cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 14104946     EISSN : 25027883     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP) is an open access, and peer-reviewed journal. Our main goal is to disseminate current and original articles from researchers and practitioners on various contemporary social and political issues: gender politics and identity, digital society and disruption, civil society movement, community welfare, social development, citizenship and public management, public policy innovation, international politics & security, media, information & literacy, politics, governance & democracy, radicalism and terrorism. JSP is published three times a year.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 546 Documents
 51   52   53   54   55 
Considering Restorative Justice and Peacebuilding: A Challenge for Ahmadiyya Communities in Indonesia Mochamad Sodik; B.J. Sujibto; Gufron Gufron
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 3 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.105743

Abstract

Having endured a history of persecution, violent attacks, and discrimination, from civil rights violations to expulsions, the Ahmadiyya community in Indonesia has pursued various strategies to promote peace and harmony. Using the Ahmadiyya settlement in Manislor, Kuningan, as a case study, this article examines how restorative justice might support peacebuilding between Ahmadiyya adherents and their offenders. We ask two questions: To what degree can restorative justice contribute to peacebuilding, and what factors either aid or hinder its practice in Manislor? Through a qualitative case study approach that combines observation, focus groups, interviews, and archival research, we identify restorative justice elements that reinforce peacebuilding efforts already initiated by Ahmadiyya leaders and the community. These elements include active dialogue and cultural bridge-building through visits to religious figures and local stakeholders, as well as expanded social engagement and charitable activities already underway in Manislor. This article develops a theoretical framework connecting restorative justice to peacebuilding in a context previously unexamined in the literature, and it provides a practical example that may inform restorative practices elsewhere, especially among other Ahmadiyya communities in Indonesia.
Incorporating Sundanese Ethics into Political Leadership: An Analysis of Dedi Mulyadi's Leadership Style in West Java, Indonesia Mahatva Yoga Adi Pradana
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 3 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.106116

Abstract

This research aims to explain how the adoption of Sundanese ethical values is reflected in Dedi Mulyadi's leadership practices, from serving as the Regent of Karawang to carrying out his role as the Governor of West Java. The focus of the research is not only on the idea of ethics as a normative concept, but also on its application in politics, leadership legitimacy building, and culturally grounded power exercises. The research uses a qualitative case study approach with data collection through interviews, field observations, document review, and public response tracking in digital media, which is analysed with the help of Python and NVivo tools. The results of the study show that values such as silih asih, silih asah, and silih asuh (compassionate leadership, deliberative democracy, and social welfare) are seen in various policies, participatory programs, and communication patterns. These findings show that Sundanese ethics do not stop at the symbolic level, but they become a practical foundation in building leadership that is rooted in local culture and responsive to public needs. On the other hand, this study also shows that the integration of local values in political leadership can strengthen public trust, even when faced with modern political dynamics and demands.
Reassessing the Effects of WTO and PTA Membership on FDI Inflows: The Case for Theory-Based Sample Selection Anthony Adinata Gunawan
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 30, No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.108391

Abstract

The positive effects of World Trade Organization (WTO) and preferential trade agreement (PTA) membership on foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows has been widely replicated in the literature. However, this seems implausible in the face of various mechanisms that could nullify or reverse this effect. This study proposes that the reason for this consensus is because the research designs used by existing literature rests on an unjustified assumption of effect homogeneity across countries. This study then demonstrates that the solution to this is theory-based sample selection—using two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimations of a 31-country panel, this study finds that within a theory-specified sample, specifically newly liberalized and/or formed countries, the effects of WTO and PTA membership on FDI are insignificant contrary to the consensus within the literature. This finding is robust to endogeneity, lag choices, estimator choices, and dependent variable choices—thus, a theory-based sample selection robustly illuminates the heterogenous effect of WTO and PTA membership on FDI. This has implications to the literature on selection bias and the economic impacts of free trade.
The GEAR Model and Social Policy on Poverty: An Analytical Integrative Literature Review Wimmy Haliim
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 3 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.109554

Abstract

The article summarises the explanatory potential of the GEAR (Growth, Empowerment, Adaptability, and Rationality) model for explaining and addressing multidimensional poverty in Indonesia. The investigation solves the persistent question of why poverty remains a systemic problem despite decades of intervention. GEAR is introduced as a mode of analysis that bridges theoretical principles with the empirical problems of poverty, rather than a descriptive approach that summarises interventions. The Integrative Literature Review (ILR) approach was used to systematically search Scopus, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Springer Nature Link, identifying 112 peer-reviewed publications published between 2020 and 2025. The resulting literature was synthesised and clustered into ten key areas. To establish coherence, complementarities, and tensions, these areas were critically mapped to the four components of the GEAR model. The analysis shows that GEAR has much in common with empirically validated interventions. Accounting for both enabling and constraining dynamics, the study reveals that GEAR not only consists of descriptive synthesis but also functions as a diagnostic model that may be used to explain the successes and failures of policies focused on reducing poverty. The article concludes that the GEAR model has the potential to guide systemic and adaptive change in Indonesia's social policy landscape.
Institutional Drivers of Policy Fragmentation: A Case of The Borobudur World Heritage Site, Indonesia I Made Krisnajaya; Janianton Damanik; Ely Susanto
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 30, No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.110966

Abstract

Policy fragmentation is often treated as a taken-for-granted phenomenon without sufficient critical efforts to further explain the underlying factors. This tendency leads to an incomplete understanding and creates a knowledge gap in advancing the state of the art of policy fragmentation. This study aims to explore and analyse the underlying causes that contribute to policy fragmentation in the governance of tourism destinations. Using a qualitative exploratory approach, the study focuses on the governance of the Borobudur World Heritage Site as a single case. Data was collected through a comprehensive literature review and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders involved in Borobudur’s conservation and commercialisation activities. The findings show that policy fragmentation arises from institutional pressures, institutional segmentation, and the commodification of policy object. These factors have shaped the governance dynamics of Borobudur over the past three decades. This study deepens understanding of the institutional drivers of policy fragmentation and strengthens the case for making fragmentation a central concern in policy studies. The findings should help policymakers and analysts to better identify and reduce the negative effects of policy fragmentation. Future research should explain the dynamics of the fragmentation process and its institutional consequences.
Warfare to Welfare: How Social Identity Supports the Political Business of the Former Free Aceh Movement Vellayati Hajad; Cut Maya Aprita Sari
JSP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan ilmu Poltik) Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jsp.98260

Abstract

This study critically examines how former members of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) transformed their collective social identity into political and economic capital in post-conflict Aceh. Drawing on social identity theory (SIT) and sociocognitive processes, it challenges prevailing reintegration narratives that emphasise disassociation from militant pasts. Instead, it finds that former GAM members deliberately retained and mobilised their rebel identity to gain legitimacy, patronage, and access to state resources. The study identifies three internal identity trajectories: the “ruling group", which converted its identity into formal political power; the “contractor group”, which leveraged political ties to access state-funded economic projects; and the “common society group”, which remained socially and economically marginalised. This stratification reveals that identity transformation does not uniformly lead to welfare gains. While existing studies often frame ex-combatant reintegration as a linear transition toward civilian life, this study argues that identity retention—rather than abandonment—can be a strategic pathway to upward mobility. However, this process is uneven. Enabling factors, such as provisions within the Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), the institutional structure of the Aceh Transition Committee (KPA), and the symbolic value of the GAM identity, supported elite access. In contrast, constraining factors, including limited economic diversification, dependency on political patronage, and exclusionary practices, prevented broader benefit-sharing among lower-tier members. By exposing the unequal outcomes of identity-based transformation, this study critiques assumptions of uniform reintegration success and offers a differentiated lens for understanding post-conflict access and inequality.

