cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 27   28   29   30   31 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS-MATEMATIS Andhika, Niken Dwi; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.021 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s logical-mathematical intelligence. The learning model compared were classical with scientific approach, TSTS with scientific approach, and TPS with scientific approach. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Pati. The samples are the students of SMPN 3 Pati, SMPN 8 Pati, and SMPN 2 Margorejo, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and matematical-logical intelligence test. The data analysis technique was used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) TSTS with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than TPS with scientific approach, and both gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high logical-mathematical intelligence was better than students who have medium logical-mathematical intelligence, and both gives better mathematics achievement than students who have low logical-mathematical intelligence. (3) For classical with scientific approach, mathematics achievement of students who have high logical-mathematical intelligence was better than students who have medium logical-mathematical intelligence, and both gives better mathematics achievement than students who have low logical-mathematical intelligence. For TSTS with scientific approach and TPS with scientific approach, students who have high and medium logical-mathematical intelligence have the same mathematics achievement, and both have the better mathematics achievement than low logical-mathematical intelligence. (4) For students who have high and low logical-mathematical intelligence, all learning models gives the same mathematics achievement. For students who have medium logical-mathematical intelligence, TSTS with scientific approach gives the better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. TSTS with scientific approach and TPS with scientific approach gives same mathematics achievement. TPS with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Classical, Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Think Pair Share (TPS), Scientific Approach, logical-mathematical intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DISERTAI STRATEGI PETA KONSEP PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VII SMPN Se-KOTA METRO LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Fitriani, Nur Syarifah; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (501.073 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical, (2) which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with concrete sequential, abstract sequential, concrete random, or abstract random, (3) at each of learning models with scientific approach, which one of the students with thinking style had a better achievement between students with sequential concrete, sequential abstract, concrete random, or abstract random, (4) at each thinking style, which one of learning models with scientific approach gave a better achievement between TTW-Concept Mapping, NHT- Concept Mapping, or classical. Population of the research was the seventh class students of Junior High School at Metro city on academic year 2014/2015. Instrument used to gather data were mathematics achievement test and thinking style questionnaire. Data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the data analysis, it was concluded as follows. 1) TTW-CM gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical, 2) Students with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random, students with abstract sequential gave the same achievement with concrete random, and abstract random, student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 3) In each learning models, student with concrete sequential had better achievement than students with abstract sequential, concrete random, and abstract random. Students with abstract sequential had better achievement than students with concrete random, and abstract random, the student with concrete random gave the same achievement with abstract random, 4) In each of thinking style, students who was subject to TTW-CM models gave better achievement than NHT-CM, NHT-CM gave better achievement than classical.Keywords: Think Talk Write, Numbered Head Together, Thinking Style, Achievement. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KETERAMPILAN SOSIAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SEMARANG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Dewi, Noviana Sukma; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (306.849 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the sosial skill of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Think Talk Write (TTW) type with scientific approach, Think Pair Share (TPS) type with scientific approach, and classical model with scientific approach.The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The study population were all of grade VII students of Junior High School in Kabupaten Semarang. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and sosial skill questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the hypothesis testing it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students’ learning achievement treated by TTW learning model with scientific approach are better than students treated by TPS model with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approach. In addition to, students’ learning achievement treated by TPS model with scientific approach are better than students treated by classical learning model with scientific approach. (2) Students’ learning achievement who have high social skill are better than students who have moderate and low social skill. Furthermore, students who have moderate social skill are better than students who have low social skill. (3) In high, moderate, and low social skill category, students learning achievement treated by TTW model with scientific approach are better than student who treated by TPS learning model with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approaching. Asides from that, students learning achievement are treated by TPS learning model with scientific approach are better than students who treated by classical learning model with scientific approach. (4) In TTW learning model with scientific approaching, TPS with scientific approach and classical learning with scientific approach, students learning achievement who have high social skill are better than students who have moderate and low social skill. Moreover, students who have moderate social skill are better than students who have low social skill.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Think Pair Share (TPS), Scientific Approach, Student Social Skill.
AKTIVITAS METAKOGNISI SISWA KELAS X SMAN 1 TEMBILAHAN DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAHAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF Annur, M. Firman; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (284.924 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to described: (1) the metacognition activities of 10th grade students of Senior High School at 1st Tembilahan with field dependent cognitive style in solving mathematics problem, and (2) the metacognition activities of 10th grade students of Senior High School at 1st Tembilahan with field independent cognitive type in solving mathematics problem.The research was a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of the research were four 10th grade students of Senior High School at 1st Tembilahan, which consisted of two students with field dependent cognitive style and the rest with field independent cognitive style. The prosedure of selecting the subjects used snowball sampling technique. The data of research was collected through questionnaire and task-based interview technique on subject matter of logarithm. The data were validated using time triangulation. The data were also analyzed using a Miles and Huberman’s concept, that was data reduction, presentation, and conclusion.The result of this research showed that: (1) the metacognition activities of FI’s students in solving mathematics problem that seems on: (a) plans development activities: writing out all informations that they got quickly, finding out the goal only by viewed important contents of problem, designing a problem solving and imagining it’s steps, and researched the connection between theirs related memory and the problem. (b) performance monitoring activities: correcting theirs own missteps, rethingking of theirs plans and fully convinced with theirs own answer, rechecking over and over theirs answer, finding the different way to solve the problem, analyzing the compatibilities between the answer and the plans that they had. (c) the actions evaluating activities: reobservating to find out the features and lacks of theirs actions, convincing that they capable to solve problem with different ways, evaluating the entire process from beginning until the end. (2) the metacognition activities of FD’s students in solving mathematics problem that seems on: (a) plans development activities: writing out all informations that they got slowly, finding out the goal only by viewed important contents of problem, designing a problem solving and imagining it’s steps, and researched the connection between theirs related memory and the problem. (b) the actions evaluating activities: reobservating of all theirs missteps, and evaluating the entire process from beginning until the end. Futhermore, there was no performance monitoring activities about to find on FD’s students.Keywords: Metacognition Activities, Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Style, Problem Solving 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF PEER TUTORING DAN TGT DENGAN TEKNIK TALKING CHIPS TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN MINAT BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Susanti, Sarah Wahyu; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.166 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models toward the learning achievement in Mathematics and the learning interest viewed from the learning styles. The learning models compared were Cooperative Learning Model of Peer Tutoring and Teams Gamest Tournament with the talking Chips Technique. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade XI of Senior High Schools of Surabaya City. The samples consisted of 223 students, and they were divided into two groups. First group consisted of 112 students who are for experimental class 1, and the other consiststed of 111 who are for experimental class 2. The instruments used were test of achievement in Mathematics learning, questionaire of learning interst and learning styles. The data was analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research show that: (1) the students exposed to the TGT-TC have a better learning achievement than peer tutoring; (2) the students exposed to peer tutoring have a better learning interest than TGT-TC; (3) the kinesthetic style have learning achievement as well as the auditory style, and the kinesthetic and auditory style have a better learning achievement than the visual style; (4) the kinesthetic style have learning interst as well as the visual style, and the kinesthetic and visual style have a better learning interest than  the auditorial style; (5) in each learning model, either in the cooperative learning model of the peer tutoring or in TGT-TC, the students with kinesthetic style have learning achievement as well as those with auditory style, and the students with kinesthetic and auditory style have a better learning achievement than those with visual style; (6) in each learning model, either in peer tutoring or TGT-TC, the students with kinesthetic style have learning interest as well as those with visual style, and the students with kinesthetic and visual style have a better learning interst than those with auditory style; (7) in each type of learning styles, either the kinesthetic, auditory, and visual, the students have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than peer tutoring; and (8) in each type of learning styles, either the kinesthetic, auditory, and visual, the students exposed to peer tutoring have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TGT-TC.Key words: Peer Tutoring, TGT, Talking Chips, learning styles, learning achievement, and learning interst. 
RESPON SISWA KELAS IX BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI SOLO DALAM MENYELESAIKANSOAL BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG YANG DISUSUN SESUAI DENGAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM DI SMP NEGERI 1 MARGOMULYO BOJONEGORO Sriyati, Sriyati; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (216.433 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The frameworks of classifying statements to predict the students’ learning ability are Bloom’s Taxonomy and SOLO Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy is made for educational purpose, while SOLO Taxonomy is used for the reference in analyzing the response of learners.The purposes of this research were to know about the IX gradestudents’ responses in solving geometry curved size based on Bloom’s Taxonomy and SOLO Taxonomy. The research method was qualitative and the data resourcesware eleven students of SMP Negeri 1 Margomulyo, Bojonegoro. The results of this research showed that the students’ response in understanding aspect on pre-structural level are 18,2%, uni-structural level are 9,1%, multi-structural level were 9,1%, relational level are 54,5%, and extended abstract level are 9,1%.  None of he students response in applying aspect on pre-structural level,uni-structural level are 9,1%, multi-structural level are 54,5%, relational level are 18,2%, extended abstract level are 18,2%.The students’ response in analyzing aspect on pre-structural level are 27,3%, uni-structural level are 9,1% multi-structural level are 9,1%, relational level are 36,4%, and extended abstract levelare18,2%. The students on the same level were not necessarily showed the same response.Keywords: Students’ response, Geometry curved sized, Bloom’s Taxonomy, SOLO Taxonomy. 
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KESIAPAN BELAJAR DAN GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA N 3 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Wardani, Endang Purwati; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.273 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were: (1) knowing the characteristics of the misconception, and (2) knowing the causes of the misconception of the XI grade students in the academic year of 2013/2014 in  equation of circle and equation of tangent line of a circle viewed from the student’s readiness and style of learning. Qualitative research was applied in this research. The subject of the research are students of the eleven grade of SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta. The source of data was taken from informants (students), documentation (questionnaire), and test. Data collection was taken by using interview, diagnostic test, and questionnaire. Data validity used the source of triangulation. Data analysis used Miles and Huberman’s concept that are data collection, data reduction, presenting the data, and drawing the conclusion. The result of the research showed as follows: (1) students who are ready to learn and have the synthetic thinking style in understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent line of  a circle,  experience a misconception of theoretical concept. Meanwhile, in determining the circle equation, the students who are ready to learn with synthetic thinking style, don’t have any misconception.  (2) Students who are ready to study and have analytic thinking style in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and the radius) experience a misconception in co relational concept. In understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent of line, students who are ready to study with analytical thinking style, experience a misconception in theoretical concept. (3) Students who are not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style experience a misconception in determining the equation of a circle (determining the center point and the radius), the misconception is in co relational and theoretical concept. In determining the equation of tangent line of a circle, students who are not ready with synthetic thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. While in understanding the locus of a point on the circle, generally   students who not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style do not experience misconception. (4) Students who are not ready to learn with analytical thinking style experience misconception in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and radius), namely the misconception of co relational and theoretical concepts. In determining the locus of a point on the circle, students who are not ready to learn with the analytical thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. (5) In general the cause of misconception for the students is the difficulty of the students to classify the form of the equation of the circle and the equation of tangent line of a circle.Keywords: misconception, readiness to learn, thinking style
KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA SESUAI DENGAN GENDER DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PADA MATERI BALOK DAN KUBUS (STUDI KASUS PADA SISWA SMP KELAS VIII SMP ISLAM AL-AZHAR 29 SEMARANG) Imam Wijaya, Henry Putra; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (136.842 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to analyze the ability of mathematical communication in solving the problem of cube and cuboid material among male and female students in grade VIII of Islam Junior High School 29 Al-Azhar Semarang. This research was a qualitative research using case studies approach and used purposive sampling techniques to select the subjects of the study. The subjects were 4 students namely 2 male and 2 female students. The technique of data collection was conducted by reviewing documents and archives, conducting written tests and interviews. This study used triangulation time to validate the data. The data analysis techniques used in this research were data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results showed that: (1) male students: (a) could express, demonstrate, and deliver their mathematical ideas visually, understand and interpret their mathematical ideas in writen or other visual forms, were able to convey the matemathical terms, notations, and its structures, were able to make connections between their ideas and the problem situation in writen form, (b) were able to express, demonstrate, convey, understand, interpret, and evaluate mathematical ideas; able to use the mathematical terms, notations and its structures; were able to convey their ideas using mathematical terms, notations of mathematics and its structures; were able to convey ideas and the relation between models of the situation in spoken form. (2) female students: had the same ability with male students, but they could evaluate their mathematical ideas in writing or in visual forms in the mathematical written communication.Key words: Mathematical Communication, Problem Solving, Gender
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DAN THINK-TALK-WRITE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN DITINJAU DARI SIKAP PERCAYA DIRI SISWA KELAS X PEMINATAN IPA SMA NEGERI DI KOTA SURAKARTA Putri, Diah Purwaning; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (494.35 KB)

Abstract

Abstract : The purpose of  this study was to determine the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics seen from the self confidence attitude of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Numbered Head Together (NHT) type using scientific approach, Think Talk Write (TTW) type using scientific approach, and classical model using scientific approach.This study was a quasi-experimental with a 3x3 factorial design. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics learning achievement tests and a questionnaire of student self confidence attitude. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. Based on the hypothesis testing it can be concluded as follows.  (1) The mathematics learning achievement of student with NHT learning model using scientific approach are as high as that of the students with TTW learning model using scientific approach, the learning achievement of students with NHT learning model using scientific approach are as high as that of the students with classical learning model using scientific approach, and the learning achievement of students with TTW learning model using scientific approach is better than that of  students with classical learning model using scientific approach, (2) high self confidence students’ learning achievement is as high as medium self confidence students’, the high self confidence students’ learning achievement is better than the low self confidence students’, and the medium self confidence students’ learning achievement is better than the low self confidence students’, (3) Seen from self confidence attitude, the mathematics learning achievement of student with NHT learning model using scientific approach are as high as that of the students with TTW learning model using scientific approach, the learning achievement of student with NHT learning model using scientific approach are as high as that of the students with classical learning model using scientific approach, and the learning achievement of student with TTW learning model using scientific approach is better than  students with classical learning model using scientific approach), (4) seen from the learning models, high self confidence students’ learning achievement is as high as medium self confidence students’, the high self confidence students’ learning achievement is better than the low self confidence students’, and the medium self confidence students’ learning achievement is better than the low self confidence students’Keywords: Number Head Together, Think Talk Write, Classical, Self Confidence Attitude
REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI ARITMATIKA SOSIAL DAN PERBANDINGAN DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 15 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015 Tyas, Wahyu Handining; Sujadi, Imam; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.025 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research intended to describe the mathematical representation of 7th grade students in SMPN 15 Surakarta in solving mathematical problem based on Krulik-Rudnick steps on the topic of social arithmetic and comparison viewed from cognitive style of Field Independent and Field Dependent. The procedure used to select the subject was snowball sampling, with six subjects consisted of three subjects in each cognitive style being analyzed. The data validation was carried out using time triangulation. The representation used by Field Independent (FI) students in solving mathematical problem based on Krulik-Rudnick steps was as follows: 1) In the first two steps, Read and Think and Explore and Plan, students used verbal representation; 2) In the next step, Select a Strategy and Find an Answer, students used symbolic representation; 3) In the last step, Reflect and Extend, students used visual and symbolic representation. The representation used by Field Dependent (FD) students in solving mathematical problems based on Krulik- Rudnick steps was as follows: 1) In the first two steps, Read and Think and Explore and Plan, students presented the given information and asked questions by using verbal and visual representation gradually, clearly and correctly; 2) In the next step, Select a Strategy and Find an Answer, students used symbolic representation by assuming the given information and asked questions into “x” and “y” and wrote it in incorrect algebraic equation, wrote simple interest rate and proportion formula, as well as used symbolic representation by substituting one equation to another incompletely, yet had a correct final result; 3) In the last step, Reflect and Extend, students used verbal and visual representation.Keywords: mathematical representation, problem solving, cognitive styles

Page 29 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 27   28   29   30   31 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue