cover
Contact Name
Kukuh Tejomurti
Contact Email
kukuhmurtifhuns@staff.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6281225027920
Journal Mail Official
yustisia@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Jalan Ir. Sutami No. 36A, Kentingan, Surakarta Kodepos: 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Yustisia
ISSN : 08520941     EISSN : 25490907     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3
Core Subject : Social,
The scope of the articles published in Yustisia Jurnal Hukum deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Health Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law (Social science and Political science). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 389 Documents
PROBLEMATIKA PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA DI INDONESIA Anis Mashdurohatun
Yustisia Vol 1, No 1: April 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i1.10600

Abstract

AbstractDevelopment of copyrighted works as part of the intellectual property rights that stem from results of  human creation gave birth to a right of the creator of the so-called copyright. Copyright inherent in the creator differs from other intellectual property rights, because the inherent consists of two types of rights, moral rights and economic rights. The problems of copyright protection in Indonesia is caused by several things including: Islamic view of Copyrights, the public's view of the Copyright, Still Lack Popularizing Copyright Act, the Purchaser is not in the questioning, and legal awareness. 
REVITALISASI PERADILAN ADAT PADA MASYARAKAT NGADA BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL Dominikus Rato
Yustisia Vol 4, No 2: August 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8652

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this study to develop conflict resolution options or alternatifve dispute resolution in the local-knowlegde perspective in woe community in Ngada. In the socio-cultural reality that local knowledge is plural. Diversity of local knowledge based on the local community cosmology. Conflict resolution is always directed towards harmony. With socio-legal approach was found that adat-land dispute resolution perspective on the local knowledge in Ngadhu- bhaga community oriented perspectives such. Dispute resolution pattern in the local knowledge perspectives begins in the family, if the conflict comes from inside relatives or clan. But, if the conflict is sourced from inter- community/relatives/clan, then the chairman of the indigenous, traditional elders, who called mosalaki consulted. Mosalaki role tailored to the competencies and their respective duties. The division of tasks/roles is done by itself, according to custom and personal awareness and recognized together. It is recommended that in the event of a conflict, especially indigenous lands, the functionaries traditional law, mosalaki given first before being taken to the formal justice institutions. If the decision of the mosalaki has been accepted and implemented, then taken to the legal system, the nebis in idem principles can be applied.AbstrakTujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengembangkan alternatif penyelesaian konflik atau sengketa melalui perspektif pengetahuan lokal di komunitas Woe di Ngada. Dalam kenyataan sosiokultural, pengetahuan lokal bersifat plural. Keberagaman pengetahuan lokal didasarkan atas kosmologi. Penyelesaian konflik diarahkan pada harmoni. Pendekatan sosio-legal menemukan bahwa perspektif yang berlaku dalam penyelesaian konflik di Ngadhubhaga merupakan penyelesaian yang berorientasi pada kehidupan komunitas. Pola penyelesaian sengketa bersumber dari keluarga apabila konflik berawal dari dalam kerabat atau klan. Namun apabila konflik merupakan sengketa antar-komunitas/kerabat/klan, maka pemimpin komunitas, tetua adat yang disebut mosalaki, bertindak selaku konsultan. Peran mosalaki bergantung pada kompetensi dan tugas-tugasnya. Pembagian tugas dilakukan oleh dirinya sendiri, bergantung pada kebiasaan, kesadaran pribadi, dan telah diketahui bersama-sama. Dalam sebuah konflik, terutama yang berkaitan dengan tanah adat, direkomendasikan untuk dapat diselesaikan terlebih dahulu oleh mosalaki sebelum menempuh jalur hukum nasional. Apabila keputusan yang diambil mosalaki dapat diterima dan diterapkan, bila selanjutnya diselesaikan melalui sistem hukum nasional, maka prinsip nebis in idem dapat diterapkan.
POLITIK PLURALISME HUKUM DALAM HUKUM UNDANG-UNDANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN : KAJIAN TERHADAP PENGAKUAN HUKUM TIDAK TERTULIS DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 48 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN Mohammad Jamin
Yustisia Vol 1, No 2: August 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10638

Abstract

AbstractIt is empirical fact in Indonesia not only has written  law which imposed by state power ( state law). Beside written law there is also unwritten law  which often called the non state law. Political of law to  uniting as one political unity and enforce the legal sentralism has disregarded the  fact of legal pluralism ( the political of ignorance). Political of law  of the Judicial Power Code  which imposed during the time does not clearly arrange the state recognation to unwritten law, even unwritten law is recognnized, but still very sumir and floating. Although  Code No. 48/2009 about Judicial Power adopt the politics of legal pluralism and recognizes the existence unwritten law, but it is still sham (weak legal pluralism), causing that in fact predominate the state law still happened and unwritten law only becoming complement to state law. Political forwards legal pluralism in   Judicial Power Code ideally is not made conditional. The   political legal  pluralism of Judicial Power Code must to adopt strong legal pluralism,  so can accommodate pluralism in society. 
Alternatif atas Pemberlakuan Hukum Humaniter Internasional dalam Konflik Bersenjata Melawan Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Ayub Torry Satriyo Kusumo; Kukuh Tejomurti
Yustisia Vol 4, No 3: December 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i3.8696

Abstract

AbstractRecently, there is a shift in armed conflict in the world from the conflicts among states or between state and belligerent into the conflict which happened across nations’ border, such as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). The ISIS is a non-state actor, which consequently means that the conflicts cannot be properly categorized into international armed conflict. As the consequence, the international humanitarian law cannot be put into practice. The alternative solution is to apply the Martens Clause by paying an ultimate appreciation of fundamental principles of international humanitarian law for the sake of humanity and human rights. AbstrakDewasa ini telah terjadi pergeseran subyek konflik bersenjata yang semula terjadi antar-negara atau antara negara dengan pemberontak menjadi konflik lintas-batas negara seperti Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Status ISIS dalam hukum internasional bukan sebagai negara melainkan sebagai aktor non negara (non-state actor). Perang melawan ISIS tidak termasuk ke dalam konflik bersenjata internasional karena tidak memenuhi kriteria berdasarkan Konvensi Jenewa Tahun 1949 dan Protokol Tambahan I Tahun 1977. Hal ini sangat mungkin memunculkan kesulitan pemberlakukan HHI. Sebagai alternatifnya, penerapan Martens Clause dapat dilakukan, yaitu dengan menghormati prinsip-prinsip fundamental yang menjadi dasar hukum humaniter internasional demi penghargaan terhadap kemanusiaan dan hak asasi manusia.
PERLINDUNGAN HAM PEKERJA MIGRAN: KAJIAN NORMATIF KEWAJIBAN INDONESIA BERDASAR PRINSIP-PRINSIP DAN NORMA-NORMA HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Sri Lestari Rahayu; Siti Muslimah; Sasmini Sasmini
Yustisia Vol 2, No 1: April 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11082

Abstract

AbstractThis research is conducted to get a legal argumentation related to responsibility of Indonesia on protection of its citizen, especially migrant workers. The question will be answered by determining the norms and principles that underlie Indonesia in protecting the human rights of its citizens. The sources of this research are international conventions, customary international law, doctrine, legal instruments in Indonesia and some of publications concerning the state responsibility to protect migrant workers. The legal sources collected by study documentation are analyzed by interpretation and content analysis. The results show that the general legal principles in which become basic of Indonesia associated with its obligation to provide protection of human rights of women migrant workers are based on the principle of nationality/citizenship of Indonesia, the principle of pacta sunt servanda, the principle of exhaustion of local remedies, the shift in meaning of the sovereignty principle and recognition principles theory of natural rights which inherent in every human being. While the norms are contained in the Migration for Employment Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 97), the Convention on Migrant Workers (Supplementary Provisions), 1975 (No. 143), United Nations Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families 1990.Key words: human rights, migrant workers, obligations, international lawAbstrakPenelitian ini dilakukan untuk memperolah gambaran yang lebih mendalam mengenai tanggung jawab Negara Indonesia dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak warga negaranya, khususnya pekerja migran. Penulis mencoba menjawab permasalahan tersebut dari sisi normatif yaitu dengan mendasarkan pada norma-norma dan prinsip-prinsip yang mewajibkan setiap negara termasuk Indone- sia untuk melindungi hak asasi warga negaranya. Bahan penelitian yang digunakan meliputi perjanjian- perjanjian internasional, doktrin, hukum kebiasaan internasional, peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, serta beberapa publikasi yang terkait dengan kewajiban negara atas perlindungan pekerja migran. Bahan hukum yang dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumen selanjutnya dianalisis melalui interpretasi teks dan analisis isi. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa prinsip-prinsip hukum umum yang menjadi dasar Indonesia terkait dengan kewajibannya untuk memberikan perlindungan HAM pekerja migran didasarkan pada prinsip nasionalitas, prinsip pacta sunt servanda, prinsip exhaustion of local remedies, pergeresan makna prinsip kedaulatan dan diakuinya prinsip teori hak-hak kodrati yang melekat dalam diri setiap manusia. Sedangkan norma-normanya terdapat dalam Konvensi Migrasi untuk Pekerjaan (Revisi), 1949 (No. 97), Konvensi Pekerja Migran (Ketentuan-Ketentuan Tambahan), 1975 (No. 143), United Nations Convention on The Protection of The Rights of All Migran Workers and Member of Their Families tahun 1990.Kata kunci: hak asasi manusia (HAM), pekerja migran, kewajiban, hukum internasional
PENDAYAGUNAAN FREIES ERMESSEN PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN DALAM KONSEP NEGARA KESEJAHTERAAN Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi
Yustisia Vol 5, No 1: April 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8730

Abstract

AbstractFreies ermessen is the authority freegiven to government officials in order to provide the best service for citizens , which is a consequence of the concept of the welfare state aimed at the welfare of society . In this case , there is principle that government should not refuse to solve a problem with no reason or no rules , so that the public interest is not harmed , officials were given the authority to interpret and apply its own rule for resolving the problems faced by the community. However , to avoid irregularities freies ermessen then it must comply with the general principles of good governance and required their means of control , control of the judicial , political and administrative .AbstrakFreies ermessen merupakan kewenangan bebas yang diberikan kepada pejabat pemerintahan dalam rangka memberikan pelayanan yang terbaik bagi warga masyarakat, yang merupakan konsekuensi dari adanya konsep negara kesejahteraan (welfarestate) yang bertujuan untuk mensejahterakan masyarakat. Dalam hal ini dikenal adanya prinsip bahwa pemerintah tidak boleh menolak untuk menyelesaikan suatu masalah dengan alasan tidak atau belum ada aturannya, sehingga agar kepentingan masyarakat tidak dirugikan, pejabat diberi kewenangan untuk menafsirkan dan menerapkan sendiri suatu aturan untuk menyelesaiakan masalah yang dihadapi oleh masyarakat. Namun demikian, untuk menghindari penyim- pangan maka freies ermessen itu harus sesuai dengan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik serta diperlukan adanya sarana kontrol, baik kontrol yudisial, politik maupun administratif.
REGISTRATION OF VOTERS WITHIN THE PERSPECTIVE OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY: CASE STUDY OF REGISTER OF VOTERS IN 2014 GENERAL ELECTION Zainal Arifin Hoesein
Yustisia Vol 5, No 3: December 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v5i3.8786

Abstract

ABSTRACT Voting right is citizen’s constitutional rights. There is nothing that can obscure it, not to mention negate it, as long as it is not against the moral, religious, public stability and security values. The action to negate the voting rights is an act of dismissal of democratic constitutional values. Indeed, the democratic values strongly upheld the citizens’ rights, including the voting rights. The correlation between the voting rights and the general election administration is a synergic correlation to create conducive election as mandated by the constitution. Administration role should not have been an obstacle for upholding the constitutional democratic values, rather, it becomes a filter in regulating each citizen in using their voting rights to ensure the legal certainty, either from technical aspects, which is the accurate ballot counting, or from substantive aspect that is to ensure the legal certainty in conducting the accountable general election. In deciding the voters, several things should be prioritized such as first, the administrative management of general election related to the population administration; and, second, the voting rights transformed into the List of Fixed Voters (DPT). Administrative data of population is a baseline data and the data source for establishing the List of Fixed Voters (DPT).
The Role of Local Government In Protection of Copyright Against Creative Industry Local Cultural Heritage In Sawahlunto City Yulia Nizwana; Rifqi Dewi Lawra
Yustisia Vol 6, No 2: August 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i2.12414

Abstract

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)  are closely related to the economic growth of a State. Appreciation and protection of intellectual works will create a conducive climate for the creativity and innovation of the people. IPR is a Right that is closely related to economic issues. IPR is identical with the commercialization of intellectual works. The commercialization of intellectual works in principle aims to generate economic benefits. Traditionally intellectual property is divided into two branches of "Industrial wealth" and "Copyright". Industrial Property includes the protection of the invention through a Patent, certain commercial protection through the laws of the mark and the laws of industrial design protection. In addition, industrial wealth includes unfair competition control. Traditional Knowledge as a Regional Asset that obtains Legal Protection, As set forth in the copyright law, in Article 10 paragraphs (1) and (2). The professional entity that has the right to decide may not be the copyright registration Copyright is an institution of IPR in each region and Higher Education. Such as the District and Municipal Trade Office, Provincial Trade Office as an extension of the Directorate General of IPR in Jakarta. Sawahlunto city is one of the cities in the province of West Sumatra Indonesia. Currently, the city of Sawahlunto develops into a multi ethnic old tourist city, making it one of the best old cities in Indonesia. The result of crafts from the work of the creation of the traditional community of Silungkang city of Sawahlunto is a cultural asset that needs to be protected under the Copyright Act. To get legal protection against the copyrights of the local creative industry heritage, is inseparable from the role of local government of course, where expected with the problems faced by the public to obtain legal protection of their copyrights. The purpose of this study is to know how the role of local government in the protection of copyright to the creative industry of local cultural heritage in Sawahlunto city, and what are the constraints of local government in the protection of copyright to the creative industry of local cultural heritage in Sawahlunto city. The object of this study is to see how far the role of local government in the protection of copyright to the creative industry of local cultural heritage in Sawahlunto city. To obtain primary data from respondents, this research will use semi-structured interview method
HARMONISASI FUNGSI DPD DAN DPR PADA LEMBAGA PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DALAM SISTEM BIKAMERAL GUNA PELAKSANAAN CHECKS AND BALANCES Titik Triwulan Tutik
Yustisia Vol 1, No 3: December 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10082

Abstract

AbstractThis study is a normative legal research. The study aims to examine the function of harmonization between DPD and the DPR in agency representatives in bicameral system. Approach is used in this study are the historical, the statute, the comparative, the conceptual, and the case approach. Data collection by collecting primary legal materials and secondary. Primary legal materials studied and identified with the “Irac”, while secondary legal materials are accounted for using the card system, which is based on the research subject. These materials are searched legal relationship between one and the other uses reasoning (analysis) deductive and inductive to generate propositions and concepts, either the definition, description, and classification as a result of research. Deductive analysis starts from the provisions made  UUDNRI 1945 and with the support of secondary legal materials including literature of constitutional law concerning state agency DPD. The results show that the first, DPD as state agencies in a bicameral system is formulated as a representative body of the people who are institutionally have equal footing with the DPR, even in terms of the representation of character based on regions, DPD has a broader representation of the character of the DPR because the dimensions of representativeness based to all the people who are in these areas. Second, the DPD as a representative body of the people have the duty and authority as the DPR, which has the function of the budget, legislation, and despite the limited supervision. Third, in the context of constitutional Indonesia, there is no synchronization and harmonization of the position and function of the DPD and DPR, it weakened the state DPD function as a state institution. AbstrakPenelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang mengkaji harmonisasi fungsi DPD dan DPR pada lembaga perwakilan rakyat dalam sistem bikameral. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan historis, perundang-undangan, perbandingan, konsep, dan kasus. Pengumpulan data dengan menghimpun bahan-bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Bahan hukum primer dikaji dan diidentifikasi dengan metode “IRAC”, sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder dicatat dengan menggunakan sistem kartu, yang disusun berdasarkan pokok permasalahan penelitian. Bahan-bahan hukum tersebut dicari hubungannya antar satu dan lainnya menggunakan penalaran (analisis) deduktif dan induktif untuk menghasilkan proposisi dan konsep, baik berupa definisi, deskripsi, maupun klasifikasi sebagai hasil penelitian. Analisis deduktif dilakukan bertitik tolak dari ketentuan UUD NRI 1945 dan didukung bahan hukum sekunder termasuk kepustakaan hukum tata negara yang menyangkut lembaga negara DPD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, DPD selaku lembaga negara dalam sistem bikameral diformulasikan sebagai lembaga perwakilan rakyat yang secara kelembagaan memiliki kedudukan sama dengan DPR, bahkan dari segi karakter keterwakilan berdasarkan daerah-daerah, DPD memiliki karakter keterwakilan yang lebih luas dari DPR karena dimensi keterwakilannya didasarkan kepada seluruh rakyat yang terdapat pada daerah-daerah. Kedua, DPD selaku lembaga perwakilan rakyat memiliki tugas dan wewenang sebagaimana DPR, yaitu memiliki fungsi anggaran, legislasi,  dan pengawasan meski sifatnya terbatas. Ketiga, dalam konteks ketatanegaraan Indonesia, tidak ada sinkronisasi dan harmonisasi kedudukan dan fungsi antara DPD dan DPR, keadaan ini melemahkan fungsi DPD selaku lembaga negara. 
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THEORY: STUDY OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 777/Pid.B/2016/ PN JAKARTA PUSAT Cahya Wulandari
Yustisia Vol 7, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.17190

Abstract

As the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the system or theory of proof embraced in Indonesia is a negative evidentiary system of law which, in the case of proof, is based on the evidences established in the law which may provide the judge's confidence. Based on the above matter, the existence of Decision Number 777 / Pid.b / 2016 / PN Jakarta Pusat is important to be studied in the judgment. The judge gives the verdict by using circumstantial evidence proof theory. The case was decided entirely using indirect evidence because there was no eye witness or other direct evidence that could prove the indictment. The discussion was conducted using qualitative approach with normative juridical method. Circumstantial evidence is new among practitioners, legal arguments from experts are needed to sharpen the analysis. The juridical review of the use of circumstantial evidence is divided into two categories that are recognized by the KUHAP and which are not recognized. Circumstantial evidence can be a solution for judges in verifying cases that are considered difficult. In a law-based State, the use of circumstantial evidence theory requires the regulation of valid evidence in accordance with the current development of cases.