cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI KPK DAN FPB DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT KECERDASAN LOGIKA MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS V SD NEGERI SE-KECAMATAN PURWODADI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2 W, Kharisma Ardhy; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (219.7 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student logical-mathematical intelligence in the topic of Smallest Common Multiple (SCM) and Greatest Common Factor (GCF) at fifth grade students of elementary schools in Purwodadi District. The learning models compared Teams Games Tournament (TGT), Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), and direct instruction model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students at fifth grade of Elementary School in Purwodadi District on academic year 2013/2014. The size of the samples were 192 students consisted of 87 students in the first experimental group by using cooperative learning model Teams Games Tournament (TGT), 53 students in the second experimental group by using cooperative learning model Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), and 52 students in the control group by using direct instruction model. The instruments used mathematics achievement test and logical-mathematical intelligence test. The data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) TGT model gives mathematics achievement as well as TAI, whereas TGT and TAI model gives better mathematics achievement than the direct instruction model. (2) The high logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than middle and low logical-mathematical intelligence students and the middle logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low logical-mathematical intelligence students. (3) For all types of logical-mathematical intelligence students, TGT model gives mathematics achievement as well as TAI, whereas TGT and TAI model gives better mathematics achievement than the direct instruction model. (4) For all types of learning model, the high logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than middle and low logical-mathematical intelligence students and the middle logical-mathematical intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than the low logical-mathematical intelligence students.Key words: Teams Games Tournament (TGT), Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), logical-mathematical intelligence, learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK INDONESIA DAN PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN KONSTRUKTIVISME MENGGUNAKAN TEKNIK HYPNOSIS IN TEACHING PADA MATERI GEOMETRI SISWA KELAS VII MTs DI KABUPATEN PONOROGO Jauhari, Hafidh; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (332.95 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT:. This research aimed to know: (1) which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education (IRME) learning approaches, constructivism learning approach using hypnosis in teaching technique or conventional learning approaches, (2) which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, students who have visual, auditory or kinesthetic learning styles, (3) in each of the learning approach, which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, students with visual learning styles, auditory or kinesthetic; (4) in each of the student’s learning styles, which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, IRME learning approaches, constructivism learning approach using hypnosis in teaching technique or conventional learning approaches. This research used the quasi experimental research method with a 3x3 factorial design. Its population was the students in VII Grade of MTs in Ponorogo. The data samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data collection tehnique used documentation, questionnaire, and test method. The documentation was used to know the scores of mathematics in Elementary School National Examination, and was used for balance test among the classes IRME learning approach, constructivism learning approach using hypnosis in teaching technique, and conventional learning approaches. The questionnaire method was used to determine the students learning style, while the test method was used to determine student’s achievement in mathematics subject rectangle. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the level of significance is 5%. The results of study showed that: (1) use of IRME learning approaches on learning the material rectangle gives mathematics achievement better than the constructivism learning approach using hypnosis in teaching technique and conventional learning approaches, while the constructivism learning approach using hypnosis in teaching technique gives mathematics achievement better than the conventional learning approach; (2) the three types of learning styles, visual, auditory, and kinesthetic provide the same effect on mathematics achievement; (3) in each of the learning approach, the three types of learning styles, visual , auditory, and kinesthetic provide the same effect on mathematics achievement; (4) on the various types of student’s learning styles, the use of IRME learning approaches in the learning of material rectangle gives mathematics achievement better than the constructivism learning approach using hypnosis in teaching technique and conventional learning approaches, while the constructivism learning approach using hypnosis in teaching technique gives mathematics achievement better than conventional learning approaches.Keywords: learning approach, IRME, constructivist, hypnosis in teaching, conventional, learning styles
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) MELALUI STRATEGI PEMBERIAN BALIKAN DAN AfL MELALUI TEKNIK BERTANYA YANG EFEKTIF DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL PADA SISWA SMP/MTs KELAS VII SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/201 R, Tika Karlina; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.782 KB)

Abstract

