Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Abdi Masyarakat Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Ganec Swara
Ahwan Ahwan
Fakultas Hukum Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Mataram
Humanities Education Energy Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Upaya Paksa Dalam Ruu Kuhap: Perspektif Model Sistem Peradilan Pidana Ahwan Ahwan; Nunung Rahmania
Journal Kompilasi Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jkh.v10i2.274

Abstract

Dimensi upaya paksa dalam RUU KUHAP menjadi aspek yang memunculkan diskursus. Praktik penegakan hukum menunjukan bahwa upaya paksa rentan terhadap penyalahgunaan wewenang yang berdampak pada pelanggaran hak yang dimiliki oleh tersangka maupun terdakwa. Seringnya, nilai-nilai yang mendasari suatu rumusan norma mengambil porsi yang signifikan terhadap gambaran implementasi dari norma tersebut. Membedah rumusan upaya paksa dalam RUU KUHAP dapat menjadi kajian akademis yang penting untuk melihat karakter pengaturan dan nilai-nilai yang melatarbelakangi perumusanya. Tulisan ini hendak mendayagunakan konsep model sistem peradilan pidana sebagai instrumen analisis dalam membedah ketentuan tentang upaya paksa. Karakteristik tulisan ini kompatibel jika menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan mendayagunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konsep. Tulisan ini melihat bahwa ketentuan tentang upaya paksa dalam RUU KUHAP sebagian besar mencerminkan nilai-nilai dari due process model, meski demikian nilai-nilai tersebut tidak terlihat sebagai suatu ideologi yang mendominasi, namun merupakan suatu konsep keseimbangan dari kewenangan upaya paksa yang dimiliki oleh aparat penegak hukum. Model-model lain seperti victims right model juga secara tersirat diadopsi oleh RUU KUHAP. Kombinasi dari model-model tersebut setidaknya mampu mengabsorpsi keseimbangan antara kekuasaan negara, hak tersangka dan terdakwa serta peran korban dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Model kombinasi ini juga diharapkan mampu mendorong iklim penegakan hukum yang lebih baik ke depanya. Tulisan ini menjadi salah satu kontribusi akademik terhadap proses penyusunan KUHAP yang sedang berlangsung.
Digital Literacy Education and Cyber ​​Crime Mitigation Related to Online Gambling for Teenagers in Tanak Awu Village, Pujut District, Central Lombok Regency Ahwan Ahwan; R. Fahmi Natigor Daulay; Lalu Panca Tresna D; Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan; Fatahullah Fatahullah
Abdi Masyarakat Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Abdi Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/j6dpef18

Abstract

The acceleration of information technology brings ambivalent impacts on rural youth, one of which is the high risk of exposure to negative content such as online gambling. youth groups in Tanak Awu Village, Central Lombok Regency, located in the buffer zone of Lombok International Airport, are vulnerable to digital culture shock and the criminogenic impacts of online gambling. This community service activity aims to strengthen youth's digital literacy through a preventive-educative approach based on cyber law. The methods applied were socialization and interactive lectures on the four pillars of digital literacy (digital skills, digital culture, digital ethics, and digital safety), followed by a regulatory review (the ITE Law and Law No. 1/2023 on the New Criminal Code), and evaluated through casual interviews. The result indicates a paradigm shift among the youths, from previously perceiving slot gambling as a lawless "grey area" to gaining a rational legal awareness regarding cyber-criminal sanctions. Furthermore, this activity successfully crystallized collective commitments, including the establishment of a defensive legal shield, a peer support system, and shifting focus toward productive digital activities.  
PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH KPK: SEBUAH PENELUSURAN TEORETIS: Termination of Investigation and Prosecution of Corruption Crimes by The KPK: A Theoretical Exploration Ahwan Ahwan; Yuni Ristanti
Ganec Swara Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): Juni 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Amin Qalbu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59896/gara.v19i2.272

Abstract

The termination of investigation and prosecution of corruption crimes is one of the important substances of the amendment to Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. The emergence of this mechanism in the KPK's authority triggered discourse in the academic realm and legal practice. Naturally, because this mechanism was previously one of the special elements owned by the KPK that excluded the provisions of the codification of criminal procedure law (KUHAP). This article takes a place as a supporter with the basis of argumentation on the theoretical aspects and urgency of the mechanism for terminating investigations and prosecutions by the KPK. This paper uses a normative legal research method that entirely uses legal materials obtained through literature studies. The results show that the termination of investigation and prosecution of corruption crimes is based on the sunrise principle and sunset principle as well as the shield function and the sword function as well as the principle of realistic prospect of conviction which in its implementation has two filters, namely evidential sufficiency and public interest. From a theoretical perspective, the termination of investigation and prosecution can be traced from the integrative theory. This theory is described as a basis that provides balance in criminal procedure law and is sourced from customary law and the way of life of Indonesian society. In terms of urgency, the authority to terminate investigations and prosecutions provides additional alternatives for the KPK in handling corruption crimes, especially in realizing legal certainty and the principle of speedy trial in criminal procedure law.
DEKONSTRUKSI BLANKET STRAFBEPALINGEN PASCA-PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 123/PUU-XXIII/2025: ANTARA TATBESTANDSMÄßIGKEIT DAN WESENSCHAU: Deconstruction of The Blanket Penal Provisions Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 123/Puu-Xxiii/2025: Between Tatbestandsmäßigkeit and Wesenschau Ahwan Ahwan; Nunung Rahmania
Ganec Swara Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026): Juni 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Amin Qalbu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59896/gara.v20i2.714

Abstract

This study critically analyzes the Constitutional Court Decision Number 123/PUU-XXIII/2025, which deconstructs the formal requirement of expressis verbis confirmation in the blanket penal provisions (blanket strafbepalingen) under Article 14 of the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption (Anti-Corruption Law). The primary issues examined are the normative position of blanket strafbepalingen within the construction of anti-corruption law in Indonesia and the dogmatic implications of the Constitutional Court's decision on criminal law doctrine. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study reveals two main findings. First, the position of blanket strafbepalingen in Article 14 of the Anti-Corruption Law is philosophically parallel to the Technology Neutral Regulation (TNR) theory as an adaptive legislative technique to prevent regulatory aging (ossification). However, in Indonesian positive law, its applicability is strictly limited by a bridging article requiring a literal corruption clause within sectoral laws to uphold the principle of legal certainty (lex certa). Second, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 123/PUU-XXIII/2025, which rules that Article 14 can still be triggered as long as the act in sectoral laws "meets the elements of corruption," brings problematic implications. The Court fell into a legal simplification by merely examining the stage of tatbestandsmäßigkeit (fulfillment of formal elements) while neglecting the aspects of wesenschau (substantial nature of the offense) and the original intent of the lawmakers. Practically, this decision perpetuates the Anti-Corruption Law as an expansive ("omnibus") or draconian tool that potentially degrades the existence of sectoral criminal laws and their administrative mechanisms.
Co-Authors Fatahullah Lalu Panca Tresna D Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan Nunung Rahmania R. Fahmi Natigor Daulay Yuni Ristanti