cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 8 No 1 (2019)" : 10 Documents clear
Penertiban Bangunan Tanpa Izin yang Berdiri di Atas Tanah Negara pada Sempadan Sungai Limpok Aceh Besar Putri Tasya Fabyolla; Ilyas Ismail; M.Nur Rasyid
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (406.955 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p09

Abstract

The prohibition of building buildings in river border areas is regulated in Article 22 Paragraph (2) Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Number 28 / PRT / M / 2015 concerning the Determination of Borders of Rivers and Lake Borders. It is stated that it is forbidden to build buildings, except building with certain functions. In reality, there are a number of buildings that stand in the river border area of Limpok Village, Aceh Besar District. The method of this research is empirical juridical research using a conceptual approach. The results of the research in the field is there are buildings that stand without permits in the river border area of the big village of Limpok, Aceh Regency. Initially, the community was given the opportunity to use the country's land to grow crops that were not hard. However, they transferred the utilization by building a building on it, so the building that stood on the land had no legality. It is clear that each building that stands must follow the licensing stage first so the building has the legality of a building permit. The factor that became the government's issues in carrying out control was the lack of budget in the field, secondly, it was indicated that the community made land payments by the village head (geuchik). The government must take strict legal action against the village head (geuchik) who plays in the area. Law enforcement does not need tolerance, so rules are not violated. Ketentuan larangan mendirikan bangunan di kawasan sempadan sungai diatur pada Pasal 22 Ayat (2) Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 28/PRT/M/2015 Tentang Penetapan Garis Sempadan Sungai Dan Sempadan Danau. Dimana disebutkan dilarang mendirikan bangunan, kecuali bangunan prasarana sumber daya air, fasilitas jembatan dan dermaga, jalur pipa gas dan air minum, rentangan kabel listrik dan telekomunikasi, dan bangunan ketenagalistrikan. Namun pada kenyataannya terdapat sejumlah bangunan yang berdiri di kawasan sempadan sungai Desa Limpok Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Metode Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris dengan melakukan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian di lapangan bahwa terdapat bangunan yang berdiri tanpa izin di kawasan sempadan sungai desa limpok kabupaten aceh besar. Pada awalnya masyarakat diberikan kesempatan untuk memanfaatkan tanah negara tersebut untuk menanam tanaman seperti jagung, pisang, dan sayur-sayuran. Namun, mereka mengalihkan pemanfaatan tersebut dengan mendirikan bangunan di atasnya, sehingga bangunan yang berdiri di atas tanah tersebut tidak memiliki legalitas. padahal jelas bahwa setiap bangunan yang berdiri wajib mengikuti tahapan perizinan terlebih dahulu, sehingga bangunan tersebut memiliki legalitas berupa surat izin mendirikan bangunan. Kemudian faktor yang menjadi hambatan pemerintah dalam melakukan penertiban adalah minimnya anggaran di lapangan, kedua telah terindikasi bahwa masyarakat melakukan pembayaran lahan oleh Kepala desa (geuchik). Pemerintah wajib melakukan tindakan hukum secara tegas terhadap kepala desa (geuchik) yang bermain dalam wilayah tersebut. penegakan hukum tidak perlu ada toleransi, sehingga aturan tidak dapat dilanggar oleh masyarakat.
Implementasi Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Baku Aryo Dwi Prasnowo; Siti Malikhatun Badriyah
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (430.871 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p05

Abstract

Businessman are required to increase the efficiency of transaction time in serving consumers, therefore a practical agreement is made and the contents have been determined by one party so that the other party does not have the opportunity to negotiate and is in the position of "take it or leave it". The standard agreement does not reflect the principle of the balance of the parties to the contract. The method used in this study is normative juridical, which refers to legal norms contained in the legislation, court decisions, using data in the form of qualitative data and using a descriptive analytical approach. In the event of an imbalance during the formation or arrangement of an agreement, the contents of the agreement or implementation of the agreement, the principle of balance is present by offering a general responsibility for the application of a variety of norms as well as assessing and determining whether there is a fair agreement. To create a balance of rights and obligations of the parties in this case, an agreement needs to contain the principle of balance, fairness and fairness which is a guideline as well as a sign in regulating and forming agreements that will be made so that eventually it will become an agreement that applies to the parties.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Wisatawan Asing dalam Konteks Kesetaraan Rasial di Indonesia Putu Baruna Giri Waisnawa
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (433.873 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p10

Abstract

Tourism is the third largest contributor to foreign exchange, Indonesia with its diversity and beauty of the island and cultural diversity make Indonesia one of the world's tourism destinations where 2018 numbers of tourists visiting Indonesia reached 11,929,542. Tourists are present are dominated by tourists from China, they come to Indonesia using tour packages from travel which of course with a limited budget, of course, the treatment of tourists come with tour packages with limited budgets will be different, it is very important to provide protection law in the context of racial equality which would certainly provide a balance and justice for foreign tourists, considering tourism is one of the contributors to foreign exchange, this study aims to collaborate legal protection for foreign tourists in the context of human rights, especially in racial equality. This study uses normative research methods with a legislative approach and methods and norms that serve as the basis for acting for citizens and society on what they deem appropriate. The results study show that foreign tourists who travel to Indonesia are protected as stipulated in the provisions of Article 28C of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as Article 13 and Article 27 of Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights and Article 19 of Law Number 10 of 2009 concerning Tourism ; The right to travel is a right that is owned by everyone. The state has an obligation to respect and protect and fulfill the right to travel. Pariwisata merupakan penyumbang terbesar devisa negara ketiga selain komoditi minyak dan gas, Indonesia dengan keanekaragamannya dan dengan keindahan pulau dan ragam budayanya menjadikan Indonesia sebagai salah satu destinasi pariwisata dunia dimana pada tahun 2018 angka wisatawan yang datang berkunjung ke Indonesia mencapai 11.929.542 juta jiwa. Wisatawan yang hadir didominasi oleh wisatawan asal cina, dimana mereka pada umumnya datang ke Indonesia menggunakan paket tur dari travel agen yang tentunya dengan anggaran biaya yang terbatas, perbedaan perlakuan terhadap wisatawan yang datang dengan paket tur yang anggarannya terbatas akan berbeda, sangatlah penting untuk memberikan suatu perlindungan hukum dalam konteks kesetaraan ras yang tentunya akan memberikan suatu keseimbangan dan keadilan bagi wisatawan asing, mengingat pariwisata merupakan salah satu penyumbang devisa negara, studi ini bertujuan untuk mengolaborasi perlindungan hukum bagi wisatawan asing dalam konteks hak asasi manusia khususnya dalam kesetaraan rasial. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang undangan dan kaedah maupun norma-norma yang menjadi dasar bertindak bagi warga maupun masyarakat terhadap apa yang mereka anggap pantas. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa wisatawan asing yang berwisata ke Indonesia mendapat perlindungan sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 28C UUD RI Tahun 1945, serta Pasal 13 dan Pasal 27 UU Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia dan Pasal 19 UU Nomor 10 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kepariwisataan; Hak berwisata merupakan hak yang dimiliki oleh setiap orang. Negara memiliki suatu kewajiban untuk menghormati serta melindungi dan memenuhi hak berwisata, yang tentunya di dalam kegiatan pariwisata tersebut baik wisatawan dan pengusaha pariwisata memiliki hak dan kewajiban.
Legal Protection For Children Againts Sexual Exploitation and Abuse of Children Online Ni Putu Ika Wijakusumariasih
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (449.431 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p01

