cover
Contact Name
Kukuh Tejomurti
Contact Email
kukuhmurtifhuns@staff.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6281225027920
Journal Mail Official
yustisia@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Jalan Ir. Sutami No. 36A, Kentingan, Surakarta Kodepos: 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Yustisia
ISSN : 08520941     EISSN : 25490907     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3
Core Subject : Social,
The scope of the articles published in Yustisia Jurnal Hukum deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Health Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law (Social science and Political science). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 389 Documents
THE PRINCIPLE OF PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE AND PROSECUTION POLICY M . Haryanto
Yustisia Vol 5, No 3: December 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v5i3.8808

Abstract

The issue IF this article is to be addressed in this article is the incompatibility between the prosecution policy issued by the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia and the principle of presumption of innocence. This article finds that the General Attorney’s Office disregards the principle of presumption of innocence recognized by the Criminal Procedural Law by issuing General Attorney Directive on Criminal Prosecution and General Attorney Notice  dispatched to the Head of High Prosecutor’s Office which denied the Prosecutor’s authority to request for acquittal in a criminal litigation. To solve this issue, the author argues that in a case where the evidence did not support the prosecution in relation with the existence of the crime or the perpetrator who is not the convicted, the Prosecutor should embrace the principle of presumption of innocence and consequently request for acquittal of the accused or convicted. 
STUDI EVALUATIF PERAN HAKIM AD HOC dALAM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INdUSTRIAL dI PENGAdILAN HUBUNGAN INdUSTRIAL YOGYAKARTA Tata Wijayanta Wijayanta; Ari Hernawan
Yustisia Vol 3, No 1: April 2014
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.10102

Abstract

AbstractThe research aim to evaluate the role of ad hoc judges in the settlement of industrial relation disputes, as well as to explore further what are the obstacles which may occur in the course of performing their duties. The research is a normative-empiric legal research. The data research comes from secondary data derived from literature studies and primary data from field researches. The data analyzed by qualitatively. The results of this research will show that ad hoc judges are appointed by the Supreme court and assigned to cases by the President of the court of Industrial Relations. Since its establishment, there has only been two appointments of ad hoc judges (one from the enterpreneur and the other from the labor union), and the court has tried and decided upon 104 cases (2006-2011). The most paramount obstacle turns out to be the lack of knowledge of the ad hoc judges in civil procedural laws while trying and deciding cases before them.Keywords: court of Industrial Relations, Ad hoc JudgeAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi peran hakim ad hoc dan untuk mengkaji hambatan-hambatan yang dialami hakim ad hoc dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (PHI). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris bersumber pada data sekunder dan data primer melalui penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan Data dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa hakim ad hoc diangkat oleh Mahkamah Agung dan ditunjuk dalam suatu perkara oleh Ketua PHI. Sejak didirikan PHI yogyakarta hanya terdapat dua hakim ad hoc yang masing-masing merupakan perwakilan dari pengusaha dan pekerja. Sebanyak 104 perkara diperiksa dan diputus oleh PHI yogyakarta antara 2006-2011. Hambatan utama yaitu kurangnya pengetahuan dan pemahaman hakim ad hoc tentang hukum acara perdata yang menghambat ketika para hakim ad hoc ini harus memeriksa dan memutus perkara.Kata kunci:  Pengadilan hubungan industrial, Hakim ad hoc
FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT STANDARD IN THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS Sefriani .
Yustisia Vol 7, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.18536

Abstract

In the last five years, the number of investors who suit against host state in the international arbitration forum increased significantly. Almost all lawsuits used fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard which has been violated by the host state. Most of international investment agreements including those that were made by Indonesia contain FET standard clauses. However, there are no definitions related to this standard. This condition potentially raises a very wide interpretation of the standard. The problem formulations in this article are how the history of FET is, where its position in international investment law is and what elements of FET standard are. The results show that the FET standard has existed since Havana Charter followed by various FCN, BIT and other international investment agreements. FET standard can be categorized as customary international, legally binding on all countries regardless their national law. Although there is no universal approval regarding the scope of FET standard, the writings which have been published and the arbitral tribunal decision mentions that those elements are legitimate expectation; due process; denial of justice; rule of law; non- discrimination; transparency; consistency, good faith, and reasonableness.
INTERAKSI POLITIK DAN HUKUM DALAM PEMBENTUKAN LEGISLASI DAERAH (STUDI TERHADAP PROSES PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN DAERAH DI DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAERAH KOTA SURAKARTA) Isharyanto Isharyanto; Adriana Grahani Firdausy
Yustisia Vol 2, No 3: December 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10154

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to analyze and review law and politic interactions in drafting legislation in the area of     the Regional Representatives Council of the City of Surakarta. Will be tested conceptualization commonly accepted that there is an interaction between law and politics in the process of legislation, so that the perspective used is a law which is not simply a normative sense, but influenced by the layout of the resultant interaction with other factors. This study is an empirical legal research. How to obtain the data held with the literature study and interviews. As an object of observation, then conducted the study and analysis of regional regulation Surakarta generated for the period 2005-2010 and this research, performed sorting into 3 clumps of Local regulations relating to the collection and Licensing, Government Activities, and Social Community. Based on research results that local regulation in the clump of government activity have a similar pattern of interaction of political and legal issues than local regulation and licensing in the family collection. The similarity is apparent in At a working meeting with the regional political system this interaction is actually happening. In such interactions will occur bargaining process and argument in order to obtain a common perception among the Special committee with the regional to the substance of the draft regulation. Meanwhile, local regulation in clumps social activity that particularly made an object of this study showed variation facts. Whenever it is deemed to include the substance of the rules of public interest and can be used as a reason for the interests of certain social groups such as the Local regulation of Education, will take some time for discussion indicates attraction between politics and law in the process of discussion. Then, in the case of the Regional Equality Regulations disabilities, in addition to the widely recognized and important problem, but because it targets only certain elite discussion, in this case the regional, then it does not show interactions that complicate the process of discussion.Keywords: law and politic, legislation, local interest.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengkaji interaksi politik dan hukum dalam penyusunan legislasi daerah di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kota Surakarta. Akan diuji konseptualisasi yang lazim diterima bahwa ada interaksi antara hukum dan politik dalam proses legislasi, sehingga perspektif yang digunakan adalah hukum tidaklah sekedar pengertian normatif, akan tetapi merupakan resultan yang dipengaruhi oleh tata interaksi dengan faktor-faktor lain. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Cara memperoleh data dilaksanakan dengan studi pustaka dan wawancara. Sebagai obyek pengamatan, maka dilakukan kajian dan analisis terhadap Peraturan Daerah Kota Surakarta yang dihasilkan kurun 2005-2010 dan untuk riset ini, dilakukan pemilahan ke dalam 3 rumpun yaitu Peraturan Daerah yang terkait dengan Pemungutan dan Perizinan, Aktivitas Pemerintahan, dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian bahwa Peraturan Daerah dalam rumpun aktivitas pemerintahan mempunyai pola yang sama terhadap masalah interaksi politik dan hukumnya dibandingkan Peraturan Daerah dalam rumpun pemungutan dan perizinan. Kesamaan itu nampak dalam Pada saat rapat kerja dengan Perangkat Daerah inilah interaksi sistem politik yang sebenarnya terjadi. Dalam interaksi tersebut akan terjadi proses tawar-menawar dan adu argumentasi dalam rangka memperoleh kesamaan persepsi antara Panitia Khusus dengan Perangkat Daerah terhadap substansi Rancangan Peraturan Daerah. Sementara itu, Peraturan Daerah dalam rumpun aktivitas sosial kemasyarakatan yang khususnya dijadikan obyek studi ini menunjukkan variasi fakta. Bilamana substansi aturan itu dianggap mencakup kepentingan masyarakat luas dan dapat dijadikan alasan untuk memperjuangkan kepentingan kelompok-kelompok masyarakat tertentu maka seperti Peraturan Daerah Pendidikan, akan memakan waktu untuk pembahasan yang menunjukkan adanya tarik menarik antara politik dan hukum dalam proses pembahasannya. Kemudian, dalam kasus Peraturan Daerah Kesetaraan Difabel, di samping masalahnya diakui luas dan penting, namun karena sasaran pembahasannya hanya elit tertentu, dalam hal ini Perangkat Daerah, maka tidak menunjukkan interaksi yang mempersulit proses pembahasannya.Kata Kunci: hukum dan politik, legislasi, kepentingan lokal.
THE IDEA OF REGULATING OF GOVERNOR’S AUTHORITY AS GOVERNMENT’S REPRESENTATIVE POST THE AMENDMENT OF 1945 CONSTITUTION (GAGASAN PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN GUBERNUR SEBAGAI WAKIL PEMERINTAH SETELAH PERUBAHAN UNDANG UNDANG DASAR 1945) Yuslim Yuslim
Yustisia Vol 2, No 2: August 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i2.10190

