cover
Contact Name
Lina Handayani
Contact Email
edulearn@uad.ac.id
Phone
+622744331976
Journal Mail Official
edulearn@uad.ac.id
Editorial Address
JEC Residence D6, Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta 55198, Indonesia
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
ISSN : 20899823     EISSN : 23029277     DOI : https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) ISSN: 2089-9823, e-ISSN 2302-9277 is a multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed open-access international journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of education, teaching, development, instruction, educational projects and innovations, learning methodologies and new technologies in education and learning. This journal is ACCREDITED (recognised) SINTA 2 by the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency, Republic of Indonesia (RISTEK-BRIN) (Decree No: 60/E/KPT/2016). The EduLearn is indexed by ERIC Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education. The focus and scope of EduLearn includes the following topics: 1. Career development and training in education and learning: entrepreneurship curriculum, internship programmes, lifelong learning, technology transfer, training educational staff, university-industry cooperation, vocational training, workplace training and employability issues, etc. 2. Experiences in education and learning: curriculum design and development, educational management, educational trends and best practice contributions, enhancing learning and the undergraduate experience, experiences in game based learning, higher education area: the bologna declaration and ects experiences, learning experiences in higher and further education, learning experiences in preschool education, pre-service and in-service teacher experiences, quality assurance/standards and accreditation, special education, stem in education, transferring skills and disciplines, etc. 3. Experiences in education and learning research: academic research projects, research methodologies, links between education and research, new projects and innovations, etc. 4. International projects in education and learning: new experiences for the international cooperation, project outcomes and conclusions, university networks, exchange programmes and erasmus experiences, the internationalization of universities, funding programmes and opportunities, etc. 5. Pedagogical innovations in education and learning: learning and teaching methodologies, evaluation and assessment of student learning, accreditation for informal learning, new learning/teaching models, neuroscience in education, language learning innovations, collaborative and problem-based learning, personalized learning, tutoring and coaching, flipped learning, etc. 6. General issues in education and learning: education and globalization, multicultural education, impact of education on development, planning digital-age school and learning spaces, organizational, legal, policy and financial issues, leadership in 21st century education , barriers to learning (age, psychosocial factors, ethnicity...), ethical issues and plagiarism in education, access to internet: advances and problems, diversity issues, women and minorities, student support in education, funding programmes and opportunities, etc. 7. Computer supported collaborative work: augmented reality, collaborative virtual environments (CVEs), community building, computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools, social & digital media in education, web 2.0 and social networking: (blogs, wikis...), web 3D applications and virtual reality, etc. 8. E-content management and development: digital identity management, digital libraries and repositories, e-portfolios, intellectual property rights, knowledge management, learning analytics, open access education, security and data protection, user-generated content, etc. 9. Educational software & serious games: animation and 3D systems, computer software on education, educational multimedia and hypermedia, educational software experiences, educational/serious games, gamification, gaming consoles as learning tools, videos for learning (YouTube generation), etc. 10. e-Learning: blended learning, distance learning, educating the educators, e-learning for environmental sustainability, e-learning standards (SCORM), e-learning projects and experiences, e-moderating, e-tutoring & mentoring, intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), learning management systems (LMs), managed learning environments (MLEs), massive open online courses (MOOCs), mobile learning, online assessment, online/virtual laboratories, personal learning environments (PLEs), training, evaluation and assessment, virtual learning environments (VLEs), virtual universities, etc. 11. Emerging technologies in education: advanced classroom technology, best practices in multimedia-based education, BYOD (bring your own device) and 1:1 learning, flipped classroom, ICT for development, ICT skills and digital literacy, mobile and tablet technologies, new platforms to teach coding skills (arduino, raspberry PI,...), technology-enhanced learning, the impact of web technologies on education, web classroom applications, etc. Papers published in the three-monthly journal (Feb, May, Aug, and Nov): (1) report evaluation and research findings; (2) treat conceptual and methodological issues; and/or (3) consider the implications of the above for action; and/or (4) an extensive book reviews section and also occasional reports on educational materials and equipment.
Articles 1,387 Documents
Professional development for primary science teachers: a systematic literature review of international and Chinese research Wenlin Yang; Sirinapa Kijkuakul
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 20, No 4: November 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.27595

Abstract

This study systematically reviews professional development for primary science teachers, emphasizing digital competencies and science, technology, engineering and mathematics or STEM-oriented instruction. There were 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2024 analyzed from Scopus and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, integrating international and Chinese perspectives. Quality assessment considered research design, instrument validity, data transparency, and alignment between findings and conclusions. The review identifies four professional development orientations: system-driven, innovation-driven, sustainability-oriented, and capacity-building. Chinese programs are largely centralized and policy-aligned, whereas international programs emphasize teacher autonomy, collaborative innovation, and long-term sustainability. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated online and blended professional development adoption, revealing both opportunities for digital competency development and inequities in access. Findings contribute a cross-cultural synthesis of professional development structures, strategies, and outcomes for primary science teachers. Implications include designing scalable, equitable, and context-sensitive professional development programs, particularly in resource-limited settings such as rural China and developing countries. Future research should focus on longitudinal evaluation, cross-cultural comparisons, and rigorous assessment of digital competency integration to enhance teacher professional learning and inform policy and practice globally.
Proposing an online pedagogical competency framework for university lecturers: evidence from Vietnam Hai Pham Thi Thanh; Hung-Hiep Pham; Dinh-Hai Luong
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 20, No 4: November 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.26713