Page 55 of 55 | Total Record : 546

 51   52   53   54   55 

Filter by Year

1997 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 30, No 1 (2026): July Vol 29, No 3 (2026): March Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): July Vol 28, No 3 (2025): March Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 28, No 1 (2024): July Vol 27, No 3 (2024): March Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): July Vol 26, No 3 (2023): March Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): July Vol 25, No 3 (2022): March Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 25, No 1 (2021): July Vol 24, No 3 (2021): March Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): July Vol 23, No 3 (2020): March Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): July Vol 22, No 3 (2019): March Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): July Vol 21, No 3 (2018): March Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): July Vol 20, No 3 (2017): March Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): Juli Vol 19, No 3 (2016): Maret Vol 19, No 2 (2015): NOVEMBER Vol 19, No 1 (2015): JULI Vol 18, No 3 (2015): Maret Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): Juli Vol 17, No 3 (2014): Maret Vol 17, No 2 (2013): NOVEMBER (Korporasi dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial) Vol 17, No 1 (2013): JULI (Menimbang Birokrasi, Partai, dan Politik di Indonesia) Vol 16, No 3 (2013): MARET (Gerakan Sosial (Baru) Pasca “Orde Baru”) Vol 16, No 2 (2012): NOVEMBER (Mengelola Perbatasan Negara) Vol 16, No 1 (2012): JULI (Politik Pengelolaan Lingkungan dan Sumber Daya Alam) Vol 15, No 3 (2012): MARET (Dinamika Politik Desentralisasi) Vol 15, No 2 (2011): NOVEMBER (Dilema Tata Kelola Pemerintahan) Vol 15, No 1 (2011): JULI (Kebijakan Sosial di Aras Lokal) Vol 14, No 3 (2011): MARET (Membingkai Peran Politik Media) Vol 14, No 2 (2010): NOVEMBER (Membedah Radikalisme di Indonesia) Vol 14, No 1 (2010): JULI (Multikulturalisme dan Pergulatan Identitas) Vol 13, No 3 (2010): MARET (Dinamika Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial) Vol 13, No 2 (2009): NOVEMBER (Demokrasi dan Transformasi Institusi Tradisional) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): JULI (Konflik dan Perdamaian) Vol 12, No 3 (2009): MARET (Parpol dan Pemilu) Vol 12, No 2 (2008): NOVEMBER (Media dan Demokrasi) Vol 12, No 1 (2008): JULI (Gerakan Sosial) Vol 11, No 3 (2008): MARET (Komunikasi Bencana) Vol 11, No 2 (2007): NOVEMBER (Dinamika Politik Lingkungan) Vol 11, No 1 (2007): JULI (Demokrasi Mencari Bentuk) Vol 10, No 3 (2007): MARET (Kebijakan Sosial Politik) Vol 10, No 2 (2006): NOVEMBER (Respon terhadap Tantangan Internasional) Vol 10, No 1 (2006): JULI (Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) Vol 9, No 3 (2006): MARET (Tarik Menarik Kepentingan dalam Media Masa) Vol 9, No 2 (2005): NOVEMBER (Potret Ilmu-ilmu Sosial) Vol 9, No 1 (2005): JULI (Demokrasi: Problema dan Manfaatnya) Vol 8, No 3 (2005): MARET (Democratic Governance) Vol 8, No 2 (2004): NOVEMBER (Tinjauan Kritis Globalisasi) Vol 8, No 1 (2004): JULI (Representasi dan Keberpihakan dalam Media) Vol 7, No 3 (2004): MARET (Peran dan Konstruksi Sosial tentang Perempuan) Vol 7, No 2 (2003): NOVEMBER (Globalisasi dan Kemiskinan) Vol 7, No 1 (2003): JULI (Neolibralisme: Refleksi Kritis) Vol 6, No 3 (2003): MARET (Dinamika Negara dan Masyarakat Sipil) Vol 6, No 2 (2002): NOVEMBER (Perkembangan dan Potret Ilmu Sosial) Vol 6, No 1 (2002): JULI (Kebijakan Publik: Perspektif Alternatif) Vol 5, No 3 (2002): MARET (Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik) Vol 5, No 2 (2001): NOVEMBER (Otonomi Lokal dan Keindonesiaan) Vol 5, No 1 (2001): JULI (Khasanah Gerakan Sosial) Vol 4, No 3 (2001): MARET (Refleksi Nasionalisme Indonesia) Vol 4, No 2 (2000): NOVEMBER (Menggugat Kajian Media dan Kebebasan Pers) Vol 4, No 1 (2000): JULI (Reformasi Kelembagaan Politik) Vol 3, No 3 (2000): MARET (Kekerasan, Keberdayaan, dan Demokrasi) Vol 3, No 2 (1999): NOVEMBER Vol 3, No 1 (1999): JULI Vol 2, No 3 (1999): MARET Vol 2, No 2 (1998): NOVEMBER Vol 2, No 1 (1998): JULI Vol 1, No 3 (1998): MARET Vol 1, No 2 (1997): NOVEMBER Vol 1, No 1 (1997): JULI More Issue