cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad Syofyan
Contact Email
ahmad.syofyan@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
fiatjustisia@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Ruang Jurnal, Gedung B, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung. Jl. Sumantri Brojonegoro No.1 Bandar Lampung. 35145. Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 19785186     EISSN : 24776238     DOI : http://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research encompassing specifically concerning human rights, policy, values of Islam. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as: ● humanity ● heritage law ● family law ● civil and political rights ● economic, social, and cultural rights ● solidarity rights ● philosophy of law ● private law ● international law ● civil law ● criminal law ● administrative law ● constitutional law ● adat law ● Intellectual Property Rights ● commercial court ● district court ● high court ● supreme court ● constitutional court ● industrial relations court ● administrative court ● fishery court ● military court ● taxation court ● court of human rights ● court of religion
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 14 No 4 (2020)" : 6 Documents clear
Consumer Protection in the Banking Credit Agreement in Accordance with the Principle of Proportionality under Indonesian Laws Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari; Kukuh Dwi Kurniawan
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1884

Abstract

The implementation of the principle of freedom of contract gives rise to the types of agreements not regulated in the law or The Indonesian Civil Code (ICC). We are familiar with the term Standard contract or standard agreement. Standard agreements are often used in the banking world, one of which is in banking credit agreements, as we all understand that the position of the customer is weaker than the bank, so it must be protected by law. In order to protect these interests, the customer is given protection contained in the Banking Act regulations as well as the Consumer Protection Act and its derivative regulations. Specifically, the credit agreement format as the standard agreement set out in Financial Services Authority Circular Number 13 / SEOJK.07 / 2014 Concerning Standard Agreements is that credit agreements that contain rights, obligations and requirements that are legally binding on customers, are required to use letters, writing, symbols, diagrams, signs, terms, readable phrases, and / or sentences simple ones in Indonesian that are easily understood by customers. This is in an effort to provide protection to customers and the regulatory and supervisory functions of the Financial Services Authority.
The Right Non Self-Incrimination and Epistemology of Criminal Witnesses Zahri Kurniawan; Ilham Wahyudi; H.S. Tisnanta
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1988

Abstract

The absence of a clear normative interpretation related to witnesses who are also criminal perpetrators in the Indonesian court has controversy on the theoretical level. In practice, the practitioners adopt a concept known in other countries. However, in adopting ideas from other countries, practitioners are often trapped in practitioners’ paradigms. Translating the perpetrators’ witnesses such as crown witnesses, justice collaborators (JC), and whistleblowers (wb,) are not the concepts comprehensively. In the end, the witness being denied the rights of the perpetrators, namely right non-self-incrimination. The paper offers a concept for finding solutions in the use of witnesses who are also as criminal perpetrators in epistemological basis. These considerations are used to provide a coherent way based on the principle to justify the use of witness evidence from the criminal perpetrators. The purpose is to accord with the principle of due process of law, not to clash the principle of non-self-incrimination in proving the search of material truth.
The Idea of Prevention and Settlement of Human Rights violations in the Field of Natural Resources Based on Local Wisdom Muhammad Risnain
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1922

Abstract

Prevention and settlement of human rights violations based on natural resources is done by establishing good cooperation (synergy) between stakeholders including local governments, community leaders, traditional leaders, religious leaders being one of the keys to avoiding human rights violations in the regions.in the aspect of the settlement of human rights violations can be done by using a settlement mechanism based on local wisdom owned by the region such as the settlement of adat SASAMBO in NTB is an alternative settlement of human rights violations in the future that can be used. So it becomes important to amend Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning human rights violations by including the resolution of human rights violations based on local wisdom in the regions.
La perspective judiciare sur la réhabilitation des drogues en Indonésie Cecep Mustafa
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1952

Abstract

L'objectif de cette étude est d'explorer les perspectives judiciaires sur la condamnation des mineurs délinquants toxicomanes. Afin de comprendre les perspectives du système judiciaire, il est important, puisque l'objet de cette étude est l'Indonésie, d'explorer ces perspectives en fonction des conditions sociales dans lesquelles elles se trouvent. La conception méthodologique s'appuie sur des méthodes qualitatives afin d'entreprendre des analyses aux niveaux micro et méso. Les juges perçoivent les infractions liées à la drogue comme une préoccupation mondiale et comme étant graves. Les juges se sentent contraints dans leurs condamnations par les mises en accusation des procureurs, la procédure d'appel, les évaluations médicales et la disponibilité des installations de traitement. La réhabilitation des mineurs délinquants toxicomanes est considérée comme étant dans l'intérêt des juges et de la société.
Government’s Role in Preventing the Theft During and After Natural Disasters Ambara Dewita Purnama; M. Syukri Akub; Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1927

Abstract

Weak supervision and security during and after natural disasters have created new problems. Crime of theft is now rife at the time and after natural disasters. This study aims to determine the government's role in preventing theft during and after natural disasters in the city of Palu. This research is an empirical legal research with a criminological approach. The study was conducted in Palu City, Central Sulawesi. The results of this study indicate that the government's role in efforts to prevent  theft can only overcome theft crimes that are motivated by urgent need of victims of natural disasters and cannot cope with theft that are motivated by opportunity.
Jurisdiction of International Court of Justice (ICJ) Over the Genocide Violations: with Special References to Rohingya Case Yordan Gunawan; Sonya Whisler Refisyanti; Aliza Mufida; Kukuh Derajat Takarub; Aisah Nur
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1900

Abstract

In 2019, Gambia, a small country which located in West Africa, is suing Myanmar to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) with alleging that Myanmar has violated the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide 1948. The governments of Myanmar in doing the violations were intended to destroy the Rohingya Muslim as a group, wholly or partly, followed by other violations such as mass murder, rape, and also damage to the villages by fire with some people are still locked in the house and burnt inside the house. Government of Myanmar keep doing so, because based on Burma Citizenship Law 1982, Myanmar doesn’t recognize the existence of Rohingya as citizen of Myanmar. It causes Rohingya as stateless. The study is normative legal research with Statute Approach and Case Approach. The study analyse the violations which is done by Myanmar to the Rohingya Ethnic in Rakhine. The result shows that International Court of Justice has a jurisdiction upon Rohingya case under the Statute of the Court as well as the Genocide Convention. The statute of the Court in Article 36 (1) stated that ICJ has jurisdiction to all cases of the Convention as long as the states are contracting parties. The Article IX of the Convention also stated that any dispute between contracting parties must be referred to ICJ.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024) Vol 17 No 3 (2023): Issue In progress (July 2023) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2023) Vol 17 No 3 (2023) Vol 17 No 2 (2023) Vol 17 No 1 (2023) Vol 16 No 4 (2022) Vol 16 No 3 (2022) Vol 16 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022) Vol 15 No 4 (2021) Vol 15 No 3 (2021) Vol 15 No 2 (2021) Vol 15 No 1 (2021) Vol 14 No 4 (2020) Vol 14 No 3 (2020) Vol 14 No 2 (2020) Vol 14 No 1 (2020) Vol 13 No 4 (2019) Vol 13 No 3 (2019) Vol 13 No 2 (2019) Vol 13 No 1 (2019) Vol 12 No 4 (2018) Vol 12 No 3 (2018) Vol 12 No 2 (2018) Vol 12 No 1 (2018) Vol 11 No 4 (2017) Vol 11 No 3 (2017) Vol 11 No 2 (2017) Vol 11 No 1 (2017) Vol 10 No 4 (2016) Vol 10 No 3 (2016) Vol 10 No 2 (2016) Vol 10 No 1 (2016) Vol 9 No 4 (2015) Vol 9, No 4 (2015) Vol 9 No 3 (2015) Vol 9, No 3 (2015) Vol 9, No 2 (2015) Vol 9 No 2 (2015) Vol 9 No 1 (2015) Vol 9, No 1 (2015) Vol 8, No 4 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 4 (2014) Vol 8, No 3 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 3 (2014) Vol 8, No 2 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 2 (2014) Vol 8, No 1 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 1 (2014) Vol 7 No 3 (2013) Vol 7 No 2 (2013) Vol 7 No 1 (2013) Vol 6 No 3 (2012) Vol 6 No 2 (2012) Vol 6 No 1 (2012) Vol 5 No 3 (2011) Vol 5 No 2 (2011) Vol 5 No 1 (2011) Vol 4 No 3 (2010) Vol 2 No 3 (2008) Vol 2 No 2 (2008) Vol 1 No 2 (2007) Vol 1 No 1 (2007) Vol 7, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 7, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 7, No 1: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 1 Vol 5, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 5, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 5, No 1 Vol 4, No 3 Vol 2, No 3 Vol 2, No 2 Vol 1, No 2 Vol 1, No 1 More Issue