cover
Contact Name
Pengelola Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum
Contact Email
jurnaldejure@kemenkum.go.id
Phone
+628119780028
Journal Mail Official
jurnaldejure@kemenkum.go.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Raya Gandul No.04 Gandul Cinere Depok 16512
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
ISSN : 14105632     EISSN : 25798561     DOI : 10.30641
Core Subject :
The De Jure Legal Research Journal, known as Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, is a legal publication issued three times a year in March, July, and November. It is published by the Law Policy Strategy Agency of the Ministry of Law of the Republic of Indonesia, in collaboration with the Indonesian Legal Researcher Association (IPHI). This association was legalized under the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number AHU-13.AHA.01.07 in 2013, dated January 28, 2013. The journal serves as a platform for communication and a means of publishing diverse and relevant legal issues, primarily for Indonesian legal researchers and the broader legal community. In 2024, the management of the De Jure Legal Research Journal will include various stakeholders, as outlined in the Decree of the Head of the Law and Human Rights Policy Agency Number PPH-18.LT.04.03 for 2024, dated February 20, 2024, which establishes a publishing team for the journal. Based on the Decree of the Director General of Higher Education, Research and Technology, Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia Number 177/E/KPT/2024 concerning the Accreditation Ranking of Scientific Journals Period II of 2024, dated October 15, 2024, the De Jure Legal Research Journal has received a Scientific Journal Accreditation Ranking of Rank 2 (Sinta-2 or S2). This re-accreditation at Rank 2 applies from Volume 23 Number 1 (2023) through Volume 27 Number 4 (2027), covering publications issued during this period.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 345 Documents
Analysis to The Policy of Delaying The Execution of Those Sentenced to Death is a Violation of Human Rights Muhaimin Muhaimin
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 1 (2022): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.105-120

Abstract

Human rights are basic rights of the human being that exist and are a gift of Almighty God. Human rights are also natural rights that therefore cannot be revoked by other human beings. Indonesia is one of the countries that still apply the death penalty in its positive law where the unlawful acts are considered an extraordinary crime that endangers the lives of the nation and the State. The discourse of Indonesia as a country that has the philosophy of Pancasila until now can cause pro and con problems, because there are still many among legal experts and human rights activists as well as the public who question it because of differences and views, among others. The statement of the problem in this scientific paper is "How is the policy related to the death penalty in human rights seen from the current positive legal regulations?" The method used in this study is a normative juridical method. Seeing so many convicts with sentenced to death who have not been executed, it can be said that the State has committed human rights crimes (against convicts with sentenced to death), because they have served the sentence for the 2nd (second) time, namely the Imprisonment and Death Penalty. The implementation of Restorative Justice is possible to be executed as a legal breakthrough, where it becomes a solution to avoid human rights violations that can occur within the time of the delay of the death penalty. The National Commission for Human Rights (the Komnas HAM) as a representative of the Government is expected to be more aggressive in protection efforts.
Juridical Analysis About Cyberbullying Cases by Child Perpetrators Against Child Victims Joshua Evandeo Irawan; Andrian Nathaniel; Steven Jonathan
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 1 (2022): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.17-32

Abstract

This study discusses the legal protection of a child victim of cyberbullying and a child perpetrator. This research raised a case where a child with the initial "Z" who became a victim of cyberbullying from her schoolmate with the initial "S". The research method used is the normative-juridical method: processing legal materials collected through a literature review.This study aims to determine the applicable law (legal protection) against the child victims of cyberbullying, based on Law No.35 of 2014 in conjunction with Law No.11 of 2008. In terms of the child perpetrator of cyberbullying, the criminal justice system of the children must be based on Law No. 11 of 2012.The result shows that "Z", the child victim of Cyberbullying, has received positive legal protection in Indonesia based on Article 76C of Law 35/2014, and Article 27 paragraph (4) juncto Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law 11/2012. Child "S" who terrorizes Child "Z" via WhatsApp may be subject to criminal sanctions in accordance to Article 80 paragraph (1) of Law 35/2014 juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law 11/2008 junctis Article 81 of Law 11/2012. This case criminal sanctions can be imposed on Child "S" with Law 11/2012.
Restorative Justice in Child Rape Perpetrators: A Case Study on Perpetrators With Intellectual Disability Wahyu Saefudin; Rony Aryono Putro; Sriwiyanti Sriwiyanti
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 1 (2022): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.49-62

