Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice
Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to publishing high-quality scholarly works in the fields of health sciences, clinical medicine, and healthcare practice. The journal provides an international platform for physicians, researchers, healthcare professionals, academics, and policymakers to disseminate original research articles, clinical studies, systematic reviews, case reports, and critical analyses that address contemporary issues in medical science and healthcare delivery. Hippocratica welcomes manuscripts covering, but not limited to, internal medicine, surgery, public health, preventive medicine, clinical epidemiology, primary care, nursing practice, medical technology, patient safety, health systems management, biomedical research, and interdisciplinary studies in modern healthcare. All submissions undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process to ensure originality, ethical integrity, methodological rigor, and meaningful scientific contribution. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December, Hippocratica aims to foster global scientific dialogue, promote evidence-based medical practice, and advance modern medicine and healthcare services to improve patient outcomes and public health at local, national, and international levels.
Articles
11 Documents
<![CDATA[Universal Health Coverage Implementation: A Comparative Policy Review Based on WHO and World Bank Reports ]]>
<![CDATA[Ilham Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has become a central objective of global health governance, yet significant variation persists in how countries interpret and implement its policy architecture. This study examines how implementation pathways are constructed and evaluated within major global policy reports, focusing on analytical frameworks developed by leading international health and development institutions. Using a non-empirical qualitative policy review design, the research analyzes institutional reports published between 2015 and 2025 alongside comparative scholarly literature on financing, governance, and service delivery. Documents were examined through thematic coding and comparative discourse analysis to identify how coverage, financial protection, quality of care, and governance are framed as reform priorities. Findings indicate that global monitoring systems tend to emphasize measurable financial indicators and insurance expansion, while empirical research highlights governance coordination, primary health care capacity, and adaptive policy learning as more decisive for equitable and sustainable outcomes. The study concludes that global evaluation frameworks function not only as assessment tools but also as normative instruments shaping national reform agendas. Reframing monitoring approaches toward systemic integration may strengthen the effectiveness of future UHC strategies.]]>
<![CDATA[Strategies for Addressing Non-Communicable Diseases: A Global Health Policy Analysis Based on WHO Publications ]]>
<![CDATA[Fazsya Tatra Khalia]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Non-communicable diseases remain the leading cause of global mortality, yet policy responses vary significantly across countries, raising questions about how international health governance frameworks shape national strategies. This study examines how the World Health Organization conceptualizes and operationalizes NCD prevention through its normative publications, using a non-empirical qualitative policy analysis based on a structured review of WHO reports, action plans, and implementation frameworks published over the past fifteen years. Thematic coding and cross-document comparison were employed to identify dominant policy framings, implementation logics, and governance narratives embedded in these texts. The analysis finds that WHO strategies consistently prioritize structural prevention, institutional integration, and economic justification, framing chronic disease control as a development and governance issue rather than solely a biomedical one. Implementation guidance emphasizes adaptive diffusion, cost-effective interventions, and monitoring systems designed to institutionalize preventive policy. The study concludes that WHO publications operate as normative governance tools shaping how states define responsibility, allocate resources, and legitimize health interventions. These findings contribute to global health policy scholarship by demonstrating how international policy texts influence domestic reform trajectories through framing, institutional logic, and political economy narratives. ]]>
<![CDATA[Digital Health Transformation and Medical Ethics Challenges: A Global Literature Review ]]>
<![CDATA[Riska Suryani]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Digital health transformation is rapidly reshaping healthcare delivery worldwide, yet its ethical implications remain unevenly conceptualized across disciplines and governance contexts. This study conducts a global integrative literature review to examine how digital technologies—such as artificial intelligence, telemedicine, and health data infrastructures—reconfigure clinical authority, data governance, and moral legitimacy within healthcare systems. Drawing on interdisciplinary sources indexed in major academic databases, the analysis employs qualitative thematic synthesis to identify recurring ethical tensions and conceptual gaps in contemporary scholarship. The findings indicate that digital health systems redistribute decision-making authority across technological and institutional actors, complicating accountability structures and challenging established models of informed consent and professional responsibility. Ethical risks are most pronounced in areas involving opaque algorithmic processes, large-scale data integration, and unequal digital access, all of which influence public trust and healthcare equity. The review further demonstrates that legitimacy in digital health depends on the interaction between inclusive access, transparent governance, and ethical leadership within healthcare organizations. This study contributes a conceptual framework for understanding digital health ethics as a structural governance issue rather than a collection of isolated dilemmas. The findings provide a foundation for future empirical research and policy design aimed at aligning technological innovation with ethically resilient healthcare systems.]]>
<![CDATA[Health System Preparedness in Times of Crisis: A Post-COVID-19 Policy Evaluation ]]>
<![CDATA[Rafidha Nur Alifah]]>;
<![CDATA[Sahal Hanafi]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The COVID-19 pandemic exposed structural weaknesses in health system preparedness worldwide, prompting extensive policy reforms aimed at strengthening resilience against future crises. This study evaluates how preparedness has been reconceptualized in the post-COVID-19 period through a structured policy-oriented literature review combined with conceptual analysis of global health governance scholarship published between 2020 and 2025. The synthesis identifies three interrelated drivers shaping contemporary preparedness frameworks: adaptive governance and institutional learning, workforce and service delivery redesign, and integrated financing architectures. Findings indicate that preparedness increasingly functions as a systemic attribute embedded in routine policy processes rather than as a discrete emergency planning function. Health systems demonstrating coordinated reforms across governance, workforce, and financing domains exhibited stronger potential for sustained crisis responsiveness. The study advances a multidimensional conceptual model of systemic preparedness that links resilience theory with practical policy evaluation, offering a framework for assessing long-term institutional transformation beyond immediate pandemic response. By clarifying how crisis experience can be translated into durable governance reform, the research contributes to the development of more robust analytical tools for guiding global health system preparedness in an era of recurring transnational threats.]]>
<![CDATA[Vaccination Policies and Public Health Resilience: A Normative Analysis Based on WHO and UNICEF Reports ]]>
<![CDATA[Nisrina Fakhiroh Hidayati Nublah]]>;
<![CDATA[Vindi Tyastutik]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): March: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Vaccination systems have increasingly been recognized as central components of resilient public health governance, particularly following disruptions caused by global health emergencies. This study examines how vaccination policies are normatively framed as instruments of health system resilience within major international institutional guidance. Using a non-empirical qualitative document analysis, the research systematically reviews strategic and operational reports issued by the World Health Organization and UNICEF, applying thematic coding and interpretive synthesis to identify underlying ethical assumptions, governance logics, and institutional priorities. The findings indicate that global vaccination discourse constructs resilience as a multidimensional governance objective shaped by equity commitments, institutional integration, sustainable financing, and public legitimacy rather than by epidemiological performance alone. Policy frameworks consistently portray immunization as a stabilizing infrastructure capable of sustaining service continuity, reinforcing trust, and supporting long-term development goals. The study concludes that resilient vaccination systems depend on policy coherence, inclusive governance, and durable investment structures that embed immunization within broader health and social systems. These insights contribute to global health scholarship by refining conceptual understanding of vaccination resilience and by demonstrating the analytical potential of normative policy interpretation for evaluating international public health strategies.]]>
<![CDATA[The Effect of Stretching Exercises on Reducing Joint Pain Levels Among Elderly Prolanis Participants at The Purwoyoso Community Health Center ]]>
<![CDATA[Aprilia Ardi Kusumadewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Heny Prasetyorini]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Joint pain represents one of the most common health problems affecting older adults and frequently contributes to functional limitation, reduced mobility, and decreased quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of stretching exercises on reducing joint pain levels among elderly participants enrolled in the Chronic Disease Management Program at the Purwoyoso Community Health Center, Semarang, Indonesia. The study employed a quantitative quasi experimental design using a one group pretest and posttest approach. A total of 35 elderly participants were selected through purposive sampling based on predefined eligibility criteria. Joint pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale before and after a structured stretching exercise intervention. Descriptive statistics were used to describe pain distribution, while the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was applied to determine intervention effectiveness. Findings showed that all participants initially experienced moderate pain, whereas postintervention assessment indicated a substantial increase in mild pain classification and a corresponding reduction in moderate pain levels. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in pain intensity with a p value of 0.000. Structured stretching exercises were effective in reducing joint pain among elderly Prolanis participants and may serve as an evidence based nonpharmacological intervention for community based elderly healthcare services.]]>
<![CDATA[The Application of Early Mobilization for Postoperative Pain Following a Cesarean Section at RSI PKU Muhammadiyah Pekajangan, Pekalongan Regency ]]>
