cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Fikri Ardiyansyah
Contact Email
fkiki9090@gmail.com
Phone
+6287870536867
Journal Mail Official
fkiki9090@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Kamal Raya No.2a, RT.11/RW.8, Cengkareng Barat, RT.6/RW.8, Cengkareng Tim., Kecamatan Cengkareng, Kota Jakarta Barat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 11730
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Published by Education Publisher
ISSN : 30900115     EISSN : 30900115     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Journal Social Politics and Humanities is a high-quality open-access peer-reviewed research journal that is published by Education Publisher : Humaniora and Sosial Sains is providing a platform that welcomes and acknowledges high quality empirical original research papers about social, Learning humanities, Educational social sciences, sociology, Management and related ones written written by researchers, academicians, professionals, and practitioners from all over the world.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 29 Documents
 1   2   3 
Refleksi Masa Depan Filsafat Hukum Di Era Kecerdasan Buatan (Ai) Dan Teknologi Global Bunga D Cahyani Sukardi
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This descriptive paper examines contemporary philosophical thought concerning the nexus of language, modern human existence, power, and technology, signifying a paradigm shift from rationalism toward critique and deconstruction spurred by scientific leaps. In the legal realm, the disruption of artificial intelligence (AI) necessitates a transition from anthropocentric jurisprudence toward algorithmic justice anchored in ethics and human rights. The proliferation of AI technology and global digitalization presents profound challenges, including autonomous machine decision-making without full human oversight, the erosion of traditional territorial sovereignty due to blurred borders, and algorithmic bias perpetuating historical social prejudices. These realities engender tension between procedural efficiency and substantive justice, ignite debates over the conferral of new legal status (electronic personhood), and complicate the attribution of legal liability for system failures.Addressing these dynamics, the future trajectory of legal philosophy must reinstate ethics and morality as foundational pillars of positive law to resist technological capitalism. Beyond fostering adaptive regulations responsive to rapid innovation, legal philosophy bears the fundamental imperative to safeguard human dignity. Consequently, humans must remain the ultimate arbiters in legal decision-making to uphold freedom, equality, and high-quality substantive justice for all.
Pemikiran Equaliti Berkualitas Dalam Era Kontemporer Didi Sukardi
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper is an inquiry into the conceptual understanding and philosophical reflections on the aspiration for high-quality equality, which constitutes a fundamental right for all global citizens, without exception to the people of Indonesia. In philosophy, the concept of equality centers on fundamental questions regarding how human beings ought to be treated and how resources and opportunities should be equitably distributed. The caliber of philosophical thought on this issue relies heavily on the clarity of the core variables used to define it. Furthermore, it addresses how high-quality equality can be realized in the contemporary era amidst the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The quality of philosophical thought regarding equality is not judged by the enforced uniformity of final outcomes, as forcibly leveling results often infringes upon individual liberty. Instead, ideal philosophical equality is appraised by a system’s capacity to eliminate structural discrimination, compensate for natural disadvantages (brute luck), equalize basic human capabilities to flourish, and cultivate mutually respectful social relations free from oppressive power hierarchies. Ultimately, high-quality equality in the contemporary era must be inclusive, technologically adaptive, and sensitive to diverse backgrounds. True equality today is achieved not by making everyone identical, but by ensuring that differences never serve as a pretext for marginalization or discrimination
ANALISIS SWOT PRODUK KERIPIK PISANG PADA KELOMPOK WANITA TANI (KWT) SATYA GEMILANG KABUPATEN LEBAK - BANTEN Akhmad Hidayatullah; Bella Nanda Ardhya
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) and formulate marketing strategies for the banana chips production business at KWT Satya Gemilang. This descriptive research was conducted from July to August 2026, utilizing primary data gathered through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data were analyzed using the SWOT analysis framework. The results indicate that the group's strengths lie in the utilization of home yards and strong group resilience, whereas weaknesses include uneven member participation and production capacity that cannot yet meet modern market demand. External opportunities consist of financial support from Biofarma Bandung and BAZNAS, alongside market potentials through local stores and social media. Meanwhile, threats include suboptimal aid fund distribution and members' time constraints due to other occupations. Based on the SWOT matrix, the business is positioned in Quadrant III (Turnaround Strategy / W-O), indicating high market opportunities constrained by internal weaknesses. Therefore, the strategic focus is directed toward mitigating internal challenges through member capacity building, maximizing local resources, and strengthening partnerships to capture market opportunities effectively.
EFEKTIVITAS ORGANISASI KEMENTERIAN INVESTASI DAN HILIRISASI/BADAN KOORDINASI PENANAMAN MODAL DALAM MENINGKATKAN INVESTASI DI INDONESIA Dwianta Hadi Pramana; Harry Nenobais; Ferid Nugroho
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the organizational effectiveness of the Ministry of Investment and Downstream Industry/Investment Coordinating Board (Kemeninveshil/BKPM) in driving investment growth in Indonesia. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach within a post-positivist paradigm, data were gathered from nine purposive informants representing strategic planning and oversight officials, operational service personnel, and business investors. Data collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and 2020–2025 performance documentation were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña interactive model alongside the McKinsey 7S diagnostic framework. Findings indicate that Kemeninveshil/BKPM is fairly effective, evidenced by the 2025 investment realization of IDR 1,931.2 trillion (101.3% of the target). However, organizational effectiveness has not been optimally institutionalized. While strategy, shared values, and style serve as enablers, the core challenge lies in an organizational alignment gap, predominantly within the structure-systems relationship. Key bottlenecks include weak process ownership, cross-functional accountability gaps, defective handover mechanisms, fragmented decision-making authority, and poor data integration, which concurrently affect staff and skills.Consequently, this study recommends reinforcing end-to-end process ownership, integrating decision-support systems, adopting dynamic workforce planning, aligning risk-based competency architectures, and fostering collaborative leadership with a culture of shared outcomes and continuous improvement
Menuju Politik Kebajikan (Politics of Virtue): Menggagas Pemerintahan komunitarian  Berbasis Pancasila di Indonesia Dita Purnama Sari Sukardi
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article analyzes the relevance of the communitarian approach and the concept of the "Politics of Virtue" pioneered by Michael J. Sandel—within the context of governance in Indonesia. From a communitarian perspective, good governance should not merely act as a "neutral umpire" allowing value-free markets to operate without direction; rather, the government must actively intervene to foster social cohesion. In Indonesia, this approach is manifested through the revitalization of the *Pancasila* values enshrined in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Substantively, this provides protection for the community's cultural identity against the threats of extreme individualism. The article argues that reconstructing the state's role as an active and moral entity is key to maintaining national integration amidst the currents of modernity.