Abstract

AbstractThe idea of regulating of governor’s authority as representative of central government to the regency/ town government after the amendment of 1945 constitution is aimed at answering two legal problems. They are: (1) How is the regulation of the authority of governor as representative of central government after the amendment of 1945 constitution, (2) How is the idea governor as the representative of government. In order to answer such a questions the research   conducted by using legal/normative research. The approach that used is statue approach and conceptual approach. The regulating of governor’s authority as representative of central government as stipulated in Art. 32 of Act No.32 year of 2004 do not have firm validity in 1945 Constitution. Such the authority of governor is conducted as the implementation of principle of de-concentration, while such a principle does not clearly formulated in 1945 constitution. Besides it does not have constitution’s validity, the regulating of governor’s authority in Act No.32, 2004 does not have clear concept since on one hand such authority is attribution, an on one hand that authority is a delegation and even in practice it is a mandate. According of Unitary state’s point of view the authority of governor as direct representative of central government  after the amendment of 1945 constitution should be in delegation form. Therefore it is not directly enumerated in Act regarding the Local government (attribution).The president that would transfer that authority in government regulation (pp). The delegation of authority to the governor should cover the affair of general government in province, so it is not just limited to a certain affair.Besides in conducting the authority, the governor as representative of central government needs certain organ that assist the governor in performing his authority and as the organ of central government.Key word: The idea, governor’s authority, government’s representat, unitary state.AbstrakGagasan penaturan kewenangan gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah terhadap kabupaten/ kota setelah perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 bertujuan menjawab 2(dua) problem hukum, yakni :   (1) Bagaimana pengaturan kewenangan gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah setelah perubahan UUD 1945, dan (2) Bagaimana gagasan kewenangan gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah. Untuk menemukan jawaban pertanyaan yang muncul dilakukan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Pengaturan kewenangan gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah dalam Pasal 38 UU No. 32/2004 tidak memiliki validasi yang tegas dalam UUD 1945.Kewenangan gubernur tersebut dilakukan dalam rangka pelaksanaan asas dekonsentrasi, sementara asas dekonsentrasi tidak dirumuskan secara tegas dalam UUD 1945.Selain tidak memiliki validasi konsitusi, pengaturan kewenangan gubernur dalam UU No. 32/2004 tidak jelas konsepnya karena satu sisi kewenangan tersebut berupa atribusi, pada bagian lain berupa delegasi dan bahkan dalam praktek berupa mandat. Menurut sudut pandang sistem negara kesatuan (unitary state) kewenangan gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah langsung setelah perubahan UUD 1945 haruslah berupa delegasi kewenangan.Jadi tidak ditegaskan (dirinci) langsung dalam UU mengenai pemerintahan daerah (atribusi). Presiden yang akan melimpahkan kewenangan tersebut nantinya dalam Peraturan Pemerintah. Pelimpahan kewenangan kepada gubernur tersebut ruanglingkupnya haruslah mencakup urusan pemerintahan umum di provinsi jadi tidak dibatasi pada urusan tertentu saja.Selain itu dalam menjalankan kewenangan gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah perlu organ tertentu yang membatu gubernur dalam menjalankan kewenangannya dan merupakan organ pemerintah.Key word: Gagasan, Kewenangan Gubernur, Wakil Pemerintah, Negara Kesatuan.
HARMONISASI PENGATURAN PAJAK DAERAH DALAM KERANGKA DESENTRALISASI FISKAL DAN OTONOMI DAERAH (studi Kabupaten Sukoharjo, Kota Surakarta, dan Kabupaten karanganyar) Achmad Achmad; Suranto Suranto; Pujiyono Pujiyono
Yustisia Vol 4, No 1: April 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8628

Abstract

AbstractKnowing the harmonization level of regional taxes legislation in Sukoharjo, Surakarta, and Karanganyar district with the act of regional tax and retribution is the aim of this research. This is normatif and empirical research. Literature studies, interviews, and observations used as data collecting instruments. The collected data drafted and analyzed systematically using qualitative methods. Data presented by deductive inductive thought (general-specific) and then find out for the logical relationships between related aspects. This research revealed that: First, the Central Government Policy through the regional tax and retribution act No. 28 of 2009,  makes the design of local taxes more organized and well arrangement. Second, there has been a harmonization of the policy formation of district legislation with the act of regional tax and retribution in three district. Without violating the limits defined by the Act, the type and the rates of the taxes determined varied according to the conditions of each region AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui taraf harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan Pajak Daerah di Kabupaten Sukoharjo, Kota Surakarta dan kabupaten Karanganyar dengan Undang-Undang Pajak Daerah dan retribusi Daerah. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan secara normatif sekaligus empiris. Instrumen pengumpul data menggunakan studi kepustakaan, wawancara, dan observasi. Data yang terkumpul disusun dan dianalisis secara sistematis dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Penyajian data dilakukan dengan menggunakan logika deduktif-induktif (umum-khusus) dan kemudian dicari hubungan logis diantara aspek-aspek yang berhubungan. Hasil penelitian ini antara lain : Pertama, Kebijakan Pemerintah Pusat dalam mengatur Pajak Daerah melalui UU No 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah, membuat desain penataan pajak daerah lebih tertata dan teratur. Kedua, telah terjadi harmonisasi kebijakan pembentukkan Peraturan Daerah ditiga kabupaten/kota dengan Undang-Undang Pajak dan retribusi Daerah. Penentuan jenis dan tarif pajak dirumuskan secara variatif/ beragam disesuaikan dengan kondisi daerah masing-masing tanpa melanggar batasan yang telah ditentukan oleh UU.
ANTINOMI DALAM PENERAPAN ASAS LEGALITAS DALAM PROSES PENEMUAN HUKUM Elisabeth Nurhaini Butar-butar
Yustisia Vol 1, No 1: April 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i1.10614

