cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 10 No 3 (2021)" : 16 Documents clear
Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Terhadap Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Johanes Bornok Butar Butar; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati Yuliati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p12

Abstract

Corporations are often neglected in the development of law as well as participation in legal development, making it vulnerable to access to justice. Corporations must obtain the same rights as humans in accordance with the laws and regulations concerning corporations as legal subjects. This is to give a sense of fairness to those who work in the company. The purpose of this study is to examine, find facts and analyze criminal liability for corporations against vehicles that have traffic accidents due to not conducting periodic tests. The method used is a type of normative juridical writing method using a statutory approach. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the LLAJ Law only focuses on vehicle drivers, the fact is that the cause of some traffic accidents is because the company does not conduct periodic tests on its vehicles. It is the responsibility of the company to conduct periodic tests on its vehicles every six months, but based on the cases described in the results of the discussion, traffic accidents caused by not conducting periodic tests by the company only focus on the fault of the driver. The current laws and regulations regarding traffic certainly do not fully support legal subjects in Indonesia, therefore there is a need for a formulation of criminal liability against corporations. Korporasi sering dilupakan dalam perkembangan hukum dan juga partisipasi dalam pembangunan hukum, sehingga menjadi rentan aksesnya terhadap keadilan. Korporasi harus memperoleh hak yang sama dengan manusia sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan tentang korporasi sebagai subjek hukum. Hal ini untuk memberikan rasa adil kepada mereka yang bekerja didalam perusahaan tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji, menemukan fakta dan menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi korporasi terhadap kendaraannya yang mengalami kecelakaan lalu lintas akibat tidak melakukan uji berkala. Metode yang digunakan adalah jenis metode penulisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunkan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa UU LLAJ hanya menitikberatkan terhadap pengemudi kendaraan, kenyataannya bahwa penyebab beberapa kecelakaan lalu lintas adalah karena perusahaan tidak melakukan uji berkala terhadap kendaraanya. Uji berkala tersebut merupakan tanggungjawab dari perusahaan untuk melakukan pengujian secara berkala terhadap kendaraanya selama 6 bulan sekali, namun berdasarkan kasus yang diuraikan dalam hasil pembahsan, kecelakaan lalu lintas yang disebabkan karena tidak dilakukan uji berkala oleh perusahaan hanya menitikberatkan kesalahan terhadap pengemudi. Peraturan perundang-undangan tentang lalu lintas saat ini tentu sangat tidak mendukung sepenuhnya subjek hukum di Indonesia, oleh karena itu perlu adanya formulasi pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap korporasi.
Geographical Indication Protection of Tenun Gringsing Bali Fabric as A Society Cultural Heritage in Tenganan Pegringsingan I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p03

Abstract

The Kain Tunun Gringsing Bali is a cultural heritage of the people of Tenganan Pegringsingan Village and has a philosophical value and sacred meaning behind every motif of the Balinese Tunun Gringsing cloth. In October 2016 the government has issued a Geographical Indication Protection certification for the Bali Gringsing Tunun Fabric. The purpose of writing this paper is to examine the granting of Geographical Indication Certificates to Bali Gringsing Tunun Fabrics both in terms of production and sales. The research in this article uses empirical legal research methods. The results of the study found that the evaluation after obtaining a protection certificate showed that there was no significant impact on the productivity of the Balinese Tunun Gringsing fabric craftsmen. This is due to the lack of socialization after and data collection so that it cannot be done in a concrete way the perceived impact of getting the exclusive right to protect the geographical indications of the Kain Tunun Gringsing Bali
Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Perencana Keuangan Penyedia Program Investasi yang Merugikan Konsumen Dihubungkan dengan Teori Kepastian Hukum Vivi Nur Arzy; Yeti Sumiyati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p08

Abstract

The principle of responsibility as one of the principles of GCG is reflected in the Company Law that every company may not carry out activities that are contrary to the law. This responsibility principle is also applied to companies engaged in the capital market. Financial planning companies are companies whose activities are connected to the capital market and can support the capital market. However, the regulations regarding financial planners have not been specifically regulated in statutory provisions. The existence of a legal vacuum regarding financial planners is used as an opening to commit violations by one of the financial planning companies so that it results in losses for consumers. This study used a normative juridical approach using a descriptive analytical research specification. The data collection technique used is through literature study using laws, books, journals and the internet related to the topic of the problem which will later be used as a reference for solving problems as part of data analysis. The analytical method used legal construction through the analogy method which is used to find specific provisions that become general provisions so that they can be applied to financial planning companies. The conclusions obtained from this research are: First, the regulation regarding financial planners in Indonesian laws and regulations has not been specifically and specifically regulated so that the existence of financial planners has not received legal certainty. Second, responsibility for financial planning companies providing investment programs that harm consumers can be subject to administrative, civil and criminal sanctions.
Penanganan Dugaan Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilu (Studi Kasus Putusan Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar Nomor: 001/ADM/BWSL/17.04/PEMILU/XI/2018) Pande Putu Ekayana Dharma Putra; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p13

