cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
AGRIVITA Editorial Team
Contact Email
agrivita@ub.ac.id
Phone
+62341-575743
Journal Mail Official
agrivita@ub.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Veteran Malang 65145 Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : 01260537     EISSN : 24778516     DOI : https://doi.org/10.17503
Core Subject : Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry
AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal published by Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Brawijaya Indonesia in collaboration with Indonesian Agronomy Association (PERAGI). The aims of the journal are to publish and disseminate high quality, original research papers and article review in plant science i.e. agronomy, horticulture, plant breeding, soil sciences, plant protection and other pertinent field related to plant production. AGRIVITA is published three times per year. The Journal has been indexed in SCOPUS, Scimago Journal Ranks (SJR), Emerging Source Citation Index ( ESCI-Web of Science), EBSCO, ProQuest, Google Scholar and others international indexing. AGRIVITA is accredited first grade (Sinta 1/S1) for five years (2018-2023) based on Decree No: 30/E/KPT/2018 by Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (Ristek Dikti), The Republic of Indonesia. We accept submission from all over the world. All submitted articles shall never been published elsewhere, original and not under consideration for other publication.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 24 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue "Vol 34, No 2 (2012)" : 24 Documents clear
PARTICULATE ORGANIC MATTER AS A SOIL QUALITY INDICATOR OF SUGARCANE PLANTATIONS IN EAST JAVA Nurhidayati Nurhidayati; Endang Arisoesialaningsih; Didik Suprayogo; Kurniatun Hairiah
AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science Vol 34, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v34i2.163

Abstract

This study is aimed to test the hypothesis that the soil quality of sugarcane plantations closely linked to the particulate organic matter (POM) and earthworm’s populations. The research was conducted at five sites in Malang, East Java. The sites were selected based on differences in average annual rainfall and two types of soil management : with and without organic input. Soil samples taken from a depth of 0-20 cm were analyzed total organic C (TOC), total N, POM-C, and POM-N and earthworm’s population density and biomass. The TOC were corrected by the clay  content using pedotransfer equations so obtained TOCref. The interaction between differences in annual rainfall and two types of the treatments significantly (p
HERITABILITY OF FRUIT QUALITY IN THE PROGENIES OF DAY-NEUTRAL AND SHORT DAY HYBRID STRAWBERRY CULTIVARS Rudi Hari Murti; Hwa Young Kim; Young Rog Yeoung
AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science Vol 34, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v34i2.124

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the heritability, heterosis, and correlation among firmness, total soluble solid (TSS), and color in the F1 hybrids between two day-neutral (DN) and six short-day (SD) cultivars. The firmness of DN cultivars and the sweetness of SD cultivars were considered as a criterion in choosing parent cultivars. Parents and eleven F1 progenies were grown in completely randomized block design. Heritability of TSS, color (a*: opponent channel between red/magenta and green), and firmness was 0.67, 0.55, and 0.49, respectively. Most of the DN × SD hybrids had higher firmness and TSS than the crossing of SD × SD and DN × DN, respectively. In the DN × SD progenies, all heterosis values of TSS and most of heterosis of firmness were positive and negative, respectively. The genetic advance of TSS was higher than firmness. ‘DNKW002’ was a better donor for firmness and can be used as female parent in producing DN cultivar with high TSS. Correlation between firmness and TSS was negative, hence the simultaneous selection was recommended. Principle component analysis (PCA) based on characteristics indicated three groups: group of DN parents and hybrids of DN × DN, group of SD parents and SD × SD hybrids, and group of DN × SD and SD × DN hybrids. Additional key words: firmness, total soluble solid, heritability, PCA
IDENTIFICATION OF M4 GAMMA IRRADIATED MAIZE MUTANT BASED ON RAPD MARKERS Rustikawati, Rustikawati; Suprijono, Eko; Romeida, Atra; Herison, Catur; Sutjahjo, Surjono H.
AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science Vol 34, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v34i2.102

Abstract

Gamma irradiation to induce mutation in plant has been used intensively since several decades ago.  On maize, 275 Gy gamma irradiation have been known to increase genetic variability indicated by their morphological variation.  Identification on genetic changes by molecular technique is important to answer whether there is mutation happening on DNA level of the plants.   The objective of this research was to identify RAPD marker polymorphism on gamma irradiation mutants compared to their parents.  The initial step of the research was to select random primers could positively amplify the maize DNA.  The result showed that selection on 60 random primers yielded 15 primers that positively amplified the maize DNA.  Amplification on both mutants and their parents by those 15 selected primers indicated that only 5 primers yielding polymorphism between mutants and their parents.  Polymorphisms on mutant G1, G3 and G6 were detected on one locus, meanwhile on mutant G7, G8 and G9 were on two loci.
CHARACTERIZATION OF FRUIT ON SEVERAL SALAK VARIETIES AND THEIR HYBRIDS Sri Hadiati; T. Budiyanti; A. Soemargono; A. Susiloadi
AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science Vol 34, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v34i2.186