Abstract

This study proposes an online pedagogical competency framework for university lecturers that covers teaching, research, and community service. The study was conducted in two phases. First, a two-round Delphi online survey was conducted with 20 Vietnamese experts, who reached consensus on an online pedagogical competency framework. Second, an online survey was distributed and collected 235 valid Vietnamese university lecturers about their perceptions of the importance and performance of each competence. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to evaluate the suitability of the online pedagogical competence. Additionally, importance-performance analysis was used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their competencies. The proposed framework consists of 39 online pedagogical competencies, which were consensually categorized into three groups: teaching, research, and community service. Vietnamese university lecturers demonstrated strengths in online teaching but faced limitations in research and community service. The results also reveal that they perceive the performance levels of these competencies as falling short of the required level of importance. The proposed framework could be used to assess university lecturers’ online pedagogical competencies, providing valuable insights for developing plans and policies to enhance them.
Determinants of career education by course instructors: a social cognitive perspective Na Qu; Wenlong Song
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 20, No 4: November 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.25767

Abstract

Based on social cognitive career theory, this study aims to explore the mechanisms influencing the participation of Chinese university professional course teachers in career education, with a specific focus on the roles of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and career goals. Employing a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative and qualitative research within this theoretical framework, the study systematically analyzes key variables including self-efficacy, personal capital, institutional constraints, and personality traits. The results show that: teachers’ self-efficacy is positively correlated with their perceived capability to implement career education; personal capital enhances motivation to participate, while administrative and research demands constitute significant barriers; the construction of value regarding the relevance of career education strengthens intrinsic motivation that transcends formal institutional requirements; recognition of professional goals improves teaching engagement, particularly among teachers with perfectionist, helper, and achiever personality traits. The findings confirm the applicability of social cognitive career theory in the Chinese higher education context and emphasize the importance of intrinsic and personal factors in motivating teachers. The study provides policy implications for promoting comprehensive engagement in career education: there is a need to reduce administrative and research burdens while leveraging teachers’ values and personal characteristics. This research extends social cognitive career theory to the Chinese educational context, revealing culturally specific predictors of teacher motivation and offering a nuanced understanding of how individual and systemic factors interact to shape engagement in career education.
Instructional performance benefits and adoption of learning management systems using task-technology fit theory Brenda Benosa; Jayvee Niel Sias
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 20, No 4: November 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.24451

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic propelled the virtualization of traditional classrooms in higher education, prompting institutions to adopt or develop learning management systems (LMS) to sustain academic functions. Although considerable research focused on commercial LMS platforms, the performance and adoption of in-house systems remain underexplored, particularly in resource-constrained settings. In response, this study examined the deployment of Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges’ (CSPC) in-house LMS, the CSPC-Learning Online Space (CSPC-LeOnS), specifically, to determine its adoption rate, evaluate the influence of task-technology fit (TTF), and LMS adoption on instructional performance benefits (PB), and generate recommendations for system improvement and information and communications technology (ICT) policy. Implementing a multimethod approach, partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) analyzed the quantitative survey data from 60 faculty members and thematic analysis to explore qualitative insights. The findings revealed a low adoption rate (0%-33%), except for the College of Computer Studies (88%). The structural model uncovered the strong influence of TTF on PB (β=0.765); however, it revealed a weak positive correlation between LMS adoption and PB (β=0.230). This suggests that while adoption is significant, alignment between system features and instructional tasks is critical to achieve better instructional outcomes. Moreover, the study also recommended improvements for LMS design, organizational technology acquisition, and deployment policy.
Development of a think-pair-share instructional material in statistics Larry John D. Sumalpong; Erniel Ghrizcer G. Ecle; Wenceslao A. Coronado; Emmylou A. Emperador; Trilbe Lizann E. Vasquez
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 20, No 4: November 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.27032

Abstract

This study examines the development of think-pair-share (TPS) instructional material in Statistics, using the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE) model, for the grade 11 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students in a parallel learning setup. It addresses the limited availability of structured TPS materials and the lack of evidence in such environments. A quasi-experimental design involving 173 students across four classes was employed. Expert-validated instruments, including an achievement test, formative assessment, and problem-solving test, measured learning outcomes. Results showed significant improvements in achievement (47.67% to 72.33%), formative scores (92.4% to 97.6%), and problem-solving ability (79.19%, closely approximating mastery). Regression analysis revealed formative scores and prior math performance as significant predictors. Qualitative feedback indicated increased engagement, clearer understanding, and improved reasoning. TPS integration enhanced learning, supporting its adoption in parallel settings.
Impact of teaching styles and other constructs on students’ performance in English Massuline Antonio D. Ligaya; Marie Charmaine P. Igwe
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 20, No 4: November 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.24653