achievement, students are given Assessment for Learning (AfL) through providing feedback, Assessment for Learning (AfL) through asking effective questions or direct learning model, (2) which has better learning achievement, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate or low, (3) which has better learning achievement, students are given Assessment for Learning (AfL) through providing feedback, Assessment for Learning (AfL) through asking effective questions or direct learning model in each intrapersonal intelligence, (4) which has better learning achievement, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate or low on each learning model. The research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The populations were the students of SMP/MTs in Surakarta on academic year 2013/2014 which consisted of 79 SMP/MTs. The size of the sample was 224 students. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and a questionnaire of student’s intrapersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using two ways ANOVA. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) AfL model through providing feedback had better mathematics achievement than AfL through asking effective questions and direct learning model, whole AfL through asking effective questions had better mathematics achievement than direct learning model, (2) the high intrapersonal intelligence students had better mathematics achievement than the moderate and low intrapersonal intelligence students, while the moderate intrapersonal intelligence students had better mathematics achievement than the low intrapersonal intelligence students, (3) for high and moderate intrapersonal intelligence, the students’ mathematics achievement treated by AfL through providing feedback better than students treated by direct learning model; for low intrapersonal intelligence, all the three models had the same mathematics achievement, (4) for AfL model through providing feedback, the students’ mathematics achievement which have high intrapersonal intelligence better than low intrapersonal intelligence; for AfL model through asking effective questions, the students’ mathematics achievement which have high intrapersonal intelligence better than moderate intrapersonal intelligence, the students’ mathematics achievement which have moderate intrapersonal intelligence better than low intrapersonal intelligence; for direct learning model, students with intrapersonal intelligence of high, moderate and low had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Assessment for Learning (AfL), providing feedback, asking effective questions, intrapersonal intelligence, learning achievement.
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAJUAN MASALAH MATEMATIKADITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA (Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas VIII-H SMP Negeri 1 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013) Komarudin, Komarudin; Sujadi, Imam; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (312.699 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to describe the process of creative thinking of students of SMP Negeri 1 Sukoharjo who have the type of cognitive style field-independent (FI) and field-dependent (FD) in the mathematics problems posing on Wallas steps, namely preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. This research was a case study. The data collection techniques conducted by using think aloud method. The results showed that the process of creative thinking on: (1) the FI students, namely (a) the preparation, students read silently APP (assignment problem posing), observe the instructions and image information carefully, and students can know the things that are known on first reading of APP; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent for a moment, it is as a start in developing a mathematical problem; (c) illumination, the students determine the attributes and the things that will be proposed to the problem, students verbalize the problem as he bowed his head, after that, the students write the problem in the worksheet and if something goes wrong on the issues raised, the students tend to immediately fix the problem; (d) verification, the students correct mathematical issues raised, explain the troubleshooting procedures and resolving the issues raised at worksheet, students corrected back problems and the settlement has been made; (2) Students FD, namely (a) the preparation, students read silently APP, observe the instructions and image information on the APP, to find the information and the things that are known, students need to read back the APP; (b) incubation, the students tend to be silent for a moment, this is the first step in preparing mathematics problems, in this step, students were less calm and worried while playing both hands; (c) illumination, the students determine the attributes and things to issues raised by several silent, students write the problem in the worksheet and if something goes wrong on the issues raised, the students tend to replace the problem; (d) verification, the student explains the troubleshooting procedures and resolves the issues raised at worksheet, students corrected the solved problem and solution.Keywords: creative thinking, problems posing, and cognitive style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN MENGHADAPI TES SISWA KELAS VII SMP KABUPATEN BREBES TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Santosa, Budi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (238.302 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the TGT type learning model, the Jigsaw type learning model approach, and the direct learning model results in a better learning achievement; (2) which students of those with the high anxiety, those with medium anxiety level, and those with the low anxiety level to deal with test have a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in the students with the low, medium, and high anxiety levels to deal with test, which learning model of the TGT type learning model, the Jigsaw type learning model, and the direct learning results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) In the TGT type learning model, the Jigsaw type learning model, and the direct learning model, which students of those with the high anxiety, those with medium anxiety level, and those with the low anxiety level to deal with test have a better learning achievement in Mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. It was conducted at Class VII of Junior Secondary Schools of Brebes regency in Semester II in Academic Year 2012/2013. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test and questionnaire anxiety level to deal with test. The data were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of α = 0.05. The results of the research are as follows: 1) The Jigsaw learning model results in a better learning achievement than both the TGT type learning model and the direct learning model, and the TGT type learning model results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. 2) The learning achievement of the students with the low anxiety level is better than those with those with high anxiety level and those with the medium anxiety level, but the learning achievement of the students with the high anxiety level is the same as that of the students with the medium anxiety level. 3) In the students with the high anxiety level to deal with test, the Jigsaw learning model results in a better learning achievement than the TGT learning model. In the students with the medium anxiety level to deal with test, the Jigsaw learning model results in a better learning achievement than the direct learning model. Other than those, in each anxiety level, the three learning models result in the same learning achievement. 4). In the TGT learning model, the learning achievement of the students with the low anxiety level to deal with test is better than that of those with the high anxiety level. Other than those, in each learning model, the students with the high, medium, and low anxiety levels have the same learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: Anxiety to deal with test, TGT learning model, Jigsaw, and realistic Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MISSOURI MATHEMATICS PROJECT (MMP) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DISERTAI ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING MELALUI TEMAN SEJAWAT DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA DI KABUPATEN Nugroho, Purna Bayu; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (244.112 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The purposes of this study were to determine: (1) which has better learning achievement, students are given MMP learning model with AfL through peers, STAD with the AfL through peers, or students who were given direct learning model, (2) which has better learning achievement, students with learning independence of high, moderate or low, (3) on each learning model, which one has the better learning achievement, students with learning independence of high, moderate or low, (4) in each learning independence category, which has better learning achievement, students are given MMP learning model with AfL through peers, STAD with AfL through peers or students who given direct learning model. This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The study populations were all of grade X students of Senior High School in Bantul. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples in this study amounted to 214 students with the details of 72 students for experiment 1 and 70 for experiments 2 and 72 for the control class. The data collected instrument used mathematics achievement tests and a questionnaire of student’s learning independence. Based on the hypothesis testing, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students’ learning achievement treated by MMP learning model with the AfL better than students treated by STAD models with AfL and direct learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by STAD model with AfL through peers better than students treated by direct learning model. (2) Students’ learning achievement which has high learning independence better than students who have moderate and low independence. In addition, students who have moderate learning independence better than students who have low learning independence. (3) In the MMP learning model with the AfL through peers, STAD with AfL through peers and direct learning model, the students’ learning achievement who have high learning independence better than moderate and low learning independence, in addition the students’ learning achievement who have moderate learning independence better than students who have low learning independence. (4) In the learning independence category of high, moderate and low, the students’ learning achievement treated by MMP with the AfL through peers better than students treated by STAD with AfL through peers and direct learning model. In addition, students’ learning achievement treated by STAD with AFL through peers better than students treated by direct learning model.Keywords: Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP), Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD), Assessment for Learning (AfL), Peers, Student’s Learning Independence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF PEER TUTORING DAN MANDIRI DENGAN E-LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASAN ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK Safitri, Dian N; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.46 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one is providing bettermathematics learning achievement, students taught using cooperative learning peer tutoring, selfdirectedlearning by e-learning or direct learning, (2) which one is having better mathematicslearning achievement, students with interpersonal intelligence, students with intrapersonalintelligence or students with linguistic intelligence, (3) at each learning model, are there anydifference mathematics learning achievement between students with interpersonal