MEMBACA PEMIKIRAN WERNER MENSKI DALAM BERSETIGA HUKUM Andrew Grey
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article critically reviews Werner Menski’s seminal work, Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa (2006). Menski offers a compelling critique of conventional Western comparative jurisprudence, arguing that it remains parochial and Eurocentric due to its exclusive focus on state-centric legal positivism. As an alternative, he proposes the Triangular Model of Legal Pluralism, conceptualizing law as a continuous dynamic interaction among three primary elements: natural/religious values, state positive law, and socio-cultural realities. This analytical framework is subsequently applied to examine major non-Western legal traditions, including the cosmic justice of Hindu law, the dialectic between divine sharia and human fiqh in Islamic law, the resilience of African customary laws against colonial legacies, and the synthesis of formal codes and moral conduct in Chinese law. Ultimately, Menski demonstrates that imposing uniform global legal standards is futile, reaffirming that legitimate and effective law inevitably reflects local socio-cultural particularities.
Populisme Programatik, Populisme Teknokratis,Kebijakan Kesejahteraan, Patronase Politik, Oligarki Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Politik Kebajikan Dan Moral Di Indonesia Kaspudin Nor; Didi Sukardi
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Studies on populism in Indonesia have generally been dominated by narratives of identity-based polarization and demagogic rhetoric. However, the contemporary political landscape reveals a significant shift marked by the emergence of programmatic populism. This article analyzes how political actors in Indonesia adopt pragmatic and technocratic populist strategies to garner mass support. Unlike classical populism, which relies on ethnic, racial, and religious (SARA) sentiments, programmatic populism focuses on offering concrete and tactical direct welfare programs. Employing a qualitative analysis of social policies centered on the fulfillment of basic material rights, the article argues that this strategy serves as an effective instrument for penetrating and challenging the dominance of traditional patronage networks and oligarchic forces. The article concludes that programmatic populism not only transforms grassroots voter mobilization but also offers a crucial repositioning regarding the fulfillment of the lower class's material rights, moving toward a more technocratic institutionalization of welfare politics in Indonesia. 
KERJA SAMA INDONESIA–NORWEGIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI RESULT-BASED CONTRIBUTION UNTUK PENGURANGAN EMISI DARI DEFORESTASI DAN DEGRADASI HUTAN PERIODE 2020–2025 Fikri Ardiyansyah
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Climate change represents a global challenge requiring international cooperation, particularly in reducing greenhouse gas emissions resulting from deforestation and forest degradation. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Indonesia–Norway cooperation through the Result-Based Contribution (RBC) mechanism in supporting forest-sector emission reductions during 2020–2025. This research employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing literature reviews and official document analysis. Robert O. Keohane's liberal institutionalism theory provides the analytical framework for examining shared interests, institutional roles, and bilateral cooperation mechanisms. The findings indicate that Indonesia–Norway cooperation underwent institutional restructuring through a renewed agreement in 2022 following the termination of the previous partnership in 2021. The RBC mechanism was implemented through financial contributions based on verified emission reductions, with Norway's total contributions reaching USD216 million by 2025. Nevertheless, increased deforestation in 2024 demonstrates persistent challenges in ensuring sustainable forest protection. The study concludes that the RBC mechanism strengthens environmental diplomacy and climate financing. However, its long-term effectiveness depends on transparency, accountability, and consistent implementation of Indonesia's forest governance policies.
Good Governance Dalam perspektif Michael J Sandel Bunga D Cahyani Sukardi
Journal Social Politics and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Journal Social Politics And Humanities
Publisher : Education Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The concept of good governance in contemporary political discourse is predominantly shaped by technocratic approaches emphasizing administrative efficiency, institutional effectiveness, and individual liberties, often overlooking ethical and moral dimensions. This study aims to reconstruct the concept of good governance through Michael J. Sandel’s philosophical perspective on justice, as presented in Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? (2009), and examine its relevance to Indonesia’s constitutional system. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach through library research, this study critically explores Sandel’s critique of utilitarianism and libertarianism alongside the constitutional values of Pancasila. The findings reveal that Sandel’s politics of virtue provides a philosophical foundation for governance grounded in substantive justice, moral responsibility, democratic deliberation, and the pursuit of the common good. These principles align with Pancasila’s emphasis on humanity, deliberative democracy, and social justice. This study concludes that integrating Sandel’s philosophical framework with Pancasila offers an alternative governance paradigm that transcends technocratic considerations by emphasizing political ethics, constitutional morality, and substantive justice while safeguarding democratic principles, pluralism, and fundamental human rights.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 29

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal Social Politics And Humanities Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Journal Social Politics And Humanities Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Journal Social Politics And Humanities Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Journal Social Politics And Humanities