<![CDATA[Ani Wahyuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Heny Prasetyorini]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Cesarean section deliveries involve major abdominal incisions that cause intense postoperative pain, often leading to prolonged immobilization, heightened anxiety, and delayed recovery. Non pharmacological nursing interventions are critical to optimize recovery and mitigate reliance on heavy opioid analgesics. This clinical study evaluates the efficacy of progressive early mobilization on postoperative pain intensity, psychological adaptation, and functional safety among peripartum patients. An empirical descriptive case study with a sequential pre test and post test approach was conducted at RSI PKU Muhammadiyah Pekajangan in April 2026, involving five purposively selected postpartum mothers. Pain severity was systematically measured using the standardized Visual Analog Scale before and after a staged physical mobility protocol. The structured mobilization framework induced a uniform reduction of exactly three units on the pain scale for every subject, successfully shifting the cohort from moderate or severe distress to mild pain classifications. Furthermore, excellent wound integrity, complete hemodynamic stability, and reduced kinesiophobia were observed throughout all functional milestones. Progressive early mobilization represents a highly effective, safe, and independent nursing intervention that accelerates functional independence and safely alleviates post cesarean discomfort. ]]>
<![CDATA[The Effects of Autogenic Relaxation on Blood Pressure in Patients with Hypertension ]]>
<![CDATA[Istiqomah Istiqomah]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Retnaningsih]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This empirical study examines the immediate cardiovascular shifts and neurovascular adaptations induced by autogenic relaxation in hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with essential hypertension. Utilizing a descriptive case approach with a structured pretest and posttest observational design, the research evaluated a participant cohort of five individuals undergoing concurrent pharmacological management. The nonpharmacological mind body intervention involved standardized standalone autogenic relaxation focusing on self induced somatic feelings of warmth and heaviness, administered once daily for twenty minutes across two consecutive days. Hemodynamic metrics were precisely captured using a calibrated manual sphygmomanometer and high sensitivity stethoscope to track immediate fluctuations resulting from minimized sympathetic hyperactivity. Quantitative results demonstrate consistent post intervention decompression, with systolic blood pressure decreasing by ten to fifteen millimeters of mercury and diastolic values dropping by five millimeters of mercury across all subjects. These uniform physiological reductions successfully shifted multiple participants into milder clinical hypertension categories without adverse secondary effects. The findings validate autogenic conditioning as a safe, effective, and reproducible complementary therapy capable of optimizing autonomic stability and enhancing target organ protection within contemporary medical surgical nursing frameworks.]]>
<![CDATA[The Relationship Between Previous Childbirth Experience and Self-Efficacy Among Third-Trimester Multigravida Pregnant Women in Preparing for Childbirth at Santi Rahayu Independent Midwifery Practice, Malang Regency ]]>
<![CDATA[Nabella Sintia Deby]]>;
<![CDATA[Asworoningrum Yulindahwati]]>;
<![CDATA[Didien Ika Setyarini]]>;
<![CDATA[Ita Yuliani]]>;
<![CDATA[Retno Dumilah]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Childbirth is a complex physiological and psychological experience in which previous birth experiences may influence women's confidence in preparing for subsequent deliveries. This study aimed to examine the relationship between previous childbirth experience and childbirth self-efficacy among third-trimester multigravida pregnant women at Santi Rahayu Independent Midwifery Practice, Malang Regency. This empirical study employed a quantitative correlational design with a cross-sectional approach. The study involved 31 third-trimester multigravida pregnant women with gestational ages of 28–40 weeks who were recruited using total population sampling during March–April 2022. Data were collected using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2 (CEQ-2) and the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI), and were analyzed using Spearman's Rank correlation test. The findings showed that 71.0% of respondents reported negative childbirth experiences and 51.6% demonstrated low childbirth self-efficacy. Statistical analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between previous childbirth experience and childbirth self-efficacy (p < 0.001) with a strong correlation coefficient (ρ = 0.600). The findings indicate that women with more positive previous childbirth experiences tend to have higher confidence in preparing for childbirth. Assessing previous childbirth experiences during antenatal care may support individualized psychological interventions to strengthen maternal confidence before labor.]]>
<![CDATA[The Effects of Diabetes Exercise on Blood Glucose Levels in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus at Budi Rahayu Hospital in Pekalongan ]]>
<![CDATA[Fransisca Andina Suci Wardani]]>;
<![CDATA[Menik Kustriyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Hippocratica : Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Hippocratica: Journal of Modern Medicine and Healthcare Practice ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Nonpharmacological interventions are critical in managing metabolic trajectories and mitigating vascular complications in type II diabetes mellitus. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of structured morning exercise protocols on blood glucose stabilization among patients at Budi Rahayu Hospital. A clinical assessment tracked baseline and postregimen glycemic shifts during strategic morning windows, analyzing systemic physiological covariates including muscle mass degradation, dietary framework adherence, and pharmacological compliance. The implementation of thirtyminute exercise sessions generated significant net glycemic reductions ranging from 60 to 115 milligrams per deciliter. Absolute glucose clearance correlated strongly with higher initial hyperglycemia, though final metabolic stabilization depended heavily on baseline values. Agerelated muscle mass decline restricted optimal insulinindependent glucose uptake, whereas strict adherence to medication and the structured threeJ dietary principles enhanced longterm therapeutic outcomes. Structured light exercise serves as a highly effective, costefficient, and protective nursing intervention that optimizes metabolic clearance and improves patient selfcare behaviors when combined with comprehensive lifestyle modifications.]]>
