cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 83 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW YANG BERORIENTASI PADA PENEMUAN TERBIMBING DENGAN PENGGUNAAN ALAT PERAGA PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR SEGI EMPAT DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIKA Djumaliningsih, Nosa Putri; Riyadi, Riyadi; Iswahyudi, Gatut
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (364.581 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research aims to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the learning using guided inquiry-oriented Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model, Jigsaw type of cooperative or conventional learning model in rectangular flat structure material, (2) which one having mathematics learning achievement, the student with high, medium, or low mathematics reasoning skill in rectangular flat structure material, (3) in each mathematics reasoning skill (high, medium, and low), which one providing better learning achievement between guided inquiry-oriented Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with visual aid use, Jigsaw type of cooperative or conventional learning model in rectangular flat structure material, (4) in each learning model (guided inquiry-oriented Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with visual aid use, Jigsaw type of cooperative or conventional), which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the students with high, medium or low mathematics reasoning skill in rectangular flat structure material.This study belonged to a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design taken place in VII grade of SMPN Ponorogo in second semester of 2011/2012 school year. The population of research was all VII graders of Junior High Schools in Ponorogo, consisting of 51 school. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The classification of school was made according to National Examination value in the school year of 2010/2011. The samples of research were 280 students from SMPN 2 Ponorogo for high classification, SMPN 6 Ponorogo for medium classification, SMPN 2 Babadan for low classification. The data of mathematic reasoning skill and learning achievement were collected using a multiple-choice test. Technique of analyzing data used was a two-way variance analysis with different cells.The conclusions of research were (1) there was an effect of learning model on the learning achievement (Fobs = 8.10 > F­table = 3), from inter-row mean comparative test, it could be found that the guided inquiry-oriented Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with visual aid use (marginal mean of 74.0833) provided better achievement than Jigsaw type of cooperative did (marginal mean of 69.5652) and both of them provided better achievement than the conventional learning model did (marginal mean of 65); (2) there was an effect of student mathematics reasoning skill on the learning achievement (Fobs = 32.74 > F­table = 3), from inter-row mean comparative test, it could be found that the students with high reasoning skill (marginal mean of 74.8785) provided reasoning skill equaling to the students with medium reasoning skill did (marginal mean of 71.5506), and both of them provided better achievement than the students with low reasoning skill did (marginal mean of 60.8571); (3) in high reasoning skill, the guided inquiry-oriented Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with visual aid use provided achievement equaling to the Jigsaw type of cooperative did and both of them provided achievement equaling to the conventional learning model did, while in medium and low reasoning skill, the three learning model provided the same learning achievement; (4) in the guided inquiry-oriented Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with visual aid use, the students with high mathematics reasoning skill had mathematics learning achievement as same as those with medium mathematics reasoning skill had, and both of them had mathematics learning achievement as same as those with low mathematics reasoning skill had, while in Jigsaw type of cooperative and conventional learning model, the students with high mathematics reasoning skill had mathematics learning achievement as same as those with medium and low mathematics reasoning skill had.
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL PADA MATERI TEOREMA PYTHAGORAS DI KELAS VIII SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA Mu’ti, Yafita Arfina; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.218 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to: (1) produce teaching and learning materials with CTL approach on Pythagorean theorem at VIII Grade of Junior High School that was valid, practical, and effective, (2) investigate the better achievement in mathematics, whether using teaching and learning materials of CTL approach than using conventional teaching and learning materials. This study was development research. The development model used in this research was a developmental  research by  Plomp that contained five phases, (1) preliminary investigation, (2) design, (3) realization/ construction, (4) test, evaluation, and revision, and (5) implementation.  Teaching and learning materials said have quality if fulfilled validity, practical, and effective criteria. Teaching and learning materials was categorized validity based on expert judgement. Taeching and Learning materials was categorized practical if based on theory, teaching and learning materials was able to use it without revision or little revision and had fulfilled criteria of a practical teaching and learning materials. Teaching and learning materials was categorized effective if it fulfilled the indicators for a effective learning, including students activity during studying, learning activities based on syntax, student response about the learning, and students learning result. The data in this research was collected using test, questionnaire, observation, documentation, and interview.  To investigate the better student achievement used t-test. The results of this study were as follows: teaching and learning materials of CTL approach that include lesson plans, worksheets, and test of learning outcome was said to be valid, practical, and effective. Besides  that, student achievement with teaching and learning materials of CTL approach was better than student achievement with teaching and learning materials of conventional approach.Keywords: Teaching and learning materials, CTL, Pythagorean theorem
PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN INKUIRI DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI KABUPATEN BLORA Mashuri, Imam
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (554.203 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) Manakah model pembelajaran yang memberikan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik, model pembelajaran berbasis masalah (PBM), inkuiri atau konvensional, (2) Manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik, kemandirian belajar tinggi, kemandirian belajar sedang, atau kemandirian belajar rendah, (3) Pada masingmasing model pembelajaran, manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik, kemandirian belajar tinggi, kemandirian belajar sedang, atau kemandirian belajar rendah. (4) Pada masingmasing klasifikasi kemandirian belajar siswa, manakah model pembelajaran yang memberikan prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik, model PBM, inkuiri atau konvensional. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA Negeri Kabupaten Blora Provinsi Jawa Tengah tahun pelajaran 2011/2012.Teknik pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan stratified cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 287 siswa, dengan rincian 92 siswa pada kelas eksperimen satu, 96 siswa pada kelas eksperimen dua, dan 99 siswa pada kelas kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes kemampuan awal, angket kemandirian, dan tes prestasi belajar. Uji coba instrumen tes meliputi validitas isi, tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan reliabilitas. Uji coba instrumen angket meliputi validitas isi, konsistensi internal, dan reliabilitas. Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitasmenggunakan metode Lilliefors dan uji homogenitas variansi menggunakan metode Bartlett. Dengan a = 0,05, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa sampel berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal dan mempunyai  variansi yang homogen. Uji keseimbangan terhadap data kemampuan awal menggunakan analisis variansi satu jalan dengan sel tak sama diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa ketiga kelas mempunyai kemampuan awal yang seimbang. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa (1) Model pembelajaran inkuiri menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik dibandingkan model PBM, model PBM menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran konvensional, dan model pembelajaran Inkuiri menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran konvensional, (2) Siswa dengan kemandirian belajar tinggi memiliki prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik dibandingkan siswa berkemandirian belajar sedang, siswa dengan kemandirian belajar sedang memiliki prestasi yang sama baiknya dengan siswa berkemandirian belajar rendah, dan siswa dengan kemandirian belajar tinggi memiliki prestasi yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa dengan kemandirian belajar rendah, (3) Pada model pembelajaran inkuiri, siswa dengan kemandirian belajar tinggi memiliki prestasi belajar matematika sama baiknya dengan siswa berkemandirian belajar sedang, siswa dengan kemandirian belajar tinggi memiliki prestasi yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa berkemandirian belajar rendah, dan siswa dengan kemandirian belajar sedang memiliki prestasi yang sama baiknya dengan siswa dengan kemandirian belajar rendah. Pada model PBM dan konvensional, ketiga klasifikasi kemandirian belajar siswa memberikan prestasi belajar yang sama baiknya, (4) Pada siswa dengan kemandirian belajar tinggi, model pembelajaran inkuiri menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik dibandingkan model PBM, model PBM menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika sama baiknya dengan model pembelajaran konvensional, dan model pembelajaran inkuiri menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran konvensional. Pada siswa dengan kemandirian belajar sedang dan rendah, ketiga model pembelajaran menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang sama baiknya.Kata kunci: Inkuiri, Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (PBM), Konvensional, Kemandirian Belajar Siswa
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TAI BERBASIS AFL PADA PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA Nurcahyo, Adi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Usodo, Budi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (245.067 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student attitude toward mathematics. The learning models compared were Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) based Assessment for Learning (AfL), TAI, and conventional learning model. The research was quasi experimental. The population of this research was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School of the District Karanganyar, academic year 2013/2014. The samples in this research were SMPN 1 Tasikmadu, SMPN 2 Jaten, and SMPN 2 Colomadu taken by stratified cluster random sampling. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement instrument test and questionnaires students toward mathematics instrument. Data analysis technique used hypothesis test with two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. From the results of the analysis, can be concluded that: 1) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL were better than the ones who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI and conventional learning model, however the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI were better than the ones who were learning mathematics with conventional learning model, 2) the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high attitude toward mathematics were better than the ones with the medium and low attitude toward mathematics, however the students with the medium  attitude toward mathematics were better  than the ones with the low attitude toward mathematics, 3) in the cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with ones who have the high attitude toward mathematics were better than the students with the low attitude toward mathematics, and students with the medium attitude toward mathematics were as good as the ones who have low attitude toward mathematics as well. In the cooperative learning model TAI and conventional learning model, the students with the high, medium, and low attitude toward mathematics had the same achievement in learning mathematics, 4) in the students with the high attitude toward mathematics, the learning achievement of the students who were learning mathematics with ones who have cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL were better than the students were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI, the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI had the same achievement in learning mathematics with conventional learning model, and the students who were learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL had the same achievement in learning mathematics with cooperative learning model TAI. The students with the medium and low attitude toward mathematics had the same achievement in learning mathematics among the ones who were given the cooperative learning model TAI Based AfL, TAI, and conventional learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Assessment for learning (AfL), students attitude toward mathematics, achievement learning mathematics.
PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA TUNAGRAHITA RINGAN DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BENTUK SOAL CERITA PADA OPERASI HITUNG CAMPURAN Hidayah, Muhlishotul; Sujadi, Imam; Pangadi, Pangadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (270.226 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to describe the thinking process of students with mild mental retardation in solving mathematics problems concerning with story questions in a mixed arithmetic operation. This research was a qualitative case study. The subjects of this research were the students of VIII C SLB Negeri Surakarta consisting of two students: a male and a female students. The procedure of selecting the subject used purposive sampling. The data of the research were collected by using think aloud method. To validate the data, the researcher used time triangulation. The techniques of analyzing the data were: (1) classifying the data into four categories based on Santrock steps: (a) finding and framing the problem, (b) developing problem-solving strategies, (c) evaluating solutions, and (d) rethinking and redefining the problem and solutions, and then reducing the data that are not included in four categories, (2) presenting the data in table, and (3) concluding thinking process of students with mild mental retardation in each category. The results of the research showed that: (a) finding and framing the problem: The two students began the activities by reading the questions, then the students kept silent while reexamining the questions, the students could not mention what was known and what was asked, the students waited for the instruction about what to do, the students could only reveal some information on what was known. To find out the information asked, the one of students got difficulty in mentioning what was asked shown by silent respond then read the questions again, and another student reexamined the questions and revealed the answers related to arithmetic operations. In framing the problem-solving strategy, these two students needed guidance to make strategy by linking the arithmetic operations, and another student also expresses problem-solving strategies that were not appropriate on the first step, (b) developing problem-solving strategies: these two students needed guidance in solving problems, another student solved problems based on the strategy that had been compiled by linking the arithmetic operations, while another student got difficulties when implementing different strategies. In the process of calculating, the students completed the calculation by compiling it downwards, and the students tended to use their hands as a means of calculation, (c) evaluating solutions: the student checked the answer by recalculating the answer, while another student only looked the answer at glance and believed in the answer, (d) rethinking and redefining the problems and solutions: these two students looked at the answer and revealed that no other idea/way in solving the problem.Key words: thinking process, mild mental retardation, problem solving, story questions. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL, JIGSAW DAN STAD TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Ariati, Lia; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (682.176 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL), Jigsaw, and Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) to the mathematics conceptual understanding and problem solving viewed from students Adversity Quotient (AQ). The type of this research was quasi-experimental with factorial design 3x3. The population was all the students of grade XI IPS SMA/MA in Wonogiri on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The sample of this research consisted of 224 students. The instruments that used to collect the data were early ability test, conceptual understanding test, problem solving test, and questionnaires Adversity Quotient of students. Data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance with a significance level α = 5%. The results of the research were as follows. (1)Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while students were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of STAD. (b) Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with the learning model of Jigsaw but it have better than with the learning model of STAD while students with Jigsaw learning models have the same problem solving as students with learning model of STAD (2)Students with high AQ have better conceptual understanding and problem solving than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (3)(a) In learning model of PBL and Jigsaw, students with high AQ have the same conceptual understanding as medium AQ but better than low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better conceptual understanding than low AQ while in learning model of STAD, students with high AQ have a better conceptual understanding than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (b) In learning model of PBL, Jigsaw and STAD, students who have high AQ have better problem solving than students who have students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better problem solving than students with low AQ. (4)(a) For high and low AQ, students were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while for medium AQ, students who were subjected to the learning model of PBL have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model Jigsaw but better than STAD and students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than students who were subjected to the learning model of STAD. (b) In each AQ, students with the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with Jigsaw learning model but better than STAD learning model, and students with Jigsaw learning model have a better problem solving than students of  STAD learning model.Keywords : PBL, Jigsaw, STAD, AQ, conceptual understanding, problem solving. 
PENGEMBANGAN PEMBELAJARAN PETA KONSEP DAN APLIKASI E-LEARNING MOODLE: UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KETUNTASAN BELAJAR DAN SIKAP POSITIF TERHADAP MATEMATIKA SISWA SMK SURAKARTA1) Chrisnawati, Henny Ekana; Kurniawati, Ira; Kuswardi, Yemi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (447.428 KB)

Abstract

Abstract This main purpose of this research is developing a mind mapping model of learning  with moodle e learning application to increase SMK’s student mathematics achievement and positive attitudes towards of mathematics. In line with the objective of the  research, so this research is  R and D research model. This research aim to produce a learning devices and research instruments that comply a mind mapping model of learning  with moodle e learning application. It used 4D procedur by Thiagarajan that  comprised  some phase, namely :  Define,  Design, Develop, and DisseminateThe subject of development research is XH class of SMK Warga Surakarta’s students. The collection data methods, we used achievement test of students, validation sheet of all instruments research , and  observation sheet of positives attitudes students of towards mathematics, observation sheet of management classroom by the teacher, students response sheet towards devices and the implementation of learning. To analyze the datas, we used quantitative descriptive analyze. The descriptive analyze used to describe achievement of learning outcomes from validator, that consist of   mathemetics  achievement, positives attitudes towards mathematics and students responses to mind mapping model of learning  with moodle e learning application. The result of this research has been developed the devices of learning  and implementation of mind mapping model of learning  with moodle e learning application. That is   (1) the average of positives attitudes towards mathematics reliabilities is 79.2 %. It means the result of observations made both observers was credible and the instruments had a good category (2) the average of reliabilities of teacher’s abilities to manage his classroom is 84.75 %. It means the result of observations made both observers was credible and the instruments had a good category. (3) the result of respons’s students was unknown thal all aspects were above 70%,  exception was an aspect that related by classroom condition (3) the achievement tes that was developed from this research were valid instrument, have reliability indeks 0.77 and the average of sensitive indeks was 0.5051. It means that all instrument of learning can be used. Kata Kunci : pembelajaran peta konsep, aplikasi e learning moodle, sikap positif siswa terhadap matematika, hasil belajar
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA PEMBELAJARAN DIMENSI TIGA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN WONOGIRI DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Tarmo, Tarmo; Riyadi, Riyadi; Sujadi, Imam
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.585 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which one providing better learning achievement, the Jigsaw learning model, GI or direct instruction; 2) which one having better learning achievement, the students with high, medium or low emotional quotient (EQ); 3) in each category of EQ, which one providing better learning achievement, the Jigsaw, GI or direct instruction; 4) in each type of the learning model, which one having better learning achievement, the students with high, medium or low EQ. This research was a quasi-experimental research using factorial design of 3x3. The population of the research were all students of the Public Senior High Schools in Wonogiri Regency. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples of the research were tenth grade students of SMA N 1 Wonogiri, SMA N 2 Wonogiri, and SMA N 1 Sidoharjo. In collecting the data, the instruments used were test and questionnaire. The technique of analyzing the data was unbalanced two-ways Anova. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the Jigsaw  result in a better learning achievement than GI and direct instruction, the GI result in a better learning achievement than direct instruction; (2) the students with the high EQ result in a better learning achievement than the students with the medium or low EQ, the students with the medium EQ result in a better learning achievement than the students with the low EQ; (3) the students with the low EQ, the Jigsaw, GI and direct instruction have the same learning achievement; the students with the medium EQ, the Jigsaw and GI result in the same learning achievement, the GI learning model and direct instruction result in the same learning achievement and the Jigsaw result in a better learning achievement than direct instruction; the students with the high EQ the Jigsaw and GI result in the same learning achievement, and both result in a better learning achievement than the direct instruction; (4) in the Jigsaw and GI, the students with the low and medium EQ result in the same learning achievement, but students with the high EQ result in a better learning achievement than the students with the low or medium EQ, in the direct instruction, the students with the low, medium and high EQ result in the same learning achievement.Key words: learning model, Jigsaw, GI, emotional quotient.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT (NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER) DENGAN ASSESMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA SE-KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG ‘Aini, Addin Zuhrotul; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (637.003 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) among the model of NHT, NHT with AfL and classical model, which learning model can give better mathematics learning achievement. (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low intrapersonal intelligence. (3) viewed from learning models, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement those with high, medium or low intrapersonal intelligence. (4) viewed from intrapersonal intelligence, which learning model produces better mathematics learning achievement NHT with AfL, NHT or classical learning model. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students  of state junior high  school  in  Tulungagung Regency.  Sampling was  done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the samples was 266 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get 2013/2014 initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student’s achievements data, and questioner of intrapersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed  using analysis of variance. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The model of NHT with AfL providing better mathematics learning achievement than the model of NHT and classical, while the model of NHT providing better mathematics learning achievement than classical model. (2)  Students with high intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than students with medium or low intrapersonal intelligence, students with medium intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics achievement than student’s with low intrapersonal intelligence. (3) Viewed from learning models, student’s with high intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than medium or low, and medium intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning than low intrapersonal intelligence. (4) Viewed from intrapersonal intelligence, mathematics learning using NHT with AfL resulted students with better mathematics learning achievement than using NHT and classical learning model, learning mathematics using NHT resulted students with  better mathematics learning achievement than using classical learning model.Keywords: Numbered Head Together, Assessment for  Learning, Intrapersonal Intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN PEMBELAJARAN KLASIKAL DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA Suprapto, Suprapto; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (593.128 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s leraning activity. The learning models compared were TAI with scientific approach, PBL with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach.This experiment was quasi-experimental. It uses 3 x 3 factorial planning. The population was the entire 8th grade students of State Junior high School in Grobogan regency in the academic year 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of students of SMP N 2 Tegowanu, SMP N 3 Godong and SMP N 5 Purwodadi. Data collection instruments used were learning achievement test and student learning activity questionnaire. Hypothesis examination used was variance analysis (anava) with unequal cell.Conclusions acquired from this thesis are as follows: 1) PBL using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to TAI and classical Learning, TAI using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to classical learning. 2) student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is better than those with intermediate and poor learning activity, intermediate learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity. 3) on TAI using scientific approach, student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. Students which is given PBL using scientific approach, students with high learning activity have mathematics learning achievement as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. 4) for students with high learning activity, PBL gives learning achievement as good as TAI, PBL gives learning achievement better than classical learning, and TAI gives learning achievement better than classical learning. For students with intermediate learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result. For students with poor learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result on student’s learning achievement. And student’s learning achievement on algebra which is given PBL is as good as those which is given classical learning.Keywords: TAI using scientific approach, PBL using scientific approach, classical learning, learning activity, learning achievement 

Page 7 of 9 | Total Record : 83

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2011 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education More Issue