Abstract

The main role of probation officers is implementing restorative justice for the juvenile. However, a rape perpetrator with intellectual disability will encourage a different approach. Therefore, this study aims to explain how the application of restorative justice by probation officers on youth offenders with intellectual disabilities. The method used in this study is an empirical normative method. Primary legal materials were obtained through interviews with probation officers tasked with assisting in the investigation, prosecution, and examination in court, to assist in implementing decisions. Another source of legal materials was also obtained through the document of community research. Finally, secondary legal materials were obtained from various sources such as legislation, library books, and scientific journals. The results show three primary points. First, probation officers have realized restorative justice through their role in community research and mentoring. Second, probation officers provide recommendations for the rehabilitation of offenders. Third, probation officers reinforce other law enforcers such as police, prosecutors, and judges to conduct psychological diagnoses to ensure the child's condition. However, this study also finds that not all law enforcers can understand and handle children with intellectual disabilities.
State's Loses in The Corruption Crimes of Members of The Board of Directors of State-Owned (Persero) or Regional Government-Owned Banks and Their Subsidiaries in The Provision of Credit/ Financing Try Widiyono; Farhana Farhana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 1 (2022): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.33-48

Abstract

Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 on Eradication of Corruption Crimes provides normative direction that one of the essential things that must be proven in corruption crime is the existence of "State's losses". Members of the Board of Directors of State-Owned Enterprise in the form of bank, in managing of the company, especially in the provision of credit or financing, are very afraid of being accused of corruption crimes. The legal relationship between the State as a legal subject with the companies having status as State-Owned Enterprises (the Persero) is the existence of majority share ownership or controlling shares by the State in limited liability companies with Persero status. Such a legal relationship has been regulated in various applicable laws and regulations that have and are sourced from theoretical and philosophical foundations such as corporate legal doctrines for example the legal doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, the doctrine of fiduciary duty law, and the Business Judgment role. Some legal problems arise, namely how is the legal relationship of the State with State Enterprises? And can the non-performing credit or non-performing bank financing affect the value of the State's participation in State-owned Bank /Region-Owned Bank? The legal research used in addressing the issues in question is normative legal research, and therefore the results obtained in this legal research are what they should be.
Urgency of The Position of District Election Supervisory Body in The Resolution of Disputes Between Participants in The Regional Head Election in Indonesia Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 1 (2022): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.121-134

Abstract

The ad hoc position of the District Election supervisory body will have an impact on actions to carry out the functions and duties of the District Election supervisory body during the election of regional heads. This study aims to determine the urgency of the position of the District Election supervisory body in the formation of effective supervision in the Pilkada and to find out the Mechanism of Dispute Resolution between Election Participants by the District Election supervisory body in the election of regional heads. This study uses a normative juridical research method, with secondary data and a conceptual approach. The data were analyzed qualitatively. The result of the first study is that the decision of the Election supervisory body an ad hoc institution is binding but still limited and not final because the aggrieved party can file a lawsuit to the State Administrative High Court. The mechanism for resolving disputes between participants in the Pilkada organizers by the District Election supervisory body is regulated technically through Election supervisory body Number 2 of 2020. Disputes between participants are carried out on the principle of the quick and simple, same-day to achieve legal certainty and benefit in regional head elections.
The Legal Position of Sumang Child According to Customary Law in Kopong Village of East Nusa Tenggara Evi Djuniarti
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 1 (2022): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.135-144

Abstract

The existence of Sumang Child for the people of Kopong Village, Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara is a "disgrace" for his extended family, so based on local customs, the parents as well as the child must be expelled from the village, after going through the customary procession. Children born from unexpected relationships do not have rights either from the family of the 2 (two) parents or based on the provisions of national and international law. The formulation of the problem in the writing of this paper is "How is the Position of Sumang Child seen from Customary Law and State Law? This research is secondary data obtained through literature studies in the form of laws and descriptive analysis. Custom is a very sacred ritual for the people of Kopong village, Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, especially regarding ceremonies for the existence of Sumang Child and the parents that cannot be delayed or avoided. When viewed from the existence of the Child Protection Law and other regulations, this does not occur in the protection of the child and his parents.
Reviewing Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding Formal Review of Job Creation Act: a Progressive Law Perspective Satria Rangga Putra; Sujatmiko Sujatmiko
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Edisi Juni
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.229-242

