cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 9 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ROUNDTABLE (RT) DAN QUESTION STUDENT HAVE (QSH) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP SE-KOTA METRO LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Widyaningrum, Amalia Zulvia; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (303.518 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of RT with scientific approach, QSH with scientific approach or classical with scientific approach one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ learning styles, students having visual, auditorial or kinesthetic giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ learning styles in giving mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each learning styles, which one is better among RT with scientific approach, QSH with scientific approach or classical with scientific approach in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Metro, Lampung. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of learning styles. As a requirement of research, both of the instruments should be measured.  Test of students’ learning achievement data was measured by using content validity, level of difficulty, discrimination power and reliability. Questionnaire data were examined by using content validity, internal consistency and reliability. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it shows that the populations have same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It shows that three classes have balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows. (1) The RT with scientific approach had better learning achievement than the QSH and classical with scientific approach. QSH with scientific approach provided better learning achievement than the classical with scientific approach, (2) The students having visual learning style had learning achievement as good as those having auditorial learning style. The students having visual learning style had better learning achievement than did those having kinesthetic learning style. The students having auditorial learning style had learning achievement as good as those having kinesthetic learning style.  (3) In each of learning styles, student’s mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with result of learning models (4) In each learning models, the student’s mathematics learning achievement is in constancy with  result of learning style categories.Keywords: Round Table (RT), Question Student Have (QSH), Classical,  Learning Style
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN TIPE ROUNDTABLE DISERTAI DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) MELALUI PEER-ASSESSMENT PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Hr, Bq Malikah; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (397.624 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to determine: (1) which learning models that produces better mathematics achievement, TSTS-AfL (TSTS type accompanied by AfL through peer-assessment), R-AfL (roundtable type accompanied by AfL through peer-assessment), or CL (classical learning); (2) which students that have better mathematics achievement, students with climbers type, campers, or quitters; (3) in each type of AQ, which of the tree learning models that produces better mathematics achievement; (4) in each learning model, which of the tree types students that have better mathematics achievement. The research was a quasi-experimental research, with a factorial design 3x3. The population was all students of State Senior High School in East Lombok of 2014/2015. The sample obtained was 347 students. Instruments in the research were mathematics learning achievement test and AQ questionnaire. The data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The results of the research indicated as follows: (1) TSTS-AfL produces better mathematics achievement than R-AfL and CL, R-AfL produces better mathematics achievement than CL; (2) Students with climbers type have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters, students with campers type have better mathematics achievement than quitters; (3) For the students with climbers and quitters type, the use of TSTS-AfL produces mathematics achievement as well as R-AfL and better than CL, R-AfL produces mathematics achievement as well as CL. For the students with campers type, the use of    TSTS-AfL produces mathematics achievement as well as R-AfL and better than CL, R-AfL produces better mathematics achievement than CL; (4) Of                  TSTS-AfL, students with climbers type have mathematics achievement as well as with campers and better than quitters, campers type have achievement as well as quitters. Of R-AfL, students with climbers type have mathematics achievement as well as campers and better than quitters, and campers type have better mathematics achievement then quitters. Of CL, all of the type had the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Cooperative learning model of TSTS type, Roundtable type,                 Peer-assessment, Adversity quotient and Mathematics achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E (LC5E) PADA MATERI TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA SMA/MA NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Nurcahyo, Andriawan; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.11 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research was to determine the effect of learning models on  learning achievement viewed from the students learning activities. The learning models compared were two stray two stay (TSTS), learning cycle 5E (LC5E) and direct learning. This research method was quasi – experimental using the factorial design 3x3. The Population of this research was all students in the tenth grade of High School / MA in Karanganyar in the academic year of 2013/2014. The Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The total samples in this research were 340 students (113 students for TSTS class, 113 students for LC5E class and 114 students for direct learning model). The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follow: (1) cooperative learning model TSTS, LC5E and direct learning model have the same achievement in  trigonometry. (2) students having high learning activities of mathematics study have the same achievement with those having medium learning activities, students having high learning activities of mathematics have better achievement than those having low learning activities, and students having medium learning activities have the same achievement with those having low learning activities in the trigonometry. (3) In the category of learning activities, students having high, medium and low, learning model TSTS, LC5E and direct learning model, have the same achievement in trigonometry. (4) In the learning model  TSTS and LC5E, students having high, medium and low learning activities have the same achievement trigonometry. For direct learning model, students having high learning activities have the same achievement with those having low learning actvities, students having high learning activities have better achievement than those having low learning activities, and students having medium learning activities have the same achievement with those having low learning activities.Keywords: TSTS, LC5E, Students Learning Activities and Learning Achievement  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM POSING TIPE WITHIN SOLUTION POSING, TIPE PRE SOLUTION POSING DAN TIPE POST SOLUTION POSING PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN BANJARNEGARA Santosa, Farah Heniati; Usodo, Budi; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.11 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This aims of the research were to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from reasoning ability of thr students. The learning models compared were the Problem Posing model type: Within Solution Posing, Pre Solution Posing, Post Solution Posing and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 4x3. The population of the research was all students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools of Banjarnegara Regency. The samples of the research were chosen by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 316 students. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and test of reasoning ability. Pre-requisite tests used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it shows that the populations have same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data were examined by using one-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Hypothesis was examined by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalance cells followed multiple comparative test using Scheffe method. The result of the research showed as follows. (1) Problem Posing model type within solution posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Pre Solution Posing, type post Solution Posing and direct learning model, whereas Problem Posing model type Pre Solution Posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Post solution Posing and direct learning model. Meanwhile, Problem Posing model type Post Solution Posing gave better achievement than learning direct model. (2) Students who had high reasoning ability got better achievement than students who had medium or low reasoning ability, whereas students who had medium reasoning ability, got better achievement than students who had low reasoning ability.(3) in every learning model, students who had high reasoning ability got better achievement than students having medium or low reasoning ability. Meanwhile, students who had medium reasoning ability got better achievement than students who had low reasoning ability. (4) In every category of reasoning ability Problem Posing model type within solution posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Pre Solution Posing, type Post Solution Posing and direct learning model, whereas Problem Posing model type Pre Solution Posing gave better achievement than Problem Posing type Post solution Posing and direct learning model. Meanwhile, Problem Posing model type Post Solution Posing gave better achievement than direct learning model.Keyword: Problem Posing Type: Within Solution Posing, Pre Solution Posing, Post Solution Posing, mathematic achievement, and reasoning ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN STRATEGI PETA KONSEP DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN SPASIAL SISWA Bilda, Westi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.03 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the spatial intelligence students. The type of this research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of the VIII class of MTsN Ngawi Regency in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of the research consisted of 314 students and were taken through stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used were spatial intelligence test and mathematics achievement test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1) NHT and mind concept gives better mathematics achievement than NHT model and direct learning model, and NHT model gives the same mathematics achievement as direct learning. 2) The high spatial intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than midlle and low spatial intelligence students, midlle spatial intelligence students have better mathematics achievement than low spatial intelligence students, 3) For NHT and mind concept and NHT, students having high, moderate and low spatial intelligence have the same achievement. For direct learning model, students having high spatial intelligence had better achievement than students having moderate and low, then, students having moderate spatial intelligence have better achievement than students having low spatial intelligence. 4) For students having high and moderate spatial intelligence NHT and mind mapping concept model, NHT and direct instructionl model have the same effect toward students’ achievement. For students having low spatial intelligence, NHT and mind concept gives better learning achievement than NHT. NHT gives better learning achievement than direct learning model. NHT gives the same learning achievement as direct learning model.Keywords: NHT, mind mapping concept, spatial intelligence.
PENGEMBANGAN BUKU ELEKTRONIK TRIGONOMETRI DENGAN MENGINTEGRASIKAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS, TEKNOLOGI, SEJARAH, DAN APLIKASI TRIGONOMETRI Wulandari, Ika; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.204 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed (1) to formulate the need of trigonometric book content, (2) to develop prototype into trigonometric electronic book, and (3) to find out the result of evaluation on the feasibility of electronic book developed for teachers’ candidates, teachers, and trigonometric instructors. A research and development method was used to provide a trigonometric electronic book. This method encompassed the following stages: (1) exploring: analyzing library study and case study, (2) developing: designing the product until it became a trigonometric electronic book, and (3) evaluating: studying  the feasibility of trigonometric electronic book. The results were reveals as follows: 1) The identification of trigonometric content should pay attention to: (a) geometric reasoning and understanding such as: symbol, distance, pythagorean theorem, circle, triangle, angle, and pi concept, (b) function reasoning and understanding such as: representation (numeric, chart, symbolic/algebraic, verbal), and representation interrelationship, (c) trigonometric function reasoning and understanding such as: definitions of function based on unit circle, based on right triangle side ratio, multiple representation and property in trigonometric main function, (d) history and the chronology of trigonometric function inception, and (e) the application of trigonometric function in real world. 2) The development of prototype into trigonometric electronic book was conducted with the following procedures: (a) design analysis based on the identification of book content need, (b) the development of book content, (c) the alignment of illustration, chart, table, game, video and layout, (d) designing the application (.exe), electronic book pdf and html, 3) Expert judgment: material expert rated 4.07 (Good), media expert rated 4.03 (Good). The result of evaluation showed that: (a) in Trial I, the product users’ candidates rated 4.95 (Very Good) for material aspect and 4.8 (Very Good) for media aspect, (b) in Trial II, the product users’ candidates rated 4.79 (Very good) for material aspect, and 4.61 (Very Good) for media aspect. Considering the result of feasibility test of materials and media expert, trials I and II for feasibility test of users’ candidates, this trigonometric electronic book was feasible to be used as the handout for the students as teachers’ candidates, teachers, and trigonometric instructors.Keywords: trigonometric electronic book, mathematic reasoning, technology, history, and trigonometric application.
POLA PIKIR (MINDSET) GURU DALAM MENERAPKAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GENDER Juwariah, Nunung; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (234.976 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to describe the mindset of female and male teachers in implementing the scientific approach to the study of mathematics. It was a qualitative research. The subjects were taken by purposive sampling. The subjects of this research were mathmatics teachers of class X SMAN 3 Madiun. The subject of the research as much as 2 teachers consisted of 1 male teacher and 1 female teacher.Data collection techniques in this research were  interviews and observation. Techniques to validate the data source triangulation and time triangulation. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The research findings are as follows (1) the female teacher do not always apply a scientific approach. During observation process, female teacher used abstract mathematic object. During question activity female teacher had obstacles. To solve this obstacle, female teacher usually persuades students with statements. During experiment activity, female teacher created guidance question. During mobilization activity, female teacher provide questions that provoke and leads to mathematics concepts. During communication activity, female teacher using presentation although it require long time. (2) during observation male teacher used approach from learned students. during question activity, the male teacher of dividing students became some group then provide opportunitie for students to ask on a friend in the group. During mobilization activity, teacher must have perfected mathematical concepts which belongs to the students. During communication activity, male teacher asked the students to present the result of that has accured. Keywords: Mindset, scientific approach, gender.
ANALISIS KESALAHAN DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA MATERI LUAS PERMUKAAN BANGUN RUANG BERDASARKAN NEWMAN’S ERROR ANALYSIS (NEA) DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL Mulyadi, Mulyadi; Riyadi, Riyadi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.327 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA) is a method to analyze the error occurring in the students. One of the main factors which causes the weakness of the students comprehension toward polyhedral material is spatial ability. This study aims at describing  error occurred in the students based on NEA viewed from spatial ability. The information of that error occurence can be used as a means of consideration in deciding the appropiate lesson plan. This study was a descriptive qualitative research with case study method. The subjects of research were the semester VIII  graders  of  SMPN  2  Kebonagung  in academic year of 2013/2014, there were 12 students who have hight spatial ability, 11 students who have medium spatial ability and 11 students who have low spatial ability. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The data were taken from the result of error diagnostic test which was followed by Certainly of Response Index (CRI) scores, spatial test and interview. The validity of data used triangulation techniques. The data was analyzed by using Miles and Huberman’s model. The result of research showed that based on NEA in the subject of hight spatial ability was 4,65% reading error, 13,95% comprehension error, 27,91% transformation error, 25,58% process skill error and 27,91% encoding  error. Medium spatial ability subjects obtain 2,94% reading error, 2,94% comprehension error, 32,35% transformation error, 29,41% process skill error and 32,35% encoding error. Subjects of low spatial ability obtain 3,03% reading error, 9,09% comprehension error, 30,30% transformation error, 27,27% process skill error and 30,30% encoding error. The errors are mainly made by the subjects because of the concept incomprehensibility, then misconception and the lowest one is the subjects comprehend the concept but they are careless in doing the assignment.Keyword: error, NEA, concept incomprehensibility, misconception, comprehend the concept 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) YANG DIMODIFIKASI PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Sasomo, Budi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (232.31 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning independency. The learning model compared were modified GI, GI and direct learning. This research  was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x4. The population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri in Pacitan regency. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. Hypotheses testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypotheses testing, it were concluded that: 1) modified GI learning model give better achievement than GI and direct learning, while GI learning model and direct learning gave the same achievement. 2) Students with independent type have better achievement than students with individualistic type, conscientious type and self-conscious type, students with individualistic type have better achievement than students with conscientious type and self-conscious type, students with conscientious type and self-conscious type have the same achievement. 3) For all of learning independency type, modified GI learning model give better achievement than GI learning model and direct learning, GI learning model and direct learning give the same achievement.  4) For all of learning models,  students with independent type, individualistic type, conscientious type and self-conscious type have the same achievement.Keywords: Modified Group Investigation (GI), student learning independency. 

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue