Suhandoko, Suhandoko
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Nilai Perjuangan Novel 49 Hari, Kisah Penantang Gelombang Suhandoko, Suhandoko; Ali Nuke Affandy; Hermoyo, R Panji
Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Vol. 10 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v10i4.4652

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan nilai-nilai perjuangan dalam novel 49 Hari Kisah Penantang Gelombang karya Nuril Basri: pendekatan psikologi sastra. Peneliti menetapkan fokus penelitian: nilai-nilai perjuangan novel 49HKPG karya Nuril Basri. Data berupa kutipan (kalimat, dialog, atau wacana) yang menunjukkan nilai perjuangan (rela berkorban, saling menghargai, semangat pantang menyerah, dan kerja sama). Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode simak dan catat dengan analisis deskiptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian; 1) nilai perjuangan rela berkorban; sebagai seorang anak harus menahan rasa egonya dan membahagiakan orang tua termasuk menuruti kemauannya, demi kebaikan dan kesuksesan diri serta untuk kebahagian orang tua kedepannya; 2) nilai perjuangan saling menghargai; sebagai seorang anak seyogianya menghargai kedua orang tua; 3) nilai perjuangan semangat pantang menyerah; sebagai manusia yang diberi akal dan tenaga diharapkan selalu semangat bekerja (dan sekolah), inovatif, melawan rintangan, dan bangkit dari keterpurukan; 4) nilai perjuangan kerja sama; manusia harus menjalin kerja sama (hal baik) demi kebaikan dan keuntungan bersama.
Voice of Empowerment: Debunking Gendered Language in Emma Watson’s Advocacy Rosyidah, Nur; Suhandoko, Suhandoko; Syuhra, Marsha Aqillah Putri; Rochmah, Maulidya
Journal of Language and Literature Vol 24, No 2 (2024): October
Publisher : Universitas Sanata Dharma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/joll.v24i2.9055

Abstract

For nearly five decades, Robin Lakoff’s women’s language features have been well examined. These features such as hedges, intensifiers, and rising intonation have traditionally positioned women as powerless language users due to their less-assertive nature. However, few have highlighted how these features can serve as rhetorical strategies that can effectively utilized to argue confidently without appearing overly assertive, in line with social expectations. This study examines women’s language features used by Emma Watson at the HeForShe Campaign 2014. By using a descriptive qualitative method, we collected data from Emma’s speech to identify the features of the women’s language that she used to address gender equality issues. The study found six of Lakoff’s (1975) women’s language features, with lexical hedges being the most frequently used to represent politeness and caution in speaking as well as expressing respect for the interlocutor. Notably, tag questions, precise color terms, hypercorrect grammar, and avoiding strong swear words were not found, likely due to their irrelevance to the feminism-focused topic in the campaign. Instead of highlighting the perceived weaknesses of women’s language, this study emphasizes that women’s language can be a means to empower women’s voices. Emma effectively and persuasively delivered her campaign by using her mastery of language, storytelling techniques, and rhetoric to engage the audience. Overall, Emma strategically utilized women’s language to demonstrate her linguistic capability and even persuade the audience effectively rather than showing the weakness of women’s language as commonly perceived by previous studies.
Courtroom Conversation in a Murder Trial of Yosua Hutabarat: A Phonopragmatic Perspective Rio Nur Rachmad; Suhandoko Suhandoko
Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Vol 13, No 2 (2024): Ranah: jurnal Kajian Bahasa
Publisher : Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26499/rnh.v13i2.6689

Abstract

This study examines the phonopragmatic features, specifically intonation, in the conversation between the judge and the witness during the Yosua Hutabarat murder trial. The study aims to explore how intonation patterns reflect the judge’s authority and the witness’s response during the trial. The study analyzes spectrogram images to capture the tone movements of the speech using PRAAT software, with David Brazil’s model employed to analyze the data. The results reveal at least twenty-three tone units across six conversation excerpts, with the most frequent tone in the judge’s speech being a rise-fall tone (9 tone units), indicating control and dominance. The witness, in contrast, predominantly uses a falling tone (4 tone units), reflecting submissiveness. The findings suggest that the judge’s use of rise-fall tones signals instrumental power and dominance, while the witness’s falling tone signals submissiveness and reveals a clear power imbalance during the trial. AbstrakPenelitian ini mengkaji fitur-fitur fonopragmatik yang berfokus pada intonasi dalam percakapan antara hakim dan saksi dalam persidangan pembunuhan Yosua Hutabarat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana pola intonasi dapat mencerminkan kekuasaan dan kontrol hakim dan bagaimana respons saksi selama persidangan. Penelitian ini menganalisis gambar spektrogram untuk menangkap gerakan nada dalam interaksi dengan menggunakan perangkat lunak PRAAT dan model David Brazil untuk menganalisis data penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan setidaknya dua puluh tiga unit nada yang tersebar di enam kutipan percakapan, dengan nada yang paling sering digunakan dalam ujaran hakim adalah nada naik-turun (9 unit nada), yang menunjukkan kontrol dan dominasi. Di sisi lain, saksi lebih sering menggunakan nada turun (4 unit nada) yang mencerminkan ketundukkan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan nada naik-turun oleh hakim menandakan kekuasaan instrumental dan dominasi, sementara nada turun dari saksi menandakan ketundukkan yang mengungkapkan ketidakseimbangan kekuasaan yang jelas selama persidangan.
A corpus-based study of authorial presence in the academic writing of Indonesian higher education EFL learners Suhandoko Suhandoko; Dian Riesti Ningrum; Ali Mustofa
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 12, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v12i3.39813

Abstract

Using appropriate stance markers is essential to enhance argumentation. However, scholars have consistently reported that linguistic, cultural, and instructional factors make developing persuasive skills in L2 writing instruction challenging. This quantitative study employed a corpus-based methodology to investigate the use of stance markers in the academic writing of Indonesian EFL learners to establish persuasive arguments. The dataset comprises academic essays from 59 learners who were part of their academic writing coursework. The stance markers were identified using AntConc software and analyzed following Hylands (2019) stance framework. The research revealed learners reliance on transitions to create a logical structure in their text, while the use of boosters slightly surpasses the use of hedges, reflecting their growing understanding of the need to balance certainty with caution in academic writing. The high frequency of markers for disagreement and doubt indicates their ability to engage effectively with alternative viewpoints. The findings of this study challenge the stigma that Asian EFL learners are less assertive in expressing their arguments and challenging opposing views because they adhere to their cultural communicative norms. However, we found the limited use of markers indicating subjectivity and evaluation, which points to a potential gap in pedagogical approaches and suggests the need for more targeted instruction to bridge culturally appropriate communication norms and academic writing conventions.
SELLING PHILANTHROPY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ‘RARE IMPACT FUND WITH SEPHORA’ INSTAGRAM CAMPAIGN Cahyaratu Ayuningtyas; Suhandoko
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Special Issue: Cultural Resilience and Digital Literacy for a Diverse Society 171-187
Publisher :

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Famous brands often incorporate charitable initiatives into their business strategies. While such practice is often perceived as genuine corporate social responsibility, it may also function as marketing tools to enhance the brand prestige and even profitability. This study examined how Rare Beauty, a renowned cosmetic brand owned by Selena Gomez, an American actress, utilizes social media campaigns to encourage consumer purchase under the guise of supporting mental health awareness. By analysing three campaign videos featuring Selena Gomez, released in October 4 and 10, 2023, this study employed Normal Fairclough’s three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis model to reveal how campaign narratives cloaks capitalist motives in humanitarianism rhetoric. Additionally, public perception was also evaluated through an examination of 21 most-liked comments on the campaign posts. The study demonstrates how the brand capitalizes on public altruism to increase its corporate image. At the textual level, Selena Gomez consistently initiates her campaign by addressing mental heal issues, followed by explicit calls to purchase products. Her use of inclusive “we,” bold claims such as “100% of the profits donated,” and emotive words (e.g., “together,” “incredible,” and “yummy”) serve to obscure the hidden commercial agenda. On the discourse level, Instagram’s features, such as the inclusion of celebrity (happens to be the company owner) voice-overs, swipeable slides, and call-to-action links, were strategically used to construct the purchasing act as a morally and even commendable form of charity. At the social practice level, the study found that the packaging of capitalism within humanitarianism is driven by the tendency to target women through emotional appeals, particularly by utilizing social issues tied to women empowerment. Thus, link cosmetic purchase to social causes seems to be an effective marketing strategy. Unfortunately, an analysis of netizen reactions reveals polarized responses; while many criticize Selena Gomez for being hypocrite, by advocating for mental health while remaining silent on the physical and mental health of war victims in Gaza, few demonstrate awareness of the capitalist mechanisms masked by humanitarianism discourse.