intelligence,students with intrapersonal intelligence or students with linguistic intelligence, (4) at each type ofintelligence, are there any difference mathematics learning achievement between students taughtusing cooperative learning peer tutoring, self-directed learning by e-learning or direct learning.This was a quasi experimental research using 3x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing usedtwo ways ANOVA with unbalance cell. This research concludes that: (1) students who weretaught using cooperative learning peer tutoring have better mathematics learning achievementthan the students who were taught using self-directed learning by e-learning and students who aretaught using direct instruction, as well as students who were taught using self-directed learningby e-learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the group of students who weretaught using direct instruction, (2) students achievement with the type of interpersonalintelligence are better than the students with the type of intrapersonal intelligence and linguisticintelligence type while the students with the type of linguistic intelligence have bettermathematics learning achievement than the students with the type of intrapersonal intelligence,(3) in the cooperative learning peer tutoring, students with interpersonal intelligence have bettermathematic learning achievement than students with interpersonal and linguistik intelligence,students with linguistic intelligence have better learning achievement than student withintrapersonal intelligence, in the self-directed learning by e-learning, there was no difference inlearning achievement in each type of intelligence, in the direct instruction, students withinterpersonal and linguistic intelligence have better mathematic learning achievement thanstudents with intrapersonal intelligence, (4) for the students who have interpersonal intelligence,cooperative learning peer tutoring produce better mathematics achievement than self-directedlearning by e-learning and direct instruction, for the students who have intrapersonal intelligence,self-directed learning by e-learning produce better mathematics achievement than directinstruction, for the students who have linguistic intelligence, there was no difference in learningachievement in each learning models.Keywords: E-Learning, Peer Tutoring, Intelligence, mathematics learning achievement
ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN GEOMETRI SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI BERDASARKAN TINGKAT BERPIKIR VAN HIELE Muhassanah, Nuraini; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (317.239 KB)

Abstract

Abstract:The objective of this research was to describe the VIII grade students geometry skills atSMP N 16 Surakarta in the level 0 (visualization), level 1 (analysis), and level 2 (informaldeduction) van Hiele level of thinking in solving the geometry problem. This research was aqualitative research in the form of case study analyzing deeply the students geometry skill insolving the geometry problem based on van Hiele level of thingking. The subject of this researchwas nine students of VIII grade at SMP N 16 Surakarta consisted of three students of level 0(visualization), three students of level 1 (analysis), and three students of level 2 (informaldeduction) obtained from clustering technic. The data in this research was the characteristics ofgeometry skills obtained from the recording script of the interview done twice for the sake oftriangulation. The result of this research was the geometry skills of students in solving thegeometry problem. Students of level 0 (visualization) at the visual skill can define the square basedon the shape appearance; descriptive skill, can group the right name of the pictures given; drawingskill, can draw the square by labeling the certain parts; logical skill, can understand theconservation of the square picture in any position and realize the similarity from some pictures ofsquare; and application skill, can correlate the given information (physical object) and develop itinto geometry model as well as explain the characteristics of geometry from the physicalappearance. Then, the syudents of level 1 (analysis) at the visual skill, can explain thecharacteristics of the picture; descriptive skill, can define the square based on the characteristics;drawing skill, can construct the picture based on the given characteristics (verbal information) anddraw draw the other square; logical skill can mention the differences of squares and realize that thecharacteristics of square can be used to differentiate kinds of square; and application skill, can usethe geometry model in solving the problem. Next, the students of level 2 (informal deduction) atvisual skill, can admit the relation from any kinds of square by admitting the general characteristic;descriptive skill, can create the sentences showing the relation among the square based on thegeneral characteristics; drawing skill, can draw other square from the given square and explain thecharacteristics; logical skill, can use the characteristics of a square to decide a class of squarewhich is in the other kinds of square; and application skill, can use the model concept ofmathematic representing the relation among the objects.Key words: geometry kill, van Hiele level of thinking, problem solving, and geometry.