Abstract

Abstrak            Penerapan asas legalitas sering menimbulkan antinomi dengan asas mengadili menurut hukum, asas rechtweigering dan asas kebebasan hakim. Namun sebagai asas, semua asas tersebut saling melengkapi dalam penerapannya. Dalam menerapkan asas legalitas, hakim tetap memperhatikan kepastian hukum, sedangkan asas hakim mengadili menurut hukum, dijalankan dengan mengingat bahwa undang-undang dibuat untuk melindungi kepentingan manusia, sedangkan kepentingan manusia itu selalu berkembang maka hukum juga harus berkembang sehingga selalu dapat melindungi kepentingan manusia. Dengan kebebasan hakim, maka hakim dapat  selalu melengkapi atau menafsirkan undang-undang sehingga putusannya dirasakan adil (Einzalfallgerechtigkeit) dan bermanfaat.   Abstract The applying of the principle of legality often generate antinomy with principle of judge according to law, principle of rechtweigering  and principle of  freedom of judge. But, as the principle,  they are  each other equiping in applying of him. In applying of principle of legality , judge remain to pay attention rule of law, while the principle of judge according to law, run by in view of law made to protect importance of human being, while importance of that human being always expand hence law also have to expand so that always can protect importance of human being. With freedom of judge, hence judge earn always equip or interpret of law so that the decision of felt fair ( Einzalfallgerechtigkeit) and useful. 
PERLINDUNGAN LAHAN PERTANIAN DALAM MENGANTISIPASI ALIH FUNGSI TANAH AKIBAT PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN Rahayu Subekti; Winarno Budyatmojo
Yustisia Vol 4, No 2: August 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8662

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of research was to anticipate and to analyze the Farming Land Protection in Anticipating the Land Function Shift Due to Land Procurement for Development. The problem of farming land compensation is an urgent to organize recalling that land procurement cases for development occurs widely and results in reduced farming land leading to decreased food product. The research method employed in this research was juridical sociological one with descriptive approach. Considering the result of research: The construction toll road in Sragen Regency involved farming and non-farming lands. Compensation was so far given in the form of money, cash and carry, corresponding to the agreement between land procurement committee and land owner. The sustainable food farming land policy was accommodated through local legal instrument, Local Regulation Number 11 of 2011 about Spatial Layout of Sragen Regency Area in 2011-2031, within which there was farming allocation area. The local Government of Sragen Regency should make policy on sustainable food farming land control. AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa  Perlindungan  Lahan Pertanian Dalam Men- gantisipasi Alih Fungsi Tanah Akibat Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan.  Persoalan kompensasi lahan pertanian  merupakan hal yang urgen untuk ditata mengingat kasus-kasus pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan banyak terjadi dan menyebabkan berkurangnya lahan pertanian sehingga akan mengu- rangi produk pangan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis sosiologis dengan pendekatan diskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan dalam Pembangunan   jalan Tol di Kabupaten Sragen  meliputi tanah pertanian dan tanah non pertanian . Pemberian ganti rugi se- lama ini di berikan dalam bentuk uang , cash dan carry sesuai dengan kesepakatan antara pihak panitia pengadaan tanah dengan pemilik tanah. Kebijakan  lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan  diakomodir melalui instrumen hukum Daerah yaitu Peraturan Daerah Nomor 11 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Sragen Tahun 2011-2031 , yang didalamnya terdapat kawasan peruntukan pertanian. Hendaknya Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Sragen perlu mengambil kebijakan pengendalian lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan 
MEDIASI PENAL DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA: PENGKAJIAN ASAS, NORMA, TEORI DAN PRAKTIK Lilik Mulyadi
Yustisia Vol 2, No 1: April 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11054

