cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
TAMRIN FATHONI
Contact Email
tam2fiana@gmail.com
Phone
+6285233089864
Journal Mail Official
tam2fiana@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. H. Agus Salim No.RT/RW 001/001, Simo, Bediwetan, Kec. Bungkal, Kabupaten Ponorogo, Jawa Timur 63462
Location
Kab. probolinggo,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
ILAW; International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Published by Edujavare Publishing
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30626633     DOI : https://doi.org/10.70610/ilaw.v3i01
Core Subject :
ILAW; International Journal Assulta of Law Review (ISSN 3062-6633) is a blind peer-reviewed journal published by Edujavare Publishing, Indonesia. This journal publishes research articles, conceptual articles, field study reports and book reviews on all scopes of education (See Focus and Scope). This journal article is published two times a year; 2 issues per year (June and December). ILAW; International Journal Assulta of Law Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research in multiple governance policies and civil rights law, particularly in developing and emerging countries.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 30 Documents
 1   2   3 
Internalization of Anti-Corruption Values to Foster Integrity Among 6th Grade Elementary School Students Siti Muniroh
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v1i1.1226

Abstract

The internalization of anti-corruption values in elementary education plays a crucial role in building a generation with strong integrity and moral character. This study aims to analyze how anti-corruption values are internalized among 6th grade elementary school students to foster honesty, responsibility, and discipline from an early age. The research employs a qualitative descriptive method with a case study approach, using data collection techniques such as observation, interviews, and documentation. The findings indicate that the internalization of anti-corruption values is most effective when integrated into daily learning activities and reinforced through teacher modeling, participatory learning methods, and consistent habituation practices. Students demonstrate better understanding and behavioral adaptation when values such as honesty and responsibility are contextualized in real-life classroom situations. The study also reveals that teachers play a central role as role models in shaping students’ moral behavior. However, challenges remain in ensuring consistency between school-based learning and the broader social environment. The study concludes that continuous, integrated, and collaborative efforts between schools, teachers, and parents are essential for the successful internalization of anti-corruption values in elementary education.
Cyber Law in the Digital Era: Challenges and Legal Developments in Developing Countries Arief Fahmi Lubis
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v2i1.1227

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technology has significantly influenced the evolution of cyber law, particularly in developing countries that face complex challenges in adapting their legal systems to the digital era. This study aims to analyze the development and key challenges of cyber law in the context of digital transformation, with a focus on developing nations. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, relying on secondary data derived from legal documents, international reports, and academic literature. The findings reveal that although many developing countries have established legal frameworks addressing cybercrime, electronic transactions, and data protection, these regulations often remain fragmented and insufficiently enforced. Major challenges include jurisdictional issues, limited institutional capacity, lack of technical expertise, and the tension between cybersecurity and the protection of human rights. Furthermore, the study highlights the growing influence of global standards, particularly in data protection, while emphasizing the need for contextual adaptation in local legal systems. The study concludes that strengthening cyber law requires a comprehensive and adaptive approach that integrates legal reform, institutional development, and international cooperation to ensure both digital security and the protection of fundamental rights.
Strengthening Legal Protection for Women Victims of Domestic Violence: A Human Rights Perspective Ami Nurafni
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v2i1.1228

Abstract

Domestic violence against women constitutes a serious violation of human rights that requires comprehensive legal protection and effective state intervention. This study aims to analyze the strengthening of legal protection for women victims of domestic violence from a human rights perspective. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with data derived from secondary legal materials such as legislation, international conventions, and academic literature. The findings reveal that although legal frameworks—both at international and national levels—have increasingly recognized domestic violence as a public issue and a human rights concern, significant challenges remain in their implementation. These challenges include limited access to justice, weak law enforcement, inadequate institutional support, and persistent socio-cultural barriers rooted in patriarchal norms. The study emphasizes that effective legal protection must go beyond formal regulation and adopt a victim-centered and holistic approach, integrating legal, social, and institutional mechanisms. It concludes that strengthening legal protection requires not only normative alignment with human rights principles but also practical efforts to ensure accessibility, enforcement, and prevention.
Dynamics of Family Law in the Context of Globalization: Comparison Between Legal Systems Achen Karriel
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v2i1.1229