Abstract

Findings of this research offer valuable insights into enhancing language learning. It investigated how teaching styles and other factors affect students’ English performance. It specifically examined the relationship between teaching styles and students’ performance, how teachers’ leadership behaviors moderate that relationship, and how students’ motivation to learn English and their level of grit mediate that relationship. This is a descriptive research study, and the statistical tools used were frequency analysis, mean computation, correlation analysis, regression analysis, moderation analysis, and mediation analysis. Three hundred eighty-five students and twenty-two English teachers participated in this study, selected through purposive sampling. Results show that students are moderately proficient in English; they are more integratively motivated than instrumentally, and they exhibit moderate grit. Teachers frequently exhibit all teaching style dimensions and exhibit consideration leadership behavior more strongly. Only instrumental motivation did not correlate with students’ performance in English. Overall, teaching style has a negligible impact on English performance, and leadership behavior does not meaningfully moderate its effect. Individual indirect effects were significant, but the total mediation effect across variables was not. These findings suggest that in English learning, teachers play a contributory role; however, students must also demonstrate motivation, passion, and perseverance to succeed.
Printed, digital, or blended modules: which best enhances learners’ academic performance in Filipino subject? Salvador P. Bacio, Jr.; Ma. Ernalyn B. Cepeda; Julie Gay B. Quidato; Jonalyn L. Denusta; Pearly Jade E. Samilo; Neña Vanessa A. Cabiles; Roberto G. Sagge, Jr.; Antoniette D. Cortez; Evelyn M. Cordero; Mariane Grace C. Barbo
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Vol 20, No 4: November 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.26450

Abstract

The Philippine education sector increasingly relies on printed, digital, and blended modules to sustain and personalize learning. This quantitative experimental study compared these delivery formats in the subject language and communication in Filipino academic contex among 108 randomly selected grade 11 learners assigned to printed-only, digital-only, or blended (print+digital) conditions. A validated researcher-made 50-item achievement test was administered before and after a six-week intervention in which groups studied the same competencies and completed parallel tasks, differing only in delivery format. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control baseline performance, posttest scores differed significantly by modality, F(2, 104)=18.91, p0.001, partial η²=0.27. The blended group obtained the highest mean score (M=42.78) and significantly outperformed both single-format groups, while printed-only and digital-only outcomes were comparable. Open-ended feedback suggested that print resources supported organization and annotation, whereas digital activities enabled practice and timely feedback; combining both helped clarify steps and correct errors. Consistent with constructivism and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, intentionally integrated print and digital components appear to enhance interactivity and manage cognitive load. Schools are encouraged to adopt accessible blended module designs and provide implementation support in low-connectivity contexts; future studies should replicate the comparison in other settings and examine longer-term retention.

Filter by Year

2012 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 20, No 4: November 2026 Vol 20, No 3: August 2026 Vol 20, No 2: May 2026 Vol 20, No 1: February 2026 Vol 19, No 4: November 2025 Vol 19, No 3: August 2025 Vol 19, No 2: May 2025 Vol 19, No 1: February 2025 Vol 18, No 4: November 2024 Vol 18, No 3: August 2024 Vol 18, No 2: May 2024 Vol 18, No 1: February 2024 Vol 17, No 4: November 2023 Vol 17, No 3: August 2023 Vol 17, No 2: May 2023 Vol 17, No 1: February 2023 Vol 16, No 4: November 2022 Vol 16, No 3: August 2022 Vol 16, No 2: May 2022 Vol 16, No 1: February 2022 Vol 15, No 4: November 2021 Vol 15, No 3: August 2021 Vol 15, No 2: May 2021 Vol 15, No 1: February 2021 Vol 14, No 4: November 2020 Vol 14, No 3: August 2020 Vol 14, No 2: May 2020 Vol 14, No 1: February 2020 Vol 13, No 4: November 2019 Vol 13, No 3: August 2019 Vol 13, No 2: May 2019 Vol 13, No 1: February 2019 Vol 12, No 4: November 2018 Vol 12, No 3: August 2018 Vol 12, No 2: May 2018 Vol 12, No 1: February 2018 Vol 11, No 4: November 2017 Vol 11, No 3: August 2017 Vol 11, No 2: May 2017 Vol 11, No 1: February 2017 Vol 10, No 4: November 2016 Vol 10, No 3: August 2016 Vol 10, No 2: May 2016 Vol 10, No 1: February 2016 Vol 9, No 4: November 2015 Vol 9, No 3: August 2015 Vol 9, No 2: May 2015 Vol 9, No 1: February 2015 Vol 8, No 4: November 2014 Vol 8, No 3: August 2014 Vol 8, No 2: May 2014 Vol 8, No 1: February 2014 Vol 7, No 4: November 2013 Vol 7, No 3: August 2013 Vol 7, No 2: May 2013 Vol 7, No 1: February 2013 Vol 6, No 4: November 2012 Vol 6, No 3: August 2012 Vol 6, No 2: May 2012 Vol 6, No 1: February 2012 More Issue