cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics
ISSN : 25285505     EISSN : 25803107     DOI : -
Core Subject : Science, Education,
JoTaLP: Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics is a peer-reviewed journal on Physics Education field and intended to communicate original research and current issues on the subject. This journal is published by Departement of Physics Education Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. The editors welcome scholars, researchers and practitioners of education around the world to submit scholarly articles to be published in this journal. All articles will be reviewed by experts before accepted for publication. JoTaLP: Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics published periodically every February and August (twice a year).
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 166 Documents
PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS SCRATCH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PHYSICS IDENTITY DAN LITERASI SAINS Cahyaningrum Solehati
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jotalp.v11i1.48911

Abstract

Students’ understanding of physics concepts is often constrained by the abstract nature of the material and the lack of connection to real life contexts. The use of digital media that combines interactive visual with local culture element, such as the traditional procces of making geplak, can be a solution to improve students engagement and conceptual understanding. This study aims to develop Scratch-based interactive physics learning media integrated wit tradional geplak in the topic of heat and temperature, as well as to asses its feasibility and effectiveness in improving students’ scientific literacy and physics identity. This research is a type of research and development ( R & D) using the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The validation results showed that the developed media was categorized as highly feasible., with an average score of 90,67%. The results also indicated that the media was effective in improving scinetific literacy and in fostering students physics idnetity
Kerangka Teoretis Integrasi Berpikir Komputasional dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Kuantum Irvani, Asep Irvan; Sinaga, Parlindungan; Suhendi, Endi; Hasanah, Lilik; Mulvia, Rahmadhani; Muhajir, Siti Nurdianti
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jotalp.v11i1.50995

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the theoretical framework of Computational Thinking (CT) integration in quantum physics education, specifically to improve concept understanding, critical thinking dispositions & abilities, and creative problem-solving skills of prospective physics teachers. CT is viewed as a systematic cognitive approach capable of bridging the gap in students' understanding of abstract and mathematical concepts in quantum physics. This study employs a qualitative method using systematic literature review and conceptual analysis of theories, models, and relevant previous research findings, both in the field of physics education and science education in general. The results of the study indicate that CT principles have the potential to improve the quality of students' thinking processes in understanding and solving quantum physics problems logically, reflectively, and creatively. The theoretical framework developed offers the integration of CT into learning design through a problem-based approach and multiple representations, both unplugged and computer-assisted. The conclusion of this study is that CT is not only relevant but also strategic as a foundation for the development of innovative pedagogy in modern physics education. The implications of this study open opportunities for curriculum designers, lecturers, and researchers to adopt and develop CT-based learning strategies in complex courses such as quantum physics, as well as encourage further empirical research to test the effectiveness of the proposed model.
ANALYSIS OF THE NEED FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY LEARNING VIDEOS BASED ON PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING (PBL) AT SMA NEGERI 5 LUBUKLINGGAU CITY surati, winda_15
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jotalp.v11i1.52677

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the need for the development of renewable energy learning videos based on Problem Based Learning (PBL) at SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau. The background of this study is based on the limited use of innovative learning media that can increase student engagement. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach through observation, interviews with teachers, and distribution of questionnaires to students. The results show that teachers and students need interactive, contextual learning videos that are suitable for the characteristics of the students. PBL-based renewable energy learning videos are considered capable of helping students understand the material more deeply through the presentation of real problems that are close to their daily lives. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of developing PBL-based renewable energy learning videos as innovative and effective learning support media to improve the quality of the learning process at SMAN 5 Lubuklinggau City. Keywords: Learning Videos, Renewable Energy, Problem-Based Learning.
ANALISIS KESENJANGAN PENELITIAN TENTANG PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING BERPENDEKATAN DEEP LEARNING DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SAINS BERMUATAN MITIGASI BENCANA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINS Azimatul Khusniah; Andin Irsadi; Ani Rusilowati
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jotalp.v11i1.53707

