Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Student Fundraising Practices as a Site of Exploitation: A Marxist Feminist Analysis of Gendered Labor in Campus Organizations Martha Lazarsyta Daluri martha; Ahmad Ridwan; Putri Dwi Permata Indah; Refti Handini
MUWAZAH : jurnal kajian gender Vol 18 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/9fb4sh93

Abstract

This study describes forms of student exploitation in campus fundraising activities through a Marxist feminist perspective. In practice, fundraising is often viewed as a learning activity and a means of developing students' interpersonal skills. However, the findings of this study indicate that behind this narrative lies a power relationship that places students, especially women, in exploitative positions of reproductive and emotional labor. This study used qualitative methods with a phenomenological approach to explore the lived experiences of three informants directly involved in fundraising activities. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, organizational observations, documentation studies, and literature reviews, then describes using thematic analysis techniques. The results of the study indicate four forms of exploitation: (1) a greater reproductive and emotional workload on female students; (2) a gender-based division of labor that places women in tasks related to body representation and public interactions; (3) structural pressures through hierarchies and organizational cultures that normalize uncompensated work; and (4) the commodification of women's bodies as a strategy for obtaining funds. This study concludes that the exploitation that occurs is the result of the intersection of campus capitalism and patriarchy that operate through organizational structures. These findings emphasize the importance of critiquing fundraising practices to make them more fair, transparent, and sensitive to gender issues.
Ideology, Power, and Policy: A Discourse Analysis of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Higher Education Nur Shabrina Atsarina Ramadhani; Elina Nurrohmah; Khuzaimah; Imma Latifa; Moh. Mudzakkir; Putri Dwi Permata Indah
Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): March 2025
Publisher : Unit Publikasi Ilmiah, P3M, Politeknik Negeri Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31940/soshum.v15i1.29-37

Abstract

As the highest authority in Indonesia’s education sector, Nadiem Makarim plays a crucial role in shaping the discourse on ideal education through curriculum policies. However, the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar (Independence Policy) in higher education has sparked both support and criticism. This study aims to analyze the discourse surrounding the policy’s implementation using a qualitative approach and Sara Mills’ discourse analysis framework, which examines actor positioning within texts. Research data is sourced from media texts, and the study applies Michael W. Apple’s theory of ideology and power, which argues that educational institutions not only regulate behaviour but also shape the meaning of knowledge within the curriculum. Findings reveal two key aspects of Sara Mills’ discourse analysis: position-object analysis and author-reader positioning. The study identifies the Indonesian government, represented by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology (Kemdikbudristek), as the dominant actor with authority over decision-making. Meanwhile, students, educators, and education practitioners serve as both implementers and beneficiaries of the policy. The research highlights how Kemdikbudristek, as a power holder, influences the discourse on ideal higher education through the Merdeka Belajar curriculum, which is shaped by various ideological factors, including the perspectives of its leadership. This study contributes to discussions on curriculum formulation in higher education and offers insights for policymakers in designing future education policies.
Analisis Interaksionisme Simbolik atas Gelar Songo di Desa Glagah Banyuwangi Alya Safira; Agus Machfud Fauzi; Putri Dwi Permata Indah
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN IPS Vol. 15 No. 4 (2025): JURNAL PENDIDIKAN IPS
Publisher : STKIP Taman Siswa Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37630/jpi.v15i4.3543

Abstract

Gelar Songo merupakan tradisi yang dilakukan setiap 9 Muharrom oleh warga Desa Glagah, Kota Banyuwangi, sebagai ungkapan rasa syukur kepada Allah SWT dan penghormatan kepada leluhur atas berkah desa yang telah diwariskan turun-temurun. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan etnografi yang memanfaatkan purposive sampling sebagai sarana pengambilan sampel. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara mendalam bersama beberapa pemangku kepentingan, yaitu ketua adat, kepala desa, tokoh agama, dan salah satu warga lokal sebagai saksi yang berpengalaman. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis model Miles dan Huberman yang melewati tiga tahapan yaitu, proses reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Teori interaksionisme simbolik oleh George Herbert Mead juga digunakan sebagai dasar penelitian untuk menjelaskan makna simbolis dari tradisi Gelar Songo. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Gelar Songo dapat diterima oleh masyarakat secara sukarela dan menghasilkan makna simbolis di tiap prosesinya. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu Gelar Songo bukan sekadar ritual simbolis, tetapi adat istiadat yang hidup melalui interaksi sehari-hari menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat dapat menjaga tradisi budaya tetap hidup sambil beradaptasi dengan zaman baru. Selain berfungsi sebagai alat mengekspresikan rasa syukur, Gelar Songo juga mendorong keharmonisan nilai-nilai adat dan agama.