Abstract

The disclosure of cases of pedophiles online on social media in Indonesia certainly dangers that lurk children from perpetrators of sexual crimes. End Child Prostitution in Asian Tourism (ECPAT) Indonesia and the Criminal Crime Reform Institute (ICJR) regard this case of online child pornography as the largest ever disclosed by police without casualties. Online pedophile actors operating on social media Facebook use Official Candy Group accounts. Online pedophile prostitution has involved international networks. Departing from this background, the purpose of writing this scientific paper is to find out about the protection of children in Indonesia in terms of online pedophiles that refer to international child protection instruments that have been ratified. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method. Seeing the situation in the territory of Indonesia become a place of practice that deviates until the involvement of international syndicates and modes is more sophisticated. Conditions further strengthen the assumption that Indonesia is indeed in an emergency of sexual violence. Harmonizing national laws to protect children online with international standards is key to providing the right tools for law enforcement in dealing with child sex crimes. In the child protection survey in the digital era in ASEAN member countries, it appears that Indonesia still needs improvement in terms of legal instruments related to child protection in the context of regulations and policies in making child protection mechanisms in the virtual realm in accordance with global commitments in which Indonesia is member of several international organizations.
Re-Evaluasi Vonis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Makassar Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Muhammad Rinaldy Bima
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (466.988 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p06

Abstract

Corruption is a special crime that has a negative impact on the survival of the nation and the state. corruption can occur everywhere / all levels. From this description, this study aims to analyze the verdicts of the Makassar District Court judges in cases of corruption. The problems that arise in this study are: What is the judge's verdict against the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption. The method used in this study is a normative legal research method by analyzing data descriptively-quantitatively. The results showed, first, the verdict was a very significant influence on the rampant cases of criminal acts of corruption, corruption cases increased from year to year. secondly, the judge's verdict in the case of corruption is strongly influenced by the demands of the prosecutor. Prosecutors 'demands and judges' verdicts are very low, so they do not provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of corruption. This illustrates that the judge has not fully applied the punishment to the perpetrators of corruption in order to give a deterrent effect, because there are still many judicial verdicts that are lower than the demands of the public prosecutor. Korupsi merupakan tindak pidana khusus yang berdampak buruk bagi kelangsungan hidup berbangsa dan bernegara. korupsi dapat terjadi dimana-mana/semua level. Dari uraian tersebut penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tentang vonis hakim Pengadilan Negeri Makassar pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Permasalahan yang timbul dalam penelitian ini adalah: Bagaimanakah vonis hakim terhadap terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi. Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode peneltian hukum normatif dengan menganalisis data secara deskriptif-kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama, vonis hakim sangat berpengaruh signifikan terhadap maraknya kasus tindak pidana korupsi, kasus tindak pidana korupsi semakin meningkat dari tahun ke tahun. kedua, vonis hakim pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi, sangat dipengaruhi oleh tuntutan jaksa. Tuntutan jaksa dan vonis hakim sangat rendah, sehingga tidak memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Hal ini menggambarkan bahwa hakim belum sepenuhnya dalam menerapkan penghukuman kepada pelaku tindak pidana korupsi untuk memberi efek jera, karena masih banyak terdapatnya vonis hakim yang lebih rendah dari tuntutan jaksa penuntut umum.
The Expansion of Administrative Decision Meaning Based on Government Administration Law: a Dispute Submission Process Approach I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana; I Ketut Sudiarta; I Wayan Bela Siki Layang; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (512.869 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p02

Abstract

The establishment of Government Administration Law brings significant change to the competence of the previously restricted Administrative Court to become expanded. This study aims to find the philosophical considerations from the extension of Administrative Decision meaning on Government Administration Law, to classify the legal implication arising from the regulation of the expansion of administrative decision meaning towards dispute submission process in Administrative Court and to formulate ideal attitude of the State Administrative Judge in resolving State Administrative Disputes. This is a combination of normative and empirical legal research. The study indicated that the legislator main consideration in regulating the expansion of administrative decision meaning on Government Administration Law is to expand the absolute competence of Indonesian Administrative Court which previously felt very narrow. The implication arises after new regulation consists of: the expansion of Administrative Court adjudicate authority for factual actions, subject expansion that have the authority to issue Administrative Decision, the expansion of the Administrative Court adjudicate authority over Administrative Decision which has a legal consequences although still need the approval from above instance, the regulation that Administrative Decision can be sued through the Administrative Court of any potential loss that may arise by the issuance of its Administrative Decision and the expansion towards the parties who have a chance to field a State Administrative accusation. The ideal attitude of State Administrative Judge is the judge should remain based on the strong theoretical concepts of the law so can create understanding and attitude in handling a case in Indonesian Administrative Court.
Comparative Study Mekanisme Penyadapan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dan Inggris Putu Oka Surya Atmaja
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (475.326 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p07

Abstract

Conventional law of proving the record of a person's conversation (tapping results) is not yet accepted as evidence in the court. Along with technological developments, criminal law also began to evolve so the way to prove difficult criminal act also evolve following it, this development technology also affecting the methods to gain evidence such as, the result of wiretapping (recording of conversations) in the form of recordings of speech, electronic data and other types of data is now acceptable and used in evidence in court. The purpose of this study is to compare and find out about the Criminal Classification in each of the countries that are the object of this research, and the tapping mechanisms that apply to each country's legal system, both Indonesia and the UK. In this Research used Normative Research Method, with 2 approaches, statute approach, and comparative approach. The results of this study illustrate that For now in Indonesia there is no clear wiretapping mechanism set out in one Act since the wiretapping mechanisms are restored to agencies requiring information. With so many authorities / agencies granting permission to tackle various laws in Indonesia from the Chief of Police, the Attorney General, the Chairman of the Court and the Chairman of the KPK (Commission Against Corruption), make no control mechanism against the tapping information obtained, and will be harmful if the information is misused. If we compare with the United Kingdom, legislation governing electronic communication interception is regulated only in 1 (one) Act. Menurut hukum pembuktian yang konvensional, hasil rekaman percakapan seseorang (hasil penyadapan) belum dapat diterima sebagai alat bukti di pengadilan, namun kini penyadapan kerap digunakan. Seiring dengan perkembangan teknologi, hukum pidana pun mulai berkembang sehinga cara-cara pembuktian terhadap tindak pidana yang sulit dibuktikan juga berkembang, hingga hasil dari penyadapan (rekaman pembicaraan) berupa data rekaman pembicaraan, data elektronik, dan jenis data lainnya kini dapat diterima dan digunakan dalam pembuktian di pengadilan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan dan mengetahui mengenai klasifikasi tindak pidana dan mekanisme penyadapan yang berlaku berdasarkan sistem hukum di Indonesia dan Inggris. Dalam Penelitian ini digunakan Metode Penelitian Normatif, dengan 2 pendekatan yakni, pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dan pendekatan perbandingan (comparative approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini menjabarkan bahwa belum ada mekanisme penyadapan yang jelas yang diatur dalam satu UU di Indonesia, karena mekanisme penyadapan dikembalikan lagi kepada instansi yang membutuhkan informasi. Inggris mengklasifikasikan suatu tindak pidana berdasarkan derajat kesalahannya, namun Indonesia menggolongkan tindak pidana menjadi 2 (dua) kategori yaitu kejahatan dan pelanggaran. Banyaknya otoritas/ instansi yang memberikan ijin untuk melakukan penyadapan di berbagai UU di Indonesia mulai dari Kapolri, Jaksa Agung, Ketua Pengadilan dan Ketua KPK (kolektif), membuat tidak adanya mekanisme control terhadap informasi penyadapan yang diperoleh, dan akan membahayakan jika informasi tersebut disalahgunakan. Jika dibandingkan dengan Negara Inggris, perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang intersepsi komunikasi elektronik hanya diatur dalam 1 (satu) UU.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perusahaan Teknologi atas Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas oleh Pengemudi Ojek Online Ratna Kumala Sari; Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (626.357 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p03

Abstract

Act No. 22 the year 2009 about Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (road traffic and transportation) raises perspectives in criminal law regarding criminal liability for public transportation companies. Furthermore, it raises problems on how criminal liability of technology companies for traffic accidents and how law enforcement practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe the criminal liability of technology companies for traffic accident by online motorcycle taxi drivers and for criticizing law enforcement. Normative research methods will be used to answer the problem. There are two approaches to assess the problem, namely case approach the and law approach. The conclusion is that technology companies can be criminally accounted for by the vicarious liability perspective and the Road Traffic and Transportation Act. Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (UULLAJ) memunculkan perspektif dalam hukum pidana menyangkut pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi perusahaan angkutan umum. Selanjutnya memunculkan permasalahan mengenai bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana perusahaan teknologi atas tindak pidana kecelakaan lalu lintas dan bagaimana praktek penegakan hukumnya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan mengenai pertanggungjawaban pidana perusahaan teknologi atas tindak pidana kecelakaan lalu lintas oleh pengemudi ojek online dan untuk mengkritisi penegakan hukumnya. Metode penelitian normatif yang akan digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan ini. Terdapat dua pendekatan untuk mengkaji permasalahan ini yaitu pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan undang-undang. Dari hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa perusahaan teknologi dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana dengan perspektif vicarious liability dan Undang-Undang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.
Studi Kritis Pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan Final Bagi Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Ni Wayan Maharatih
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.341 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p08

Abstract

The tax is the most important sector for the country in the framework of national development. Government Regulation Number 46 the Year 2013 of income taxes from businesses that received or obtained taxpayers who have certain gross circulation create worry and fear the small businessmen who are pioneering efforts. The purpose of this research was to know and analyze the arrangements regarding the imposition of Final income tax on perpetrators of small medium enterprises according to the Government Regulation number. 46 the year 2013. This type of research is the study of the law normative approach to legislation. The results showed that according to article 2 paragraph (1) the Government Regulation Number 46 the Year 2013 mentioned businessmen who generate income that does not exceed Rp 4.8 Billion in future tax levied a tax of 1% of the total circulation gross (revenue) per month. But in fact, the imposition of a tax of 1% for small medium enterprises whose income Rp Rp-300jt 4, 8 m is not carried out effectively. Pajak merupakan sektor terpenting bagi negara dalam rangka pembangunan nasional. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 tentang Pajak Penghasilan dari Usaha yang diterima atau diperoleh wajib pajak yang memiliki peredaran bruto tertentu membuat khawatir dan ketakutan pelaku usaha kecil yang sedang merintis usahanya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan mengenai pengenaan PPh Final pada Pelaku UMKM menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor. 46 Tahun 2013. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Penerapan tarif 1% dari pendapatan bagi Pelaku UMKM tidak bisa dipahami kecil, mengingat Pendapatan ini dihitung bukan dari hasil keuntungan, karena tidak bisa dijamin jika berpendapatan besar maka pasti keuntungannya besar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Menurut Pasal 2 ayat (1) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 disebutkan pelaku usaha yang menghasilkan pendapatan yang tidak melebihi Rp. 4,8 Miliar dalam satu masa pajak dikenakan pajak sebesar 1% dari jumlah peredaran bruto (pendapatan) setiap bulan. Namun pada kenyataannya, pembebanan pajak 1% bagi UMKM yang berpendapatan Rp. 300jt-Rp. 4,8M tidak terlaksana secara efektif. Apalagi pengenaan 1% dari pendapatan ini dianggap tidak adil karena dibebankan tanpa melihat apakah pelaku UMKM ini berada dalam keadaan untung ataupun rugi, dan juga diberlakukan bagi seluruh pelaku UMKM.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Produk Indikasi Geografis dari Tindakan Peniruan Anak Agung Ngurah Tresna Adnyana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (427.55 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p04

Abstract

Legal protection of Geographical Indications is necessary to determine whether there are communal or collective people. The communal community character means to belong to the community in the registered Geographical Indication area. This study aims to analyze legal certainty as well as the legal protection of product geographical indications of imitation actions. This research uses empirical law research method. In this case, the authors find that the TRIPs Agreement (Trade-related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) and the act no 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications are terms used to register. Perlindungan hukum terhadap Indikasi Geografis sangat perlu di perhatikan karena karakter kepemilikannya yang kolektif atau komunal. Karakter kepemilikan yang komunal memiliki arti menjadi milik bersama semua masyarakat dalam wilayah Indikasi Geografis yang telah didaftarkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum produk indikasi geografis dari tindakan peniruan. Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menemukan bahwa TRIPs Agreement (Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) dan Undang-Undang 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis mengatur secara khusus perlindungan bagi produk indikasi geografis yang telah didaftarkan.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10