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL JIGSAW SNOWBALL DRILLING DAN PEER TUTORING SNOWBALL DRILLING PADA MATERI POKOK TABUNG, KERUCUT, DAN BOLA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA P, Nelly Indriastuti; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.266 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to determine: (1) which results better mathematics learning achievement between students who were taught by using jigsaw snowball drilling, peer tutoring snowball drilling, or direct instruction, (2) which has better mathematics learning achievement between students with visual learning styles, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3). at each of the learning model, which one has better mathematics learning achievement between student with visual learning style, auditory, or kinesthetic, (4). at each learning style, which one results better mathematics learning achievement between students who were taught by using jigsaw snowball drilling, peer tutoring snowball drilling or direct instruction. This study was a quasi experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The population in this study was all students of IX graders of SMPN in Blora in the academic year of 2013/2014. Stratified cluster random sampling was used to select three schools namely SMPN 2 Cepu, SMPN 1 Kedungtuban, and SMPN 1 Cepu. The hypotheses testing used unbalanced two ways ANOVA. Based on the research conducted, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students who were taught by using jigsaw snowball drilling have better learning achievement than those who were taught by using peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct learning. While the learning achievement of students who were taught by using peer tutoring snowball drilling was better than those who were taught by using direct instruction. (2) Mathematics achievement of auditory students was better than visual and kinesthetic students have. Visual students result mathematics achievement which was better than kinesthetic students. (3) In the jigsaw snowball drilling model, there was no difference in learning achievement in each criterion of student’s learning styles (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic). In the peer tutoring snowball drilling models, students mathematics achievement which have auditory learning style better than students with visual and kinesthetic learning style; there was no difference in learning achievement between student who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles. In the direct instruction, there was no difference in learning achievement between student who have visual and auditory learning styles; there was no difference in learning achievement between student who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles; and students mathematics achievement which have auditory learning style better than students with kinesthetic learning style. (4) For the students who have visual learning style, jigsaw snowball drilling results better learning achievement than peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct instruction; there was no difference learning achievement in peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct instruction. For the students who have auditory learning style, there was no difference learning achievement in jigsaw snowball drilling and peer tutoring snowball drilling; jigsaw snowball drilling and peer tutoring snowball drilling result better learning achievement than direct instruction. For the students who have kinesthetic learning style, there was no difference learning achievement in peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct instruction. Jigsaw snowball drilling and peer tutoring snowball drilling result better learning achievement than direct instruction.Keywords: Jigsaw Snowball Drilling, Peer Tutoring Snowball Drilling, Direct Instruction, Student Learning Styles, and Mathematics Learning Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DAN TGT DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF MATEMATIKA SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK Fadila, Abi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (334.842 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) whose learning achievement and affective aspect of Mathematics are better between the students with the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with contextual approach and those with the cooperative learning model of the TGT type with contextual approach; (2) whose learning achievement and affective aspect of Mathematics are better among the students with mathematical logical intelligence, visual intelligence, kinesthetic intelligence, and interpersonal intelligence; and (3) whether or not there is an interaction in each category of the cooperative learning models and the intelligence types on the learning achievement and affective aspect of Mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Sukoharjo regency in Academic Year 2012/2013. The samples of the research consisted of 141 students, and they were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The data of the research were gathered through test of learning achievement and questionnaire affective aspect. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using a two-way MANOVA with unbalance cells at the significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows 1) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students of the TGT with contextual approach is better than that STAD with contextual approach, but the affective aspect of Mathematics of the students with TGT with contextual approach is as good as that STAD with contextual approach; 2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the mathematical logical intelligence is as good as those of the students with the kinesthetic intelligence, interpersonal intelligence but better than visual intelligence, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the kinesthetic intelligence is better than interpersonal intelligence. The affective aspect of Mathematics of the students with the mathematical logical intelligence is as good as that of the students with the kinesthetic intelligence, but better than visual intelligence and interpersonal intelligence, and the affective aspect of Mathematics of the students with the visual intelligence is as good as that of the students with the interpersonal intelligence. 3) There is no any interaction of effect of the cooperative learning models and the multiple intelligences on the learning achievement in Mathematics and the affective aspect of Mathematics.Keywords: STAD, TGT, multiple intelligences, learning achievement, and affective aspect.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue