cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 369 Documents
 28   29   30   31   32 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) PADA PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SURAKARTA DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN DATAR Sofia Hapsari, Alfonsa Maria; Budiyono, Budiyono; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (470.023 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims at determining the effect of learning models on conceptual understanding and problem-solving viewed from the  anxiety on mathematics. The learning models compared were TSTS, SNH, and direct instruction. This research used the quasi experimental research method. The proposed hypotheses of research were tested by using the two-way multivariate variance analysis with unbalanced cells. The results of research are as follows: 1) the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type gives a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than the cooperative learning model of the SNH type and the direct learning model, but both the cooperative learning model of the SNH type and the direct learning model give the same good conceptual understanding and problem solving; (2) the students with the low anxiety level on Mathematics have a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than those with the moderate anxiety level on Mathematics, and those with high anxiety level on Mathematics, and the students  with the moderate anxiety level on Mathematics have a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than those with the high anxiety level on Mathematics; (3) in the direct learning model, the students with the low anxiety on Mathematics have a better conceptual understanding and problem solving than those with the moderate anxiety level on Mathematics and those with the high anxiety level on Mathematics, but in the cooperative learning model of the SNH type and the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type, all of the groups of the students have the same good conceptual understanding and problem solving; and (4) in each anxiety level, the three learning models give the same good conceptual understanding and problem solving.Keywords: SNH, TSTS, problem solving, conceptual understanding
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINKING ALOUD PAIR PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI SURAKARTA Hidayat, Edisut Taufik; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (513.287 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of research were to find out: 1) which one is better learning achievement, scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, or scientific classical, 2) which one is better learning achievement, students with high, medium, or low AQ, 3) in each learning models, which one is better learning achievement, students with high, medium, or low AQ, 4) in each AQ level, which one is better learning achievement, scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, or scientific classical. This research was the quasi experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Surakarta. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that used were achievement test and Adversity Quotient (AQ) questionare. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by using the unbalanced two-way ANOVA. The results of this research were as follows. 1) Scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific TAPPS and scientific classical, while scientific TAPPS had better learning achievement than scientific classical. 2) The students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium and low AQ, while the students with medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. 3) In scientific NHT, the students with high, medium, and low AQ had the same learning achievement. In scientific TAPPS, the students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium AQ, while the students with high and medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. In scientific classical, the students with high AQ had better learning achievement than medium and low AQ, while the students with medium AQ had better learning achievement than low AQ. 4) At the students with high AQ, scientific NHT and scientific classical had the same learning achievement with scientific TAPPS, while scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific classical. At the students with medium AQ, scientific NHT had the same learning achievement with scientific TAPPS, while scientific NHT and scientific TAPPS had better learning achievement than scientific classical. At the student with low AQ, scientific NHT had better learning achievement than scientific TAPPS and scientific classical, while scientific TAPPS had the same learning achievement with scientific classical.Keywords: scientific NHT, scientific TAPPS, scientific classical, Adversity Quotient (AQ), Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL, MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TGT, DAN STAD DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT AKTIVITAS METAKOGNISI Wahartojo, Sri; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (251.923 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students category of metacognition activity. The learning models compared were PBL learning model, the cooperative learning model of TGT, and STAD. The type of research was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of the study was all first grade students of Vocational High Schools in Surakarta in academic year 2015/2016 by using Curriculum 2013. Instruments used for data collection techniques were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire from metacognition activity. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on the hypothesis test, it was concluded that: 1) The mathematics learning achievement of TGT was better than PBL, the mathematics learning achievement of STAD was better than PBL. The mathematics learning achievement of TGT was equal STAD. 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with middle category in metacognition activity was better than the students with low category in metacognition activity. The mathematics learning achievement of the students with low category in metacognition activity was equal with the students who had high category in metacognition activity. The mathematics learning achievement of the students with middle category in metacognition activity was equal with the students who had high category in metacognition activity. 3) On all learning models, PBL learning model, TGT learning model, and STAD learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of the students with middle category in metacognition activity was better than students with low category, but the students with low category was equal with high category students then, middle category students was equal with high category students. 4) On all categories, the students with low, middle, and high category in metacognition activity who were treated by PBL, TGT, and STAD learning models, TGT was better than PBL, then, STAD was better than PBL, in addition TGT was equal with STAD.Key words: Achievement in Learning Mathematics, Metacognition Activity, PBL, STAD, TGT Learning Model.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAME TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Uyun, Musmiratul; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (296.133 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to know: (1) which one of the learning models with scientific approach gave a better mathematics achievement, TGT, TAI, or classical; (2) which one has a better mathematics achievement, the students with high logical mathematical intelligence( LMI), the students with the medium LMI, and the students with the low LMI; (3) in each learning models with scientific approach, which one has a better mathematics achievement, the students with high LMI, the students with the medium LMI, and the students with the low LMI; (4) in each category LMI, which one gave a better mathematics achievement, TGT, TAI, or classical. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. This population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used to gather the data were test of learning achievement in mathematics and test of LMI. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The students instructed TGT had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those instructed TAI and those instructed with the classical learning model. Furthermore, the students instructed with TAI had a better learning achievement in mathematics than those instructed with the classical learning models. 2) The learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high LMI was better than that of the students with the medium LMI and the students with the low LMI. In addition, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the medium LMI was better than that of the students with the low LMI. 3) In each learning model of the TGT, TAI, and the classical learning models, the students with the high LMI had a better learning achievement in mathematics than that of   those with the medium LMI and those with the low LMI. Moreover, the students with the medium LMI had a better learning achievement in mathematics than that of those with the low LMI. 4) In each of the students with the high, medium, and low LMI, TGT gave  better learning achievement in mathematics than TAI and the classical learning models. Furthermore, TAI gave better learning achievement in mathematics than the classical learning models.Keywords: Teams Game Tournament (TGT) Team Assisted Individualization (TAI),  learning achievement, mathematical intelligence 
PROFIL INTUISI SISWA KELAS IX SMP NEGERI 3 SALATIGA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH KESEBANGUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MATEMATIS-LOGIS, KECERDASAN LINGUISTIK, DAN KECERDASAN VISUAL SPASIAL Pratiwi, Rani; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (211.821 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe intuition profile of ninth grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Salatiga in similarity problem solving reviewed from mathematical-logical intelligence, linguistic intelligence, and visual spatial intelligence. The research was a qualitative research. The subjects of the research were taken by using purposive sampling. The subjects of the research were ninth grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Salatiga odd semester of academic year 2015/2016. Data collection techniques used is a task-based interviews, while the validity of the data using a time triangulation technique. The instrument of this study was consists of two, researchers as the main instrument that supported by multiple intelligences questionnaire, problem solving tests, and interview guidelines. Data analysis technique includes three activities, those are data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. Data analysis was performed based on intuition category indicators in problem solving. Based on the results of data analysis showed that the intuition profile of ninth grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Salatiga in similarity problem solving is as follows: (1) Students with mathematical-logical intelligence use affirmatory intuition in understanding the problems and planning solutions, but do not use intuition when doing settlement plan, while in checking answer, students use conclusive intuition, (2) students with linguistic intelligence use affirmatory intuition, but do not use intuition when doing settlement plan of the students, while in checking answer, students do not use intuition conclusive, (3) students with visual spatial intelligence use anticipatory intuition in understanding the problems and planning solutions, but do not use intuition when doing settlement plan, while in checking answer, students use conclusive intuition.Key words: intuition profile, similarity, logical-mathematical intelligence, linguistic intelligence, visual spatial intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN MIND MAPPING DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Primasari, Dessy Marlinda; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (436.805 KB)

Abstract

Abstract : The aim of this research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning models compared were PBL with Mind Mapping, PBL and Classical learning. This research  was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population of this research was all students of class VIII of the State Junior High School in the region of Sragen Regency. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 293 students, consisted of 98 students in experimental class 1, 98 students in experimental class 2, and 97 students in control class. The instruments of gather the data were test of achievement on the learning and questionnaire of learning style. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalance cells. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The PBL learning model with Mind Mapping gave the same achievement as students with PBL learning model, the PBL learning model with Mind Mapping gave better achievement than students with classical learning model, the PBL learning model gave the same achievement as students with classical learning model. (2) The students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the auditory and kinesthetic learning style. The students with the auditory learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic learning style. (3) In each category of the learning style,  the PBL learning model with Mind Mapping gave the same achievement as students with PBL learning model and classical learning model, the PBL learning model gave the same achievement as students with classical learning model. (4)  In each of the learning models, the students with the visual learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the kinesthetic and auditory learning style, and the students with the kinesthetic learning style had the same learning achievement as those with the auditory learning style.Keywords : PBL, Mind Mapping, Learning Style. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN TWO STAY TWOSTRAY (TSTS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Rahman, Arif; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.222 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were NHT, TSTS, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X senior high school in Mataram City on academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 279 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave better achievement than classical with scientific learning model. NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. (2) The students with visual and auditory learning style had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style. The students with visual and auditory learning style had the same achievement. (3) In NHT with scientific approach learning model, the students with visual and auditory learning style the same achievement, the students with auditory and visual learning style had better achievement than the students with kinesthetic learning style. In TSTS and Classical with scientific approach learning models, the students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style the same achievement. (4) At the students with visual learning style, NHT and TSTS with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. NHT with scientific approach learning model gave better achievement than classical with scientific learning model. TSTS and classical with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement. At the students with auditory and kinesthetic learning style, NHT, TSTS, and classical with scientific approach learning models gave the same achievement.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Two Stay Two Stray, Classical learning model, Scientific Approach, Learning Style, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) DAN PROBLEM POSING BENTUK WITHIN-SOLUTION POSING PADA MATERI PERBANDINGAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA SMP NEGERI KOTA PONTIANAK Susiaty, Utin Desy; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.066 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) which learning model produces student’s better mathematics learning achievement, Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), Problem Posing Learning Model Within-Solution Posing (WSP) Form or classical learning model; (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) viewed from learning models, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence; (4) viewed from interpersonal intelligences, which learning model produces better mathematics learning achievement, CIRC, WSP or classical learning model. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in Pontianak City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 313 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get the 2013/2014 National Test (UN) of Elementary School for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student’s achievement data, and questioner of interpersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. Based on these results it can be concluded as follows. (1) Mathematics learning using CIRC produced the same mathematics achievement as using classical learning model. However, mathematics learning using WSP produced student’s better mathematics learning achievement than using CIRC and classical learning model. (2) For students with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence have the same mathematics achievement. (3) Viewed from learning models, students with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence have the same mathematics achievement. (4) Viewed from interpersonal intelligences, mathematics learning using WSP produced student’s better mathematics learning achievement than using CIRC and classical learning model. However, mathematics learning using CIRC and classical learning model have the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: CIRC learning model, WSP learning model, interpersonal intelligence, the mathematical achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Ayuningrum, Retna; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (462.55 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which one learning model that provide better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model, TPS learning model, or direct learning model, (2) which one category logical matematical intelligence of students that giving better mathematics learning achievement, high, medium, or low, (3) in each category logical matematical intelligence which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model TPS learning model, or direct learning  model. (4) in each learning models which one providing better mathematics learning achievement category self confidence high, medium, or low. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta Regency in the school year of 2015/2016. Population of this research was all VII graders of Junior High School of Surakarta. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 291 students: 96 students for experiment I class, 97 for experiment II class and 98 for control class. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypotheses, the results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) The use of TGT resulted better achievement than that of TPS and direct learning model, the use of TPS resulted better achievement than that of direct learning model. (2) The students’ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence.Keywords: TGT,TPS, Direct Learning, and Logical Mathematical Intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN PROBING-PROMPTING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Kurniasari, Dewi; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (334.184 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model toward learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the mathematics anxiety. The learning models of this research were cooperative learning model of the GI with Scientific Approach, the cooperative learning model of the Probing-Prompting with Scientific Approach, and classical learning model with Scientific Approach. This was a quasi-experimental study with 3×3 factorical design. The study population was all eighth grade students of state junior high school in Karanganyar District. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling method. The sample consisted of 280 students with 95 students in the first experimental class, 93 students in the second experimental class, and 92 students in the control class. Instruments used to colled data were mathematics achievement test and the student’s mathematics anxiety questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: 1) GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach gave better achievement than probing-prompting with scientific approach and classical learning model with scientific approach while probing-prompting and classical learning model with scientific approach gave same achievement, 2) the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety, 3) in all categories of student’s mathematics anxiety, GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach, Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, and classical learning model with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, 4) in the GI cooperative learning model with scientific approach and Probing-Prompting cooperative learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, and the students with moderate mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with high mathematics anxiety. In the classical learning model with scientific approach, the students with low mathematics anxiety had better achievement than the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety, while the students with moderate and high mathematics anxiety had the same achievement.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Probing-Prompting, Classical Instruction, Scientific Approach, Mathematics Anxiety, Learning Achievement in Mathematics.

Page 30 of 37 | Total Record : 369

 28   29   30   31   32 

Filter by Year

2013 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue