Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.064
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Hukum Saraswati
I Gede Pasek Pramana
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
The Expansion of Administrative Decision Meaning Based on Government Administration Law: a Dispute Submission Process Approach I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana; I Ketut Sudiarta; I Wayan Bela Siki Layang; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (512.869 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p02

Abstract

The establishment of Government Administration Law brings significant change to the competence of the previously restricted Administrative Court to become expanded. This study aims to find the philosophical considerations from the extension of Administrative Decision meaning on Government Administration Law, to classify the legal implication arising from the regulation of the expansion of administrative decision meaning towards dispute submission process in Administrative Court and to formulate ideal attitude of the State Administrative Judge in resolving State Administrative Disputes. This is a combination of normative and empirical legal research. The study indicated that the legislator main consideration in regulating the expansion of administrative decision meaning on Government Administration Law is to expand the absolute competence of Indonesian Administrative Court which previously felt very narrow. The implication arises after new regulation consists of: the expansion of Administrative Court adjudicate authority for factual actions, subject expansion that have the authority to issue Administrative Decision, the expansion of the Administrative Court adjudicate authority over Administrative Decision which has a legal consequences although still need the approval from above instance, the regulation that Administrative Decision can be sued through the Administrative Court of any potential loss that may arise by the issuance of its Administrative Decision and the expansion towards the parties who have a chance to field a State Administrative accusation. The ideal attitude of State Administrative Judge is the judge should remain based on the strong theoretical concepts of the law so can create understanding and attitude in handling a case in Indonesian Administrative Court.
Penanganan Dugaan Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilu (Studi Kasus Putusan Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar Nomor: 001/ADM/BWSL/17.04/PEMILU/XI/2018) Pande Putu Ekayana Dharma Putra; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p13

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the mechanism for handling suspected election administrative violations in Bawaslu of Gianyar Regency, as well as knowing and analyzing the inhibiting factors in the implementation of handling the alleged administrative violations of the Election at Bawaslu, Gianyar Regency. This study uses an empirical legal research method, with data and data sources coming from the chief informant and members of the Bawaslu Gianyar Regency. The results of this study explain that mechanism for handling alleged administrative violations of the General Election in Gianyar Regency begins with public reports and then determines the type of violation and is registered by Bawaslu of Gianyar Regency. Furthermore, a preliminary hearing and preliminary decisions are held, then an examination session, and finally a final decision is made by the examining panel. There are 3 (three) obstacles in the handling of alleged election administrative violations, namely bringing in witnesses in trials, the authority to execute decisions, and the lack of institutional personnel to carry out trial duties in conjunction with supervision of the Election stages. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mekanisme penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar, serta mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor-faktor penghambat dalam pelaksanaan penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dengan data dan sumber data yang berasal dari informan ketua dan anggota Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Teori negara hukum digunakan untuk menjawab pertanyaan pertama, dimana mekanisme penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Kabupaten Gianyar diawali dari laporan masyarakat lalu ditentukan jenis pelanggaran dan dilakukan registrasi oleh Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Selanjutnya dilaksanakan sidang pendahuluan serta putusan pendahuluan, lalu sidang pemeriksaan, dan terakhir pembuatan Putusan akhir oleh majelis pemeriksa. Permasalahan kedua digunakan teori sistem hukum, dilihat dari struktur hukum, terdapat 3 (tiga) hambatan dalam penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif pemilu, yaitu mendatangkan saksi dalam perisdangan, kewenangan eksekusi Putusan, serta kurangnya personil lembaga untuk melaksanakan tugas persidangan yang berasamaan dengan pengawasan tahapan Pemilu.
PENGANGKATAN ANAK BEDA KASTA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA I Gede Pasek Pramana; Ni Putu Niti Suari Giri
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Saraswati
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research has 2 objectives: (1) to find out and analyze the legality of adopting children of different caste; (2) to find out and analyze the responsibility of the state in the case of the cancellation of adopting children of different castes in the context of fulfill, respect and protect human rights. This research is a sociolegal research that examines the problem of adopting children of different caste from a normative perspective and an empirical perspective. Based on the results of the research, it was concluded that the adoption children of different caste is legal act according to positive law in Indonesia. In fact there are still cases of cancellation of the adoption children of different caste in Bali. The state responsibility in implementing efforts to fulfill, respect and protect human rights, the state then intervenes in cases referred to through mediation efforts and/or appointment of trustees.
Majelis Desa Adat sebagai Pasikian Desa Adat di Bali I Made Darpana; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tentang Majelis Desa Adat Sebagai Pasikian Desa Adat di Bali. Pengkajian pada Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan sejarah. Hasil studi menjelaskan bahwa Desa Adat di Bali memiliki kewenangan untuk membentuk Pasikian Desa Adat yang telah diakui secara yuridis pada tatanan hukum di Indonesia mulai dari Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945 hingga pada Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Tentang Desa Adat di Bali. Secara sosiologis telah diakui oleh pemerintah maupun Pemerintah Daerah serta telah disepakati dan diakui oleh Masyarakat (krama) Desa Adat di Bali. Pasca terbentuknya Majelis Desa Adat menimbulkan Konsekuensi yuridis terhadap Desa Adat di Bali, antara lain pada bidang pendampingan serta pembuatan pedoman penyuratan awig-awig dan perarem, pembentukan lembaga adat dan pembentukan pedoman ngadegang Bendesa Adat dan Majelis Desa Adat memiliki wewenang untuk menyelesaikan persoalan-persoalan adat yang tidak bisa diselesaikan oleh Desa Adat dan memberikan keputusan terkait pelanggaran Prajuru Desa Adat. Konsekuensi yuridis tersebut diatur pada Perda tentang Desa Adat, Pergub Bali dan Anggaran Dasar Anggaran Rumah Tangga Majelis Desa Adat Bali. Kata Kunci: Desa Adat, Pasikian, Majelis Desa Adat, Kewenangan, Konsekuensi. ABSTRACT This Study aims to examine the Assembly of Indigenous Villages as Pasikian Indigenous Villages in Bali. The study uses normative legal research methods with statutory approaches, conceptual approaches and historical approaches. The results of the study explain that Indigenous Villages in Bali have the authority to form Pasikian Desa Adat which has been recognized juridically in the legal order in Indonesia starting from the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 to the Regional Regulation of Bali Province on Indigenous Villages in Bali. Sociologically it has been recognized by the government and local government and has been agreed and recognized by the Indigenous Village Community (krama) in Bali. After the formation of the Indigenous Village Assembly gave juridical consequences to indigenous villages in Bali, among others in the field of mentoring and the creation of guidelines awig-awig and perarem, the establishment of customary institutions and the establishment of guidelines ngadegang Bendesa Adat and Indigenous Village Assembly have the authority to resolve customary issues that can not be resolved by the Indigenous Village and give decisions related to violations of The Village Prajuru Adat. The juridical consequences are stipulated in the Regulation on Indigenous Villages, Pergub Bali and the Articles of Association of the Household Budget of the Bali Indigenous Village Assembly. Keywords: Indigenous Village, Pasikian, Indigenous Village Assembly, Authority, Consequences.
Pengendalian Tindakan Land Clearing Oleh Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia Putu Ari Sagita; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 11 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i02.p10

Abstract

Land clearing action by customary law community units (hereinafter referred to as KMHA) always intersects with the concept of environmental protection and management. Even though the existence of the KMHA is clearly recognized by the constitution and its origins. The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the authority and limits of the KMHA authorities in context of land clearing. The method used in this article is the normative legal research by using the statute approach and the conceptual approach. Based on the analysis, it is known that the KMHA has the authority to carry out land clearing or clearing land by burning as stated in Article 61 paragraph 1 letter h of the PPLH Law, however, there are limitations that must be considered by KMHA in carrying out land clearing by burning. Neverthless, it can be done a maximum of 2 (two) hectares per family head as regulated in Article 4 paragraph 1 Regulation of the Minister of LHK No.10/2010. Tindakan land clearing oleh kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat (selanjutnya disebut KMHA) senantiansa bersinggungan dengan konsep perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup. Padahal keberadaan KMHA jelas diakui oleh konstitusi beserta hak asal-usulnya. Adapun tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganlisis tentang kewenangan dan batasan kewenangan dari KMHA dalam konteks land clearing. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah metode hukum normatif dengan turut menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang dan pendekatan Konseptual. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, diketahui bahwa KMHA berwenang untuk melakukan land clearing atau membuka lahan dengan cara membakar sebagaimana dinyatakan dalam Pasal 61 ayat 1 huruf h UU PPLH, Namun demikian, ada batasan yang wajib diperhatikan oleh KMHA dalam melaksanakan land clearing melalui pembakaran lahanyakni dapat dilakukan pada lahan dengan luas maksimal 2 (dua) hektar per kepala keluarga sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 4 ayat 1 Permen LHK No.10/2010.
PERIHAL BATAS USIA DALAM HUKUM PENGANGKATAN ANAK DI INDONESIA Ni Made Kintan Oktavianti; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 7 (2022)
Publisher : Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini berjudul Perihal Batas Usia dalam Hukum Pengangkatan Anak di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji serta mengtehaui terkait dengan batasan usia seorang anak yang dapat diangkat berdasarkan hukum positif yang diberlakukan di Indonesia serta untuk mengetahui apakah pengangkatan terhadap seorang anak yang usianya sudah melampaui usia 18 tahun dianggap sah menurut hukum yang ada di Indonesia. Metode yang dipergunakan pada penyusunan jurnal ini ialah metode penelitian normative yang mempergunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum yang dipakai dalam penulisan ini ialah bahan hukum primer yang terdiri dari beberapa jenis peraturan perundang-undangan dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa berbagai buku maupun literatur, jurnal hukum, pandangan ahli sertajuga yurisprudensi yang berkaitan dengan pokok persoalan yang tengah dibahas. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, maka diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa ada 2 sistem hukum yang diberlakukan prihal penganggkatan anak di Indonesia, yakni hukum nasional dan hukum adat. Diantara 2 sistem hukum tersebut, memiliki perbadaan pandangan mengenai hakikat pengangkatan anak. Namun perbedaan tersebut bukan merupakan suatu konflik norma, mengingat hukum negara mengakui keabsahan pengaturan hukum adat terkait pengangkatan anak. Jika bertolak dari konstitusi, maka pengangkatan anak terhadap orang yang sudah dewasa adalah hal yang legal menurut hukum, sepanjang bersesuaian dengan prasyarat dan ketentuan yang telah ditetapkan hukum adat(dalam hal ini khususnya hukum adat Bali). Arguementasi ini juga berpedoman pada teori pluralisme hukum yang diberlakukan di Indonesia. Kata Kunci : Batas Usia, Pengangkatan Anak , Hukum ABSTRACT This writing is entitled Regarding the Age Limit in the Adoption Law in Indonesia. This study intend to examine and find out related to the age limit of a child who can be adopted under positive law enforced in Indonesia and to find out whether the adoption of a child who has exceeded the age of 18 is considered legal according to existing regulations in Indonesia. The method used in the preparation of this journal is a normative research method that uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach . The legal materials used in this research are in the form of primary legal materials consisting of several types of legislation and secondary legal materials in the form of various books or literature, legal journals, expert opinions and norms relating to the subject matter being discussed. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that there are two legal systems applied regarding child adoption in Indonesia, namely national law and customary law. Between the two systems of norms, there are dissimilar views on the nature of adoption. However, this difference does not constitute a conflict of norms, considering that state law recognizes the validity of customary law arrangements regarding child adoption. If it departs from the constitution, then the adopttion of children of adults is legal according to law, as long as it is in accordance with the prerequisites and clause stipulated by customary law (in this case especially Balinese customary law). This argument is also guided by the theory of legall pluralism applied in Indonesia. Keywords : Age Limit , Child Adoption , Law
Perlindungan Hukum Dan Pelestarian Tradisi Siat Yeh Banjar Teba Desa Adat Jimbaran Anak Agung Bagus Cahya Dwijanata; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i02.p14