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 states that the Job Creation Act has a formal defect and must be corrected within 2 (two) years since the decision was pronounced. The a quo decision created a discourse in the community regarding the enforcement status of the Job Creation Act. This paper tried to review constructively using the perspective of progressive law and judicial proportionality in finding solutions and balances. This paper used a normative juridical research method, with a conceptual, case, and legislation approach. Progressive law in Satjipto Rahardjo's perspective has four criteria. The first has a big goal in the form of human welfare and happiness. Second, contains very good human moral content. Third, progressive law is a "liberating law" which includes a very broad dimension that does not only move in the realm of practice but also theory. Fourth, it is critical and functional, because it does not stop reviewing existing deficiencies and finding ways to improve them. Meanwhile, the principle of proportionality emphasizes the alignment of goals to be achieved, rational relationships, steps that must be taken, and the feasibility between the benefits obtained in realizing the goals to be achieved and the losses suffered against constitutional rights. Based on this explanation, it can be concluded that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is in line with the concept of progressive law and tried to find out a middle way through a judicial proportionality approach by considering the smallest potential loss from the issuance of the decision.
Initiating The Concept of Sui Generis of the Legal Protection of Communal Intellectual Property in The Philosophy of Science Perspective Taufik H. Simatupang
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Edisi Juni
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.243-256

Abstract

This study aims to answer how the protection of Communal Intellectual Property rights in Indonesia and how the concept of sui generis can be applied from the perspective of the philosophy of science. The research method used is a doctrinal legal research method with an approach to legislation, legal concepts, and theories through literature search. The results show that until now Indonesia has recorded and documented the Communal Intellectual Property, both by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and the Directorate General of Culture of the Ministry of Education and Culture. Including the recording and registration of Intangible Cultural Heritage to UNESCO. However, legal protection of Communal Intellectual Property cannot be carried out optimally considering that several laws and regulations governing Communal Intellectual Property, especially those related to Traditional Cultural Expressions, are not in harmony with one another, besides thatno law specifically regulates this Communal Intellectual Property. On the other hand, considering the problems that are not easy to regulate, considering intellectual property protection which is individual protection while Intellectual Property Rights arecommunal. Therefore, Indonesia needs to immediately regulate the protection of Communal Intellectual Property in the form of law through the idea of the sui generis concept.
The Idea of a Single Term of Office of the President and Vice President in Indonesia Sahel Muzzammil; Fitra Arsil
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Edisi Juni
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.163-174

Abstract

Limiting the term of office of the head of government is an important prerequisite for realizing a democratic state life. In Indonesia, these restrictions are imposed on the President and Vice President with a term of office of 5 years and after that, they can be re-elected only for 1 term of office. Using the normative juridical method, this study shows that this choice has become a source of debate in other parts of the world, and several presidential countries have chosen different models of restrictions. In Indonesia, it has been revealed that this choice is not based on a deep conceptual debate and empirically has threatened the continuity of a principled election. As a solution, this study offers the application of the concept of a single term of office for the President and Vice President in Indonesia. This research also enriches the study of state administration in the theme of structuring the presidential system.
Government Responsibility Post Covid-19 Pandemic with The Increase of Social Problems in Society Suherman SH; Wicipto Setiadi; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Edisi Juni
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.205-218

Abstract

The post-covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia has had a major social impact on society in the form of unemployment and divorce. The problem is whether the government can be held accountable for its policies in the context of overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic which has caused many social impacts on the society. The is study aimed to determine the government's responsibility for increasing social community such as increasing layoffs (PHK) and divorce in the society during the pandemic. The research methodology applied empirical methods. The results were based on the theory of government action, which is an action taken by state administrators in carrying out government duties that cause disputes between the people and the government. In Indonesia, the responsibilities of the government have not been regulated, and in practice, the society is still neglected. Society has surrendered to the consequences of the PPKM policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even if there are people who will file a civil lawsuit against the government. This lawsuit against government officials in the civil sector in Indonesia is based on the unlawful acts of the government as regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code.  The responsibilities of the Government other than in the field of civil law is in the field of state administrative law.