Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL AND RELIGIOUS ROLES OF TUAN KADI SHELTER FOR THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY IN PEKANBARU CITY. Afrinaldy Rustam; Ahmad Fauzi; Achmad Ghozai; Nurjanis; Nur Hilal Nazri Arif; M. Saidi Azuhar
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, Policy and Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): June 2026, Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, Policy and Politics (IJSSPP)
Publisher : Yayasan Wayan Marwan Pulungan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69745/ijsspp.v4i2.177

Abstract

This study examines the social and religious roles of Rumah Singgah Tuan Kadi as a faith-based shelter serving the Muslim community in Pekanbaru, Riau Province. Shelter homes (rumah singgah) function as important social institutions that provide assistance for individuals facing social, economic, and spiritual challenges, particularly travelers and marginalized groups. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach to explore how Islamic values are integrated into the shelter’s social services and religious activities. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews with administrators, beneficiaries, and community members, as well as document analysis conducted from November to December 2025. Data analysis followed the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, supported by source and method triangulation to ensure validity. The findings reveal that Rumah Singgah Tuan Kadi plays a significant social role by providing temporary accommodation, distributing social aid, and facilitating educational and community-based activities. In terms of religious function, the shelter offers regular religious studies, spiritual guidance, Qur’anic education, and moral development programs, particularly for children and adolescents. The community perceives the shelter positively due to its contribution to social welfare, spiritual growth, and community cohesion. Despite limitations in facilities, human resources, and funding, Rumah Singgah Tuan Kadi remains committed to fulfilling its socio-religious mission and strengthening social solidarity in an urban Islamic context.
Perlindungan Hukum Jurnalis Warga Pasca Perubahan UU ITE: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024 Budi Hermanto; M. Saidi Azuhar; Sudianto Sudianto; Afrinaldy Rustam; Ahmad Ghozali
Jurnal Kolaborasi Sains dan Ilmu Terapan Vol. 5 No. 1.1 (2026): SPECIAL ISSUE
Publisher : Utiliti Project Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69688/juksit.v5i1.1.284

Abstract

Perkembangan media sosial telah mengubah cara informasi diproduksi, didistribusikan, dan diakses masyarakat serta mendorong berkembangnya jurnalisme warga (citizen journalism). Kondisi ini menimbulkan persoalan hukum mengenai kedudukan dan perlindungan jurnalis warga dalam menggunakan kebebasan berekspresi, khususnya terhadap potensi penerapan ketentuan pencemaran nama baik dalam hukum informasi dan transaksi elektronik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan dan perlindungan hukum jurnalis warga dalam publikasi informasi melalui media sosial serta implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap kebebasan berekspresi. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Bahan hukum meliputi UUD NRI Tahun 1945, UU Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, UU Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 tentang Pers, UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua UU ITE, serta Putusan MK Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jurnalis warga tetap memiliki hak konstitusional untuk memperoleh dan menyebarluaskan informasi meskipun tidak berstatus sebagai wartawan profesional. Namun, kebebasan tersebut dibatasi oleh kewajiban menghormati hak dan reputasi orang lain. Putusan MK tersebut mempertegas bahwa kritik terhadap lembaga publik atau jabatan tidak secara otomatis merupakan pencemaran nama baik terhadap individu. Dengan demikian, penegakan hukum terhadap jurnalis warga harus dilakukan secara proporsional dengan membedakan kritik yang sah dari serangan terhadap kehormatan individu.