cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 18 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013" : 18 Documents clear
FORMULATION POLICY ON CRIMINAL PROVISION RELATED TO SEEDS ON FOOD SERTIFICATION Sudjito, Bambang
Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis research focuses on the formulation policy of criminal provisions related to seed certification which is based on the basis of farmers’ protection. The bases consideration in this research is the circumstance in which the policy of seed certification supported by the regulations supports the businessmen, instead of farmers. The impact of seed certification policy that is supported by related regulations is that farmers’ right as consumers in obtaining and utilizing qualified, certified, and labeled seeds (genetically, physiologically, and physically) is neglected. Furthermore, farmers obtain and utilize seeds from businessmen that do not comply with the quality set by the regulations. The goals of this research are as follows: (1) finding the factors of formulation policy on criminal provisions related to seed certification which is not based on farmers’ protection, (2) offering formulation policy which is related to farmer-based norms of criminal act of seed sertification protection, and (3) offering formulation policy which is related to farmer-based norms of criminal penalty of seed sertification protection. The hope into reality of this research, is formulating policy on criminal provision related to seed certification on the basis of farmers’ protection of plant cultivation through that values of justice, democracy, environmental awareness, and the sustainability. It is include of farmers protection as consumers to obtain and use qualified, certified, and labeled seeds (genetically, physiologically, and physically). .(Key words: formulation policy, criminal provisions, seed certification, and farmer-based protection)
THE REFORMULATION OF INDONESIAN NATIONAL POLICE FORCE AND POLICE SERVANT INVESTIGATOR (PPNS) AUTHORITIES IN INVESTIGATING THE CRIME OF ENVIRONMENT POLLUTION AND DAMAGING Yurizal Yurizal
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (237.83 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe polluting and/or damaging of environment is crime, which is belonging to “extra ordinary crime” that means the crime of polluting and/or damage to environment, is so an extra ordinary crime that then the solving problem has to be extra ordinary. Extra ordinary crime is a crime of polluting and/or damaging to environment, which has big impact for the survival of the environment ecosystem diversity in Indonesia.
THE DYNAMICS IN THE RECOGNITION OF CUSTOMARY JUSTICE IN THE POLITICS OF LAW OF THE JUDICIARY IN INDONESIA I Ketut Sudantra
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (312.272 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study aims at discussing the dynamics of the legal recognition of customary justice in politics of law of the judicial power in Indonesia. In accordance with the nature of the analysis, namely, the normative legal analysis, the approach used in this study is the statute approach completed with historical and futuristic approach of the law. The study results show that the recognition of customary justice in the politics of law in Indonesia has been dynamic along with the change of government. In the colonial time of the Dutch East Indies  government, there were two forms of customary justice formally recognized, namely, the indigenous justice ( inheemsche rechtspraak ) and the village justice ( dorpjustitie ).These conditions remained prevailing at the time of the Japanese occupation and in the early days of Indonesian independence. In 1951, the existence of customary courts were abolished gradually and brought an end in 1970 in which the existence of the formal justice system of out-of-the state court- settlement was not allowed anymore. The customary courts abolished in 1951 were indigenous justice (inheemsche rechtspraak) while the existence of village justice (dorpjustitie) continued to berecognized. In the  Judicial Power Act of 2009 applied at present, there is no provision which gives recognition of customary justice, but in the laws governing special autonomy for Papua Province - a province in eastern Indonesia – the existence of customary court is explicitly recognized . From the program of national legislation in the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, it is known that in the future it seems customary justice will be recognized nationally by legislation governing the unity of customary law societyKeywords: customary justice, the unity of customary law society, politics of law.
