisms to address bullying that emphasizes punishment rather than social recovery and build awareness, empathy, and social recovery for all parties involved
Public Health Protection and Social Insurance: Reforming Legal Norms through Contextualized Islamic Economic Law Ade fisti pongoliu; Abdul Razak; Marwati Riza; Sri Susyanti Nur; Uzodinma Yurriens
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8402

Abstract

Public health protection and social insurance represent foundational pillars in achieving equitable welfare across societies. In many Muslim-majority countries, however, existing social policies often fail to fully reflect Islamic legal values in a contextualized manner. This study aims to reformulate positive legal norms concerning public health and social protection through the lens of Islamic economic law. Employing a normative juridical approach, the study applies maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as its primary theoretical framework, supported by literature reviews and comparative analysis of social policy models in selected Muslim-majority states. The findings reveal that integrating Islamic financial instruments—such as zakat for funding basic healthcare, productive waqf for health facility development, and social insurance schemes based on tabarru’ and ta’āwun can be practically implemented as viable alternatives to conventional systems. In Indonesia, policies grounded in these principles show strong potential to reduce the burden on the state budget (APBN) while simultaneously enhancing social solidarity. A contextualized application of Islamic economic law proves not only normatively sound but also practically effective in designing a socially just and resilient protection system capable of responding to contemporary challenges
Integrating Tradition into Legal Reform: Reconstructing the Role of Reconciliatory Customary Judges in Diversion Processes within the Interplay of Islamic, Customary, and National Law Siti Zubaidah; Musakkir Musakkir; Syamsuddin Muchtar; Wiwie Heryani; Ahmad Masum
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8439

Abstract

Juvenile cases in conflict with the law are ideally resolved through diversion, a restorative mechanism that prioritizes recovery, avoids stigmatization, and encourages participatory dialogue among stakeholders. However, in practice, diversion implementation in Indonesia often encounters systemic and cultural barriers, especially when relying solely on formal legal institutions. This study explores the role of Reconciliatory Customary Judges (RCJs) in Tana Toraja as culturally embedded mediators and reconstructs their potential function within the national diversion framework. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research combined qualitative interviews with customary leaders (to parenge), religious figures, and law enforcement actors, alongside quantitative surveys conducted among community members. The empirical findings reveal that RCJs hold significant social legitimacy, drawn from their alignment with tongkonan kinship systems and aluk todolo norms of deliberation (musyawarah). Their mediation practices reflect Islamic principles of reconciliation (sulh) and complement the restorative justice goals of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU-SPPA). The study identifies a legal pluralism in practice, wherein Islamic, customary, and national legal traditions converge. RCJs have proven effective in resolving community conflicts and are trusted across generational lines, making them ideal mediators in diversion cases. The results call for the institutionalization of RCJ roles across diversion stages, including police, prosecution, and judiciary levels, to enhance cultural responsiveness, legal legitimacy, and social restoration. This research offers a transformative framework for integrating localized wisdom into national legal reform. By recognizing RCJs as formal diversion mediators, Indonesia can bridge gaps between normative aspirations and socio-cultural realities, promoting a restorative justice system that is legally sound, culturally resonant, and constitutionally grounded
Reforming Sharia Business Law in Indonesia: Reconstructing a Contemporary Legal Framework for Islamic Financial Integration Achmad Jaka Santos Adiwijaya; Martin Roestamy; Abraham Yazdi Martin; Radif Khotamir Rusli; Ismail Sugardo
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.10034

Abstract

Indonesia's ambition to become a global leader in Islamic finance is significantly hampered by a fragmented and sectoral Sharia business law structure. Despite substantial legislative progress, including the enactment of the Sharia Banking Law (Law No. 21 of 2008), the Financial Services Authority Law (Law No. 21 of 2011), and the Halal Product Assurance Law (Law No. 33 of 2014), regulatory power remains dispersed across various institutions and state agencies. This study employs a qualitative doctrinal legal research method, complemented by comparative and descriptive quantitative analysis, to examine Indonesia's current regulatory configuration against the backdrop of jurisdictions like Malaysia, Bahrain, the United Kingdom, and Brunei Darussalam. The findings reveal that overlapping jurisdictions, delayed implementation of fatwa-based rulings, and the absence of a unified Sharia governance framework have constrained the country's Islamic finance regulation. The paper proposes the establishment of an autonomous, comprehensive Sharia Financial Services Authority, the enactment of a professional Sharia Business Law Code harmonized with international standards, and the adoption of technology-based supervision. This contemporary legal reform is essential to ensure institutional consistency, strengthen legal certainty in Islamic finance, and advance public welfare (maslahah) through a fully integrated Islamic financial system in Indonesia.
Legal Protection of Trademark Holders Against Imported Goods: A Contextual Framework under Islamic Economic Law Elfi Haris; OK Saidin; Ningrum Natasya Sirait; Maria Kaban; Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.9064

Abstract

The increasing influx of imported goods in Indonesia has intensified market competition and created complex challenges in protecting the rights of local trademark holders. Weak enforcement mechanisms and limited public awareness have facilitated imitation and unfair competition, threatening economic sustainability and consumer confidence. This study examines the adequacy of Indonesia’s trademark protection and reinterprets it through the ethical and normative framework of Islamic economic law. Using a normative juridical approach with statutory, conceptual, and comparative methods, the research analyzes Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications alongside Islamic legal principles such as maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah (objectives of Islamic law), hifẓ al-māl (protection of wealth), and maṣlaḥah ‘āmmah (public interest). This analytical synthesis evaluates the harmony between positive law and Islamic ethics in regulating fair competition. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s legal framework provides sufficient formal protection but remains ineffective due to weak implementation, inadequate sanctions, and the limited capacity of small and medium enterprises. Conversely, Islamic economic principles emphasize moral accountability, fairness, and transparency as essential to market justice. Integrating these ethical values into trademark regulation would not only strengthen compliance but also foster socially responsible trade practices. This study contributes to contextualized Islamic law by proposing an integrated model that harmonizes intellectual property protection with Islamic moral economy. It advances theoretical understanding by linking fiqh mu‘āmalah with modern IP law and offers policy recommendations for promoting ethical branding, fair competition, and sustainable economic protection for Indonesian industries
Strengthening Dominus Litis Principle for Effective Corruption Case Management in Indonesia: Harmonizing Positive Law and Islamic Legal Principles Zet Tadung Allo; M. Syukri Akub; Aswanto Aswanto; Ratnawati Ratnawati; Andi Muhammad Aswin Anas
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8415

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia persists as a systemic problem, exacerbated by fragmented investigative authority, inconsistent regulations, and the absence of strict deadlines for case resolution. This study examines the dominus litis principle—vesting the Prosecutor’s Office with control over criminal cases—through both Islamic legal foundations and empirical realities in Indonesia. Using a normative-empirical method that combines legislative, conceptual, and comparative analyses, the research highlights the novelty of contextualizing dominus litis within Islamic jurisprudence, constitutional mandates, and human rights principles. Islamic sources, including the Qur’an and Hadith, unequivocally condemn corruption as ghulūl and bribery, framing it as both a sin and a betrayal of public trust. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, prolonged investigations that freeze assets and stigmatize suspects create harm (mafsadah) rather than benefit (maṣlaḥah), thereby violating the objectives of justice, dignity, and wealth protection. Historical institutions such as the qāḍī al-maẓālim and the doctrine of siyāsah shar‘iyyah further legitimize prosecutorial oversight as a means of ensuring accountability and safeguarding public welfare. Empirical evidence shows that fragmented authority between the Police, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), and the Prosecutor’s Office has caused overlapping roles, case stagnation, and human rights violations. Comparative insights from civil law jurisdictions such as Germany and France illustrate that stronger prosecutorial dominance ensures legal certainty and efficiency. The study concludes that reinforcing the Prosecutor’s Office as dominus litis from the investigation stage is essential for harmonizing institutional roles, establishing strict case deadlines, and enhancing coordination. Contextualized within Islamic law and Indonesian constitutional values, dominus litis emerges not only as a procedural reform but also as a structural solution that integrates legal certainty, justice, and moral legitimacy in Indonesia’s fight against corruption
Reforming Islamic Family Law: The Relevance of Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah's Concept of Legal Change Ayu Sari Ningsih; Nawa Angkasa; Nency Dela Oktora; Sakirman Sakirman; Nyimas Lidya Putri Pertiwi; Ananto Triwibowo
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i1.7087

Abstract

Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah's concept of legal change—asserting that Islamic law can evolve in response to variations in place, time, conditions, motives, and customs—offers a foundational framework for contemporary Islamic legal thought. This principle provides significant theoretical support for the ongoing renewal of Islamic family law. This study aims to critically examine the implementation of Ibn Qayyim's legal change theory in the reform of Islamic family law to meet the demands of modern social contexts. Using a library research method and a doctrinal-deductive approach, this study analyzes classical and contemporary texts to extract relevant insights. Data collection was conducted through document analysis, and triangulation of sources was employed for validation. The findings reveal that Ibn Qayyim's theory is not only relevant but essential to the dynamic nature of Islamic family law, particularly in responding to social transformations and preventing legal stagnation. His approach enables the contextualization of legal rulings, thereby aligning them with contemporary realities without detaching from Islamic legal principles. The study contributes to the discourse on Islamic legal reform by offering a normative-empirical argument for adapting Islamic family law to changing societal needs. It underscores the legitimacy of legal flexibility within Islamic jurisprudence and advocates for a responsive, contextualized approach to lawmaking. By grounding reform in social reality, this study affirms that differences and changes in Islamic family law are not only inevitable but also necessary for its continued relevance and justice in the modern world.

Page 1 of 3 | Total Record : 30

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2026): January-June Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October Vol 12, No 1 (2025): April Vol 11, No 2 (2024): October Vol 11, No 1 (2024): April Vol 10, No 2 (2023): October Vol 10, No 1 (2023): April Vol 9, No 2 (2022): October Vol 9, No 1 (2022): April Vol 8, No 2 (2021): October Vol 8, No 1 (2021): April Vol 7, No 2 (2020): October Vol 7, No 1 (2020): April Vol 6, No 2 (2019): October Vol 6, No 1 (2019): April Vol 5, No 2 (2018): October Vol 5, No 1 (2018): April Vol 4, No 2 (2017): October Vol 4, No 1 (2017): April Vol 3, No 2 (2016): October Vol 3, No 1 (2016): April Vol 2, No 1 (2015): April Vol 1, No 2 (2014): October Vol 1, No 1 (2014): April More Issue