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the authority of the Jimbaran Traditional Village regarding efforts to protect the law and preserve the Siat Yeh tradition and efforts to protect the law and preserve the Siat Yeh tradition carried out by the Jimbaran Traditional Village. The type of research used in this article is empirical legal research which is carried out by examining the facts that occur in a problem. As well as using interviews as the main data. Based on the results of the research, the following conclusions can be formulated: Jimbaran Traditional Village has authority in legal protection and tradition preservation based on the provisions of the 1945 Constitution, the Culture Promotion Law, and the Regional Regulations on Traditional Villages in Bali; and With the authority that belongs to the Jimbaran Traditional Village to protect the law and preserve the Siat Yeh tradition in the form of making pararem banjars, taking an inventory of traditions through the cultural service, and invalidating them in inscriptions. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kewenangan Desa Adat Jimbaran terkait upaya perlindungan hukum dan pelestarian tradisi siat yeh dan upaya perlindungan hukum dan pelestarian tradisi siat yeh yang dilaksanakan oleh Desa Adat Jimbaran. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris yang dilakukan dengan mengkaji suatu fakta-fakta yang terjadi dalam suatu masalah. Serta menggunakan wawancara sebagai data utama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat dirumuskan kesimpulan sebagai berikut : Desa Adat Jimbaran memiliki kewenangan dalam perlindungan hukum dan pelestarian tradisi berdasarkan ketentuan UUD 1945, UU Pemajuan Kebudayaan, dan Perda Desa Adat di Bali; dan Dengan kewenangan yang dimiliki Desa Adat Jimbaran melakukan perlindungan hukum dan pelestarian tradisi siat yeh dalam bentuk membuat pararem banjar, menginventaris tradisi melalui dinas kebudayaan, dan mencacatkan dalam prasasti.
Co-Authors Anak Agung Bagus Cahya Dwijanata Anak Agung Istri Widyasari Anak Agung Ngurah Aditya Mahendra I Gede Oka Cosmei Digo Permana I Gst. A. Ayu Frysca Fryscilia I Gust i Ngurah Wairocana I Gusti Ngurah Agung Kusumayasa Diputra I Ketut Sudiarta I Made Darpana I Putu Dio Kusumayuda I Wayan Bela Siki Layang Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Ketut Puspa Dewik Ni Made Kintan Oktavianti Ni Putu Niti Suari Giri Pande Putu Ekayana Dharma Putra Putu Ari Sagita Putu Bagus Dananjaya Putu Ulandari Sri Lestari Stevanny Stevanny Tania Octora Setiady Theodhorus Thrieyadi Nyarong