Abstract

Indonesia has a high vulnerability to disasters, but the integration of disaster education in the curriculum is often still sporadic so that it has an impact on students' low science literacy. Conventional methods are considered inadequate, so a transition to a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model is needed which is strengthened with a Deep Learning approach. This study aims to analyze and synthesize the current scientific literature landscape regarding the effectiveness of PBL integration with Deep Learning in disaster mitigation science learning. Using  the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method which refers to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this study examines empirical articles from the Scopus database for the period 2015–2025 which were analyzed with the help of VOSviewer. The results show that the current research trend is dominated by the social science education domain with a focus on Active Learning to improve higher level thinking skills (HOTS), but significant methodological gaps were found in the form of a lack of studies that integrate PBL and Deep Learning syntaxin its entirety in the context of science. This study concludes the need for a new conceptual framework that synergizes problem-solving structures with deep information processing to build adaptive and disaster-responsive science literacy.
DEVELOPMENT OF LITA (LIQUID TILT ACCELEROMETER): AN ALTERNATIVE INSTRUMENT FOR ACCELERATION MEASUREMENT IN LINEAR MOTION EXPERIMENTS Nur Syamsiah, Endah; Rizka Taufani, Muhammad; Hadiana Aminudin, Adam; Panji Firdaus, Hilman; Putra, Adit
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jotalp.v11i1.54154

Abstract

This study aims to design an alternative instrument for measuring acceleration in linear motion dynamics experiments, named LiTA (Liquid Tilt Accelerometer). The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) method using the ADPT (Analysis, Design, Prototyping, and Testing) approach. The needs analysis stage was conducted using a questionnaire, and the data were analyzed with VOSviewer. The results of the needs analysis revealed that the required experimental instrument should be easily obtainable at an affordable cost, simple in both operation and maintenance, and Integrated technology with digital support is already available. The design of LiTA utilizes the movement of water in a vessel mounted on a dynamics cart. The object’s acceleration is determined based on the inclination of the water surface inside the vessel. The prototyping of LiTA used transparent acrylic with black striped transparent stickers attached as a reference to help measure the air slope in the vessel. The testing process was carried out by conducting experiments to measure the acceleration of an object, and the results were compared with the theoretical acceleration values. The experimental data were analyzed using a paired sample t-test and the Bland–Altman plot method. The results of the paired sample t-test showed a p-value greater than 0.05, specifically 0.079, at a 95% confidence level. This indicates that there is no significant difference between the calculated acceleration and the experimental acceleration, when the pulley’s moment of inertia is included in the acceleration calculation. All data points fall within the limits of agreement when analyzed using the Bland–Altman plot. The LiTA acceleration measurement instrument can serve as an alternative apparatus for experiments on linear motion dynamics. It provides a feasible solution for measuring acceleration in situations where conventional experimental equipment is limited or unavailable.
Bahasa Inggris Elusandy, Libertus; Sirait, Judyanto; Syarif. H, M. Musa
Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jotalp.v11i1.54507

Abstract

This research aims to create a static fluid assessment that physics teachers can use, utilizing the Evidence-Centered Design approach. Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) is a framework for designing educational assessments that uses a systematic approach to design, develop, and evaluate assessments focused on evidence collection. ECD consists of three main components: claims, evidence, and questions. This research focuses on static fluids as its topic. Research and development (R&D) adapts the ADDIE model (analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation) to create the assessment. Analysis is conducted through several stages, namely problem analysis, curriculum analysis, student analysis, and material analysis. The design stage is carried out by determining the assessment objectives, determining the form and number of assessments, designing the assessment components, and writing the assessments. The development stage involves three steps: expert validation, one-to-one trials, and small-scale trials. The results of the research and development of the ECD assessment are deemed feasible based on the results: 1) Validators stated that the instrument falls into the very feasible category with an average Aiken index of 0.87, categorized as very high; 2) one-to-one trial respondents stated that the instrument was very good and the time given was sufficient; and 3) a small-scale trial with a sample of 10 students found that the instrument was very appropriate and the time given was sufficient. Through assessment based on the Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) approach, it is hoped that it can provide guidance to teachers in designing assessments that are appropriate and effective in evaluating each student's understanding

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2026) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (August 2025) Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2025) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2025) Vol 9, No 2 (2024): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (September 2024) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (September 2024) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2024) Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2023) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2022) Vol 7, No 2 (2022): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2022) Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2022) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2022) Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2021) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2021) Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2021) Vol 5, No 2 (2020): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2020) Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (February 2020) Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2019) Vol 4, No 1 (2019): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2018): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2018) Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2017): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2017) Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2016): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Agustus 2016) Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics (Februari 2016) More Issue