THE DYNAMIC CONCEPT OF WELFARE STATE IN INDONESIAN CONSTITUTION Mohammad Tavip
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (248.267 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the dynamics of welfare state concepts in Indonesia in accordance with the Indonesian Constitution (UUD 1945) through legalization spectrums and social policies in three regime orders, namely: old order, new order and reformation order. The welfare state concept is one enabling the government to measurably act as a social welfare accelerator. The legal reviewtowards this concept is further elaborated in such a way that it touches the dimensions of ideology, democracy and politics. These dimensions advocatesabout the shadows of inevitable effects of two world ideology mainstreams to thelegal realities and social policies in Indonesia as a welfare state based on itsState Ideology (Pancasila). With reference to the aforementioned facets of analysis, it is definitely implied that there were strong impacts from both technical and legal predicaments during the transition phase in the early independence of Republic of Indonesia and changes in constitutional structure in Indonesia post reformation to the dynamics of concepts of welfare state in Indonesia. Accordingly, this paper addresses the concept dynamics in terms of constitutional precisions in the line with welfare state of Indonesia.Keywords: Indonesian Welfare State Concept, State Ideology (Pancasila), Third-Way Ideology from minimal model to minimal-plural model.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR INVESTOR IN CAPITAL MARKET STOCK TRADING Tito Sofyan
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (488.875 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTProtection for investor is the crucial issue because it has been found  many evidence of the misuse of company’s resources for extensive period. Moreover, there are also the case of stock lose, case in IPO, short selling, securities fraud, market manipulation, and insider trading. Stock market is abouttrust, if it lose,  the market will collpase and it will affect the other sector, mainly economic sector. Undang-UndangNomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentangPasar Modal (UUPM) is one of the legal order to support the development of economy. UUPM have regulatethings that very important in activities in security market, especially the regulation of protection for investor. However, there are still problems that have not been regulated proporsionally, insinkronisasirule of law, and the needs for further explanation for the existing norm. The purpose of this research is to discuss the problem of the needs of investor to get a legal protection, and to discuss the problem of the right of investor in security market that is not  provided legal certaintyin Undang- Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 tentangpasar Modal. Furthermore, this researchalso tried to analyze the law conception  problem that can be developed in the legal protection for the rights of investors in security market in the future so that it can contribute to the development of law in Indonesia. The theory that used to analyze the law material in this research is the contract theory from Grotius, justice theory from John Rawls, legal protection theory from Fitzgerald, Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham, and socialengineering theory from Roscoe Pound. The method that used in this research isnormative law research with rule of law approach, philosophy of law, and law history. The result of the research shows that investor is one of the most important element in security market activities because it fulfill the need of addiltional capital for issuers, develop the market, and one of the stakeholdersbeside the other stakeholders, that is the issuers, management, commissioner,employee, and creditor. But the rights of the investor are oftenly forgotten because of the lack of information towards company’s resources compared tothat of issuers. Because of that it needs protection from law that fair and balanced, with the norm of law interference that purposefully made by the statebecause the legal protection that is not sufficient with just the norm of freecontract. Regardingthe relationship betweenthe investor and theissuerhasregulated in UUPT, includingtheir rights, butit was not enoughtogivelegal protection toinvestorsin the capital market. Relationship between UUPM and UUPT is Lex Specialis with Lex Generalis. UPM as Lex Specialis and UUPT as Lex Generalis, and as we know that Lex Specialis may differrent from the general provisionsor Lex Generalis. UUPT has authorized the forming of the Act to regulate the rights of investors in UUPM in the future in order to give more legal certainty, especially in the regulated of compensation, full disclosure and criminal provisions. Because of that, the approach of UUPM in security market can be classified in two, that is the institutional approach and activity approach. The Institutonal approach are the existence of Bapepam, stock market, LKP, and LPP. They don’t just having in charge of Perdata but also in charge of public authority that run some of the government function. From activity approach, UUPM consist of limitation for certain party based on the spirit of “fair competition”.such as the necessity of transparency, reporting requirements, and restrictions such as market manipulation, insider trading, misleading information, and the regulation of sanctions in administrative, civil, and criminal. The consept that can be developed to increase the protection for investor is to make UUPM give stronger legal framework in the future through the regulation of the protection of investor’s right and maximize the transparency of information for go public company and for company that have not go public yet, as the guarantee of certainty of law that is needed by investor with this step : (1) Make Good Corporate Governance refer to the principle of OECD 2001 as reference for UUPM norm; (2) Demutualisasi stock market to increase the transparency of information and quality of the management as an entity; (3) The development of reporting system and the disclosure of data electronically; (4) Strengthen Bapepam authority as supervisor in supervising the behavior of market player for the organized, fair, and efficient market.Key Words : Protection, Investor, Certainty, Capital Market, Stock Trading
