cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 14104946     EISSN : 25027883     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP) is an open access, and peer-reviewed journal. Our main goal is to disseminate current and original articles from researchers and practitioners on various contemporary social and political issues: gender politics and identity, digital society and disruption, civil society movement, community welfare, social development, citizenship and public management, public policy innovation, international politics & security, media, information & literacy, politics, governance & democracy, radicalism and terrorism. JSP is published three times a year.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 538 Documents
 42   43   44   45   46 
Assessing the Papuan Government’s Policy for Tackling the Spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Johni R. V. Korwa; Diego R. De Fretes; Meyland S. F. Wambrauw; Jackson Yumame; Christine O. I. Sanggenafa; Reni Shintasari; Ferinandus L. Snanfi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.56157

Abstract

This paper aims to assess the Papuan government’s policy for preventing the spread of COVID-19 through the shutdown of travel to the region based on the Papua joint statement. Excluding the transportation of goods, Papua was the first province in Indonesia to restrict entry into the region by both sea and air travel. To analyse the Papuan government’s policy, Edwards’ theory of policy implementation was adopted. Using first-hand interviews, observations, and library research, this paper argues that the government of Papua has made the right decision to close its borders, despite challenges, as part of a strict policy to protect the region from COVID-19. It is also worth noting that although five regions selected for this study (Jayapura City, Mimika, Biak Numfor, Merauke and Yapen Regency) reflected variations between one another in policy implementation, they all had expressed how the local government in Papua was doing the best they could to eradicate COVID-19. The use of theoretical frameworks (communication, resources, dispositions, and bureaucratic structures) as part of policy implementation had also been effective, despite that some parts need to be improved. The results of this study include recommendations for effective coordination among policymakers, the availability of laboratory testing, adoption of evidence-based policies and improving the health system in Papua.
Post COVID-19 Pandemic International Travel: Does Risk Perception and Stress-Level Affect Future Travel Intention? Ahmad Febri Falahuddin; Clare Teroviel Tergu; Rachele Brollo; Ratih Oktri Nanda
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.56252

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has extremely affected several industries including international travel and tourism. Many scholars have tried to describe the cause-effects of this major phenomenon. This study majorly aims to explore the relationship between risk perception and travel intention where stress level prone to COVID-19 quarantine serves as a moderating factor. The researchers believed that the influence of the dimensions of risk perception including social risk, psychological risk, physical risk, performance risk, financial risk and time risk on travel intention will be significant when the variable of stress level intervenes. This paper used a quantitative approach involving 409 respondents around the world. The data were gathered via online questionnaires facilitated by Google form and Wenjuanxing. The respective questionnaires were available in five languages (Chinese, English, Italian, French and Indonesian). Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The outcome of the hierarchical multiple regression (HMR) test resulted in a positive connection between all independent variables and travel intention simultaneously but not partially. The uppermost influence was found in social risk. Meanwhile, financial risk and time risk indicate no significant relationship. Lastly, the researchers believe that understanding the relationships between the variables of this study would be beneficial for the DMOs to predict the future market and rearrange strategies after being affected by the pandemic.
“Ndableg,” “Ra Sah Ngeyel”: Verbal Offense through Banners about the COVID-19 Pandemic Aris Munandar
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.56401

Abstract

Frustration can be expressed in public in different ways. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the grassroots protestors in Yogyakarta vent their frustrations triggered by the uncertainty through banners, which are simple, yet send messages of the country’s wrongdoings in dealing with the pandemic. This paper discusses verbal violence through negative sentiments expressed in the banners the Yogyakarta grassroots organizations use to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic prevention campaign. This study collected the data from 20 banners displayed in rural areas in Sleman regency, Yogyakarta, during March through April 2020. The analysis applied a sociopragmatic approach. The findings reveal the banners’ strong negative tones targetted to the lower-working class which reflect an inaccurate understanding of the fundamental concept of Covid-19 preventive measures and mitigation. Stigmatization of the lower-working class is underway to hurt the cohesion of society. The negative tones can escalate people’s anxiety, counterproductive to Covid-19 pandemic mitigation as it is against the wisdom of coping with the pandemic with a peaceful mind. Therefore, it suggests that evaluation by the agents of authority is imperative to prevent misunderstanding of the Covid-19 pandemic and build effective communication skills.
Does the Covid-19 Pandemic Affect the Stock Market in Indonesia? Dwi Rahmayani; Shanty Oktavilia
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.56432

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the existence and effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on the stock market over the long-term and short-term in Indonesia. The study followed Krugman’s (1979) approach stating the pandemic crisis problems have the potential to decrease the performance of the international balance of payments which will ultimately lead to uncertainty in the market. The research method was the Error Correction Model (ECM) with stock markets as an endogenous variable; and exchange rate, inflation, interest rate, foreign stock markets, commodity price, and pandemic as exogenous variables. The pandemic indicator was measured by total accumulative cases of Covid-19 per day in Indonesia. Using ECM, the result showed that foreign interest rates and commodity prices positively affect the stock markets. Conversely, the exchange rate has a negative effect on the stock markets. However, the estimation fails to reflect the significant impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the short-term, but it has a negative effect on stock markets in the long-term. This result implies that the higher total accumulative cases of Covid-19 has been the source of Indonesia’s stock market weakness in the long-term. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to examine Indonesia’s stock market’s pandemic impact between the short term and long term.
Partisanship in Crisis: Public Response to Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Arya Budi; Warih Aji Pamungkas
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.56443

Abstract

Given the fact that in a context of crises, people are concerned with their safety, among other things, partisan response toward policies and public leaders is an intriguing topic. This article examines the extent to which partisanship pertains to the time of the Covid-19 pandemic. We employ natural language processing (NLP) and social network analysis (SNA) on Twitter data to analyse public responses toward prominent political leaders, namely, Indonesian President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) and Jakarta Governor Anies Baswedan (Anies), in handling the crisis of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. We then put the social media analysis in a framework of political partisanship. Our sentiment analysis through NLP across time and categories found that supports and demands towards the two public figures indicate positive and negative partisanship that replicates previous electoral supports. Similarly, our SNA indicates a high polarization rate among the accounts connected with the two leaders in response to the crisis. Extended analysis of the accounts who are at the epicentres of the sentiment conversations, either positive or negative about Jokowi and Anies, reveals that there are connections with their past political support. Though we find negative partisan responses for both leaders, a type of hard-core partisanship has been leveraged for Jokowi but not for Anies. We conclude that electoral polarization contributes to the extent to which partisanship responses circulate in a context of crisis.
Pandemic Crisis in Online Media: Quantitative Framing Analysis on detik.com’s Coverage of Covid-19 Justito Adiprasetio; Annissa Winda Larasati
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.56457

Abstract

This study shows how detik.com, a pioneer and one of the largest online media companies in Indonesia frames the Covid-19 pandemic crisis. From the 6713 news reports in January, February and March, the most dominant framing of the crisis that appeared in the coverage was attribution of responsibility, followed by frame of human interest, frame of morality, frame of conflict and the last is frame of economic consequences. The quantitative approach was used in this research to ensure that systematic analysis and non-arbitrary procedures can be carried out on large amounts of data. This study offered a better understanding on of how online media framed the crisis during the pandemic. The results of this study indicate that the frame of attribution of responsibility is not only the most widely used by detik.com, but also the most dominant when the government is the main source of the news. The form of attribution of responsibility in times of crisis tends to be stronger in the realm of government because crisis events are widespread, forming an experience felt at the national level. As a result, crisis events have the potential to become political symbols used in framing various debates regarding a policy in the long run. The average tone of news towards the government from January to March was positive, although it gradually became more negative. 
Blunders of Government Communication: The Political Economy of COVID-19 Communication Policy in Indonesia Masduki Masduki
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.57389

Abstract

Government officials and politicians have been both a help and hindrance in the public dissemination of information during the COVID-19 pandemic. The intervention of a president and his/her ministries with their political and economic interests is particularly problematic when they employ a tactical approach rather than provide accurate and effective disaster information. This paper utilizes a political-economy approach to analyze the link between COVID-19 communication policies and practices with the interests of politics and market stability in Indonesia. In this paper, the author drills into the extent to which the country’s president and ministries manage their political interests in times of global pandemic. The ways they interact with the public during various stages of disaster are crucial because society is severely disrupted, with the government serving as the sole actor. This study uses qualitative methods and all materials are managed from an extensive review of current literature, policy analysis, and field observation. This paper finds that Indonesian government communication during the COVID-19 pandemic period (February– June 2020) has been dominated by a desire to maintain a strong power of the ruling authority and to secure market stability. Two factors—pro-market communication policies and manufactured- politicized COVID-19 data—have occurred. This paper contributes to the literature by focusing on the political and economic approach over the mediated discourses surrounding the pandemic.
Health Citizenship and Healthcare Access in Indonesia, 1945-2020 Arief Priyo Nugroho; Sri Handayani; Diyan Ermawan Effendi
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.54618

Abstract

Health citizenship is understood over how the government provides access to healthcare. This paper aims to describe the development of health citizenship from the post-colonial until the democratization era in Indonesia by analyzing health accessibility. The social-history approach was applied to analyze contemporary study in Indonesian healthcare access from 1945 to 2020. This article analyses the dynamic over political regime changes context and its approach to deal with health accessibility based on acceptability, availability, and affordability issues. This study found that each political regime provides a different social-political context in prioritizing and administrating the accessibility of healthcare. Besides each regime appears issues of accessibility, all of which provoke inequity in healthcare. This paper argues that health citizenship development in Indonesia shows the underlying cause of inequity. Consequently, the minimal presence of public participation raises inequity. Inequity leads to healthcare access that provides pointless improvement. Narratives in health citizenship fulfillment call for public participation space in administering access to healthcare.
Political Polarization and Selective Exposure of Social Media Users in Indonesia Denny Januar Ali; Eriyanto Eriyanto
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.58199

Abstract

This study is intended to answer the question of how political polarization is related to social media users’ posts about Covid-19. The researchers chose health cases related to Covid-19 instead of political issues (e.g. elections) to prove that this political polarization has spread to many areas. The research also wants to see the relationship between this political polarization and selective exposure. Theories applied in this study are polarization, filter bubble, and selective exposure. The study applied two methods: social media network analysis and content analysis. The network analysis included 82,156 posts, while the content analysis was carried out on 4,050 social media accounts. The research outcome proves the occurrence of political polarization. Social media users were divided into two major groups, namely pro-Jokowi and anti-Jokowi. Each group interacted with fellow users who had the same political choices and shared the same message content. Users with certain political choices tend to receive the same information as their political choices, and ignore information from other political parties. Another interesting finding from this study is how this polarization was sharpened by the use of hashtags. Each party (supporters and oppositions of Jokowi) uses hashtags to create solidarity and mobilization from each supporter. Research also proves the validity of the selective exposure and filter bubble hypothesis in the Indonesian context.
Quasi-Alliance at Play: The Curious Case of South Korea’s Aborted Withdrawal from GSOMIA in 2019 Resi Qurrata Aini; Yandry Kurniawan
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.59148

Abstract

This study aims to explain why countries maintain security cooperation with a partner even though they are in the middle of severe tensions. This is experienced by the Republic of Korea (ROK), which preferred to maintain its security cooperation with Japan under the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA). This research utilizes the concept of abandonment fears to explain South Korea's behavior in reversing its self-declared withdrawal from GSOMIA in 2019. By conducting a deductive-qualitative research approach, this research shows that South Korea was in a position of abandonment fears—fears of being ignored by Japan—magnified by the uncertainty of US commitment. For now, South Korea considers Japan as the most likely partner choice in the region. Thus, Seoul decided to maintain the partnership with Japan within the GSOMIA framework and compromise its grievances with the latter.

Page 44 of 54 | Total Record : 538

 42   43   44   45   46 

Filter by Year

1997 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 3 (2026): March Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July Vol 28, No 3 (2025): March Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 28, No 1 (2024): July Vol 27, No 3 (2024): March Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): July Vol 26, No 3 (2023): March Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): July Vol 25, No 3 (2022): March Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 25, No 1 (2021): July Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July Vol 23, No 3 (2020): March Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): July Vol 22, No 3 (2019): March Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): July Vol 21, No 3 (2018): March Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): July Vol 20, No 3 (2017): March Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): Juli Vol 19, No 3 (2016): Maret Vol 19, No 2 (2015): NOVEMBER Vol 19, No 1 (2015): JULI Vol 18, No 3 (2015): Maret Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): Juli Vol 17, No 3 (2014): Maret Vol 17, No 2 (2013): NOVEMBER (Korporasi dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial) Vol 17, No 1 (2013): JULI (Menimbang Birokrasi, Partai, dan Politik di Indonesia) Vol 16, No 3 (2013): MARET (Gerakan Sosial (Baru) Pasca “Orde Baru”) Vol 16, No 2 (2012): NOVEMBER (Mengelola Perbatasan Negara) Vol 16, No 1 (2012): JULI (Politik Pengelolaan Lingkungan dan Sumber Daya Alam) Vol 15, No 3 (2012): MARET (Dinamika Politik Desentralisasi) Vol 15, No 2 (2011): NOVEMBER (Dilema Tata Kelola Pemerintahan) Vol 15, No 1 (2011): JULI (Kebijakan Sosial di Aras Lokal) Vol 14, No 3 (2011): MARET (Membingkai Peran Politik Media) Vol 14, No 2 (2010): NOVEMBER (Membedah Radikalisme di Indonesia) Vol 14, No 1 (2010): JULI (Multikulturalisme dan Pergulatan Identitas) Vol 13, No 3 (2010): MARET (Dinamika Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial) Vol 13, No 2 (2009): NOVEMBER (Demokrasi dan Transformasi Institusi Tradisional) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): JULI (Konflik dan Perdamaian) Vol 12, No 3 (2009): MARET (Parpol dan Pemilu) Vol 12, No 2 (2008): NOVEMBER (Media dan Demokrasi) Vol 12, No 1 (2008): JULI (Gerakan Sosial) Vol 11, No 3 (2008): MARET (Komunikasi Bencana) Vol 11, No 2 (2007): NOVEMBER (Dinamika Politik Lingkungan) Vol 11, No 1 (2007): JULI (Demokrasi Mencari Bentuk) Vol 10, No 3 (2007): MARET (Kebijakan Sosial Politik) Vol 10, No 2 (2006): NOVEMBER (Respon terhadap Tantangan Internasional) Vol 10, No 1 (2006): JULI (Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) Vol 9, No 3 (2006): MARET (Tarik Menarik Kepentingan dalam Media Masa) Vol 9, No 2 (2005): NOVEMBER (Potret Ilmu-ilmu Sosial) Vol 9, No 1 (2005): JULI (Demokrasi: Problema dan Manfaatnya) Vol 8, No 3 (2005): MARET (Democratic Governance) Vol 8, No 2 (2004): NOVEMBER (Tinjauan Kritis Globalisasi) Vol 8, No 1 (2004): JULI (Representasi dan Keberpihakan dalam Media) Vol 7, No 3 (2004): MARET (Peran dan Konstruksi Sosial tentang Perempuan) Vol 7, No 2 (2003): NOVEMBER (Globalisasi dan Kemiskinan) Vol 7, No 1 (2003): JULI (Neolibralisme: Refleksi Kritis) Vol 6, No 3 (2003): MARET (Dinamika Negara dan Masyarakat Sipil) Vol 6, No 2 (2002): NOVEMBER (Perkembangan dan Potret Ilmu Sosial) Vol 6, No 1 (2002): JULI (Kebijakan Publik: Perspektif Alternatif) Vol 5, No 3 (2002): MARET (Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik) Vol 5, No 2 (2001): NOVEMBER (Otonomi Lokal dan Keindonesiaan) Vol 5, No 1 (2001): JULI (Khasanah Gerakan Sosial) Vol 4, No 3 (2001): MARET (Refleksi Nasionalisme Indonesia) Vol 4, No 2 (2000): NOVEMBER (Menggugat Kajian Media dan Kebebasan Pers) Vol 4, No 1 (2000): JULI (Reformasi Kelembagaan Politik) Vol 3, No 3 (2000): MARET (Kekerasan, Keberdayaan, dan Demokrasi) Vol 3, No 2 (1999): NOVEMBER Vol 3, No 1 (1999): JULI Vol 2, No 3 (1999): MARET Vol 2, No 2 (1998): NOVEMBER Vol 2, No 1 (1998): JULI Vol 1, No 3 (1998): MARET Vol 1, No 2 (1997): NOVEMBER Vol 1, No 1 (1997): JULI More Issue