Abstract

The dynamics of family law have experienced significant transformation in the era of globalization, driven by the increasing influence of international norms, transnational interactions, and the growing emphasis on human rights. This study aims to analyze the reform of family law across different legal systems through a comparative legal approach, focusing on how globalization shapes legal frameworks, principles, and practices. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, relying on secondary data obtained from legal documents and academic literature. The findings reveal that globalization encourages the convergence of family law systems, particularly in the adoption of human rights principles such as gender equality, child protection, and individual autonomy. However, the study also identifies persistent divergence due to cultural, religious, and social factors, especially in regions where legal pluralism remains strong. While European legal systems tend to exhibit greater harmonization through supranational institutions, many Asian systems demonstrate selective adaptation by integrating global norms with local values. The study concludes that an effective model of family law reform requires a balanced approach that combines universal legal standards with socio-cultural sensitivity, ensuring both legal certainty and social legitimacy in the globalization era.
Reform of Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Study of Restorative Justice in Indonesia and the Netherlands Mohammed Abdu Rehany
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v2i1.1230

Abstract

The reform of criminal justice systems has increasingly shifted toward more humane and participatory approaches, particularly through the adoption of restorative justice. This study aims to analyze and compare the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia and the Netherlands as part of broader criminal justice system reforms. The research employs a normative legal method with a comparative approach, examining legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms, and practical applications in both countries. The findings reveal that Indonesia applies restorative justice in a more flexible and culturally embedded manner, emphasizing social harmony and community-based resolution. However, its implementation remains fragmented and largely dependent on the discretion of law enforcement authorities. In contrast, the Netherlands demonstrates a more structured and institutionalized approach, supported by clear legal regulations, professional mediation services, and stronger protection of victims’ rights. Both countries share a common objective of reducing reliance on punitive measures, improving access to justice, and restoring social relationships. Nevertheless, differences in legal certainty, institutional capacity, and empirical evaluation highlight the need for further development, particularly in Indonesia. This study concludes that an integrative model combining legal rigor with socio-cultural adaptability is essential for achieving an effective and equitable criminal justice system.
Identification of Indicators for Evaluating Reclamation and Post-Mining Policies Towards Compliance by Companies in Jambi Province in Environmental Aspects Amril Fadli; Bunga Mardhotillah
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v3i02.1859

Abstract

Mining activities in Jambi Province significantly contribute to economic growth but pose severe threats to environmental sustainability. Despite existing regulations, company compliance regarding reclamation and post-mining obligations remains a critical challenge. Evaluating these policies requires a clear, standardized set of indicators to measure compliance effectively. This study aims to identify and formulate key performance indicators (KPIs) for evaluating reclamation and post-mining policies, specifically focusing on enhancing company compliance with environmental aspects in Jambi Province. This study employs a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative analyses. Data were gathered through legal desk research, deep interviews with environmental experts, government officials, and mining representatives, followed by a Delphi survey to validate the indicators. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was utilized to prioritize and weight the identified indicators. The study successfully identified four main dimensions of indicators: Ecological Restoration (soil quality, revegetation success, biodiversity index), Financial Assurance (reclamation bond placement, budget realization), Legal-Administrative Compliance (reporting punctuality, document conformity), and Social-Environmental Impact (acid mine drainage control, local community satisfaction). Ecological restoration and financial assurance emerged as the highest-weighted priorities for ensuring long-term environmental sustainability. The formulated indicators provide a robust, measurable framework for local governments to monitor, audit, and evaluate mining companies' compliance. Implementing these structured indicators will strengthen policy enforcement and accelerate successful post-mining rehabilitation in Jambi Province.
Analisis Yuridis Normatif terhadap Perbandingan Sistem Arbitrase di Indonesia dan Malaysia Imanuel Christopher Valentino Lahai; Darrent Holys Mingki
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v3i02.1195

Abstract

Arbitration is an out-of-court civil dispute resolution mechanism based on the agreement of the parties, designed to provide a resolution that is swift, efficient, final, and binding. This study aims to analyze the arbitration systems in Indonesia and Malaysia from a normative-juridical perspective and to compare the scope of authority of arbitration institutions and the role of courts within both legal systems. The research employs a normative legal research method utilizing statutory and comparative legal approaches, drawing upon primary legal materials (legislation) and secondary legal materials (legal literature). The findings indicate that, normatively, the Indonesian arbitration system grants robust authority to arbitration institutions through the final and binding nature of awards; however, in practice, court involvement persists, potentially undermining legal certainty and the effectiveness of arbitration. Furthermore, limiting the grounds for setting aside awards to procedural issues raises concerns regarding substantive justice in instances of arbitrator error. In contrast, the Malaysian arbitration system demonstrates greater consistency in limiting court intervention, positioning arbitration as an autonomous dispute resolution mechanism aligned with international arbitration practices. A comparison of the two systems reveals differences in the degree of institutional autonomy and the consistency with which the principle of award finality is applied factors that directly impact legal certainty and business confidence.
The Legal Position of the Geneva Conventions in Resolving Contemporary International Conflicts Isabelle Rochat
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v3i02.1919

Abstract

This article examines the legal position of the 1949 Geneva Conventions in resolving contemporary international conflicts. It analyzes the Conventions as the central treaty framework of international humanitarian law and evaluates their continuing relevance in international and non-international armed conflicts, asymmetric warfare, cyber operations, autonomous weapons, occupation, detention, and civilian protection. Using a normative juridical and qualitative literature-based method, the study examines treaty provisions, international legal principles, judicial practice, ICRC materials, and scholarly literature. The analysis shows that the Geneva Conventions remain legally authoritative because their core principles have been reinforced by customary international law, Additional Protocols, international criminal law, and domestic implementation. Their principal weakness is not legal irrelevance, but decentralized enforcement, political selectivity, uncertain classification of conflicts, and technological change. The article argues that the Conventions remain indispensable, but their effectiveness depends on good-faith implementation, Common Article 1 obligations, independent monitoring, national prosecution, international accountability, and contextual interpretation of existing rules.
Implementing Gender Pay Equality within Icelandic Labor Law Rebecca L. Morrison
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v3i02.1920

Abstract

This article examines the implementation of gender pay equality within Icelandic labor law. It focuses on the legal principle of equal pay for equal work and work of equal value, the Icelandic Equal Pay Standard ÍST85, mandatory certification, pay transparency, collective bargaining, and organizational enforcement. Using a normative juridical and qualitative literature-based method, the study analyzes Icelandic legal policy, academic literature, organizational research, comparative equality law, and labor-market studies. The analysis shows that Iceland has moved beyond a purely individual-complaint model by requiring covered employers to document, evaluate, and certify their pay systems. This institutional design improves transparency and shifts part of the burden from workers to employers. Nevertheless, certification does not automatically eliminate gender inequality. Occupational segregation, undervaluation of feminized work, unequal care responsibilities, managerial discretion, and limited enforcement may reproduce pay differences within formally compliant organizations. The article argues that effective equality requires integrated regulation combining certification, transparent criteria, collective bargaining, strong sanctions, independent auditing, and family policies that support equal labor-market participation.
Strategies to Enhance Students’ Resilience in Stochastic Process Lectures in Accordance with Permendiktisaintek 39/2025 and Permendiktisaintek 10/2026 Bunga Mardhotillah; Kamid; Nizlel Huda; Zurweni
ILAW International Journal Assulta of Law Review
Publisher : Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/ilaw.v3i02.1971

Abstract

The Stochastic Processes Lectures involves a high level of conceptual abstraction and mathematical complexity, often posing a significant cognitive challenge that triggers academic anxiety among students. In this context, academic resilience—the ability of students to persevere and overcome learning difficulties—becomes a vital factor in determining academic success. This study aims to identify academic resilience strategies employed by students undertaking the Stochastic Processes course and to analyze their implications for the governance of higher education quality assurance. This study adopted a qualitative approach combining a descriptive case study method with an educational policy analysis. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with students, classroom observations, and a document analysis of curriculum and quality assurance policies. The results identified four primary resilience strategies deployed by students: (1) Self-Regulated Learning: Structured time management and cognitive load decomposition; (2) Peer-Assisted Learning: Formation of independent study groups to tackle complex probability problems. (3) Visual Computing Utilization: Leveraging software simulations to visualize abstract stochastic models. (4) Proactive Academic Help-Seeking: Actively utilizing consultation hours with lecturers and teaching assistants. These findings carry strategic implications for fulfilling quality assurance standards in accordance with Permendiktisaintek No. 39 of 2025, as amended by Permendiktisaintek No. 10 of 2026 on Higher Education Quality Assurance. This regulation mandates higher education institutions to strengthen their Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI) by delivering inclusive, flexible, and adaptive learning processes. Institutions are required to go beyond merely measuring learning outcomes by actively establishing comprehensive academic support systems and fostering environments that safeguard student mental well-being when facing high-difficulty courses.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 30

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue International Journal Assulta of Law Review