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize salak of local varieties and their hybrids. The fruits characterized were taken from plants that were grown in October 2004. The results revealed that fruits ³ 61 g were mostly produced by hybrids, in which one of their parents was Mwr or Ph. Fruits with flesh thickness ³ 0.85 cm were mostly yielded from Sdp, Sdm, and hybrids where one of their parents was Sdp or Mwr. While fruits with edible portion ³ 65.0% were mostly yielded from Sdp, Gp, and hybrids where their female parents were Mwr, Ph, and Sdp. Fruits with small seeds (≤ 3.0 g) were observed on Gp, whilst those with big seeds (≥ 7.0 g) were on Sdm, Sdm-Sj and Sdp-Sj. Hybrids from the female of Ph and Sdp mostly gave sweet taste (TSS ≥ 20º Brix). Mwr x Sdp crossing produced non-astringent fruits, while Ph x Java (K, M, Mj), Sdp x Sjg and some Sdp x Mwr crossing as well as Mwr produced astringent fruits. The four superior characters, namely fruit ≥ 61 g, flesh thickness ³ 0.85 cm, edible portion ≥ 65%, and TSS ≥ 20º Brix were found in Mwr-Sp-8, Sdp-Sj-8, and          Ph-M-7. Fruits produced by Mwr-Sp-8 were not astringent, while those produced by Sdp-Sj-8 and Ph-M-7 were astringent. These findings suggest that the selection of parent can play an important role in improving the varieties of salak. Keywords: salak, characterization, variety, hybrid, fruit

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 24

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2012 2012


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 48, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS Vol 47, No 3 (2025) Vol 47, No 2 (2025) Vol 47, No 1 (2025) Vol 46, No 3 (2024) Vol 46, No 2 (2024) Vol 46, No 1 (2024) Vol 45, No 3 (2023): IN PRESS Vol 45, No 3 (2023) Vol 45, No 2 (2023) Vol 45, No 1 (2023): IN PRESS Vol 45, No 1 (2023) Vol 44, No 3 (2022) Vol 44, No 2 (2022) Vol 44, No 1 (2022) Vol 43, No 3 (2021) Vol 43, No 2 (2021): ARTICLE IN PRESS Vol 43, No 2 (2021) Vol 43, No 1 (2021) Vol 42, No 3 (2020) Vol 42, No 2 (2020) Vol 42, No 1 (2020) Vol 41, No 3 (2019) Vol 41, No 2 (2019) Vol 41, No 1 (2019) Vol 40, No 3 (2018): OCTOBER Vol 40, No 2 (2018): JUNE Vol 40, No 1 (2018): FEBRUARY Vol 39, No 3 (2017): OCTOBER Vol 39, No 2 (2017): JUNE Vol 39, No 1 (2017): FEBRUARY Vol 38, No 3 (2016): OCTOBER Vol 38, No 2 (2016): JUNE Vol 38, No 1 (2016): FEBRUARY Vol 37, No 3 (2015): OCTOBER Vol 37, No 2 (2015): JUNE Vol 37, No 2 (2015): JUNE Vol 37, No 2 (2015) Vol 37, No 1 (2015) Vol 37, No 1 (2015): FEBRUARY Vol 36, No 3 (2014) Vol 36, No 3 (2014) Vol 36, No 2 (2014) Vol 36, No 2 (2014) Vol 36, No 1 (2014) Vol 36, No 1 (2014) Vol 35, No 3 (2013) Vol 35, No 3 (2013) Vol 35, No 2 (2013) Vol 35, No 2 (2013) Vol 35, No 1 (2013) Vol 35, No 1 (2013) Vol 34, No 3 (2012) Vol 34, No 3 (2012) Vol 34, No 2 (2012) Vol 34, No 2 (2012) Vol 34, No 1 (2012) Vol 34, No 1 (2012) Vol 33, No 3 (2011) Vol 33, No 3 (2011) Vol 33, No 2 (2011) Vol 33, No 2 (2011) Vol 33, No 1 (2011) Vol 33, No 1 (2011) Vol 32, No 3 (2010) Vol 32, No 3 (2010) More Issue