cover
Contact Name
Khairiah
Contact Email
khairiah@iainbengkulu.ac.id
Phone
+6285342358888
Journal Mail Official
nazarhusain80@gmail.com
Editorial Address
LP2M IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo jl. Gelatik no1 Kota Utara, kota Gorontalo Provinsi Gorontalo, Indonesia.
Location
Kota gorontalo,
Gorontalo
INDONESIA
Al-Ulum
ISSN : 14120534     EISSN : 24428213     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v19i2.1051
Core Subject : Religion, Economy,
Al-Ulum adalah jurnal yang terbit berkala pada bulan Juni dan Desember, ditelaah dan direview oleh para ahli dalam bidangnya, diterbitkan oleh lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia ISSN 1412-0534 E-ISSN 2442-8213 Al-Ulum telah diakreditasi dengan peringkat B oleh Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Keputusan Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi No. 53/DIKTI/Kep/2013 untuk periode 2013-2018. Sekarang, AL-Ulum telah terakreditasi sistem online dengan peringkat “Sinta 2” untuk periode 2018-2022 oleh Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi SK No. 21/E/KPT/2018.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 481 Documents
Judicial Disparities in Asset Confiscation Rulings in Online Trading Cases in Indonesia: A Maqashid al-Shariah Analysis Sahnaz Kartika; Muhammad Syukri Albani Nasution; Hasan Matsum
Al-Ulum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2024): Al-Ulum
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/au.v24i1.6900

Abstract

This study examines the disparity in court rulings concerning the status of confiscated assets in online trading crime cases. The Banten High Court Decision No. 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT BTN ordered the return of assets to victims, whereas the Bandung High Court Decision No. 1/Pid.Sus/2023/PT BDG ruled that such assets be confiscated for the state. This divergence generates legal uncertainty and raises fundamental questions of justice. The research aims to critically assess the extent to which these rulings are consistent with the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, particularly the principle of ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of property). A normative legal approach is employed, drawing on statutory analysis, judicial decisions, and comparative perspectives. The findings indicate that the Banten ruling more closely reflects ḥifẓ al-māl by safeguarding victims’ property rights, while the Bandung ruling risks undermining justice, as the state did not directly incur losses. Beyond highlighting this jurisprudential inconsistency, the study underscores the urgency of harmonizing regulatory frameworks so that the principle of ḥifẓ al-māl can be systematically integrated into Indonesian criminal justice practice, thereby advancing substantive justice and strengthening public trust in the law.