THE REGIONAL HEAD ELECTION MODEL BASED ON THE 1945 CONSTITUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL AUTONOMY Amancik Amancik
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (642.852 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTArticle 18 of the Constitution of 1945, is not set explicitly on the model either local elections before the change and after the change, giving rise to multiple interpretations. Legislature to interpret the model in accordance with the local elections of political will at the time. Prior to the 1945 changes in the regulation of local government such as the Act No. 5 of 1974, No. 22 of 1999, and after the 1945 changes governed by Act No. 32 of 2004 on regional governance. Setting the local elections in the legislation are inconsistencies between laws that regulate each other electoral models vary. The inconsistency of these legal norms have implications for the implementation of regional autonomy within the system of the Republic of Indonesia. Under the decentralized form an autonomous region, the system is essentially delegated to the local government administration (the law) is given the right to administer their own affairs of the household. The goal is for people to participate in democratic governance, inorder to realize social justice welfare in the area.Key words : Implications, Local Elections, Autonomy
EXTENSION OF RIGHTS FOR BUILDING BY THE LIMITED LIABILITY REVIEWED FROM LEGAL CERTAINTY, JUSTICE AND TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENTS AND PEOPLE’S WELFARE I Nyoman Alit Puspadma
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (467.177 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTUUPA HGB regulates the extension of Article 35 paragraph (2), which containsfuzziness norm. The word "may" in norms in the article lead to different  interpretations, so contrary to the provisions of Article 5 of Law No. f letters. 12 in 2011, which ordered that in every formation a good rule, one of the requirements that must be met is "clear statement". Regarding the subject of HGB stipulated in Article 36 paragraph (1) UUPA, which is a. Citizens, and b. legal entities established under Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia. Legal entity used in this study is a limited liability company (PT). In that regard there are three problems examined, namely: How does extension HGB werearranged? How to interpret the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (2) if it is associated with UUPA kepastia principles of law, keadian, and continued investment towards social welfare, as well as the legal consequences for HGB PT when the extension is rejected? Theory is used to analyze the hierarchy theory Norma (stuffen theory), the theory of legal certainty, justice theory, and the theory of the Welfare State, while the research method used in accordance with the normative legal research is a method of approach to legislation (statute approach), approaches the concept (conceptual approach), and analytical approaches (analytic approach), with the source material in the form of the lawof primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. Once analyzed, the conclusion is as follows: extension HGB above TN stipulated in Article 35 paragraph (2) UUPA conjunction with Article 26 paragraph (1) 1996 PP 40 in conjunction with Article 40 PMNA / KBPN 9, 1999, while the extension of HGB over HPL occurred after the approval of the shareholders of HPL stipulated in Article 35 paragraph (2) UUPA Article 26 paragraph (2) 1996 PP 40 in conjunction with Article 45 PMNA / KBPN 9, 1999. HGB on land ownership is set to be extended, but in accordance with Article 29 paragraph (2) PP 40 epidemic in 1996 may be updated. Interpret the provisions of Article 35 paragraph (2) UUPA should always be associated with Article 2 (3) and Article 3 of the Capital Market Law UUPA. In terms of HGB  expires, the land is returned to the States when coming from TN or holder if 2 the land comes from HPL HPL, and PT was no longer able to use the land as a place of business (investing). If PT does not get land to run his business (investment), then there will be other legal consequences, namely: PT dissolution, and laid off employees, which will lead to other consequences, such as economic and social consequence.Key Words : Extension Of Rights For Building, Company Limited Liability, Legal Certainty, Sustainable Investments, People's Welfare
THE FORMULATION POLICY ON THE LIMITED IMPRISONMENT IN THE RENEWAL OF THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW As’ad As’ad
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.214 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTOne attempt to eradicte crime is to use the criminal sanction, most of the means used is imprisonment. Meanwhile, in its development, imprisonment as a state facility of confinement for conficted criminals has got harsh critisicm from many legal exerts. A lot of criticism directed against this kind of criminal forfeiture is the independence, both seen from the effectiveness as well as the views of other negative consequences accompanying the sanction. In the concept of the draft of the new Criminal Code of 1982, it is filed a new criminal sanction, i.e. a sanction of supervision as an alternative to the imprisonment. Imprisonment and supervision or criminal scrutiny is in fact two concepts that are philosophically opposed, because on the one hand, imprisonment needs a convicted person imprisoned inside the institution, and on the other hand the criminal supervision requires the convicted person undergoing outside the institution (in the community), but remains under supervision. The two opposing concepts cause particular consequenses, either weaknesses or advantages. In order to compensate the weaknesses, it is needed a kind of criminal sanction as a balance between imprisonment and supervision. A limited imprisonment is a kind of imprisonment which is expected to achieve a balance between the interests of protection or security of society and the interests of the individual. Furthermore, it can be compromised or exploit the positive impacts (the opposite also means avoiding negative impacts) from imprisonment on the onehand and criminal supervision on the other hand.Key words : Policy, Formulation, Limited Imprisonment.
INTER REGIONAL GOVERNMENT COOPERATION Emanuel Sujatmoko
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (389.907 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe regional administration based on autonomy often can not be done alone, butmust be undertaken in collaboration with other local governments. In the area of intergovernmental cooperation sometimes born disputes relating to the implementation of the agreed cooperation. To settle disputes born of cooperation among local governments are expected to finalize the parties amicably, but if consensus fails, then the settlement is done through the Governor or the Minister of the Interior. The dispute resolution emphasizes aspects of monitoring or politics. For the settlement of disputes which were born as a result of cooperation among local governments need to go through the courts, through the Supreme Court after deliberation and efforts through the Governor or the Minister of the Interior has been taken, but there are parties to a dispute can not accept the verdict.Keywords: Cooperation between local governments, Authority
FORMULATIF POLICY REMEDIES INDEPENDENT DECISION OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR PERSPECTIVE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OF INDONESIA I Gede Artha
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (309.568 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis dissertation is a research of acquital (vrijspraak)in some criminal cases that were made by the judge, and related with the law effort of appellate and cassation. Due process of law in criminal justice of Indonesia tends to be notgiving satisfaction for the justice seekers. The many amount of criminal casesthat get acquital (vrijspraak) such as the cases of corruption, narcotic, murder, and others got opinion and contra from broad society. The practitioners andtheoreticians of law and so does the justice seekers often spotlight the judge’sverdict which is judged as the engineering of justice, full of mafia andfraudulence. The Procedure of Criminal of Indonesia based on the Criminal Code stills seem to contain disharmony of law norms such as not to give the authority to general prosecutor to submit law effort of appellate and cassation upon the acquital (vrijspraak) as written in the Article 67 and Article 244 of Criminal Code, so it creates the disharmony or injustice in the existing law norms about the acquital (vrijspraak) arrangement, it seems that there is an empty norm, even there is a blur norm in the procedure of criminal with Criminal Code as the basis. This research has purpose to give solution upon disharmony that happen in the acquital (vrijspraak) and its law effort for the general prosecutor. Beside that, it also gives a scientifically input for the theoreticians and practitioners. In studying of this acquital (vrijspraak), it uses some approaches, such as the statute approach, the analytical and conceptual approach, the case approach, the comparative approach, and the philosophical approach. The source of the researched law materials related with the primary, secondary, and tertiary law material. The future perspective of acquital (vrijspraak) arrangement construction related to appellate is: “To criminal case verdict given in the first stage court, the defendant or the general prosecutor is able and or has authority to submit the appellate request to the high court including for free verdict”. And the construction of article for acquital (vrijspraak) for cassation is: “To the criminal case verdict given in the last stage by other court except the Supreme Court, the defendant or general prosecutor is able and or has authority to submit the request for cassation to the Supreme Court including the acquital (vrijspraak)”.Key words: formulation policy, acquital, procecutor, criminal justice system.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 18

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2013 2013


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2023 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2022 Sarjana ilmu Hukum, Januari 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2022 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2021 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2021 Sarjana ilmu Hukum, November 2021 Sarjana ilmu Hukum, September 2021 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2021 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2021 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2021 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2021 Sarjana ilmu Hukum, Desember 2021 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2021 Sarjana ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2021 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2020 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2019 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2018 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2017 MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM DAN KENOTARIATAN, 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2017 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2016 Periode I Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2016 MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM DAN KENOTARIATAN, 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum,September 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2016 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2016 Periode II MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM DAN KENOTARIATAN, 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2015 MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM DAN KENOTARIATAN, 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2015 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2014 Magister Ilmu Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2014 Magister Ilmu Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2014 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Januari 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2013 Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2013 Magister Ilmu Hukum dan Kenotariatan 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Februari 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juli 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2013 Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Maret 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Juni 2013 Magister Ilmu Hukum dan Kenotariatan 2013 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Desember 2012 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, November 2012 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2012 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, September 2012 Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2012 More Issue