cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin)
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
ISSN : 23564997     EISSN : 27154734     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education, Engineering,
Education Mechanical Engineering
Journal of Mechaninal Engineering Education merupakan jurnal yang mendeseminasikan hasil penelitian dalam bidang pendidikan teknik mesin (vocational education in mechanical engineering). Terbit tiap bulan Juni dan Desember setiap tahunnya.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December 2025" : 4 Documents clear
DEVELOPING A BEST PRACTICE-BASED OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH MODULE FOR VOCATIONAL STUDENTS Randyputra, Bofit Osbron; Suryanto, Ahmad Eko; Pancawati, Ratna
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin) Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jmee.v12i2.87792

Abstract

This study aims to develop a best practice-based Occupational Safety and Health teaching module and evaluate its feasibility for vocational students in Light Vehicle Engineering. This research employed the Research and Development method with an ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The subjects included a material expert (vocational teacher), a media expert (instructional media lecturer), and 35 students. Data were collected using expert validation questionnaires and student response surveys with a Likert scale, then analyzed using quantitative descriptive statistics. The results indicated high feasibility in content, with the material expert validation reaching 82.67% (Very Feasible) and student responses scoring 84.57% (Very Feasible). The findings highlight that the module's content is highly relevant and contextually beneficial for students. However, the media expert validation only scored 65.33% (Feasible), indicating significant weaknesses in visual design, graphics quality, and layout. This study concludes that for vocational students, the relevance and practical utility of content are more dominant factors in the acceptance of a teaching module than its aesthetic appeal. Nevertheless, improvements in media design are necessary to achieve optimal learning effectiveness.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION INSTRUMENT BASED ON THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL FOR TEACHERS' ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE READINESS Nugraha, Hari Din; Gumelar, Agung; AK, Tri Bambang; Anggrainy, Rani; Nurahman, Muhamad Habib Alfin; Gunadi, Diandra Keisha
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin) Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jmee.v12i2.88890

Abstract

In Indonesia, only 48% of vocational teachers demonstrate limited readiness to integrate Artificial Intelligence into learning. Addressing this issue requires a reliable instrument to evaluate prospective teachers' preparedness. This study developed and validated an instrument based on the Technology Acceptance Model to assess the digital competencies of Mechanical Engineering pre-service teachers in Indonesian vocational education. The research quantitatively evaluated four constructs: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Behavioral Intention, and Self-Efficacy. Involving 100 respondents from a community service program, the development followed three stages: preparation, expert content validation using Aiken’s V, and construct validation via Exploratory Factor Analysis. Results confirmed unidimensional structures for all constructs. Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use showed strong validity with high eigenvalues (4.984 and 5.063) and explained variance (49.8% and 50.6%). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure confirmed sampling adequacy (0.833–0.909). Aiken’s V analysis indicated high content (0.83), construct (0.81), and linguistic validity (0.85). Key findings highlight deficiencies in Artificial Intelligence tool proficiency, emphasizing the need for curriculum alignment with Industry 4.0 demands. This study provides a validated tool to guide teacher training and policy, effectively addressing the digital divide in vocational education and bridging a critical gap between theory and practice.
THE INFLUENCE OF THE WELDING PRACTICE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES AT SMKN 2 KOTA SERANG Warni, Enok; Abdillah, Hamid; Ikhsanudin, Ikhsanudin
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin) Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jmee.v12i2.88816

Abstract

 Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh lingkungan belajar praktik pengelasan terhadap hasil belajar siswa di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Serang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan pendekatan asosiatif. Lokasi penelitian dilakukan di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Serang dengan menggunakan angket yang disebarkan di kelas 11 Teknik Pengelasan dengan jumlah siswa 51 orang dengan menggunakan rumus Slovin (10%). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji validitas, uji reliabilitas, uji normalitas, uji linearitas, uji regresi linear sederhana, dan uji parsial. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah R2 0,495 (49,5%) dan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,000 yang berarti 0,000 0,05 maka Ha (Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara lingkungan belajar (X) terhadap hasil belajar (Y).Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh mengetahui lingkungan belajar praktik pengelasan terhadap hasil belajar siswa di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Serang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan pendekatan asosiatif. Lokasi penelitian dilakukan di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Serang dengan menggunakan angket yang disebarkan di kelas 11 Teknik Pengelasan dengan jumlah siswa 51 orang dengan menggunakan rumus Slovin (10%). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji validitas, uji reliabilitas, uji normalitas, uji linearitas, uji regresi linier sederhana, dan uji parsial. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah R2 0,495 (49,5%) dan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,000 yang berarti 0,000 0,05 maka Ha (Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara lingkungan belajar (X) terhadap hasil belajar (Y).Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh llingkungan belajar praktik pengelasan terhadap hasil belajar siswa di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Serang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan pendekatan asosiatif. Lokasi penelitian dilakukan di SMK Negeri 2 Kota Serang dengan menggunakan angket/kuisioner yang disebar di kelas 11 Teknik Pengelasan dengan jumlah 51 siswa dengan menggunakan rumus slovin (10%). Teknik analisis data yang dilakukan yaitu uji validitas, uji reliabilitas, uji normalitas, uji linearitas, uji regresi linier sederhana, dan uji parsial. Adapun hasil yang diperoleh bahwa R 2  0,495 (49,5%) dan nilai signifikansinya yaitu 0,000   yang berarti 0,000 0,05, sehingga Ha (Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara lingkungan belajar(X) terhadap hasil belajar(Y).
UNCOVERING THE BARRIERS TO TEACHING FACTORY IMPLEMENTATION IN MACHINING VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS Nurholisoh, Nurholisoh; Putra, Ricky Cahyasari; Ikhsanudin, Ikhsanudin
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education (Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin) Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jmee.v12i2.87140

Abstract

The implementation of the Teaching Factory in Vocational High Schools (SMK) specializing in Machining Engineering is crucial for bridging the gap between schools and industry; however, its application still faces various challenges. This study aims to identify the barriers to Teaching Factory implementation in SMK Machining Engineering programs. The method employed is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with a descriptive qualitative approach, analyzing six scientific articles published between 2020 and 2025, selected through the PRISMA protocol. The results indicate that the main barriers lie in managerial aspects (67%), workshop/laboratory facilities (50%), human resources (50%), learning patterns and promotion (33%), as well as products and industry collaboration (17%). Managerial barriers are the most dominant. In conclusion, the implementation of Teaching Factory in SMK Machining Engineering remains suboptimal and requires strengthened management, improved human resources, enhanced facilities, and stronger industry collaboration to support sustainable production-based learning. Therefore, it is recommended to establish a Teaching Factory management team, and develop a data-based evaluation system.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 2 (2025): December 2025 Vol 12, No 1 (2025): June 2025 Vol 11, No 2 (2024): December 2024 Vol 11, No 1 (2024): June 2024 Vol 10, No 2 (2023): December 2023 Vol 10, No 1 (2023): Juni 2023 Vol 9, No 2 (2022): Desember 2022 Vol 9, No 1 (2022): Juni 2022 Vol 8, No 2 (2021): Desember 2021 Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Juni Vol 7, No 2 (2020): Desember 2020 Vol 7, No 1 (2020): Juni Vol 6, No 2 (2019): December Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Juni Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Juni Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Desember Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Desember Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Juni Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Desember Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Desember Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Juni Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Juni Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Desember Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Desember Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Juni Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Juni Vol 2, No 2 (2015): Desember Vol 2, No 2 (2015): Desember Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Juni Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Juni Vol 2, No 1: Juni 2015 Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Desember Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Desember Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Juni Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Juni More Issue