Abstract

AbstractThis research’s aim is to analyze the penal mediation role from principle, norm, theory, and practical perspective of Indonesian criminal judicial system. This research is included into sociological and normative legal research using statute approach, analytical and conceptual approach, case approach and perceptional approach. The data uses primary and secondary database through observation and interview, and then descriptively analyze in qualitative and quantitative methods. The result shows that the settlement of penal mediation still could not be facilitated in national act but it is implemented in partial cases by the discretion of law officers.Keywords: penal mediation, the enforcement of criminal law system, Indonesia’s mores institution.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran mediasi penal dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dari perspektif pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori dan Praktik. Dilihat dari jenis penelitiannya merupakan penelitian hukum sosiologis dan normatif. Pendekatannya melalui pendekatan perundangan-undangan (Statute Approach), pendekatan konseptual (Analytical and Conceptual Approach), pendekatan kasus (Case Approach), dan pendekatan presepsional (perceptional approac). Data yang digunakan primer dan sekunder. Pencarian data dengan pengamatan dan wawancara.  Kemudian data dianalisis secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif, selanjutnya ditulis secara deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mediasi penal penyelesaiannya tidak secara formil difasilitasi oleh negara melainkan melalui mekanisme lembaga adat (Peradilan Gampong, Budaya Bakar Batu, Lembaga Begundem dan awig-awig), karena selama ini mediasi penal tidak diatur pada tataran Undang-Undang melainkan dikenal secara terbatas melalui diskresi penegak hukum dan sifatnya parsial.Kata kunci: mediasi penal, sistem penegakan hukum pidana, lembaga adat Indonesia
KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA DALAM RANAH HUKUM HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL (Studi Kritis Pembajakan Karya Cipta Musik dalam Bentuk VCD dan DVD) Oksidelfa Yanto
Yustisia Vol 4, No 3: December 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i3.8706

Abstract

AbstractToday the Intellectual Property Rights or Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) plays an important role in aspects of life. This is because IPR is closely related to technology, economic, and cultural arts. Due to the importance of IPR in life, it is proper that IPR must be protected. One form of IPRs that should be protected is copyrighted, particularly musical works of acts of piracy. This is important, because the copyrighted has legislation to protect copyright. However, these laws have not been able to make the perpetrators of piracy deterrent. Piracy even tend increasingly widespread and alarming. Uncontrolled piracy in the community will clearly have a negative impact on Indonesia. Bad image by the international community and the threat of sanctions ensured gets accepted by the Indonesian state. In addition, uncontrolled piracy will also result in decreased creative spirit of the artist. Seeing the condition of uncontrolled piracy of copyrighted works of music in Indonesia and as the country’s signing of the TRIPS agreement would copyrighted musical works. If the piracy of copyrighted musical works continues, the creators will continue the protection of copyright works owned by the nation of acts of piracy. AbstrakDewasa ini Intellectual property Rights atau Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) memegang peran penting dalam aspek kehidupan. Hal ini dikarenakan HKI berkaitan erat dengan teknologi, ekonomi, maupun seni budaya. Begitu pentingnya HKI dalam kehidupan, selayaknyalah HKI tersebut dilindungi. Salah satu bentuk HKI yang harus dilindungi adalah hak cipta, khususnya karya musik dari tindakan pembajakan. Hal ini menjadi penting, karena karya cipta musik dihasilkan melalui pengorbanan pikiran, tenaga, waktu bahkan biaya. Indonesia memang sudah memiliki Undang-undang untuk melindungi hak cipta. Namun undang-undang tersebut belum mampu membuat para pelaku pembajakan jera. Pembajakan bahkan cenderung semakin marak dan memprihatinkan. Maraknya pembajakan di tengah masyarakat jelas akan berdampak negatif terhadap Indonesia. Citra buruk oleh dunia internasional dan ancaman mendapat sanksi dipastikan diterima oleh negara Indonesia. Disamping itu, maraknya aksi pembajakan juga akan berakibat menurunnya semangat berkreasi dari kalangan seniman. Melihat kondisi maraknya pembajakan karya cipta musik di Indonesia dan sebagai negara penandatanganan perjanjian TRIPs mau tidak mau Indonesia harus menegakkan hukum di bidang HKI, khususnya hak cipta. Lebih khusus lagi hak cipta karya musik. Jika pembajakan hasil karya cipta musik terus berlanjut, pencipta akan terus mengalami kerugian terutama dalam bidang ekonomi. Untuk itu, negara mempunyai tanggungjawab moril terhadap perlindungan karya cipta yang dimiliki anak bangsa dari tindakan pembajakan.