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the mechanism for handling suspected election administrative violations in Bawaslu of Gianyar Regency, as well as knowing and analyzing the inhibiting factors in the implementation of handling the alleged administrative violations of the Election at Bawaslu, Gianyar Regency. This study uses an empirical legal research method, with data and data sources coming from the chief informant and members of the Bawaslu Gianyar Regency. The results of this study explain that mechanism for handling alleged administrative violations of the General Election in Gianyar Regency begins with public reports and then determines the type of violation and is registered by Bawaslu of Gianyar Regency. Furthermore, a preliminary hearing and preliminary decisions are held, then an examination session, and finally a final decision is made by the examining panel. There are 3 (three) obstacles in the handling of alleged election administrative violations, namely bringing in witnesses in trials, the authority to execute decisions, and the lack of institutional personnel to carry out trial duties in conjunction with supervision of the Election stages. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mekanisme penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar, serta mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor-faktor penghambat dalam pelaksanaan penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dengan data dan sumber data yang berasal dari informan ketua dan anggota Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Teori negara hukum digunakan untuk menjawab pertanyaan pertama, dimana mekanisme penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Kabupaten Gianyar diawali dari laporan masyarakat lalu ditentukan jenis pelanggaran dan dilakukan registrasi oleh Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Selanjutnya dilaksanakan sidang pendahuluan serta putusan pendahuluan, lalu sidang pemeriksaan, dan terakhir pembuatan Putusan akhir oleh majelis pemeriksa. Permasalahan kedua digunakan teori sistem hukum, dilihat dari struktur hukum, terdapat 3 (tiga) hambatan dalam penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif pemilu, yaitu mendatangkan saksi dalam perisdangan, kewenangan eksekusi Putusan, serta kurangnya personil lembaga untuk melaksanakan tugas persidangan yang berasamaan dengan pengawasan tahapan Pemilu.
Surveillance Function in Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Integrated Criminal Justice System Perspective Ni Nengah Adiyaryani; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p04

Abstract

This study aims to determine the role of law enforcement officer in integrated criminal justice system and to find the concept of surveillance patterns that need to be established for law enforcement officer for the future integrated criminal justice system (ius constituendum). This is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis using qualitative methods and the results are presented in descriptive analysis report. The results show that the integrated criminal justice system did not have an integrated surveillance system in a special form that was implemented by the law enforcement officers and its society yet. It still applying an internal and conventional surveillance pattern. Hence, empowering the existing surveillance pattern and creating an integrated surveillance pattern could be a solution to overcome the weakness of the surveillance system in the Integrated Criminal Justice System nowadays which caused by the fragmented surveillance system without any external-cross institutional surveillance.
Hak Subrogasi Penanggung dalam Borgtocht Luh Made Asri Dwi Lestari; Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p09

Abstract

The guarantee agreement (borgtocht) creates legal consequences such as subrogation rights for the guarantor who has borne debtor's debt to creditor. The provisions of Article 1820 of Civil Code and other articles related to borgtocht in other laws and regulations relating to guarantees show that there are no regulations for the protection of subrogation rights that the guarantor obtained in the guarantee agreement, resulting in a vacuum of norm against this matter. Determining the guarantor’s legal standing in guarantee agreement according to the Indonesian guarantee legal system and the binding strength of the authentic deed in protecting the subrogation rights of guarantor in the guarantee agreement are the goals from this research. The normative juridical research method is used in this paper by carrying out legal construction through the argumentum per analogiam method to solve the vacuum of norms, implemented by expanding the meaning of statutory provisions on similar issues and the existence of community interests that demand the same assessment. This research shows that the legal standing of guarantor are implicitly regulated in Articles 1831-1843 Civil Code and based on the argumentum per analogiam method the provisions of the authentic deed formulation in subrogation that occur because the meaning of the agreement is expanded to be applied to this issue, therefore the third parties obtain legal protection for the rights of subrogation that arise, after bearing repayment of debtor's debt. Perjanjian penanggungan (borgtocht) menimbulkan akibat hukum berupa hak subrogasi bagi penanggung yang telah melakukan penanggungan utang debitur terhadap kreditur. Ketentuan Pasal 1820 KUH Perdata dan pasal-pasal lainnya terkait dengan penanggungan serta pasal-pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya terkait dengan jaminan tidak terdapat pengaturan perumusan hak subrogasi yang diperoleh penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan, sehingga terjadi suatu kekosongan norma (vacuum of norm) terhadap persoalan ini. Mengetahui kedudukan hukum penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan menurut sistem hukum jaminan Indonesia dan kekuatan mengikat akta otentik dalam melindungi hak subrogasi penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan menjadi tujuan dalam penelitian ini. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif digunakan dalam penulisan karya tulis ini dengan melakukan konstruksi hukum melalui metode argumentum per analogiam untuk mengatasi kekosongan norma, yaitu perluasan makna ketentuan perundang-undangan terhadap persoalan yang mirip serta adanya kepentingan masyarakat yang menuntut penilaian sama. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kedudukan hukum bagi penanggung diatur secara implisit pada Pasal 1831-1843 KUH Perdara serta berdasarkan metode argumentum per analogiam ketentuan perumusan akta otentik pada peristiwa subrogasi yang terjadi karena persetujuan diperluas maknanya untuk diterapkan pada persoalan ini, sehingga pihak ketiga memperoleh perlindungan hukum atas hak subrogasinya yang timbul setelah dilakukannya penanggungan utang.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue